{"id":349739,"date":"2025-06-05T12:00:38","date_gmt":"2025-06-05T06:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=349739"},"modified":"2025-06-09T09:49:33","modified_gmt":"2025-06-09T04:19:33","slug":"rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Freedom of speech not a license to defame individuals or Indian Army\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds summoning order against Rahul Gandhi in Army defamation case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In an application filed by Rahul Gandhi under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (\u2018CrPC\u2019) challenging the validity of the Trial Court\u2019s order summoning him to face trial for the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">500<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (\u2018IPC\u2019) for defaming Indian Army with his alleged remarks about thrashing of soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh, a Single Judge Bench of Subhash Vidyarthi J., dismissed the application on lack of merits. The Court viewed that the Trial Court had correctly decided to summon Rahul Gandhi to face trial for the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">500<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> after satisfying that a prima facie case existed against him. The Court further held that there was no illegality or procedural infirmity in the summoning order that would warrant the exercise of its inherent powers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The complainant had retired from the post of Director of the Border Roads Organization, a position equivalent to that of a Colonel in the Indian Army and held immense respect for the Indian Army. During the &#8216;Bharat Jodo Yatra,&#8217; Rahul Gandhi, had made certain remarks regarding a face-off between the Indian Army and the Chinese Army. According to the complainant, some of the alleged defamatory statements suggested that the Indian Army was being &#8220;trashed and killed&#8221; in Arunachal Pradesh. These remarks, he contended, were false, baseless, and had the effect of demoralizing the Indian Army while undermining the faith of the Indian public in the institution. The statements were widely reported in the media and deeply hurt the sentiments of the complainant, who revered the Indian Army. The Trial Court, upon considering the matter, had observed that, prima facie, the statements made by Rahul appeared to demoralize members of the Indian Army, their associates, and their families. Given that the complainant had served in a position equivalent to that of a Colonel and the remarks were directed at the Army, the Court found that a prima facie case under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">500<\/a> IPC was made out against Rahul.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis and Decision<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning the issue of maintainability, the Court noted that the phrase \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">some person aggrieved by the offence\u201d<\/span> occurring in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519447\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">199<\/a> (1) <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> refers to some person other than the person than against whom the offence is alleged to have been committed. The Section itself contemplates filing of complaints by some person aggrieved by the offence, although the offence has not been committed against him.\u201d The Court viewed that averments made by the complainant of being hurt by the alleged remarks which demoralized the Indian Army and portrayed its achievements in a demeaning manner indicated that he was an aggrieved person under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519447\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">199<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> and hence possessed the requisite locus standi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the mechanical manner of initiating a defamation case, the Court observed, upon perusal of the Trial Court\u2019s summoning order, that the Trial Court had not acted mechanically. Instead, it had examined the statements of the complainant and the witnesses, and through a judicial application of mind, concluded that the alleged remarks constituted a case of defamation against Rahul. Accordingly, the Trial Court had summoned him after forming an independent opinion based on the material placed before it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the contention of freedom of speech and expression, the Court said, \u201c<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">No doubt, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression, this freedom is subject to the reasonable restrictions and it does not include the freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or defamatory to the Indian Army<\/span>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning the issue of publication of the alleged remarks, the Court observed that the allegedly defamatory remarks were made by Rahul in response to a question by some media person. This showed his clear intention of making his statements published in newspaper and magazines.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court rejected all other submissions made on behalf of Rahul Gandhi and, while dismissing the present application, held that the Trial Court had rightly arrived at the decision to summon Rahul to face trial for the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561854\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">500<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> after taking into consideration all the relevant facts and circumstances of the case and after satisfying itself that a prima facie case for trial was made out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rahul Gandhi v. State of U.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Qtww6W79\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine All 3270<\/a>, decided on 29-05-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Mohd. Yasir Abbasi, Mohammed Samar Ansari, and Pranshu Agrawal, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> G.A.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 \u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;No doubt, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression, this freedom is subject to the reasonable restrictions, and it does not include the freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or defamatory to the Indian Army.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,58869,41201,3623,12781,34629,83039,33123,44893],"class_list":["post-349739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-bharat-jodo-yatra","tag-defamation-case","tag-freedom_of_speech","tag-indian-army","tag-rahul-gandhi","tag-rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case","tag-section-500-ipc","tag-summoning-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Allahabad HC on Rahul Gandhi Army defamation case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rahul Gandhi Army defamation case: Discover why Allahabad High Court upheld Trial Court\u2019s order summoning Rahul Gandhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Freedom of speech not a license to defame individuals or Indian Army\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds summoning order against Rahul Gandhi in Army defamation case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court upheld Trial Court\u2019s order summoning Rahul Gandhi in defamation case over remarks against the Indian Army, stating that freedom of speech does not permit defamatory statements.