{"id":351734,"date":"2025-06-28T11:00:33","date_gmt":"2025-06-28T05:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=351734"},"modified":"2025-07-03T09:42:07","modified_gmt":"2025-07-03T04:12:07","slug":"humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Andhra Pradesh High Court<\/span>: A criminal revision petition was filed by the petitioners challenging their conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">306<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a>, (IPC) for abetting the suicide of the wife of petitioner 1. Lakhshmana Rao, J., acquitted the petitioners as the conviction of the petitioners under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">306<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was not sustainable in law on grounds due to evidence failing to establish the requisite <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">mens rea<\/span> or any direct\/proximate instigation to commit suicide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The background to the case involves a deeply strained marital relationship between petitioner 1 and his wife, with ongoing physical and mental harassment rooted in suspicion of the deceased\u2019s fidelity. The prosecution case alleged that on the night of 14-02-2008, the deceased was beaten by both petitioners, including being struck with a chappal by petitioner 2. Thus, being humiliated by the assault and verbal abuse, she poured kerosene over herself and set herself on fire. She was shifted to the Government Hospital at Nandigama and later to Vijayawada General Hospital, where she succumbed to burn injuries the following day.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case hinged substantially on the dying-declaration of the deceased recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, and another statement recorded by the Sub-Inspector of Police. However, significant discrepancies emerged in the timings and circumstances of these recordings. While the Magistrate claimed to have recorded the dying declaration between 10:45 a.m. and 10:55 a.m. in the presence of a duty doctor and attender, the Sub-Inspector testified that he recorded the statement between 10:50 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., raising serious doubts about the credibility of the evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The trial court convicted the petitioners solely on the basis of the dying declaration, despite the fact that key eyewitnesses (PWs 1 to 4) turned hostile and the attending doctor, whose testimony would have been critical in proving the mental fitness of the deceased at the time of making the statement, was not examined. The post-mortem report revealed 100% burn injuries, further questioning the plausibility of a coherent dying declaration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The conviction originally recorded by the Assistant Sessions Judge was affirmed on appeal by the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Krishna, Machilipatnam in criminal appeal. The petitioner was sentenced to four years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500 each, and in default, simple imprisonment for three months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court carefully analysed the evidentiary matrix and the judicial precedents governing Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">306<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. Relying on a catena of Supreme Court decisions including <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S.S. Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/kjl17uX3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2010) 1 SCC 707<\/a>, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Amalendu Pal v. State of West Bengal<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/kjl17uX3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2010) 1 SCC 707<\/a>, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M. Mohan v. State<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/anpf2Ovk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2011) 3 SCC 626<\/a> and more recent authoritative pronouncements such as <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mahendra Awase v. State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/t1H14w0g\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 107<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nipun Aneja v. State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nS7UDkx7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 4091<\/a> the Court reiterated the principle that abetment of suicide demands more than general harassment. It must involve a direct or proximate act of instigation or aid, accompanied by clear mens rea. The conduct must have actively created a situation where the victim felt suicide was the only escape.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court remarked that There was no evidence that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">\u201cthe petitioners instigated X to commit suicide. There was no evidence to the effect that the petitioners either goaded or provoked or instigated or encouraged her to commit suicide. Therefore, it may not be right to hold that the petitioners were guilty of abetment of suicide. The deceased felt insulted or humiliated as her brother-in-law and husband beat her on the pretext that she had not kept her matrimonial piousness. The action of the Petitioners is otherwise not ordinarily expected to induce similarly circumstanced person to commit suicide, the deceased was hypersensitive, as such, it would not be appropriate and proper to convict the Petitioners for abetment of suicide\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the incident of assault, though reprehensible, was a one-off episode and could not, by itself, be construed as abetment. There was no evidence of sustained harassment or a proximate act of incitement that pushed the deceased into committing suicide. The mere utterance by the petitioners asking her why she should continue living, while abusive, did not fulfill the legal threshold for instigation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561357\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">107<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, which is a prerequisite for a conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">306<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. Moreover, the lack of medical testimony and contradictions in recording the dying declaration made the prosecution case unreliable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court allowed the criminal revision petition, set aside the conviction and sentences passed by both the trial and appellate courts, and acquitted the petitioners of all charges. The Court also highlighted the need for cautious application of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561613\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">306<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> by both investigating agencies and subordinate courts, to prevent misuse and miscarriage of justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Chilikuri Mariyadas v. State of AP, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/JEwxvf2h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine AP 2379<\/a>, decided on 16-06-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Petitioners:<\/span> Sri P. Prabhakara Rao<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Respondent:<\/span> Ms. P. Akhila Naidu, Assistant Public Prosecutor<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court observed that the deceased felt humiliated after being beaten by her husband and brother-in-law over allegations of infidelity. However, such conduct, though condemnable, is not ordinarily