{"id":352035,"date":"2025-07-01T16:30:15","date_gmt":"2025-07-01T11:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=352035"},"modified":"2025-07-08T09:28:53","modified_gmt":"2025-07-08T03:58:53","slug":"guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"Insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted or received into evidence: Gujarat HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Gujarat High Court:<\/span> In an application for issuance of the writ of mandamus\/certiorari to quash or set aside the order of the trial court rejecting the appellant\u2019s application to exhibit the sale deed entered between Defendant 1 and Defendants 4-9 (\u2018respondents\u2019), a Single Judge Bench of Maulik J Shelat*, J<\/span>, opined that an insufficiently stamped sale deed could not be admitted into evidence or exhibited as part of evidence.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The trial court had accepted her application under Order 11 Rule 12<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC), requesting the trial court to direct the respondents to submit the original sale deed. However, the respondents had submitted that due to insufficiency of stamp duty, the sale deed had not been released by the Registrar concerned and was therefore not in the possession\/custody of the respondents.<\/p>\n

The trial court had rejected the appellant\u2019s application to give exhibit to the aforementioned sale deed and that order of the trial court had been challenged by the appellant.<\/p>\n

The Court dealt with two questions:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Whether the sale deed could be exhibited, and;<\/li>\n
  2. \n

    Whether the trial court had committed a gross error of law or a jurisdictional error by rejecting the appellant\u2019s application.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Analysis, Law and Decision<\/h3>\n

    The Court observed that the appellant had challenged the sale deed since the inception of the suit, however, neither did she ever called upon the defendants to produce the original copy of the same deed, nor did she raise any questions about the non-exhibiting of the sale deed between 2014 to 2019. Instead, she had filed an application with a request to give an exhibit to photocopy of the sale deed.<\/p>\n

    The Court referred to Section 34<\/a> of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958<\/a> which stated that any instrument that is required by law to be stamped shall be inadmissible in evidence unless it is duly stamped. The Court relied on Vijay v. Union of India<\/span>, (2023) 17 SCC 455<\/a> and stated that when an instrument was not duly stamped, it could not be received or admitted in evidence, for any purpose, by any person, irrespective of any consent of parties\u2019 authority to receive evidence. Therefore, once it was admitted in Court that the sale deed was insufficiently stamped, by no stretch of imagination could it be received to admit in evidence, especially when the appellant had challenged the said sale deed.<\/p>\n

    The Court noted that while it\u2019s true that the rule of procedure is a handmaid of justice and a hyper technical approach should be avoided, it cannot be bent to such an extent that every legal requirement or evidence can be brought on record irrespective of its inadmissibility. Rules of evidence must be considered vis-\u00e0-vis provisions of CPC. Furthermore, the Court observed that technicality should not override a justice-oriented approach, but that approach cannot be arbitrary, fanciful and contrary to mandatory provisions of law.<\/p>\n

    Thereafter, with respect to the first issue, the Court held that the sale deed could not be exhibited.<\/p>\n

    With regard to the second issue, the Court held that no gross error of law or any jurisdictional error had been committed by the trial court in rejecting the appellant\u2019s application. Thereafter, finding no merit in the application, the Court did not deem fit to exercise its power under Article 227<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> and declined to interfere with the order passed by the trial court.<\/p>\n

    [Savitaben Bachubhai Trivedi v. Trivedi Romaben, 2025 SCC OnLine Guj 2384<\/a>, decided on 23-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    Order by: Justice Maulik J Shelat<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    For the Appellant:<\/span> Shegun B Chokshi, SP Majmudar, Advocates<\/p>\n

    Buy Constitution of India \u00a0HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

