{"id":350675,"date":"2025-06-16T12:00:43","date_gmt":"2025-06-16T06:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=350675"},"modified":"2025-06-16T12:03:02","modified_gmt":"2025-06-16T06:33:02","slug":"inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018In merit-cum-seniority there is greater emphasis on merit\u2019; Gauhati High Court holds promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-6 ai-optimize-introduction\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Gauhati High Court:<\/span> In a civil writ petition challenging the notice dated 16-01-2024 of the Promotion Exercise 2024-25 to the cadre of Scale VII issued by the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (\u2018NIAC\u2019) on the ground of it being illegal and violative of the Promotion Policy 2006, the Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kardak Ete, J*.<\/span>, finding no procedural infirmity or illegality in the promotion exercise dismissed the petition holding that the principle of \u2018merit-cum-seniority\u2019 lays greater emphasis on merit and ability and seniority plays a less significant role and is to be given weight only when merit and ability are approximately equal.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"ai-optimize-7\">Background<\/h3>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-8\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Administrative Officer in the Scale I cadre in 1988 in NIAC. After subsequent promotions, the petitioner presently serves as Deputy General Manager in the Scale VI cadre.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-9\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NIAC on 16-01-2024 issued notice for the Promotion Exercise 2024-25 for filling sixteen vacancies in the cadre of General Manager (Scale VII) in the General Insurers\u2019 (Public Sector) Association of India (\u2018GIPSA\u2019) Members Companies. The petitioner, being in Sl. No.44 in the overall seniority list and at Serial No. 4 in the zone of consideration was also considered for promotion and accordingly registered himself for online screening exercise and gave the final interview along with 46 other eligible candidates. The petitioner\u2019s name appeared at Sl. No.4 in the combined seniority list of all the GIPSA companies. Thereafter, sixteen officers of the Scale VI cadre were promoted to Scale VII cadre. The petitioner\u2019s name was not on the list. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging the Promotion Exercise 2024-25.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"ai-optimize-10\">Contentions from the Petitioner\u2019s side<\/h3>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-11\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">M. N. Choudhury, Senior Counsel for the petitioner, argued that his client, a highly accomplished Scale VI officer ranked fourth on the combined seniority list, was unfairly denied promotion despite an extraordinary and unblemished service record. The petitioner consistently acted in the best interests of his employers, earning \u201coutstanding\u201d remarks and Grade-A appraisals for five consecutive years. Despite being recommended by the Screening Committee, his name was not considered for promotion, while some candidates only a year his senior were promoted. Mr. Choudhury contended that the respondent authorities arbitrarily violated the Promotion Policy by not declaring vacancies for all four companies and adopting a \u201cpick and choose\u201d approach, which he argued was arbitrary, prejudiced the petitioner, and violated both natural justice and the Promotion Policy, 2006.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"ai-optimize-12\">Contentions from the Respondent\u2019s side<\/h3>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-13\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Zorawar Singh, counsel for the respondent, asserted that the 2024-25 promotion exercise adhered to the Promotion Policy for Officers, 2006, with a fair selection process prioritizing merit over seniority for Scale VII promotions. He explained that top leadership roles demanded proven performance, vision, managerial acumen, and strong decision-making, which the Promotion Committee objectively assessed using parameters from the said policy, including a candidates performance appraisal record for the last six years. He pointed out that prior to 2011, seniority held no weight, and points were only allocated to it thereafter. He further pointed out that the petitioner himself was promoted to Scale VI in 2021-22 under the same rules. There was no illegality or arbitrariness in the implementation of the Promotion Policy 2006, and while employees have a right to be considered for promotion, there\u2019s no vested or fundamental right to promotion enforceable under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nA4c4Sy5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Article 226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"ai-optimize-14\">Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-15\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court began by perusal through the Promotion Policy 2006. The Court noted the records show that all the steps as enumerated in the Promotion Policy were followed to the letter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-16\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the contention of petitioner about the non-declaration of number of vacancies being in utter disregard of the Promotion Policy, the Court noted that as per records the promotion exercises were conducted for 2023-24 and 2024-25 and the petitioner had participated in the same without any demur.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-17\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">\u201cIt is a well settled principle of administrative law that when relevant considerations have been taken note of and irrelevant aspects have been eschewed from consideration and that no relevant aspect has been ignored and the administrative decisions have nexus with the facts on record, the same cannot be attacked on merits. Judicial review is permissible only to extent of finding whether the process in reaching decision has been observed correctly and not the decision as such\u201d.