{"id":349627,"date":"2025-06-04T15:30:32","date_gmt":"2025-06-04T10:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=349627"},"modified":"2025-06-04T15:30:37","modified_gmt":"2025-06-04T10:00:37","slug":"legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup May 2025 | Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr Android TV Settlement, GBS Outbreak in Pune, Arshad Warsi SEBI Ban, Amazon Fined Over \u20b9100 Rakhi; and more"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">This Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of May 2025 captures key highlights including the Competition Commission&#8217;s acceptance of Google&#8217;s &#8377;20.24 crore settlement in the Android TV antitrust case, NCLT&#8217;s rejection of Vedanta&#8217;s demerger plan, SEBI&#8217;s stringent action against a high-profile pump and dump scheme involving actor Arshad Warsi, and critical environmental rulings by the National Green Tribunal. From consumer disputes to insolvency updates, this roundup brings you a comprehensive overview of decisions that shaped the legal landscape in May 2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; color: #171617; font-size: 14pt;\">Central Administrative Tribunal<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Inter Railway Request Transfer approved before policy change cannot be denied; CAT directs Railways to restore pre policy approved transfer<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an application filed by the applicant seeking reliefs regarding the cancellation of his &#8216;Inter Railway Request Transfer&#8217; (IRRT) application, which had previously been approved but was later treated as cancelled by the respondents following a change in policy, a Coram of Akhil Kumar Srivastava (Judicial Member) and Mallika Arya (Administrative Member) allowed the application and directed the respondents to restore the application for IRRT of the applicant to its original position and to consider for IRRT from SECR to NCR Jhansi and shall relieve the applicant within 15 days of receipt of a copy of this order. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/28\/cat-jabalpur-orders-railways-to-restore-irrt-approved-before-policy-change-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; color: #171617; font-size: 14pt;\">Competition Commission of India<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">CCI approves Google&#8217;s Rupees 20.24 crore settlement in Android TV anti-competitive practices case<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a case filed by the informants under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001531240\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)(a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002783336\" target=\"_blank\">Competition Act, 2002<\/a> (the Act) against Google LLC (OP-1), Google India Private Limited (OP-2), Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited (OP-3) and TCL India Holding Private Limited (OP-4) alleging contravention of various provisions of Section 3 and Section 4 of the Act, a 4-member bench of Ms. Ravneet Kaur (Chairperson), Mr. Anil Agrawal, Ms. Sweta Kakkad and Mr. Deepak Anurag, found prima facie contraventions by Google and accepted Google&#8217;s Settlement Proposal of rupees 20.24 crore under Section 48A(3) of the Act. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/29\/cci-approves-googles-20-24-crore-settlement-in-android-tv-anti-competitive-practices-case-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; color: #171617; font-size: 14pt;\">District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">When DCDRC, Mumbai directed Amazon to pay Rs 40,000 for non-delivery of Rs. 100 Motu Patlu Kids Rakhi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering the instant consumer complaint filed against Amazon for failure to deliver a &#8216;Motu Patlu Kids Rakhi&#8217; as ordered by the complainant; the Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Samindara R. Surve<\/span>, (President)* and Sameer S. Kamble, (Member), held Amazon to be guilty for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices and directed them to pay Rs.30,000 towards compensation to the complainant along with Rs.10,000 towards the cost of the proceedings. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/dcdrc-directs-amazon-pay-rs40000-compensation-non-delivery-motu-patlu-kids-rakhi-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; color: #171617; font-size: 14pt;\">National Company Law Appellate Tribunal<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Electricity is an &#8220;essential service&#8221; under Section 14(2) IBC; can&#8217;t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal challenging the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order directing the appellant, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., to restore Corporate Debtor&#8217;s electricity without insisting on payment during CIRP, a 3-member bench of Ashok Bhushan, J., Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member), upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order and held that Electricity is an essential service under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) and cannot be disconnected even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549797\" target=\"_blank\">61<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) challenging the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order dismissing Section 7 IBC application, a Division Bench of Ashok Bhushan, J., and Barun Mitra (Technical Member), upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order that the Section 7 IBC application is time-barred. The NCLAT held that the acknowledgment in Balance sheet for the purpose of limitation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553179\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act, 1963<\/a> has to be counted from the date of signing of the Balance sheet and not from the date of its uploading with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) on the MCA portal. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8216;Single Homebuyer can&#8217;t challenge CoC approved Resolution Plan&#8217;; NCLAT upholds CoC&#8217;s commercial wisdom.