{"id":351099,"date":"2025-06-20T14:30:28","date_gmt":"2025-06-20T09:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=351099"},"modified":"2025-06-25T10:45:34","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T05:15:34","slug":"bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cIt\u2019s wife&#8217;s tendency to implicate husband and his family members to settle personal scores\u201d: Bombay HC Quashes Dowry Harassment FIR against In-Laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> An application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (\u2018CrPC\u2019) was filed by Applicant 1 seeking quashment of an FIR lodged against him and his family members alleging mental and physical cruelty along with dowry related accusations invoking Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019) and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546434\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a>. A Division Bench of Anil S. Kilor and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Pravin S. Patil*<\/span>, JJ., observed that the allegations made against the applicant\u2019s family member were general in nature, lacking any specific details to disclose claims of harassment and the only specific accusations pertained to the husband. The Court thus partly allowed the criminal application by quashing and setting aside the case pending against Applicants 2 to 8 and rejecting the application in respect to Applicant 1.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As per a police report dated 30-8-2023, Non-applicant 2 alleged that after her marriage on 2-6-2014 with Applicant 1, she was subjected to mental and physical cruelty at the instance of the applicants. She was insulted by being told that she was a daughter of a beggar and that no one liked her and she was given ill treatment for bringing less dowry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The applicants challenged the registration of offences made against them on the grounds that there was a matrimonial discord between Applicant 1 and Non-applicant 2, since a divorce petition was already pending. Also, in the year 2022, Non-applicant 2 left the house without intimation. However, the applicants by taking help of the police, searched her out, which shows the allegation made against them are false, since the police complaint lodged against them is only with the intention to settle her personal score.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court while examining the records, referred to a divorce proceeding against Non-applicant 2 dated 29-6-2022, where serious allegations were raised against her, showing a dispute between Non-applicant 2 and Applicant 1 since then. While going through the FIR and her statement, her main grievance was against Applicant 1, as she had specifically mentioned how Applicant 1 was doubting her character and how out of that she was mercilessly beaten by him. The Court opined that the said fact suggested that there was a serious dispute between Applicant 1 and Non-applicant 2, which gave rise to a reason to believe the allegations made against Applicant 1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Cout further observed that the allegations levelled against Applicants 2 to 8 were of a general nature. Non-applicant 2 had stated that they used insulting language, failed to treat her with respect as a daughter-in-law, and instigated Applicant 1 to subject her to further harassment. The Court opined that however, no specific details such as time, place and the nature of harassment were provided to substantiate the claims.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that in cases arising from matrimonial discord, there was a growing tendency of wife to implicate not just the husband but also his family members with generalised and sweeping accusations. Such allegations often lack concrete evidence and were used to settle personal score, causing undue hardships to family members despite no <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> case being made out against them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that since there were no specific allegations disclosing the date, time and manner in which alleged harassment was inflicted by the relatives or family members, no offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">504<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546434\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dowry Prohibition Act<\/a> were attracted against Applicants 2 to 8. The criminal application was partly allowed, by quashing and setting aside the case pending against Applicants 2 to 8 and rejecting the application in respect to Applicant 1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further held that since the allegations were specifically directed against Applicant 1, his criminal application for quashing the FIR was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0L7rdj6Q\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2396<\/a>, decided on 9-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Pravin S. Patil<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Applicants:<\/span> Anup S. Dhore, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Non-applicant 1\/State:<\/span> G.S. Umale, APP<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Non-applicant 2:<\/span> Pragya Jaiswal, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Only out of ulterior motive to settle personal score, wife makes generalized and sweeping accusation unsupported by concrete evidence. As a result, the family members of husband have to face agony of criminal trial, when no prima facie case is made out against them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,2570,3171,83811,83810,3000,81447,81448,47631,13021,31299],"class_list":["post-351099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-Cruelty","tag-Domestic_Violence","tag-dowry-allegations","tag-fir-quash","tag-harassment","tag-justice-anil-s-kilor","tag-justice-pravin-s-patil","tag-section-4-dowry-prohibition-act","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-section-498-a-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Wife can&#039;t invoke S. 498-A IPC to settle personal scores<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay HC held that there was tendency of wife to implicate the husband and his family members in the web of crime to settle personal scores.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cIt\u2019s wife&#039;s tendency to implicate husband and his family members to settle personal scores\u201d: Bombay HC Quashes Dowry Harassment FIR against In-Laws\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that there was tendency of wife to implicate the husband and his family members in the web of crime to settle personal scores.