    \"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The respondents submitted that the sale deed in question had been retained by the Registrar due to insufficiency of stamp and was thus, not in their possession.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":352036,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2568,6252,3096,84500,84501,78558,30459],"class_list":["post-352035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Evidence","tag-evidence-act","tag-Gujarat_High_Court","tag-insufficient-stamp-duty","tag-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed","tag-justice-maulik-j-shelat","tag-sale-deed"],"yoast_head":"\nGuj HC: Evidentiary value of insufficiently stamped sale deed|SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court held that the insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted in evidence.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted or received into evidence: Gujarat HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court held that the insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted in evidence.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-01T11:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-08T03:58:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/\",\"name\":\"Guj HC: Evidentiary value of insufficiently stamped sale deed|SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-01T11:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-08T03:58:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Gujarat High Court held that the insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted in evidence.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted or received into evidence: Gujarat HC\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted or received into evidence: Gujarat HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Guj HC: Evidentiary value of insufficiently stamped sale deed|SCC Times","description":"Gujarat High Court held that the insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted in evidence.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted or received into evidence: Gujarat HC","og_description":"Gujarat High Court held that the insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted in evidence.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-01T11:00:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-08T03:58:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/","name":"Guj HC: Evidentiary value of insufficiently stamped sale deed|SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-01T11:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-08T03:58:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Gujarat High Court held that the insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted in evidence.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted or received into evidence: Gujarat HC"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/guj-hc-insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed-inadmissible-as-evidence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Insufficiently stamped sale deed cannot be admitted or received into evidence: Gujarat HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-sale-deed.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/19\/court-can-recall-insufficiently-stamped-instrument-exercising-power-151-cpc-admitted-and-exhibited-by-it\/","url_meta":{"origin":352035,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court rules on Court\u2019s power under Section 151 CPC to recall insufficiently stamped instrument admitted and exhibited as evidence","author":"Editor","date":"July 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Should the Court find the instrument to be chargeable with duty, but it is either not stamped or is insufficiently stamped, it is bound by Section 33 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 to impound the same. Section 34 also places a fetter on the Court\u2019s authority to admit an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"insufficiently stamped instrument","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-instrument.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-instrument.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-instrument.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/insufficiently-stamped-instrument.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330059,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/sc-summarises-sequence-of-application-of-karnataka-stamp-act-provisions-on-insufficiently-stamped-instruments\/","url_meta":{"origin":352035,"position":1},"title":"SC summarises sequence of application of Karnataka Stamp Act provisions on insufficiently stamped instruments","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court pointed out that the object of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 is not to exclude evidence or to enable parties to avoid obligations on technical grounds. Rather, the object is to obtain revenue even from such instruments which are at the first instance unstamped or insufficiently stamped.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka stamp act provisions sequence of application","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Karnataka-stamp-act-provisions-sequence-of-application.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Karnataka-stamp-act-provisions-sequence-of-application.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Karnataka-stamp-act-provisions-sequence-of-application.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Karnataka-stamp-act-provisions-sequence-of-application.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/13\/del-hc-documents-require-proper-stamping-validate-property-transfer-claims-directs-stamp-duty-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":352035,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court rules documents require proper stamping to validate Property Transfer Claims; Directs rectification of Stamp Duty","author":"Arunima","date":"June 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"There is a clear distinction between the invalidity and inadmissibility of the document. The document is rendered invalid if the document is not sufficiently stamped and would not be admissible in evidence unless such instrument is duly stamped as provided under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/","url_meta":{"origin":352035,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Sabina, J., dismissed the petition moved for dismissing the suit for partition qua the petitioner since no ground for interference was made out. The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order passed by the trial court. The respondents had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":328335,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/08\/registering-authority-debarred-from-examining-nature-of-right-title-and-character-in-sale-deed-presented-for-registration-jhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":352035,"position":4},"title":"Registering Authority debarred from examining nature of right, title and character in sale-deed presented for registration; cannot refuse to register sale deed: Jharkhand HC","author":"Arushi","date":"August 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"If the sale-deed is duly executed and sufficiently stamped and there is no legal or formal defect, the Registering Authority cannot refuse to register the deed.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/29\/nclat-document-as-evidence-once-admitted-cabnot-objected-later-stage-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":352035,"position":5},"title":"Once a document admitted as evidence cannot be objected at a later stage: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"May 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that once a document is relied upon as evidence and not objected to, it cannot be rejected or ignored.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352035","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=352035"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352035\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/352036"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=352035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=352035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=352035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}