{"id":351004,"date":"2025-06-19T15:30:33","date_gmt":"2025-06-19T10:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=351004"},"modified":"2025-06-25T10:18:20","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T04:48:20","slug":"bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC upholds life sentence of husband for wife\u2019s death by setting her on fire; highlights cruel conduct"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> The appellant, who was sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs 5000, for setting his wife on fire, filed an appeal for reduction of the punishment imposed on him under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019). The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sarang V. Kotwal*<\/span> and Shyam C. Chandak, JJ., refused to reduce his conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The Court held that his actions were exceptionally cruel and took undue advantage of his wife and children\u2019s vulnerability. It was held that such cruelty disqualifies him from seeking relief under Exception 4 of the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant and his wife had been married for 16 years. He was a tailor by profession but was not engaged in any work, addicted to gambling and frequently quarrelled with his wife, who worked in a bidi manufacturing unit to support their family and raise three children. She also repaid the loan of Rs 50,000 that the appellant took from many people. On the night of 10-2-2014, following another quarrel, the appellant poured kerosene on his wife and set her on fire. He then locked the house from outside, preventing anyone from assisting her, including their own children.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The wife\u2019s brother eventually arrived upon being called, rescued, and rushed her to the hospital. Despite medical care, she succumbed to her injuries the next day. In her dying declarations she mentioned all the details required to identify appellant as the person responsible for setting her ablaze. Both the dying declarations were duly endorsed and certified by the doctors that the declarant was in a fit mental and physical state to give a statement at the time of its recording.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant\u2019s counsel argued that since the wife had suffered 94 per cent burn injuries, it was not possible for her to give any dying declaration. It was further claimed that there was no pre-mediation and the offence might not fall within the meaning of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> but could be an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304(1)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The counsel for the respondent asserted that the dying declarations were consistent and duly endorsed. Additionally, the appellant\u2019s case would not fall within the Exception 4 to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> because he had acted in a cruel and unusual manner which was sufficient to prove the intention and knowledge required.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphasised that, to seek benefit under Exception 4 to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, the offender must not have acted in a cruel or unusual matter. The Court was not satisfied that offence could be the one punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">304(1)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and not punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the important incriminating evidence in this case was in the form of dying declarations and direct evidence of the appellant\u2019s daughter. There was no material discrepancy in both the dying declarations and no inconsistency in the statements recorded. Also, there were endorsements of the concerned Doctor on both the dying declarations making them consistent and cogent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted the cruelty in the appellant\u2019s actions, where not only he set his wife on fire, but he also deliberately locked the door from outside and obstructed attempts to save her, using the vulnerability of his own wife and children to his advantage. The Court precluded the application of Exception 4 to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">300<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, in the appellant\u2019s case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the life sentence awarded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mdyEG87h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2388<\/a>, decided on 12-6-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Sarang V. Kotwal<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Nasreen Ayubi<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> St Sharmila Kaushik, APP.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The appellant latched the house from outside when his wife was inside the house and had caught fire. This clearly shows that he had prevented the children from helping their mother and saw to it that she suffered fatal burn injuries.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,3171,7931,83745,71816,68044,9291,30765],"class_list":["post-351004","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-Domestic_Violence","tag-dying-declaration","tag-exception-4-section-300-ipc","tag-justice-sarang-v-kotwal","tag-justice-shyam-c-chandak","tag-life-imprisonment","tag-section-302-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC upholds husband&#039;s life sentence for setting wife on fire | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court rejected husband&#039;s plea to reduce his murder conviction citing cruel conduct in setting his wife ablaze and preventing rescue, thus denying benefit of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC upholds life sentence of husband for wife\u2019s death by setting her on fire; highlights cruel conduct\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court rejected husband&#039;s plea to reduce his murder conviction citing cruel conduct in setting his wife ablaze and preventing rescue, thus denying benefit of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-19T10:00:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-25T04:48:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay HC upholds life sentence of husband for wife\u2019s death by setting her on fire; highlights cruel conduct\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC upholds husband's life sentence for setting wife on fire | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-19T10:00:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-25T04:48:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court rejected husband's plea to reduce his murder conviction citing cruel conduct in setting his wife ablaze and preventing rescue, thus denying benefit of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC upholds life sentence of husband for wife\u2019s death by setting her on fire; highlights cruel conduct\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC upholds husband's life sentence for setting wife on fire | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court