{"id":35251,"date":"2016-02-09T12:08:14","date_gmt":"2016-02-09T06:38:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=35251"},"modified":"2016-03-05T13:02:49","modified_gmt":"2016-03-05T07:32:49","slug":"prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Telecom Regulatory Authority of India via notification dated February 8, 2016 made Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 (2 of 2016). Keeping in view India&#8217;s large number of internet users and content producers, both of which are rising exponentially, the Authority has taken a view that prohibition of discriminatory tariff for data services is necessary to ensure that service providers continue to fulfill their obligations in keeping the internet open and non-discriminatory.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Regulation 3 of the said Regulations deals with Prohibition of discriminatory tariffs. The provision states that No service provider shall offer or charge discriminatory tariffs for data services on the basis of content. Also, No service provider shall enter into any arrangement, agreement or contract, by whatever name called, with any person, natural or legal, that has the effect of discriminatory tariffs for data services being offered or charged to the consumer on the basis of content. Provided that this regulation shall not apply to tariffs for data services over closed electronic communications networks, unless such tariffs are offered or charged by the service provider for the purpose of evading the prohibition in this regulation. Regulation 4 deals with exemption for certain content stating that Notwithstanding anything contained in regulation 3, a service provider may reduce tariff for accessing or providing emergency services, or at times of grave public emergency. Provided that such tariff shall be reported to the Authority within seven working days from the date of implementation of the reduced tariff and the decision of the Authority as to whether such reduced tariff qualifies under this regulation shall be final and binding. Rule 5 deals with the penalty in case of contravention of the Regulations i.e. an amount of rupees fifty thousand for each day of contravention, subject to a maximum of rupees fifty lakh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Explanatory Memorandum of Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 further states that the Regulations will come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. Once the Regulation comes into effect, no new launches of prohibited packs, plans or vouchers shall be permitted. Presently, different types of vouchers as specified in TCPR, 2012 are offered to pre-paid consumers. \u00a0In addition, data tariffs are offered to post-paid consumers either as part of a plan or by way of add-on packs. The Authority is aware that there would be some such packs, plans and vouchers already subscribed and paid for by the consumer, the validity of which is specified and at present unexpired. The rationale for the savings provided in the regulations is to protect consumers who have spent money and bought these offerings. It is clarified that no new offerings of this nature shall come within the purview of such savings. Further, no plan, pack or voucher already subscribed by a pre-paid or post-paid consumer providing differential data tariff based on content, shall be in operation beyond a period of six months from the date of these regulations coming into effect. This provision has been made in the light of the tariff protection available to the existing consumers as per ITO.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><strong>-Telecom Regulatory Authority of India<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Telecom Regulatory Authority of India via notification dated February 8, 2016 made Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 (2 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":35261,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legislationupdates","category-rules_regulations"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telecom Regulatory Authority of India via notification dated February 8, 2016 made Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 (2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-02-09T06:38:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-05T07:32:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"739\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/\",\"name\":\"Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-09T06:38:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-05T07:32:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":739},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016","og_description":"Telecom Regulatory Authority of India via notification dated February 8, 2016 made Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 (2","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-02-09T06:38:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-05T07:32:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":739,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/","name":"Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg","datePublished":"2016-02-09T06:38:14+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-05T07:32:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg","width":1330,"height":739},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/09\/prohibition-of-discriminatory-tariffs-for-data-services-regulations-2016\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations, 2016"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/trai_big.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6329,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/02\/differential-tariffs-over-subscribers-making-calls-from-one-private-provider-to-other-private-service-provider-and-private-to-bsnl-mtnl-held-arbitrary\/","url_meta":{"origin":35251,"position":0},"title":"Differential tariffs over subscribers making calls from one private provider to other private service provider and from private network to BSNL\/MTNL held arbitrary","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 2, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While deciding that whether the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal was right in terming the action of the private telecom service providers (forming the appellant association) for levying differential tariffs for calls made from their network to the BSNL\/MTNL networks compared to the calls made from one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233595,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/08\/bom-hc-age-based-prohibition-in-only-film-industry-television-ott-constitutes-an-unreasonable-restriction\/","url_meta":{"origin":35251,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Absolute prohibition from being present at the site of shooting over persons above age of 65 years who earn livelihood from film\/television industry, quashed in light of being discriminatory","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of S.J. Kathawalla and R.I. Chagla, JJ., quashed and set aside the unreasonable restriction placed by the State of Maharashtra on prohibiting the actors, crew members, etc. who are above the age of 65 years from being present at the site of the shooting of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/29\/all-hc-right-to-practise-and-propagate-religion-is-subject-to-public-order-morality-and-health-permission-to-lift-prohibition-on-performing-moharram-rituals-declined\/","url_meta":{"origin":35251,"position":2},"title":"All HC | Right to practise and propagate religion is subject to public order, morality and health; Permission to lift prohibition on performing Moharram rituals, declined","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Pandemic is spreading like wild fire, despite harsh lockdowns. We are standing naked at the shore and don\u2019t know when the huge wave of Corona may sweep us into the deep sea. -- Allahabad High Court Allahabad High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Shashi Kant Gupta and Shamim Ahmed, JJ., while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215122,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/prohibition-of-benami-property-transactions-conditions-of-services-of-members-of-adjudicating-authority-rules-2019-notified\/","url_meta":{"origin":35251,"position":3},"title":"Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions (Conditions of services of Members of Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2019 &#8212; Notified","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"G.S.R. 379(E)\u2014 In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 68 read with sub-section (2) of Section 9, sub-section (1) of Section 13 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (45 of 1988) (hereafter referred to as \u2018the Act\u2019), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, namely:\u2014\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/06\/nothing-wrong-with-trai-seeking-information-to-ensure-transparency-sc-directs-airtel-vodafone-idea-to-disclose-segmented-offers-details-to-trai\/","url_meta":{"origin":35251,"position":4},"title":"Nothing wrong with TRAI seeking information to ensure transparency; SC directs Airtel, Vodafone Idea to disclose segmented offers details to TRAI","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of SA, Bobde, CJ* and AS Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has directed telecom giants Bharti Airtel and Vodafone-Idea to disclose information\/details regarding segmented offers to TRAI. It asked TRAI to ensure that such information is kept confidential and is not made available to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/29\/uk-supreme-court-rules-ban-on-heterosexual-civil-partnerships-as-discriminatory\/","url_meta":{"origin":35251,"position":5},"title":"UK Supreme Court rules ban on heterosexual civil partnerships as discriminatory","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0Supreme Court of United Kingdom: Lord Kerr, J. delivered the judgment for the Court including himself and Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lady Black, JJ. wherein the Hon\u2019ble Court struck down Sections 1 and 3 of Civil Partnership Act 2004, in as much as they precluded different-sex couples\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/DSC_7472-2-e1476682323502.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35251\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35261"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}