{"id":351428,"date":"2025-06-25T12:00:42","date_gmt":"2025-06-25T06:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=351428"},"modified":"2025-06-26T17:24:48","modified_gmt":"2025-06-26T11:54:48","slug":"impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/","title":{"rendered":"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> While adjudicating upon an interlocutory application seeking impleadment of arbitrator to the proceedings under Section 36(2)<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (\u2018Arbitration Act\u2019), a Single Judge Bench of Aniruddha Roy, J*<\/span>, held that where allegations of fraud or corruption have been raised against an arbitrator, the arbitrator cannot be impleaded to the proceedings until a prima facie case of fraud or corruption is established against him.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (award-debtor) applied for setting aside the arbitral award dated 30-10-2023 under Section 34<\/a> of the Arbitration Act<\/a>. During the pendency of the same, the award-debtor filed an independent application under Section 36(2)<\/a> of the Arbitration Act<\/a> praying for unconditional stay on operation of the award.<\/p>\n

In the Section 36(2) application, the award-debtor had raised allegations of bias against one of the three members of the Arbitral Tribunal citing incidents where the arbitrator in question has attended launching programs hosted by Tata Motors (award-holder).<\/p>\n

The present case is an interlocutory application which was moved by the award-debtor during the hearing of Section 36(2) application.<\/p>\n

The primary bone of contention in this case was whether the arbitrator could be impleaded without determination of prima facie finding of fraud, corruption or bias.<\/p>\n

Arguments and Contentions<\/h3>\n

The counsel for the award-debtor referred to Section 36(3)<\/a> of the Arbitration Act<\/a> which states that if the court is satisfied that a prima facie case is made out, that the making of the award was induced or effected by fraud or corruption, the Court shall stay the award unconditionally till the challenge of award under Section 34 is not disposed of.<\/p>\n

According to the counsel for the award-debtor, bias is an element of fraud, and therefore, the expression in Section 36(3) necessarily includes bias in the ambit of fraud. He further stated that since the allegation of fraud has been raised, the arbitrator concerned must be impleaded to enable the Court to effectively and completely adjudicate upon the questions raised. To implicate bias, the counsel for the award-debtor referred to several incidents of the arbitrator concerned attending launch shows held by the award-holder during the pendency of the award.<\/p>\n

Per contra, the counsel for the award-holder contended that the filing of the present interlocutory application is nothing more than a delaying tactic and has been filed as an afterthought. He further submitted that the ground of bias is not included within the ambit of the second proviso of Section 36(3), which clearly codifies only fraud and corruption. Additionally, he contended that when fraud is alleged against an arbitrator, the arbitrator concerned must be impleaded at the setting aside proceeding so that he can deal with the charge against him.<\/p>\n

Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court noted that the scope of adjudication of fraud under Sections 34 and 36(2) and (3) were completely different. In Section 34 proceeding, the Court can adjudicate upon whether the award can be vitiated on the ground of fraud or corruption and\/or the ground of bias alleged against the Arbitral Tribunal. On the contrary, when unconditional stay under Section 36(2) is prayed for, the Court must look at fraud or corruption alleged against the Tribunal in context of Section 36(3). At the stage of setting aside under Sections 36(2) and (3), the Court must be satisfied of a prima facie<\/span> case of fraud or corruption.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the Court held that unless the Court arrives at a prima facie finding of fraud, corruption or bias, the question of impleadment of concerned arbitrator did not and could not arise. The Court stated that while adjudicating Section 36(2) application, it would decide whether a prima facie case of fraud, corruption or bias has been made, so that there can be an order for unconditional stay of the arbitral award. Until that application was finally adjudicated upon its merits, no order for impleadment of the arbitrator concerned could be made.<\/p>\n

It is noteworthy that the Court refused to adjudicate upon the inclusion of the word \u2018bias\u2019 within the element of fraud and left it open to be considered at a more appropriate stage.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the present interlocutory order was premature and dismissed it accordingly.<\/p>\n

[West Bengal Industrial Development Corpn v. Tata Motors Ltd., 2025 SCC OnLine Cal 4969<\/a>, decided on 19-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Judgement authored by- Justice Aniruddha Roy<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the award-holder:<\/span> Sudipto Sarkar, Siddhartha Mitra (Sr. Advocate), Deepan Kr. Sarkar, Samridha Sen, Soumitra Datta, Advocates<\/p>\n

