{"id":352017,"date":"2025-07-01T15:00:18","date_gmt":"2025-07-01T09:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=352017"},"modified":"2025-07-07T09:37:03","modified_gmt":"2025-07-07T04:07:03","slug":"mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/","title":{"rendered":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In an appeal filed contesting the rejection of his writ petition against the Archaeological Survey of India\u2019s (\u2018ASI\u2019) refusal to grant the petitioner permission to observe Urs at the Dargah of Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus (\u2018the Dargah\u2019), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Anand Pathak*<\/span> and Hirdesh, JJ., rejected the appeal, holding that the monument was a centrally protected monument of national importance, no such permission for use could be granted to the petitioner. The Court also concurred that the petitioner did not come to the Court with clean hands.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was the Sajjada Nashin of the Dargah and allegedly the legal heir of Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus as well. According to the petitioner, various religious and cultural activities have been performed in the Dargah for the last 400 years. However, after the ASI declared the Dargah as a protected monument, such activities were prohibited or curtailed, including Urs (Jalsa) and Namaz.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In 2024, the petitioner submitted an application to the ASI requesting permission to observe Urs at the Dargah, but the said permission was denied, stating that said monument was a protected monument under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958<\/a> (\u201cthe 1958 Act\u201d) and it could only be opened from sunrise to sunset. As per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002840991\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules, 1959<\/a> (\u201cthe 1959 Rules\u201d), no such permission could be granted. Furthermore, as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543060\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1958 Act<\/a> and Rule 8 of the 1959 Rules, any such act would be punishable with imprisonment for two years with a fine of Rs. 1 Lakh. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed a writ petition, but it was rejected vide the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, he filed the present appeal.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the outset, the Court noted that the Tomb of Muhammad Ghaus, Gwalior (\u2018the monument\u2019), was a Centrally Protected Monument and declared as a National Monument in 1962. Since then, it had been maintained by the Central Government\/ASI.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon perusal of the aim and object of the 1958 Act, the Court stated that the very spirit of the said Act was to preserve history, culture, and civilization for posterity and guidance of future generations. Therefore, the intent was to preserve such monuments and regulate them for visitors to gain knowledge about our past and undertake research for the future.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, the Court remarked that the Constitution makers were also cognizant of the importance of preserving monuments, reflected in Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575263\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">49<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575267\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">51A(f)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, which places obligations on the State and citizens to protect and preserve monuments.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Noting the aforesaid, the Court stated that if the petitioner was permitted to conduct Urs and Namaz, the monument would suffer damage as tents would be installed, nails would be inserted, and lights would be fixed. Additionally, since the monument was not declared an archaeological monument of national importance under Section 5 or 13 but under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543075\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1958 Act<\/a>, no such permission for use could be granted. The Court stated that the monument did not fall under the place of worship and shrine. Therefore, it could not be used.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also noted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543028\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1958 Act<\/a> gives the public the right of access to any protected monument, and if the prayer put forth by the petitioner was accepted, then it would certainly hinder the right of access given to the public. Thus, the right of access to the public as visitors deserved protection. The Court remarked that this right was an important statutory right and deserved protection.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, upon perusal of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543029\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002831994\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1958 Act<\/a>, the Court noted that no person, including the owner or occupier of a protected area, shall construct any building\/or make operation within the protected area or carry on any mining, quarrying, excavating, blasting or any operation of a like nature in such area, or utilise such area or any part thereof. In this regard, the Court noted that the civil suits for ownership of the monument herein were dismissed long back. Therefore, on this count as well, the petitioner had no case on merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it was the duty of the ASI and the District Administration to protect the monument, which was of national importance, with utmost care and strictness. <span style=\"font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;\">The constitutional vision and morality ought to prevail over personal and vested interests.<\/span> The Court added that the monument deserved to be protected with utmost care and caution, and no activity as sought by the petitioner could be permitted lest the monument lose its originality, sanctity, and vitality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As to the facts, the Court pointed out that the petitioner did not challenge the rejection of his request to perform Urs at the Dargah. Thus, in the absence of any such challenge, the Court stated that no relief could be granted to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court affirmed the impugned order. The Court agreed with the Writ Court\u2019s findings, which concluded that the petitioner did not approach the Court with clean hands as he concealed facts and had other motives.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the appeal was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sabla Hasan v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5h8uf50A\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine MP 4721<\/a>, decided on 16-06-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Anand Pathak<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the appellant:<\/span> Ashish Srivastava<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Dy. Solicitor General Praveen Kumar Newaskar and Additional Advocate General Vivek Khedkar<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Constitutional vision and morality ought to prevail over personal and vested interests. It deserves to be protected with utmost care and caution, and no activity as sought by the petitioner can be permitted lest the monument lose its originality, sanctity, and vitality.