{"id":350610,"date":"2025-06-14T12:00:22","date_gmt":"2025-06-14T06:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=350610"},"modified":"2025-06-17T11:52:14","modified_gmt":"2025-06-17T06:22:14","slug":"mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Notice under Section 61 JGST Act cannot be issued for mere sale of goods at concessional rates\u2019; Jharkhand High Court quashes GST-ASMT 10 notices"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Jharkhand High Court<\/span>: In a series of writ petitions filed against the GST-ASMT-10 notices issued under Section 61 of Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017<\/a> (‘JGST Act’) to the petitioners for selling their goods at prices lower than the prevalent market prices, the Division Bench of M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J. and Deepak Roshan, J*.<\/span>, quashed the notices holding that no action under JGST Act can be taken merely because of difference in transaction value at which the petitioners have sold the goods with that of prevalent market value of goods.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The petitioners are working as mining lessees\/dealers, registered under the provisions of the JGST Act, engaged in the business of selling stone boulders, stone chips and other related goods. Notices were issued to the petitioners under Section 61 of the JGST Act<\/a>, stating that they have sold stone boulders\/stone chips at prices less than the prevalent market price and were accordingly directed to show cause as to why not the proceedings under Section 73 or 74 of the JGST<\/a> Act be initiated against them.<\/p>\n

The petitioners in their reply to the said notices stated that the notices under Section 61 of the JGST Act<\/a> read with Rule 99 of Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (‘JGST Rules’) were limited to discrepancies occurring in the returns and the actions of the petitioners selling their goods at prices less than the market prices were outside the purview of Section 61 of the JGST Act. Subsequent notices in Form GST ASMT-10 were issued again. All these notices were challenged by the petitioners in the present writ petitions.<\/p>\n

Issue<\/h3>\n

Whether GST-ASMT-10 notices issued by respondents purporting to invoke power under Section 61 JGST Act by alleging that petitioners, in their returns filed under the Act, quoted lower market price than the actual market price and asking the petitioners to explain the same, are wholly without jurisdiction and beyond the scope of Section 61 of the Act since the issue raised does not relate any discrepancy in the returns filed by petitioners.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court, after pursuing Section 61 of the JGST Act<\/a>, noted that the provisions are set out with a clear objective to enable an Assessing Officer to point out the discrepancies and errors that occur while filing of a return by a registered person with that of the related particulars. The Court further noted that if despite pointing out the discrepancies the registered person does not take any corrective measures then appropriate action can be taken by the proper officer under Sections 65 to 67 and 73 or 74 of the JGST Act.<\/a><\/p>\n

The Court noted that under the scheme of the GST Act, three separate enabling provisions are notified:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    At the preliminary stage of filing a return, the scrutiny provision under Section 61<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    At the investigation stage, the investigation provisions from Sections 65 to 69 and Section 71<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    At the adjudication stage, the adjudicatory provisions Sections 73 and 74<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Court observed that in the present cases, while issuing notices under Section 61 of the JGST Act<\/a> the competent officer had embarked upon the exercise of comparing the selling prices of stone boulders\/stone chips with their prevalent market prices. No discrepancies were pointed out in the returns filed by writ petitioners. The petitioners were asked to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against them for recovery of tax and dues.<\/p>\n

    The Court opined that notices issued comparing the selling prices of the petitioners’ goods with that of the prevalent market rates, were issued without jurisdiction and were beyond the scope of Section 61 of the JGST Act<\/a>. The Court further stated that unless it is shown that the sale transactions are sham, the mere fact that the goods were sold at concessional rates would not entitle the Revenue to assess the differences in the market prices and the price paid by the purchaser as transactional value.<\/p>\n

    The Court for the aforesaid reasons quashed the notices under Section 61 of the JGST Act<\/a> issued to the respective petitioners holding them to have been issued without jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

    [Sri Ram Stone Works v. State of Jharkhand, 2025 SCC OnLine Jhar 2169<\/a>, decided on 09-05-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    *Judgment Authored by: Justice Deepak Roshan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    For the petitioners:<\/span> Sumeet Kumar Gadodia, Shilpi Sandil Gadodia, Ranjeet Kushwaha, Shruti Shekhar, Sanya Kumari, Nidhi Lall, Advocates<\/p>\n