For the award-debtor:<\/span> Kishore Datta (Advocate General), T.N. Siddique, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Deepank Anand, Arpita Dey, Advocates<\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u00a0 HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The award debtor’s counsel contended that the bias is an element of fraud, and to adjudicate the allegations of fraud and\/or bias, the member concerned of the arbitral tribunal is required to be impleaded in the proceedings under Section 34 and Section 36(2)<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":351432,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[43926,2689,84074,84075,63443,80472,84073],"class_list":["post-351428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitration-act","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-fraud-or-corruption","tag-impleadment-of-arbitrator","tag-justice-aniruddha-roy","tag-section-36-of-arbitration-act","tag-unconditional-stay"],"yoast_head":"\nImpleadment of arbitrator in S.36 A&C Act proceedings | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court held that arbitrators can\u2019t be impleaded in proceedings u\/s 36(2) unless prima facie fraud or corruption is established.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court held that arbitrators can\u2019t be impleaded in proceedings u\/s 36(2) unless prima facie fraud or corruption is established.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-25T06:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-26T11:54:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\\\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-25T06:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-26T11:54:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":773,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Arbitration Act\",\"Calcutta High Court\",\"fraud or corruption\",\"impleadment of arbitrator\",\"Justice Aniruddha Roy\",\"Section 36 of Arbitration Act\",\"Unconditional stay\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/\",\"name\":\"Impleadment of arbitrator in S.36 A&C Act proceedings | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-25T06:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-26T11:54:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court held that arbitrators can\u2019t be impleaded in proceedings u\\\/s 36(2) unless prima facie fraud or corruption is established.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Impleading arbitrator in S. 36\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/25\\\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\\\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Impleadment of arbitrator in S.36 A&C Act proceedings | SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court held that arbitrators can\u2019t be impleaded in proceedings u\/s 36(2) unless prima facie fraud or corruption is established.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC","og_description":"Calcutta High Court held that arbitrators can\u2019t be impleaded in proceedings u\/s 36(2) unless prima facie fraud or corruption is established.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-25T06:30:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-26T11:54:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC","datePublished":"2025-06-25T06:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-26T11:54:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/"},"wordCount":773,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp","keywords":["Arbitration Act","Calcutta High Court","fraud or corruption","impleadment of arbitrator","Justice Aniruddha Roy","Section 36 of Arbitration Act","Unconditional stay"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/","name":"Impleadment of arbitrator in S.36 A&C Act proceedings | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-25T06:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-26T11:54:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Calcutta High Court held that arbitrators can\u2019t be impleaded in proceedings u\/s 36(2) unless prima facie fraud or corruption is established.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Impleading arbitrator in S. 36"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/impleadment-of-arbitrator-in-s-36-ac-act-proceedings\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arbitrator cannot be impleaded in proceedings under S. 36(2) of A&C Act until prima facie case of fraud\/corruption is established: Calcutta HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Impleading-arbitrator-in-S.-36.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/05\/arbitration-and-conciliation-amendment-ordinance-2020-stakeholder-get-opportunity-to-seek-unconditional-stay-of-enforcement-of-arbitral-awards-induced-by-fraud-or-corruption\/","url_meta":{"origin":351428,"position":0},"title":"Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020: Stakeholder get opportunity to seek unconditional stay of enforcement of arbitral awards induced by fraud or corruption","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"President promulgates Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020 Amendment of Section 36 In Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act), in sub-section (3), after the proviso, the following shall be inserted and shall be deemed to have been inserted with effect\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":292321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/16\/calcutta-high-court-appointed-sole-arbitrator-despite-forgrry-fraud-allegation-scc-blog-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":351428,"position":1},"title":"Allegation of Forgery\/Fraud inter partes does not render dispute non-arbitrable; Calcutta High Court appoints sole arbitrator","author":"Ritu","date":"May 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that the mere potential or presence of criminal proceedings deriving from the same circumstances would not exclude the issue from being resolved through arbitration.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298336,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/02\/disclosure-s-122-of-the-arbitration-act-the-arbitrator-not-continue-any-association-during-subsistence-proceedings-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":351428,"position":2},"title":"Object of Arbitration Act’s Section 12(2) disclosure is to prohibit any continued Arbitrator-Party associations during proceedings: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 12(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 obligates the Arbitrator to remain neutral and to disclose to the parties any acts or omissions that are likely to fall foul of the mandate.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272655,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/30\/calcutta-high-court-illegal-procedure-for-appointment-of-arbitrator-does-not-render-arbitration-agreement-illegal-in-toto-guiding-principles-for-appointment-of-arbitrator-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":351428,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Illegal procedure for appointment of Arbitrator does not render Arbitration agreement illegal in toto; Guiding Principles for Appointment of Arbitrator reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"August 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Calcutta High Court: In a petition challenging the appointment of sole Arbitrator by the respondent, Shekhar B. Saraf, J., held that merely because an arbitration clause provides for an illegal method of appointment of arbitrator, it does not come to an end and after removing the illegal portion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251086,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/10\/taking-it-out-on-the-arbitrator-the-rationale-of-arbitral-immunity\/","url_meta":{"origin":351428,"position":4},"title":"Taking it out on the Arbitrator: The Rationale of Arbitral Immunity","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tariq Khan\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 57","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-100.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-100.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-100.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-100.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-100.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/arbitration-petition-calcutta-high-court-appointment-arbitrator-disqualification-section-12-seventh-schedule-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-legal-research-news-scc-online-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":351428,"position":5},"title":"All unilateral appointments of arbitrators are not invalid: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that all the unilateral appointment of arbitrators is not invalid unless the arbitrator's relationship falls within the Seventh Schedule to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351428","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=351428"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351428\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/351432"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=351428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=351428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=351428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}