{"id":352408,"date":"2025-07-04T16:00:28","date_gmt":"2025-07-04T10:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=352408"},"modified":"2025-07-10T09:45:29","modified_gmt":"2025-07-10T04:15:29","slug":"bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR over construction and naming a public square\/chowk \u2018Tipu Sultan\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> The present application was filed by the applicant-MLA, seeking quashing of an FIR registered against him under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561597\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">295-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561859\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">505(1)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019), wherein he was accused of constructing a raised platform without obtaining the requisite permission and naming it &#8216;Tipu Sultan Chowk&#8217;, an act which allegedly incited communal tension between two communities. The Division Bench comprising <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Vibha Kankanwadi*<\/span> and Sanjay A. Deshmukh, JJ., refused to quash the FIR while exercising their powers under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (\u2018CrPC\u2019). The Court held that the investigation was ongoing to determine who had erected the construction and whether proper permission had been obtained, while emphasizing that a public square could not be named by an MLA without following the procedures given in the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 ( the \u20181965 Act\u2019) and the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 (the \u20181949 Act\u2019).<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The applicant submitted that the FIR was filed with mala fide intention since there was admittedly a political rivalry. It was alleged by the respondent that the applicant had constructed a raised platform without obtaining any permission and named it as \u2018Tipu Sultan Chowk\u2019 which resulted in creating hatred amongst two communities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The applicant argued that the respondent was trying to settle political scores as he was from a rival political group. He further alleged that there was no question of offence under Sections 153-A, 295-A, 504, 505(1) and 506 IPC getting involved in the matter as Tipu Sultan was the freedom fighter of India and great warrior and therefore, giving name of the said person could not attract any criminal prosecution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent submitted that there was some evidence of a construction in the chowk that was later demolished and questioned how the applicant obtained the alleged supplementary statement, especially since police records showed no copy was provided. It was alleged that the applicant had made no effort to prevent the illegal construction and the investigation records showed that the construction had been carried out under the supervision of a person related to the applicant. He further argued that there was also some evidence to show that the accused had made abusive comments on his social media Facebook account and Instagram against Shri Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the alleged supplementary statement did not bear the signature of the person who had taken it down and how the copy of the same was in possession of the applicant. The Court observed that the applicant&#8217;s counsel had filed an affidavit stating that the document had been downloaded by the applicant from the informant\u2019s Facebook page, but it had not been properly endorsed as a true copy. The Court condemned the act of producing a document obtained through improper means and held that it was the duty of the advocate representing the party to consider whether the document had come into the client&#8217;s possession through legal means. Merely because the client had requested its production, the advocate should not have risked presenting such a document before any Court of law without being able to explain the source from which the client had obtained it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the investigation was still ongoing and that it was yet to be determined who had erected the construction in the chowk, whether permission for the construction had been obtained or the funds available to the MLA had been utilised for the construction. The Court noted that a public square (chowk), road, or place could not be named by an MLA on their own as there was a procedure under the 1965 Act as well as the 1949 Act, wherein the proposal had to be tabled before the authority concerned, i.e., the general body meeting of the elected members, and only after reaching a consensus could such a place be named accordingly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court rejected the application, observing that the applicant, at one point, supported the act of naming the public square after Tipu Sultan, while at another, claimed innocence and these two positions were contradictory and could not coexist. Since the investigation was still ongoing, and the police report suggested there was some evidence and whether it was connected to the applicant was a different question. The Court held that this was not a fit case for exercising its powers under Section 482 CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Farukh Shah v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/t12Z84m9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2558<\/a>, decided on 25-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Vibha Kankanwadi<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Applicant:<\/span> S.S. Kazi, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> A.R. Kale, APP and Chetan B. Chaudhari, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;All the persons including the persons attached to political party were required to obtain construction permission under the local bylaws of the local municipal authority. A public square (chowk), road or place could not be named by the MLA on his own.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":352409,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,45537,2810,79392,71795,84731,84732,44474,41002,13021,84729,45356,84730],"class_list":["post-352408","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-communal-tension","tag-illegal_construction","tag-justice-sanjay-a-deshmukh","tag-justice-vibha-kankanwadi","tag-maharashtra-municipalities-act-1965","tag-mla-case","tag-political-rivalry","tag-section-295-a-ipc","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-section-504-ipc","tag-section-506-ipc","tag-tipu-sultan-chowk"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bom HC on illegal construction of Tipu Sultan Chowk | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay high Court dismissed an MLA\u2019s application to quash FIR alleging unauthorised construction on Tipu Sultan Chowk and misuse of government funds.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR over construction and naming a public square\/chowk \u2018Tipu Sultan\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay high Court dismissed an MLA\u2019s application to quash FIR alleging unauthorised construction on Tipu Sultan Chowk and misuse of government funds.