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67524,"featured_media":352027,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[45651,84489,75971,59820,75143,7201,84493,84492,84491,84490,84488],"class_list":["post-352017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-asi","tag-centrally-protected-monument","tag-gwalior","tag-justice-anand-pathak","tag-justice-hirdesh","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-national-heritage","tag-national-monument","tag-tomb-of-muhammad-ghaus","tag-tomb-of-tansen","tag-urs-at-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>&quot;No Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah&quot;: MP HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah citing possible harm to the monument\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah citing possible harm to the monument\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-01T09:30:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-07T04:07:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sonali Ahuja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"headline\":\"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-01T09:30:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-07T04:07:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":895,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"ASI\",\"Centrally Protected Monument\",\"Gwalior\",\"Justice Anand Pathak\",\"Justice Hirdesh\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\",\"National Heritage\",\"National Monument\",\"Tomb of Muhammad Ghaus\",\"Tomb of Tansen\",\"Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/\",\"name\":\"\\\"No Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\\\": MP HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-01T09:30:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-07T04:07:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\"},\"description\":\"Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah citing possible harm to the monument\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/07\\\/01\\\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8\",\"name\":\"Sonali Ahuja\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sonali Ahuja\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/sonali\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"No Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\": MP HC | SCC Times","description":"Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah citing possible harm to the monument","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah citing possible harm to the monument","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-07-01T09:30:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-07T04:07:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sonali Ahuja","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sonali Ahuja","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/"},"author":{"name":"Sonali Ahuja","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"headline":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah","datePublished":"2025-07-01T09:30:18+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-07T04:07:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/"},"wordCount":895,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp","keywords":["ASI","Centrally Protected Monument","Gwalior","Justice Anand Pathak","Justice Hirdesh","Madhya Pradesh High Court","National Heritage","National Monument","Tomb of Muhammad Ghaus","Tomb of Tansen","Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/","name":"\"No Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah\": MP HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp","datePublished":"2025-07-01T09:30:18+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-07T04:07:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8"},"description":"Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah citing possible harm to the monument","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/01\/mp-hc-denies-performance-urs-hazrat-sheikh-muhammad-ghaus-dargah\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Read why Madhya Pradesh HC denied observance of Urs at Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ghaus Dargah"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/804215d21fa5732c2ccd62c9f0e3d5b8","name":"Sonali Ahuja","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5faab43abee2061c8d25b9f681654d2c9244515f0993a2aa038c45ccd42727bd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sonali Ahuja"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/sonali\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Urs-at-Hazrat-Sheikh-Muhammad-Ghaus-Dargah.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295449,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/27\/gujarat-high-court-issues-notice-on-plea-challenging-demolition-of-dargahs-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":352017,"position":0},"title":"Gujarat High Court issues Notice to State Government and Junagadh Municipal Corporation on plea Opposing Demolition of Dargahs","author":"Editor","date":"June 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner was aggrieved by the illegal and unconstitutional demolitions, contrary to the provisions of the GPMC Act, the Waqf Act, 1995 and the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gujarat high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354372,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/allahabad-hc-disposes-petitions-bahraich-dargah-jeth-mela-2025\/","url_meta":{"origin":352017,"position":1},"title":"\u201cState\u2019s security concerns stand dispelled by peaceful organisation of rituals\u201d: Allahabad HC disposes petitions concerning Bahraich Dargah Jeth Mela 2025","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"July 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFor observance of such usages and customs, sometimes it does not appeal to reason, but all such practices, which assume a ritualistic model amongst the masses of single or multiple faith, bringing harmony and peace to society, cannot be obstructed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bahraich Dargah Jeth Mela 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Bahraich-Dargah-Jeth-Mela-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Bahraich-Dargah-Jeth-Mela-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Bahraich-Dargah-Jeth-Mela-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Bahraich-Dargah-Jeth-Mela-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240279,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/07\/sc-refuses-to-quash-firs-for-remarks-on-sufi-saint-khwaja-moinuddin-chisti-but-amish-devgan-not-to-be-arrested-pending-investigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":352017,"position":2},"title":"SC refuses to quash FIRs for remarks on Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti but Amish Devgan not to be arrested pending investigation","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 2-judge bench of AM Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has refused to quash the FIRs registered against News18 Journalist Amish Devgan for using the term \u201cLootera Chisti\u201d in one of his shows but has granted interim protection to him against arrest subject to his joining and cooperating\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352582,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/06\/high-court-weekly-roundup-june-2025-on-mohammed-shami-dabur-emami-parachute\/","url_meta":{"origin":352017,"position":3},"title":"HIGH COURT JUNE 2025 WEEKLY ROUNDUP | Stories on Doubtful Dying Declaration; Senior Advocate\u2019s VC appearance with beer mug; Rape in Live-in-relationship; Insufficiently stamped sale deed; and more","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"July 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"High Court Weekly Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/shared-image-2025-07-06T170100.964.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/shared-image-2025-07-06T170100.964.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/shared-image-2025-07-06T170100.964.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/shared-image-2025-07-06T170100.964.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/delhi-hc-right-to-health-heritage-and-culture-has-to-be-harmonised-and-balanced-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":352017,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Right to health, heritage and culture must be harmonised and balanced\u2019; Delhi High Court in a petition seeking to desist from demolishing religious structures","author":"Arushi","date":"February 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner submitted that Dargahs and surrounding monuments ought to be protected as they are of historical, artistic and archaeological interest. Further, the sites in question have been noted in authoritative studies, thus eliminating any question of encroachments.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/waqf-board-has-no-jurisdiction-over-property-declared-as-an-ancient-monument-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":352017,"position":5},"title":"Waqf Board has no jurisdiction over property declared as ancient monument: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the property in question, which includes ancient monuments like the Tomb of Shah Shuja, Tomb of Nadir Shah, and Bibi Sahib\u2019s Masjid, had been declared as protected under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=352017"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/352017\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/352027"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=352017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=352017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=352017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}