<\/span> The Court noted that the respondent authorities appear to have proceeded fairly by applying the same yardsticks and norms to all eligible candidates and therefore no procedural infirmity or arbitrariness can be discerned in the assessment process for promotions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-18\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to the decision of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ajay Kumar Shukla<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Arvind Rai<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/52ReBIQv\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2021 SCC OnLine SC 1195<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court has held that the view that \u2018a right to be considered for promotion is only a statutory right and not a fundamental right\u2019 cannot be accepted. That the right to equal opportunity in the matter of promotion in the sense of a right to be \u2018considered\u2019 for promotion is indeed a fundamental right guaranteed under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Uei3bEDC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Article 16(1)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-19\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further referred to the decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bihar State Electricity Board<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dharamdeo Das<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/804ixNEe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 1768<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court had held that \u201c\u2026<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">a right to be considered for promotion being a facet of the right to equal opportunity in employment and appointment, would have to be treated as a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">14<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574893\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">16(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> but such a right cannot translate into a vested right of the employee for being necessarily promoted to the promotional post, unless the rules expressly provide for such a situation<\/span>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-20\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court made a reference to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">B.V. Sivaiah<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Addanki Babu<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k27IJZ0f\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1998) 6 SCC 720<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court while holding that the principal merit-cum-seniority lays greater emphasis on merit and ability rather than seniority had cited the decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohan Lal Capoor<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/44l9PAqA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1973) 2 SCC 836<\/a> saying <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">\u201cFor inclusion in the list, merit and suitability in all respects should be the governing consideration and that seniority should play a secondary role. It is only when merit and suitability are roughly equal that seniority will be a determining factor\u2026\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-21\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the petitioner was duly considered for promotion but could not make it up to the list of sixteen selected candidates. The Court further held that was no illegality much less unfairness in the actions of the respondents. Upon finding no procedural infirmity or illegality in the promotion exercise the Court dismissed the writ petition.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-22\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Lathrang Born Buam v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/fvFSZmBl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Gau 2945<\/a>, decided on 03-06-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-23\">Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-24\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> S P Sharma, S P Sharma, K N Choudhury, N Sarma, A Kashyap, K Ahmed, U Sharma, Advocates<\/p>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-25\" style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Dy. S.G.I., Md A Rahman (R-2), Ishani Shome (R-2), T R Sen(R-2),A W Aman (R-2), Sarfraz Nawaz(R-4,5,8), T R Sen (R-4,5,8), Surajit Das (R-4,5,8), A W Aman (R-4,5,8), Surajit Das (R-6), S A Barbhuyan (R-6), T R Sen (R-6),Samim Rahman (R-6), Sarfraz Nawaz (R-6), A W Aman (R-6), S A Barbhuyan (R-3,7), T R Sen (R-3,7), Samim Rahman (R-3,7), Suraya Rahman (R-3,7), A W Aman (R-3,7)<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"ai-optimize-26\" style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p class=\"ai-optimize-27\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;For inclusion in the list, merit and suitability in all respects should be the governing consideration and seniority should play a secondary role. It is only when merit and suitability are roughly equal that seniority will be a determining factor&#8230;&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":317943,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[25464,69292,83527,34785,83528,46424],"class_list":["post-350675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-gauhati-high-court","tag-merit-cum-seniority","tag-new-india-assurance-ltd","tag-promotion-policy","tag-right-to-be-considered-for-promotion","tag-right-to-promotion"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd valid | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court holds promotion exercise held the promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018In merit-cum-seniority there is greater emphasis on merit\u2019; Gauhati High Court holds promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court finding no procedural infirmity or illegality in the promotion exercise held the promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-16T06:30:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-16T06:33:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018In merit-cum-seniority there is greater emphasis on merit\u2019; Gauhati High Court holds promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/\",\"name\":\"Promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd valid | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-16T06:30:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-16T06:33:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Gauhati High Court holds promotion exercise held the promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Gauhati High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018In merit-cum-seniority there is greater emphasis on merit\u2019; Gauhati High Court holds promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd valid | SCC Times","description":"Gauhati High Court holds promotion exercise held the promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018In merit-cum-seniority there is greater emphasis on merit\u2019; Gauhati High Court holds promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid","og_description":"Gauhati High Court finding no procedural infirmity or illegality in the promotion exercise held the promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-16T06:30:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-16T06:33:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018In merit-cum-seniority there is greater emphasis on merit\u2019; Gauhati High Court holds promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/","name":"Promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd valid | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-16T06:30:43+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-16T06:33:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Gauhati High Court holds promotion exercise held the promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Gauhati High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/inside-gauhati-high-courts-decision-holding-the-promotional-exercise-of-new-india-assurance-ltd-valid-scc-times-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018In merit-cum-seniority there is greater emphasis on merit\u2019; Gauhati High Court holds promotional exercise of New India Assurance Ltd. valid"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":323280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/31\/sc-upheld-gujarat-hc-promotion-judicial-officers-based-65-promotional-quota-complying-merit-cum-seniority\/","url_meta":{"origin":350675,"position":0},"title":"Read why SC upheld Gujarat HC\u2019s promotion of Judicial Officers based on 65% promotional quota complying with principle of \u2018Merit-cum-Seniority\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"May 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAs long as \u2018Merit-cum-Seniority\u2019 is applied in the manner as explained in All India Judges\u2019 Association v. Union of India, (2002) 4 SCC 247, wherein both merit and seniority are considered, and merit plays the dominant role, the process of promotion cannot be said to be violative of the principle\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Merit-cum-Seniority","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Merit-cum-Seniority.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Merit-cum-Seniority.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Merit-cum-Seniority.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Merit-cum-Seniority.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314547,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/19\/cal-hc-upholds-promotion-selection-process-emphasises-on-minimum-merit-benchmarks-beyond-written-test-stage-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":350675,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds promotion selection process; emphasises on minimum merit benchmarks beyond written test stage","author":"Ritu","date":"February 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the appellant at best can make an endeavour before the fact-finding forum because in exercise of writ jurisdiction, the High Court found no tenable and cogent ground on which the impugned judgment can be faulted.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/12\/supreme-court-stays-promotion-of-judicial-officers-as-district-judge-in-gujarat\/","url_meta":{"origin":350675,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court stays Gujarat Govt&#8217;s \u2018rushed\u2019 decision to promote judicial officers as District Judges; says \u2018State could\u2019ve waited till next hearing\u2019","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Gujarat Government had issued the impugned Notification dated 18.04.2023 during the pendency of the present writ petition and after receiving the notice issued by the Court. The Supreme Court observed that the State Government could have waited till the next date of hearing which was on 28.04.2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"promotion of judicial officers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/promotion-of-judicial-officers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/promotion-of-judicial-officers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/promotion-of-judicial-officers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/promotion-of-judicial-officers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":124321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/12\/concept-of-transfer-versus-recruitment-by-transfer-and-seniority-versus-eligibility-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":350675,"position":3},"title":"Concept of \u2018transfer\u2019 versus \u2018recruitment by transfer\u2019 and \u2018seniority\u2019 versus \u2018eligibility\u2019, explained","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 12, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Stating that \u2018transfer\u2019 and \u2018recruitment by transfer\u2019 are entirely two different concepts, the Court said that no doubt transfer can be from one category to another category or within the class if the rule permits interchangeability of the categories within a class but any other transfer both intra\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":105461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/10\/karnataka-state-law-granting-consequential-seniority-to-the-government-servants-belonging-to-scst-category-held-unconstitutional\/","url_meta":{"origin":350675,"position":4},"title":"Karnataka State Law granting consequential seniority to the Government servants belonging to SC\/ST Category, held unconstitutional","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding the validity of the Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservation (To the Posts in the Civil Services of the State) Act, 2002 which provides for grant of consequential seniority to the Government servants belonging to Scheduled Castes and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343655,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/15\/exemption-from-efficiency-test-for-promotion-is-not-a-matter-of-right-but-a-one-time-exception-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":350675,"position":5},"title":"Exemption from Efficiency Test for promotion is a one-time exception, not a matter of Right: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA government employee cannot claim promotion as a matter of right and he can only be considered for promotion according to the extant Rules.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=350675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350675\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=350675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=350675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=350675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}