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-05T06:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-09T04:19:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Freedom of speech not a license to defame individuals or Indian Army\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds summoning order against Rahul Gandhi in Army defamation case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Allahabad HC on Rahul Gandhi Army defamation case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-05T06:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-09T04:19:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Rahul Gandhi Army defamation case: Discover why Allahabad High Court upheld Trial Court\u2019s order summoning Rahul Gandhi\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Freedom of speech not a license to defame individuals or Indian Army\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds summoning order against Rahul Gandhi in Army defamation case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Allahabad HC on Rahul Gandhi Army defamation case | SCC Times","description":"Rahul Gandhi Army defamation case: Discover why Allahabad High Court upheld Trial Court\u2019s order summoning Rahul Gandhi","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Freedom of speech not a license to defame individuals or Indian Army\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds summoning order against Rahul Gandhi in Army defamation case","og_description":"Allahabad High Court upheld Trial Court\u2019s order summoning Rahul Gandhi in defamation case over remarks against the Indian Army, stating that freedom of speech does not permit defamatory statements.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-05T06:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-09T04:19:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Freedom of speech not a license to defame individuals or Indian Army\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds summoning order against Rahul Gandhi in Army defamation case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/","name":"Allahabad HC on Rahul Gandhi Army defamation case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-05T06:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-09T04:19:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Rahul Gandhi Army defamation case: Discover why Allahabad High Court upheld Trial Court\u2019s order summoning Rahul Gandhi","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/05\/rahul-gandhi-army-defamation-case-allahabad-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Freedom of speech not a license to defame individuals or Indian Army\u2019; Allahabad HC upholds summoning order against Rahul Gandhi in Army defamation case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":65991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/01\/rahul-gandhi-withdraws-his-petition-seeking-quashment-of-defamation-proceedings-against-him-before-the-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":349739,"position":0},"title":"Rahul Gandhi withdraws his petition seeking quashment of defamation proceedings against him before the Bombay High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench of Dipak Misra and R.F. Nariman, JJ allowed petitioner Rahul Gandhi to withdraw his Special Leave to Appeal seeking the quashment of the defamation proceedings against him for the statements made by him against the RSS. Kapil Sibal, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/sc-to-hear-rahul-gandhis-plea-on-august-4-in-modi-surname-defamation-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":349739,"position":1},"title":"SC issues Notice in Modi Surname Defamation Case; to hear Rahul Gandhi&#8217;s plea on August 4","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court was hearing Rahul Gandhi's plea challenging Gujarat High Court's order dismissing his application to stay two years conviction Order.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rahul gandhi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rahul-gandhi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rahul-gandhi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rahul-gandhi.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rahul-gandhi.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/07\/gujarat-hc-refuses-to-stay-rahul-gandhi-conviction-in-defamation-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":349739,"position":2},"title":"Gujarat HC rejects Rahul Gandhi&#8217;s plea to stay Conviction in Modi Surname Defamation Case","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Rahul Gandhi was sentenced to two years imprisonment for offence under Sections 499 and 500 of IPC for his \u2018all thieves have Modi surname\u2019 remark.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gujarat high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gujarat-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298555,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/sc-stays-rahul-gandhis-conviction-in-modi-surname-defamation-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":349739,"position":3},"title":"Modi Surname Defamation Case | Supreme Court stays Rahul Gandhi&#8217;s conviction","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Rahul Gandhi was sentenced to two years imprisonment for offence under Sections 499 and 500 of IPC for his \u2018all thieves have Modi surname\u2019 remark.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"modi surname","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/modi-surname.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/modi-surname.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/modi-surname.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/modi-surname.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/23\/modi-surname-defamation-case-rahul-gandhi-sentenced-bailed-by-surat-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":349739,"position":4},"title":"[\u2018Modi Surname\u2019 Remark] Surat Court sentences Rahul Gandhi in 2019 defamation case, grants bail and suspends 2-year sentence for 30 days","author":"Ridhi","date":"March 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi had made headlines during 2019 political campaign with his 'Modi surname' remark allegedly connecting the dots between Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rahul Gandhi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-848.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-848.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-848.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-848.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290209,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/modi-surname-case-surat-court-refuses-to-stay-rahul-gandhi-conviction-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":349739,"position":5},"title":"[Modi Surname Defamation Case] Surat Court refuses to stay Rahul Gandhi&#8217;s conviction","author":"Ridhi","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Surat Court commented that Rahul Gandhi was not an ordinary person and any word spoken by him has a large impact on the common public. Hence, a high standard of morality is expected from a person like him.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"modi surname case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/modi-surname-case.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/modi-surname-case.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/modi-surname-case.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/modi-surname-case.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=349739"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349739\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=349739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=349739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=349739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}