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-04T10:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-10T04:15:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR over construction and naming a public square\/chowk \u2018Tipu Sultan\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC on illegal construction of Tipu Sultan Chowk | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-04T10:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-10T04:15:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay high Court dismissed an MLA\u2019s application to quash FIR alleging unauthorised construction on Tipu Sultan Chowk and misuse of government funds.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Tipu Sultan Chowk\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR over construction and naming a public square\/chowk \u2018Tipu Sultan\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC on illegal construction of Tipu Sultan Chowk | SCC Times","description":"Bombay high Court dismissed an MLA\u2019s application to quash FIR alleging unauthorised construction on Tipu Sultan Chowk and misuse of government funds.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR over construction and naming a public square\/chowk \u2018Tipu Sultan\u2019","og_description":"Bombay high Court dismissed an MLA\u2019s application to quash FIR alleging unauthorised construction on Tipu Sultan Chowk and misuse of government funds.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-04T10:30:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-10T04:15:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR over construction and naming a public square\/chowk \u2018Tipu Sultan\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/","name":"Bom HC on illegal construction of Tipu Sultan Chowk | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-04T10:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-10T04:15:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay high Court dismissed an MLA\u2019s application to quash FIR alleging unauthorised construction on Tipu Sultan Chowk and misuse of government funds.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Tipu Sultan Chowk"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/04\/bombay-hc-rejects-mla-fir-quash-construction-tipu-sultan-chowk\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR over construction and naming a public square\/chowk \u2018Tipu Sultan\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Tipu-Sultan-Chowk.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":289453,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/14\/bombay-high-court-quashes-fir-filed-by-state-on-false-grounds-in-blatant-violation-law-legal-research-updates-awareness-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":352408,"position":0},"title":"S. 353 IPC not to be used as a tool to cover outright illegality; Bombay High Court quashes false FIR filed by State","author":"Arunima","date":"April 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court observed that the objective of Section 353 IPC is to prevent a public servant from not being obstructed while performing his lawful duties and same cannot be allowed to become a tool in hand, of unscrupulous persons to cover up outright illegality as done in the present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328183,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/whatsapp-group-chat-outrage-religious-feelings-bombay-hc-fir-chargesheet-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":352408,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC quashes FIR and chargesheet against members of WhatsApp group chat accused of outraging religious feelings","author":"Editor","date":"August 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNow-a-days people have become more sensitive about their religions may be than before and everybody wants to impress as to how his religion\/God is supreme. Everybody should respect the religion, caste, creed etc. of another. But at the same time, if the person says that his religion is supreme, then\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355013,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/bom-hc-quashes-fir-in-an-affray-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":352408,"position":2},"title":"\u2018No disturbance to public peace\u2019: Bombay HC quashes FIR against men allegedly accused of committing affray","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"It is submitted that though there was fighting at public place, due to that fighting, there was no disturbance to the public peace, which is an essential ingredient of Section 159 of Penal Code, 1860. Therefore, as there is no breach\/disturbance to the public peace, no offence is made out.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"quashes FIR in affray case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/quashes-FIR-in-affray-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/quashes-FIR-in-affray-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/quashes-FIR-in-affray-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/quashes-FIR-in-affray-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":352408,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), a Division Bench of Vibha Kankanwadi and Rajesh S Patil,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260034,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/can-an-alleged-girlfriend-be-arrayed-as-an-accused-in-a-crime-registered-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":352408,"position":4},"title":"Law on S. 498-A IPC | Can an alleged girlfriend be arrayed as an accused in a crime registered under S. 498-A IPC? Bom HC reiterates SC\u2019s observation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of V.K. Jadhav and Shrikant D. Kulkarni, JJ., reiterated that an alleged girlfriend cannot be arrayed as accused in an offence registered under Section 498-A of Penal Code, 1860. Applicant was accused of the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280700,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/30\/prosecutrix-statement-has-been-totally-disbelieved-in-grave-and-serious-offence-under-s-376-ipc-by-non-adherence-to-basic-principles-of-investigation-bombay-high-court-directs-for-transferring-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":352408,"position":5},"title":"Prosecutrix statement has been totally disbelieved in grave and serious offence under S 376 IPC by non-adherence to basic principles of investigation ; Bombay High Court directs for transferring case to Senior Officer","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court remarked that they have come across at least three such cases in last three weeks wherein the statement of the prosecutrix has been totally disbelieved in the grave and a serious offence under Section 376 IPC by not following the law enunciated by the Supreme Court in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352408","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=352408"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352408\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/352409"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=352408"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=352408"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=352408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}