{"id":350986,"date":"2025-06-19T13:00:44","date_gmt":"2025-06-19T07:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=350986"},"modified":"2025-06-25T10:22:25","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T04:52:25","slug":"2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/","title":{"rendered":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam | Read Why Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered split verdict and referred to Larger Bench"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> In a significant decision regarding the contentious 2004 Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) recruitment, a Division Bench comprising Sanjeev Prakash Sharma*<\/span> and Meenakshi I. Mehta*, JJ.<\/span> delivered a split verdict regarding allegations of irregularities in the selection process and discriminatory denial of appointment and referred the matter to a larger bench.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In 2004, the Haryana Public Service Commission issued an advertisement to fill \u201858\u2019 posts in the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and \u201844\u2019 in allied services. The appellant was selected and recommended for an appointment. However, a Vigilance Bureau inquiry revealed discrepancies in the answer sheets regarding the use of different inks by examiners.<\/p>\n

While some candidates with similar irregularities were appointed, appellant was declared \u201ctainted\u201d and denied appointment. He challenged this classification, arguing that the use of different inks was not evidence of fraud, especially as the FSL confirmed that the same examiner made the markings.<\/p>\n

Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma\u2019s Decision<\/h3>\n

He allowed the plea and opined that arbitrary exercise had been conducted by the respondents while carrying out the duties of examining the case of candidates as directed by the Division Bench of this Court and the Supreme Court. It stated that executive authorities have to exercise their power fairly and without discrimination.<\/p>\n

He further opined that the committee arbitrarily cherry-picked certain candidates by adopting the \u201cpick and choose method\u201d with similar answer sheet discrepancies, appointing them while excluding the appellant. The Court noted that the answer sheets of those candidates who have been appointed also carry two different inks of the same examiner who has examined the answer sheet of the appellant.<\/p>\n

The Court pointed out that the examiner had made markings with one pen while examining the answers; however, on the front page, he had used another ink and also put in his signatures. Furthermore, the Court found that no forgery had been found by FSL, nor was there any ambiguity. No doubt, therefore, could be raised about the authenticity of the answer copy.<\/p>\n

He opined that, therefore, cannot turn back and hold that the revival could not have been done. The principle of res-judicata herefore cannot turn back and hold that the revival could not have been done. The principle of res-judicata erefore cannot turn back and hold that the revival could not have been done. The principle of res-judicata essentially would apply where there is a same cause of action which has arisen and was decided on merits in an earlier litigation between the same parties.\u201d<\/p>\n

Allowing the appeal, he directed the respondents to offer the appointment to the appellant.<\/p>\n

The state was further directed to offer appointment to the appellant with notional seniority, pay fixation, and all service benefits.<\/p>\n

Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta\u2019s Decision<\/h3>\n

Dissenting, she dismissed the appeal and held that the appellant failed to contest his tainted status earlier and had not reserved his right to appeal, undermining his current claim.<\/p>\n

She pointed out differences in handwriting between appellant\u2019s Hindi and Hindi Essay papers and other subjects. Article 14 cannot be invoked to justify illegality, and mere similarity with other appointees does not grant automatic parity. Emphasising judicial discipline, it was held that the State Vigilance Bureau\u2019s findings and the committee\u2019s conclusions had been duly considered and were not perverse. The Court referred to the judgment of Ashok Kumar Yadav<\/span> v. State of Haryana<\/span> and Surendra Narain Singh<\/span> v. State of Bihar<\/span>, (1985) 4 SCC 417<\/a> and clarified that factual parity must be based on substance, not form.<\/p>\n

She noted that there was nothing in the impugned order of the Single Judge to suggest that the writ-petitioner had ever sought to reserve his right to file an appeal against the same.<\/p>\n

Further, stated that it is quite explicit that the writ petitioner, even after having been categorised as a tainted candidate, had chosen not to agitate\/contest his above-referred appeal on merits and has opted consideration of his claim.<\/p>\n

She found the contentions devoid of any merit as the chart obtained findings from the inquiry report in respect of the 102 selected candidates and the name of the writ petitioner mentioned at Sr. No. 20 in the same and the findings as recorded.<\/p>\n

Further, the Court stated that different ink used for marking the front page makes it crystal clear that besides different ink has been used for marking the front page on the table of marks and the signature of the examiner, secondly, the Court also pointed out that handwriting of the marking in the answer sheets of the Hindi and Hindi essay of the writ petitioner being different from the handwriting of the marking of the other answer sheets had also been founded\/noticed.<\/p>\n

The petitioner\u2019s claim for parity with five appointed candidates was rejected, citing that even if the petitioner\u2019s case was similar, the presence of discrepancies in 22 answer sheets disqualified them from seeking relief. She found no merit in the LPA and dismissed the appeal, reiterating that equality cannot be claimed to repeat or justify irregularities. The rejection of the petitioner\u2019s representation was also based on a thorough consideration of all relevant factors. The petitioner failed to provide evidence of bias, malice, or mala fides on the part of the respondents.<\/p>\n

Due to the differing opinions, the Court referred the matter to the Chief Justice to constitute a Larger Bench for the final decision.<\/p>\n

[Surender Lather v. State of Haryana, 2025 SCC OnLine P&H 3038<\/a>, decided on 29-05-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the petitioner:<\/span> Chetan Mittal, Himanshu Gupta, Avichal Sharma, Vivek Chauhan<\/p>\n