    For the respondents:<\/span> Sachin Kumar, A.A.G.-II, Ashok Kumar Yadav, Sr. S.C.-I, Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. Gauraav Raj, A.C. to A.A.G.-II, Aditya Kumar, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-I, Sahbaj Akhtar, A.C. to A.A.G.-III<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    “We have no hesitation in declaring that notices issued under Section 61 to the respective writ petitioners are wholly without jurisdiction and are, accordingly, liable to be quashed\/set aside by this Court.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":333852,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38712,83484,83480,83485,83479,5791,83478,83482,83483,83481],"class_list":["post-350610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-concessional-rates","tag-discrepancies-in-return","tag-gst-notices","tag-gst-section-61-notice","tag-gst-asmt-10","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-section-61-jgst-act","tag-section-73-jgst-act","tag-section-74-of-jgst-act","tag-sham-transactions"],"yoast_head":"\nJharkhand High Court ruling on Notice under Section 61 of the JGST Act| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand HC held merely selling goods at a concessional rate not a sham transaction for notice to be issued under Section 61 of the JGST Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Notice under Section 61 JGST Act cannot be issued for mere sale of goods at concessional rates\u2019; Jharkhand High Court quashes GST-ASMT 10 notices\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand HC held merely selling goods at a concessional rate not a sham transaction for notice to be issued under Section 61 of the JGST Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-14T06:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-17T06:22:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Notice under Section 61 JGST Act cannot be issued for mere sale of goods at concessional rates\u2019; Jharkhand High Court quashes GST-ASMT 10 notices\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/\",\"name\":\"Jharkhand High Court ruling on Notice under Section 61 of the JGST Act| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-14T06:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-17T06:22:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand HC held merely selling goods at a concessional rate not a sham transaction for notice to be issued under Section 61 of the JGST Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Jharkhand High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Notice under Section 61 JGST Act cannot be issued for mere sale of goods at concessional rates\u2019; Jharkhand High Court quashes GST-ASMT 10 notices\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jharkhand High Court ruling on Notice under Section 61 of the JGST Act| SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand HC held merely selling goods at a concessional rate not a sham transaction for notice to be issued under Section 61 of the JGST Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Notice under Section 61 JGST Act cannot be issued for mere sale of goods at concessional rates\u2019; Jharkhand High Court quashes GST-ASMT 10 notices","og_description":"Jharkhand HC held merely selling goods at a concessional rate not a sham transaction for notice to be issued under Section 61 of the JGST Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-14T06:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-17T06:22:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Notice under Section 61 JGST Act cannot be issued for mere sale of goods at concessional rates\u2019; Jharkhand High Court quashes GST-ASMT 10 notices","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/","name":"Jharkhand High Court ruling on Notice under Section 61 of the JGST Act| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-14T06:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-17T06:22:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Jharkhand HC held merely selling goods at a concessional rate not a sham transaction for notice to be issued under Section 61 of the JGST Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Jharkhand High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/14\/mere-selling-goods-concessional-rate-not-sham-transaction-to-issue-notice-under-section-61-jgst-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Notice under Section 61 JGST Act cannot be issued for mere sale of goods at concessional rates\u2019; Jharkhand High Court quashes GST-ASMT 10 notices"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234200,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/19\/ker-hc-power-of-detention-under-s-129-gst-act-to-be-exercised-only-in-cases-where-transportation-of-goods-is-in-contravention-of-act-and-rules-and-not-simply-because-document-relevant-for-assessme\/","url_meta":{"origin":350610,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Power of detention under S. 129, GST Act to be exercised only on contravention of statute, not simply because tax payment details absent in relevant documents","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. allowed the writ petition and quashed the series of detention notices issued against the petitioner. The petitioner challenged a series of notices of detention, whereby a consignment of goods transported at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/18\/jharkhand-hc-gst-officers-shall-not-force-summoned-person-to-give-statement-after-office-hours\/","url_meta":{"origin":350610,"position":1},"title":"GST officers shall not force a person to give statement after office hours; Must follow instructions of GST-Investigation and CBIC while summoning: Jharkhand HC","author":"Arushi","date":"June 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that to speak or not to speak has always been a dilemma for a person called for giving his statement before the Customs Officer, Central Sales Tax Officer, Police Officer etc, as the implications are serious.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/30\/whether-on-coming-into-force-of-gst-act-a-municipal-corporation-can-levy-advertisement-tax\/","url_meta":{"origin":350610,"position":2},"title":"Whether on coming into force of GST Act a Municipal Corporation can levy advertisement tax\/fee? Kar HC analyses","author":"Editor","date":"May 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Suraj Govindaraj, J. dismissed the petition as being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that petitioner 1 is a registered association of the advertising agencies, in the business of advertisement on the advertisement hoardings licensed by respondent 2 Hubballi Dharwad Mahanagara Palike and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334128,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/29\/delhi-high-court-gst-show-cause-notices-metal-one-corporation-sony-india-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":350610,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court examines legitimacy of GST Show Cause Notices issued against Metal One Corporation, Sony India Limited and others","author":"Arunima","date":"October 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the proceedings initiated in terms of the impugned SCNs and their continuance would be futile and impractical. The impugned SCNs are essentially rendered impotent and would serve no practical purpose.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284893,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/23\/madras-high-court-examines-the-scope-and-ambit-of-s-174-of-cgst-act-in-context-of-notifications-issued-under-the-repealed-tax-regime-dismisses-petition-filed-by-ar-rahman\/","url_meta":{"origin":350610,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court examines the scope and ambit of S. 174 of CGST Act in context of Notifications issued under the repealed tax regime","author":"Editor","date":"February 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The practice and procedure, both pre and post GST are consistent and involve participation of the officer of the DGGI in issuance of show cause notices.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/allahabad-hc-penalty-goods-in-transit-gst-registration-suspension\/","url_meta":{"origin":350610,"position":5},"title":"Penalty can’t be imposed on goods in transit with valid tax invoice and e-way bill, even after suspension of GST registration: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court directed the authorities to carry out the exercise in terms of Section 129 (1)(a) of the CGST Act within a period of two weeks from the date of this order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=350610"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350610\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/333852"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=350610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=350610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=350610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}