{"id":350589,"date":"2025-06-13T18:00:10","date_gmt":"2025-06-13T12:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=350589"},"modified":"2025-06-19T10:21:22","modified_gmt":"2025-06-19T04:51:22","slug":"calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"[Constructive Desertion] Calcutta High Court sets aside divorce granted to husband due to his foundational deceit and concealment of prior marriages"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court<\/span>: In an appeal filed by the appellant (wife) challenging the judgment and decree dated 21-11-2019 and 18-12-2019, issued by the Additional District Judge in a matrimonial suit wherein the marriage was dissolved between the parties by divorce, the Division Bench of Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Uday Kumar, JJ. set aside the decree of divorce and held that divorce decree cannot be granted to a party (petitioner) who perpetrated foundational cruelty (e.g., deliberate marital deception) of greater magnitude than any alleged misconduct by the other spouse, even if the marriage is irretrievably broken down, as it would constitute a miscarriage of justice and violate the principle of &#8220;clean hands&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The marriage was solemnised at Dakshineswar Maa Kali Temple on 21-01-2010 and registered on 17-04-2010. A male child was born to them on 30-09-2010. The couple began residing at the husband&#8217;s residence in Agarpara, but marital discord arose within six months, culminating in the wife&#8217;s departure on 14-07-2010. This triggered a series of litigations between the parties. The husband initiated a matrimonial suit before the Barrackpore court seeking divorce under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\">13(1)(ia) and (ib)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Marriage Act<\/a>, alleging cruelty and desertion. The Trial Court decreed the suit, accepting the husband&#8217;s claims that the wife filed false complaints under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, damaged his career by writing to his employer, and deserted him without cause.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The husband&#8217;s primary grievance stemmed from the wife&#8217;s lodging of criminal complaints and alleged refusal to fulfill conjugal obligations. He accused her of prioritising her legal career over marital responsibilities, using abusive language, and threatening false cases. According to him, her complaint to his employer resulted in his job termination, an act that he characterised as mental cruelty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In rebuttal, the wife asserted that the husband&#8217;s suit was a retaliatory move against her legitimate pursuit of justice under criminal and domestic violence laws. Crucially, she revealed that he had concealed two prior marriages, one that ended in compromise following a Section 498A complaint, and the other by ex parte divorce. These claims were backed by certified Court Records along with her own experience of physical and emotional abuse and stated that she was forced out of her matrimonial home during pregnancy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The primary issue before the Court was whether the Trial Court had rightly concluded that the wife had subjected the husband to cruelty and deserted him without cause. A closer judicial scrutiny revealed that while the Trial Court had accepted the husband&#8217;s allegations at face value, particularly that the wife had made complaints leading to his dismissal from employment, it failed to assess the evidentiary basis and intent behind those allegations. The Court emphasized that for acts to constitute mental cruelty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\">13(1)(i-a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Marriage Act<\/a>, they must be proved to be false, malicious, and of a nature likely to cause harm. The mere institution of complaints, especially in a domestic context where grievances may be genuine, does not automatically amount to cruelty unless shown to be unfounded and motivated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, the Court turned its lens on the conduct of the husband, noting that he had failed to disclose two prior marriages and a pending criminal case at the time of solemnizing the current marriage. This concealment, which went undisputed on record, constituted an egregious breach of trust and amounted to mental cruelty in its own right. The Trial Court, in its analysis, overlooked this critical aspect, thereby ignoring the principle that cruelty must be viewed in the context of the entire matrimonial relationship, including the conduct of both parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the issue of desertion under Section 13(1)(i-b), the High Court found that the wife&#8217;s separation was not willful but rather a consequence of circumstances, including her pregnancy and the husband&#8217;s refusal to allow her re-entry into the matrimonial home. The Court relied on established jurisprudence recognizing &#8220;constructive desertion&#8221; where one party is forced to live apart due to the conduct of the other and held that the husband&#8217;s act of denying the wife access to the marital home negated any claim of desertion on her part. This undermined the Trial Court&#8217;s finding that the wife had deserted the husband without cause.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Addressing the plea of irretrievable breakdown, the Court acknowledged the parties had been living separately for over 14 years. Nonetheless, it cautioned against allowing divorce solely on this ground, especially when the party seeking divorce is at fault. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the Court reiterated that such a ground, while relevant, is not statutorily recognized and cannot override the principle that relief in matrimonial matters must be denied to a party with &#8220;unclean hands.&#8221; The husband&#8217;s suppression of material facts and unjustified conduct weighed heavily against him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court set aside the divorce decree, holding that granting a divorce in these circumstances would result in a grave miscarriage of justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kamalika Majumdar Nee Das v. Subhapriya Majumdar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Tv4wsiM3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Cal 4835<\/a>, decided on 11-06-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Mr. Supriya Ranjan Saha, Mr. S.K. Mukherjee<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, Ld. Sr. Adv., Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee, Mr. Sunil Gupta Ms. Shakshi Rathi, Ms. Swapna Jha, Mr. Shwetank S. Prasad, Mr. Bikash Kr. Singh, Ms. Kat<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The deliberate suppression of such a crucial and material fact concerning one&#8217;s marital history at the solemnization of marriage, especially when it involved a contentious prior dissolution and criminal proceedings (a 498A IPC case), constitutes profound and inexcusable mental cruelty to the wife.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[72033,83471,32351,83472,82686,83152,76775,83037,83469,82687,83470],"class_list":["post-350589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-calcuttahighcourt","tag-cleanhandsprinciple","tag-concealment","tag-constructivedesertion","tag-divorcedecree","tag-divorcelaw","tag-familylaw","tag-hindumarriageact","tag-matrimoniallaw","tag-mentalcruelty","tag-priormarriage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta HC sets aside divorce due to husband&#039;s concealment of past marriages on grounds of cruelty| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court sets aside a divorce decree citing husband&#039;s concealment of past marriages and misuse of cruelty law as grounds for mental cruelty.