{"id":352129,"date":"2025-07-02T12:30:19","date_gmt":"2025-07-02T07:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=352129"},"modified":"2025-07-03T17:55:15","modified_gmt":"2025-07-03T12:25:15","slug":"guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/","title":{"rendered":"Demanding to arrange money to meet legal expense of husband\u2019s bail does not constitute \u2018dowry\u2019; Gujarat HC upholds acquittal in dowry death case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gujarat High Court<\/span>: In a criminal appeal filed against the judgment dated 6-7-2013 passed by the trial court, whereby the accused persons were acquitted of the charges under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304(B)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">306<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561849\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498(A)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">114<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Cheekati Manavendranath Roy*<\/span> and D. M. Vyas, JJ, upheld the trial court order and stated that a demand made to the wife to arrange for money to meet the legal expenses for applying bail of the husband does not amount to \u2018dowry\u2019 under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546432\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The deceased wife and her husband had been married for 6 months when a criminal case was filed against the accused persons, i.e., her husband, her father-in-law and her brother-in-law for fabrication of documents regarding a land transaction with a third party. The wife\u2019s parents (prosecution) claimed that the wife\u2019s father-in-law had directed the other accused persons to pressurize the wife to arrange Rs 50,000 from her father to meet the legal expenses for obtaining bail for her husband and Accused 1 and 4.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">According to the prosecution, the wife\u2019s father arranged for Rs 10,000 but the accused kept harassing the wife for the remaining amount and when she was unable to bear the harassment any longer, the wife consumed poison and committed suicide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The accused were charged under Sections 304(B), 306, 498(A) and 114 of the IPC, but the trial court acquitted the accused of all charges on the ground that the prosecution had failed to prove the case against the accused beyond all reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The instant petition was filed as an appeal against the trial court\u2019s judgment.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that one of the requirements under Section 304(B) of the IPC was that the person must have died under unnatural circumstances. Even though the prosecution had claimed that the wife died due to consumption of poison, there was no medical evidence on the record to definitively prove that the wife had consumed poison. The Court held that the prosecution had miserably failed to prove that the death of the wife was due to consumption of poison.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further observed that in accordance with Section 304(B) of the IPC, harassment must be meted out within a period of 7 years of marriage in connection with any demand for dowry. The Court also referred to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546432\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a> which defined dowry as any demand made for money or any valuable security in connection with marriage either before, or at the time of or even after marriage. In the instant case, the accused made a demand of Rs 50,000 to apply for bail of the husband. The Court opined that such a demand could not be considered as \u2018dowry\u2019 and therefore, it could not be said that the wife had been harassed to meet an illegal demand for dowry which led her to consume poison and commit suicide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Additionally, the Court looked at the bank statements of the accused persons and noted that the accused had around Rs 2 lakhs to Rs 3 lakhs in their account at the time of arrest. Clearly, the accused had sufficient funds to arrange bail and therefore, it seemed doubtful that they would\u2019ve harassed the wife for Rs 50,000.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court went on to state that the prosecution had failed to establish a case under Section 306 of the IPC as well. To prove an offence of abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the IPC, the prerequisites under Section 107 of the IPC which relate to instigating or aiding the deceased in committing suicide, must be proved. The Court observed that there was no reason to believe that any of the accused had instigated the wife either directly or indirectly, to commit suicide and therefore no case under Section 306 of the IPC could be made as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon re-appraisal of the evidence on record, the Court held that the prosecution had failed to prove the charges levelled against the accused beyond all reasonable doubt. Thereafter, the Court upheld the order of acquittal passed by the trial court and dismissed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of Gujarat v. Natubhai Golanbhai Khuman, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1snPO9cg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Guj 2265<\/a>, decided on 26-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Order by: Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Bhargav Pandya (APP)<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Pavan Barot, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">It was not the prosecution&#8217;s case that any demand for dowry or any valuable security or other property was made by the accused. Rather, it was an admitted case that the only demand was to arrange Rs 50,000 to meet the legal expenses for applying bail of the husband and her father-in-law, who were in judicial custody.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":352147,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[20891,6691,33559,52786,3096,84535,84536,84537,36335],"class_list":["post-352129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bail-application","tag-dowry-death","tag-dowry-demand","tag-dowry-prohibition-act-1961","tag-Gujarat_High_Court","tag-justice-cheekati-manavendranath-roy","tag-justice-d-m-vyas","tag-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry","tag-penal-code-1860"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Demanding money for husband\u2019s bail not \u2018dowry\u2019: Guj HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court holds that money demanded from wife\u2019s family for bail application of husband doesn\u2019t amount to dowry.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Demanding to arrange money to meet legal expense of husband\u2019s bail does not constitute \u2018dowry\u2019; Gujarat HC upholds acquittal in dowry death case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court holds that money demanded from wife\u2019s family for bail application of husband doesn\u2019t amount to dowry.