rejected husband's plea to reduce his murder conviction citing cruel conduct in setting his wife ablaze and preventing rescue, thus denying benefit of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC upholds life sentence of husband for wife\u2019s death by setting her on fire; highlights cruel conduct","og_description":"Bombay High Court rejected husband's plea to reduce his murder conviction citing cruel conduct in setting his wife ablaze and preventing rescue, thus denying benefit of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-19T10:00:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-25T04:48:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay HC upholds life sentence of husband for wife\u2019s death by setting her on fire; highlights cruel conduct","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/","name":"Bombay HC upholds husband's life sentence for setting wife on fire | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-19T10:00:33+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-25T04:48:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay High Court rejected husband's plea to reduce his murder conviction citing cruel conduct in setting his wife ablaze and preventing rescue, thus denying benefit of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/bom-hc-upholds-husbands-life-sentence-who-put-his-wife-on-fire\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC upholds life sentence of husband for wife\u2019s death by setting her on fire; highlights cruel conduct"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":378679,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/18\/bombay-hc-converts-murder-conviction-to-culpable-homicide-on-provocation\/","url_meta":{"origin":351004,"position":0},"title":"Bombay HC converts conviction from murder to culpable homicide, recognises \u201ccontinuous provocation\u201d from tobacco-addicted brother","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 18, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe deceased used to beat them even though they tried to persuade him to give up his addictions and improve.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"culpable homicide on provocation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/culpable-homicide-on-provocation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/culpable-homicide-on-provocation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/culpable-homicide-on-provocation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/culpable-homicide-on-provocation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328214,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/07\/conviction-changed-section-307-to-section-308-ipc-forcibly-poisoning-wife-during-quarrel-bombay-hc-release\/","url_meta":{"origin":351004,"position":1},"title":"Read why Bombay HC changed husband\u2019s conviction u\/S. 307 to S. 308 for forcibly poisoning wife amidst a quarrel","author":"Editor","date":"August 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere was no premeditation, no pre-planning and no design on the part of the convict, in such a case, if that act had led to the death of the victim, it would not have been murder, but only the culpable homicide, not amounting to murder\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/24\/necessary-to-read-mind-of-offender-and-not-consider-offence-devoid-of-emotions\/","url_meta":{"origin":351004,"position":2},"title":"\u201cNecessary to read mind of offender and not consider offence devoid of emotions\u201d: Bom HC acquits accused of offence under S. 302 IPC rather convicts under S. 304 Part I IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Convicting a person under Section 304 Part I of Penal Code, 1860 Division Bench of Sadhana S. Jadhav and Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ., held that, On finding that there was no hope that his beloved wife would return to matrimonial abode, accused got enraged an lost self-control\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354134,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/bom-hc-upholds-conviction-life-sentence-of-man-who-slit-girlfriends-throat-convicted-marriage-application-withdrawal\/","url_meta":{"origin":351004,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC upholds conviction &amp; life sentence of man who slit his girlfriend\u2019s throat after she withdrew their marriage application","author":"Editor","date":"July 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe specific defence of the accused was not that the victim died because of his assault rather it was that he inflicted injuries on himself and lost consciousness. Firstly, he suggested that the victim had committed suicide by inflicting those injuries on herself and secondly, he feigned ignorance about what\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"man who slit girlfriend's throat convicted","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/man-who-slit-girlfriends-throat-convicted.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/man-who-slit-girlfriends-throat-convicted.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/man-who-slit-girlfriends-throat-convicted.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/man-who-slit-girlfriends-throat-convicted.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":108741,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/22\/woman-sets-husband-ablaze-in-anger-bombay-hc-convicts-her-under-section-300-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":351004,"position":4},"title":"Woman sets husband ablaze in anger: Bombay HC convicts her under Section 300 IPC","author":"Saba","date":"February 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Before the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court, a woman convicted by trial court for murdering her husband by setting him on fire appealed against the conviction. The accused got married to the deceased husband and had a son out of the wedlock and since the day of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323551,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/meghalaya-hc-modifies-husband-conviction-302-killing-wife-ex-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":351004,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Every possibility for prudent man to lose temper on seeing wife with another man\u2019: Meghalaya HC modifies husband\u2019s conviction u\/s 302 for killing wife\u2019s ex-husband","author":"Editor","date":"June 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOn noticing the presence of the ex-husband (deceased) in his house, the husband caused the death of the deceased in order to safeguard his right over person (wife) without any premeditation or intention. The case fell within the ambit of Exception 2 to Section 300 of the IPC on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=351004"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351004\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=351004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=351004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=351004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}