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Constructive Desertion] Calcutta High Court sets aside divorce granted to husband due to his foundational deceit and concealment of prior marriages\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court sets aside a divorce decree citing husband&#039;s concealment of past marriages and misuse of cruelty law as grounds for mental cruelty.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-13T12:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-19T04:51:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Constructive Desertion] Calcutta High Court sets aside divorce granted to husband due to his foundational deceit and concealment of prior marriages\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta HC sets aside divorce due to husband's concealment of past marriages on grounds of cruelty| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-13T12:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-19T04:51:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court sets aside a divorce decree citing husband's concealment of past marriages and misuse of cruelty law as grounds for mental cruelty.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Constructive Desertion] Calcutta High Court sets aside divorce granted to husband due to his foundational deceit and concealment of prior marriages\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta HC sets aside divorce due to husband's concealment of past marriages on grounds of cruelty| SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court sets aside a divorce decree citing husband's concealment of past marriages and misuse of cruelty law as grounds for mental cruelty.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Constructive Desertion] Calcutta High Court sets aside divorce granted to husband due to his foundational deceit and concealment of prior marriages","og_description":"Calcutta High Court sets aside a divorce decree citing husband's concealment of past marriages and misuse of cruelty law as grounds for mental cruelty.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-13T12:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-19T04:51:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Constructive Desertion] Calcutta High Court sets aside divorce granted to husband due to his foundational deceit and concealment of prior marriages","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/","name":"Calcutta HC sets aside divorce due to husband's concealment of past marriages on grounds of cruelty| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-13T12:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-19T04:51:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Calcutta High Court sets aside a divorce decree citing husband's concealment of past marriages and misuse of cruelty law as grounds for mental cruelty.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/calcutta-high-court-divorce-deceit-cruelty-constructive-desertion-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Constructive Desertion] Calcutta High Court sets aside divorce granted to husband due to his foundational deceit and concealment of prior marriages"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219465,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/12\/kar-hc-decree-of-divorce-set-aside-in-light-of-no-statutory-provisions-followed-by-family-court-while-granting-the-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":350589,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Decree of divorce set aside in light of no statutory provisions followed by Family Court while granting the same","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: The Division Bench of S.N. Satyanarayana and P.G.M. Patil, JJ. allowed this appeal and remanded the matter back to the Principal Judge, Family Court. In this instant case, the Respondent \u2013 wife in M.C. No. 268 of 2016 before the Family Court, Hubballi has appealed impugning the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216337,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/02\/cal-hc-divorced-wife-who-hasnt-remarried-held-entitled-to-execute-order-granted-under-s-12-of-dv-act-existence-of-domestic-relationship-dispensed-with\/","url_meta":{"origin":350589,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | &#8216;Divorced wife&#8217; who hasn&#8217;t remarried held entitled to execute order granted under S.12 of DV Act; existence of &#8216;domestic relationship&#8217; dispensed with","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Madhumati Mitra, J. dismissed an application filed by the petitioner to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge whereby he refused to stay the petition filed by his former wife for the execution of the maintenance order granted in her favour by the Magistrate. By the order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/05\/pat-hc-maintenance-denied-to-wife-when-divorce-granted-on-grounds-of-adultery-pendency-of-appeal-to-set-aside-such-divorce-decree-cannot-be-a-reason-to-uphold-order-of-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":350589,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Maintenance denied to wife when divorce granted on grounds of adultery, pendency of appeal to set aside such divorce decree cannot be a reason to uphold order of maintenance","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. allowed the application of the petitioner to set aside the order granting maintenance to his wife when the divorce was granted on account of adultery on the wife\u2019s part. The petitioner filed an application under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204457,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/","url_meta":{"origin":350589,"position":3},"title":"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. while hearing a matrimonial appeal ruled that remarriage by the opposite spouse during pendency of an application for setting aside ex-parte divorce decree would not render such application as infructuous.\u00a0 The appellant-husband was granted\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":73451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/26\/once-the-statutory-period-for-preferring-appeal-against-divorce-expires-a-party-can-go-for-second-marriage-without-any-legal-hassles\/","url_meta":{"origin":350589,"position":4},"title":"Once the statutory period for preferring appeal against divorce expires, a party can go for second marriage without any legal hassles","author":"Saba","date":"September 26, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: While answering a plethora of important questions regarding the sustainability of a decree for judicial seperation, the Division Bench of I.A. Ansari, C.J., and Nilu Agarwal, J., observed that a decree of judicial separation only lays down the foundation for making an application for the grant of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246609,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/07\/maintenance-6\/","url_meta":{"origin":350589,"position":5},"title":"All HC | Wife&#8217;s appeal against divorce decree withdrawn due to reconciliation and cohabitation with husband. Later, husband passed away. Is she entitled to maintenance under Hindu Adoptions &#038; Maintenance Act? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajit Singh, JJ., while setting aside a decree of divorce addressed the issue of granting maintenance to a widowed wife. Present application was filed for modification of Court's earlier order whereby the appellant wife's appeal against the divorce\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=350589"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/350589\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=350589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=350589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=350589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}