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-02T07:00:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-03T12:25:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Demanding to arrange money to meet legal expense of husband\u2019s bail does not constitute \u2018dowry\u2019; Gujarat HC upholds acquittal in dowry death case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/\",\"name\":\"Demanding money for husband\u2019s bail not \u2018dowry\u2019: Guj HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-02T07:00:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-03T12:25:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Gujarat High Court holds that money demanded from wife\u2019s family for bail application of husband doesn\u2019t amount to dowry.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"money for husband's bail not dowry\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Demanding to arrange money to meet legal expense of husband\u2019s bail does not constitute \u2018dowry\u2019; Gujarat HC upholds acquittal in dowry death case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Demanding money for husband\u2019s bail not \u2018dowry\u2019: Guj HC | SCC Times","description":"Gujarat High Court holds that money demanded from wife\u2019s family for bail application of husband doesn\u2019t amount to dowry.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Demanding to arrange money to meet legal expense of husband\u2019s bail does not constitute \u2018dowry\u2019; Gujarat HC upholds acquittal in dowry death case","og_description":"Gujarat High Court holds that money demanded from wife\u2019s family for bail application of husband doesn\u2019t amount to dowry.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-02T07:00:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-03T12:25:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Demanding to arrange money to meet legal expense of husband\u2019s bail does not constitute \u2018dowry\u2019; Gujarat HC upholds acquittal in dowry death case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/","name":"Demanding money for husband\u2019s bail not \u2018dowry\u2019: Guj HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-02T07:00:19+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-03T12:25:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Gujarat High Court holds that money demanded from wife\u2019s family for bail application of husband doesn\u2019t amount to dowry.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"money for husband's bail not dowry"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/guj-hc-demanding-money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Demanding to arrange money to meet legal expense of husband\u2019s bail does not constitute \u2018dowry\u2019; Gujarat HC upholds acquittal in dowry death case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/money-for-husbands-bail-not-dowry.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":353025,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/10\/guj-hc-petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":352129,"position":0},"title":"Petty family quarrels do not amount to dowry harassment: Gujarat High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo prove the offence of dowry death, it must be shown that there was cruelty and harassment within 7 years of marriage and that it was meted out for or in connection with, demand for dowry\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"petty family quarrel dowry harassment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/petty-family-quarrel-dowry-harassment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/21\/guj-hc-%e2%94%82-anticipatory-bail-granted-in-dowry-death-case-court-allows-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":352129,"position":1},"title":"Guj HC | Anticipatory bail granted in dowry death case; Court allows application","author":"Editor","date":"August 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: A.J. Desai, J., allowed an application of anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304(B), 506(2) and 114 of the Penal Code, 1860. The counsel for the applicant submitted that the nature of allegations were such for which custodial\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/jharkhand-high-court-upheld-the-decision-of-trial-court-accused-convicted-for-dowry-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":352129,"position":2},"title":"Jharkhand High Court | Upheld the decision of trial court; Accused convicted for dowry death","author":"Editor","date":"July 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Navneet Kumar, J., upheld the conviction of the appellant- accused guilty of killing his wife within a few years of marriage on her failure to fulfill the demands of the dowry. The deceased, Rita Devi, had gone missing from her husband's home and her body was found\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/jharkhand_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/16\/kerala-high-court-no-patent-infirmity-in-the-order-of-conviction-to-render-it-prima-facie-erroneous-rejects-suspension-of-sentence-to-the-husband-in-vismaya-dowry-death-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":352129,"position":3},"title":"No patent infirmity in the order of conviction to render it erroneous; Kerala High Court rejects suspension of sentence to the husband in \u2018Vismaya dowry death case\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The atrocities against women in their matrimonial homes are on the rise, and women committing suicide unable to bear the cruelty and harassment on demand of dowry are also rampant.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":261233,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/05\/22-year-old-woman-burnt-and-buried-due-to-demand-of-dowry\/","url_meta":{"origin":352129,"position":4},"title":"22-year-old woman, burnt and buried due to demand of dowry: All HC denies bail to accused husband\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Noting the brutality with wife a 22-year-old lady and mother of a one year's infant child in causing her death, beating her cruelly by \"her husband\" Vikas Kunvar Srivastav, J. held that the said act was not only grave in nature but heinous also. In the present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/25\/dowry-demand\/","url_meta":{"origin":352129,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | Is mere demand of money, property, etc.  sufficient to penalise for demanding dowry? Court answers; says gifts exchanged out of love are not dowry","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Bibek Chaudhuri, J., expressed that, voluntary presents given at or before or after the marriage to the bride or the bridegroom, as the case may be, of a traditional nature, which are given not as a consideration for marriage but out of love, affection on regard, would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=352129"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352129\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/352147"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=352129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=352129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=352129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}