expected to drive a similarly placed person to suicide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":351779,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[74915,84136,74322,84332,11681,84333],"class_list":["post-351734","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abetmentofsuicide","tag-aphighcourt","tag-criminallaw","tag-s-306ipc","tag-section-306","tag-suicidelaw"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>APHC: Mere Humiliation not abetment of suicide | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that insulting or humiliating someone, without any direct provocation or intent to instigate suicide, does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that insulting or humiliating someone, without any direct provocation or intent to instigate suicide, does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-28T05:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-03T04:12:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"APHC: Mere Humiliation not abetment of suicide | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-28T05:30:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-03T04:12:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that insulting or humiliating someone, without any direct provocation or intent to instigate suicide, does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"APHC: Mere Humiliation not abetment of suicide | SCC Times","description":"Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that insulting or humiliating someone, without any direct provocation or intent to instigate suicide, does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused","og_description":"Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that insulting or humiliating someone, without any direct provocation or intent to instigate suicide, does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-28T05:30:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-03T04:12:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/","name":"APHC: Mere Humiliation not abetment of suicide | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-28T05:30:33+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-03T04:12:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that insulting or humiliating someone, without any direct provocation or intent to instigate suicide, does not amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/28\/humiliation-not-abetment-of-suicide-andhra-pradesh-high-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Humiliation by act and words will not by itself constitute abetment of suicide; Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits accused"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/abetment-of-suicide.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-mere-allegations-of-pressure-or-harassment-at-workplace-will-not-suffice-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-306-ipc-proof-of-instigation-and-abetment-is-necessary\/","url_meta":{"origin":351734,"position":0},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court | Mere allegations of pressure or harassment at workplace will not suffice to attract ingredients of S. 306 IPC; Proof of instigation and abetment is necessary","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Andhra Pradesh High Court: Subba Reddy Satti J. granted anticipatory bail to the Chief Executing Officer (applicant-accused) as on perusal of complaint there was no sign of instigation and abetment and mere allegation of harassment will not attract offence under Section 306 Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') unless such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":262203,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/22\/ap-hc-if-the-de-facto-complainant-feels-insulted-as-he-was-beaten-in-front-of-public-and-if-he-takes-a-hasty-decision-to-commit-suicide-will-the-accused-be-held-responsible-in-the-eyes-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":351734,"position":1},"title":"AP HC | If the de facto complainant feels insulted as he was beaten in front of public and if he takes a hasty decision to commit suicide; will the accused be held responsible in the eyes of law?","author":"Editor","date":"February 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court: Cheekati Manavendranath Roy J. partly allowed the petition by quashing FIR for the offence punishable under Section 306 r\/w 116 IPC. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is the sole accused in a case under Sections 323, 306 r\/w 116 Penal Code,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266960,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/17\/abetment-of-suicide-by-wife-and-mother-in-law-of-deceased\/","url_meta":{"origin":351734,"position":2},"title":"Abetment of suicide by wife and mother-in-law of deceased? P&#038;H HC finds out","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Vikas Bahl, J., granted bail to mother-in-law and wife alleged to have incited husband to commit suicide. Regular bail for the petitioners was sought in an FIR under Sections 306 and 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 (Section 506 IPC has been added later on).\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/PHSuicide.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254232,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/abetment-of-suicide-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":351734,"position":3},"title":"Husband and Wife consumed pesticide after a quarrel, wife died but husband survived. Will allegation of abetment of suicide on husband survive? SC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of M.R. Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ., while addressing a matter noted that, Abetment by a person is when a person instigates another to do something. Instigation can be inferred where the accused had, by his acts or omission created such circumstances that the deceased\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/13\/del-hc-conviction-under-s-498-a-does-not-automatically-render-the-accused-liable-to-be-held-guilty-under-s-306-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":351734,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Conviction under S. 498-A does not automatically render the accused liable to be held guilty under S. 306 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., set aside the order of the trial court challenged by the appellant, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 498-A\u00a0(husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty)\u00a0and Section 306\u00a0(abetment of suicide)\u00a0of the Penal Code. The wife\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":198395,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/clear-mens-rea-to-commit-the-offence-is-a-sine-qua-non-for-conviction-under-section-306-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":351734,"position":5},"title":"Clear mens rea to commit the offence is a sine qua non for conviction under Section 306 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Deshmukh and M.G. Giratkar, JJ. allowed an application for quashing an FIR lodged for the offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC. One Rupchand Sirsat, 54, working as Group Secretary in Kherda-Mozari Coop. Society committed suicide and left\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351734","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=351734"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351734\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/351779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=351734"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=351734"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=351734"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}