For the respondent:<\/span> Kanwal Goyal, Sheena Dhaia<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma allowed the intra court appeal and directed to appoint the petitioner- candidate, whereas Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta dismissed the plea.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314970,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[83722,83726,80260,83724,83725,76401,2670,83723],"class_list":["post-350986","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-2004-hcs-recruitment-scam","tag-corruption-in-civil-services-recruitment","tag-haryana-public-service-commission","tag-hcs-judicial-recruitment-case","tag-judicial-disagreement","tag-larger-bench-reference","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-split-verdict-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\n2004 HCS Recruitment Scam: Split Verdict by Punjab & Haryana High Court Referred to Larger Bench | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam case, the Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered a split verdict, prompting a reference to a Larger Bench\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam | Read Why Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered split verdict and referred to Larger Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam case, the Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered a split verdict, prompting a reference to a Larger Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-19T07:30:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-25T04:52:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam | Read Why Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered split verdict and referred to Larger Bench\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/\",\"name\":\"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam: Split Verdict by Punjab & Haryana High Court Referred to Larger Bench | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-19T07:30:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-25T04:52:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam case, the Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered a split verdict, prompting a reference to a Larger Bench\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam | Read Why Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered split verdict and referred to Larger Bench\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam: Split Verdict by Punjab & Haryana High Court Referred to Larger Bench | SCC Times","description":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam case, the Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered a split verdict, prompting a reference to a Larger Bench","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam | Read Why Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered split verdict and referred to Larger Bench","og_description":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam case, the Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered a split verdict, prompting a reference to a Larger Bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-19T07:30:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-25T04:52:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam | Read Why Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered split verdict and referred to Larger Bench","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/","name":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam: Split Verdict by Punjab & Haryana High Court Referred to Larger Bench | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-19T07:30:44+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-25T04:52:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam case, the Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered a split verdict, prompting a reference to a Larger Bench","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Punjab and Haryana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/19\/2004-hcs-recruitment-scam-read-why-punjab-haryana-high-court-delivered-split-verdict-and-referred-to-larger-bench\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2004 HCS Recruitment Scam | Read Why Punjab & Haryana High Court delivered split verdict and referred to Larger Bench"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":153514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/31\/hcs-judicial-preliminary-exam-paper-leak-paper-allegedly-leaked-by-toppers-3-judge-bench-to-hear-the-matter\/","url_meta":{"origin":350986,"position":0},"title":"Haryana Judicial Services Exam Paper leak: Paper allegedly leaked by toppers; 3-judge bench to hear the matter","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 31, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In the matter where 2 candidates who had topped the Haryana Civil Services (Judicial) examination in General & reserved category, were alleged to have leaked the paper for money, a 3-judge bench of Rajesh Bindal, Tajan Gupta and GS Sandhawalia, JJ has been formed to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":352593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/07\/legal-roundup-service-law-roundup-june-2025-reservation-recruitment-resignation-dismissal-scc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":350986,"position":1},"title":"SERVICE LAW ROUNDUP: A quick recap of the latest Service Law rulings from June 2025.","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering all the important service law cases across various High Courts and the Supreme Court as well as the legislative updates, this roundup provides a quick summary of cases, latest legal updates in service law and links to other roundups.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Service Law Roundup June 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Service-Law-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Service-Law-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Service-Law-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Service-Law-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339422,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":350986,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Limit of 15% marks in viva voce can be exceeded in judiciary exams\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn matters of recruitment to services, interference to the process of recruitment when otherwise conducted in a transparent, fair and reasonable manner with no allegation of malafides cannot be gone into in the limited power of judicial review of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/14\/ph-hc-disposes-plea-2016-civil-judge-exam-candidate-after-viva-voce-call\/","url_meta":{"origin":350986,"position":3},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC disposes plea of 2016 Civil Judge exam candidate after Recruitment Committee calls him for viva-voce following dispute over 3 marks","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, the petitioner had appeared in Civil Judge examination of 2016. In 2019, he had sought modification of marks obtained in the mains examination and eventually to be called for viva-voce.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"P&H HC disposes plea of 2016 Civil Judge exam candidate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PH-HC-disposes-plea-of-2016-Civil-Judge-exam-candidate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PH-HC-disposes-plea-of-2016-Civil-Judge-exam-candidate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PH-HC-disposes-plea-of-2016-Civil-Judge-exam-candidate.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PH-HC-disposes-plea-of-2016-Civil-Judge-exam-candidate.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313624,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/former-military-nurse-an-ex-serviceman-for-employment-punjab-haryana-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":350986,"position":4},"title":"Former Military Nurse an ex-serviceman under Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Servicemen Rules: Punjab and Haryana HC","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the conditions for eligibility and benefits regarding reservations were the employer\u2019s prerogative, which was not the Central Government in the instant matter but the Government of Punjab.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-non-domicile-candidates-not-entitled-to-33-percent-reservation-for-women-under-punjab-civil-services-rules-2020-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":350986,"position":5},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Non-Domicile Candidates not entitled to 33% reservation for women under Punjab Civil Services Rules, 2020","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court acknowledged the Punjab Government's intention to grant 33% reservation to the women of the \u2018State of Punjab\u2019 in direct recruitment of Group-A, B, C and D posts.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image42.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=350986"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350986\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=350986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=350986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=350986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}