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-20T09:00:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-25T05:15:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cIt\u2019s wife&#039;s tendency to implicate husband and his family members to settle personal scores\u201d: Bombay HC Quashes Dowry Harassment FIR against In-Laws\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/\",\"name\":\"Wife can't invoke S. 498-A IPC to settle personal scores\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-20T09:00:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-25T05:15:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay HC held that there was tendency of wife to implicate the husband and his family members in the web of crime to settle personal scores.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cIt\u2019s wife&#8217;s tendency to implicate husband and his family members to settle personal scores\u201d: Bombay HC Quashes Dowry Harassment FIR against In-Laws\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Wife can't invoke S. 498-A IPC to settle personal scores","description":"Bombay HC held that there was tendency of wife to implicate the husband and his family members in the web of crime to settle personal scores.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cIt\u2019s wife's tendency to implicate husband and his family members to settle personal scores\u201d: Bombay HC Quashes Dowry Harassment FIR against In-Laws","og_description":"Bombay High Court held that there was tendency of wife to implicate the husband and his family members in the web of crime to settle personal scores.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-20T09:00:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-25T05:15:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cIt\u2019s wife's tendency to implicate husband and his family members to settle personal scores\u201d: Bombay HC Quashes Dowry Harassment FIR against In-Laws","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/","name":"Wife can't invoke S. 498-A IPC to settle personal scores","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-20T09:00:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-25T05:15:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay HC held that there was tendency of wife to implicate the husband and his family members in the web of crime to settle personal scores.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/20\/bom-hc-section-498a-ipc-wifes-tendency-to-implicate-husband-to-settle-personal-scores\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cIt\u2019s wife&#8217;s tendency to implicate husband and his family members to settle personal scores\u201d: Bombay HC Quashes Dowry Harassment FIR against In-Laws"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281735,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/16\/bombay-high-court-quashes-dowry-fir-false-implication-of-husband-and-relatives-applicant-is-judicial-officer-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":351099,"position":0},"title":"Loss of character or bruised reputation cannot be restored even by judicial reprieve; Bombay High Court quashes FIR filed under S. 498 A IPC","author":"Editor","date":"January 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Unfounded criminal charges and long drawn criminal prosecution can have serious consequences. A person subjected to such litigation suffers immense mental trauma, humiliation and monetary loss.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":237828,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/22\/bom-hc-abuse-of-s-498-a-ipc-by-making-vague-allegations-and-roping-in-family-members-of-husband-courts-to-carefully-scrutinize-allegations\/","url_meta":{"origin":351099,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Abuse of S. 498-A IPC by making vague allegations and roping in family members of husband: Courts to carefully scrutinize allegations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of Z.A. Haq and Amit B. Borkar, JJ., while allowing the present criminal application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 observed the tendency in the society wherein the relatives of husband are also roped in with vague allegations under Section 498-A\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/bombay-high-court-mere-use-of-the-word-harassment-mentally-and-physically-not-sufficient-to-attract-ingredients-of-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":351099,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court | Mere use of the word harassment &#8216;mentally and physically&#8217; not sufficient to attract ingredients of S. 498-A IPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In an application filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) for quashing the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), a Division Bench of Vibha Kankanwadi and Rajesh S Patil,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295507,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/28\/gujarat-hc-quashes-fir-against-86-years-old-mother-in-law-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":351099,"position":3},"title":"[Section 498-A] Gujarat HC quashes FIR against 86 years old mother-in-law","author":"Editor","date":"June 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that Section 498-A is being rampantly misused by the complainants and all the family members are roped in the complaint only with a view to harass them.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gujarat high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216010,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/21\/utt-hc-power-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-legitimate-trial-and-in-cases-where-facts-are-hazy-criminal-application-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":351099,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | Power under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle legitimate trial and in cases where facts are hazy; criminal application dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: N.S. Dhanik, J. contemplated a criminal application for quashing of the FIR filed against the applicant-husband by his wife for alleged cruelty and criminal intimidation under the relevant sections of IPC. The respondent had filed an FIR against the applicant and his relatives for harassing and treating\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236296,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/all-hc-offences-under-ss-498-a-ipc-and-3-4-of-dowry-prohibition-act-compounded-in-light-of-settlement-between-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":351099,"position":5},"title":"All HC | Offences under Ss. 498-A IPC and 3\/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act compounded in light of settlement between parties","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., addressed a matter with regard to the settlement of divorce proceedings. Parties in the present petition have deposed before the Court below that they have entered into a compromise. Hence, in view of the above, the petition is taken for final disposal. It\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=351099"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351099\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=351099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=351099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=351099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}