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In appeals challenging the rejection of application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549777\" target=\"_blank\">43<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC), rejection of objections to the Resolution Plan and the approval of the Resolution Plan itself, a 3-member bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ashok Bhushan, J<\/span>., (Chairperson), Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member), upheld the NCLT&#8217;s order and the Resolution Plan. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/26\/single-homebuyer-cant-challenge-coc-approved-resolution-plan-nclat-upholds-cocs-commercial-wisdom-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Zee Entertainment guarantor&#8217;s liability arises only upon invocation of demand guarantee by IDBI: NCLAT dismisses IDBI&#8217;s plea to initiate CIRP.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal challenging the rejection of Section 7 application filed by the appellant-IDBI Bank on the ground that the same is barred by Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000623354\" target=\"_blank\">10-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC), a Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ashok Bhushan, J<\/span>., (Chairperson) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member), upheld the rejection of the Section 7 application against respondent-Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. (ZEE) and held that the invocation of the corporate guarantee during the Covid-19 moratorium period under Section 10-A barred the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, even though the underlying debt continued to exist. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/as-per-guarantee-deed-guarantors-liability-arises-only-upon-invocation-of-demand-guarantee-by-lender-nclat-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; color: #171617; font-size: 14pt;\">National Company Law Tribunal<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8216;Secured Creditor who relinquishes interest cannot seek priority among others based on charge&#8217;; NCLT directs distribution of sale proceeds of Monnet Power&#8217;s assets.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an application filed by the liquidator (&#8216;Applicant&#8217;) of the corporate debtor, i.e., Monnet Power Company Limited (&#8220;Monnet&#8221;), seeking directions for distribution of the balance sale consideration and for extending the time for distribution of sale proceeds under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549788\" target=\"_blank\">53<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (&#8216;IBC&#8217;) read with Regulation 42 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 (&#8216;the Regulations&#8217;), a two-member bench of Deep Chandra Joshi (Judicial Member) and Banwari Lal Meena (Technical Member), allowed the application holding that Secured Creditors cannot seek priority over other similar creditors during the distribution of the sale proceeds of the secured assets. Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the Applicant to distribute Rs. 30.26 Crores among the Secured Creditors of Monnet on a pro rata basis without giving any priority of charge. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/09\/secured-creditor-who-relinquishes-interest-cannot-seek-priority-among-others-based-on-charge-nclt\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLT rejects Vedanta Ltd.&#8217;s demerger plan over non-disclosure of SEPCO&#8217;s debt and procedural irregularities<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an application challenging the demerger plan of Vedanta Limited into multiple resulting companies, a Division bench of Madhu Sinha (Technical Member) and Reeta Kohli (Judicial Member), rejected the demerger plan on the ground of non-disclosure of material facts which violated Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001537448\" target=\"_blank\">230(2)(a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002766251\" target=\"_blank\">Companies Act, 2013<\/a>, and is bound to prejudice the public interest at large. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/nclt-rejects-vedanta-ltd-s-demerger-plan-over-non-disclosure-of-sepcos-debt-and-procedural-irregularities-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Force Majeure doesn&#8217;t absolve Corporate Debtor from contractual obligations; NCLT directs initiation of CIRP against Corporate Debtor<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an application filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC), seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, a Division Bench of Sanjiv Jain (Judicial Member) and Venkataraman Subramaniam (Technical Member), admitted the Section 7 IBC application and initiated the insolvency proceeding against Corporate Debtor. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/20\/force-majeure-doesnt-absolve-corporate-debtor-from-contractual-obligations-nclt-directs-initiation-of-cirp-against-corporate-debtor-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Protection of minority shareholder rights | NCLT lays down structured buy-out mechanism to resolve deadlock between shareholders<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a company petition seeking relief under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001537460\" target=\"_blank\">241<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001537461\" target=\"_blank\">242<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002766251\" target=\"_blank\">Companies Act, 2013<\/a> (the Companies Act), and requested a buyout order, a Division bench of Dr. Venkata Ramakrishna Badarinath Nandula (Judicial Member) and Charan Singh (Technical Member), allowed the petition and held that the Deccan Group&#8217;s actions amounted to &#8220;grave acts of oppression&#8221; and was not mere instances of internal shareholder disputes. The NCLT laid out a structured buy-out mechanism to resolve the deadlock between shareholders. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/protection-of-minority-shareholder-rights-nclt-lays-down-a-structured-buy-out-mechanism-to-resolve-deadlock-between-shareholders-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; color: #171617; font-size: 14pt;\">National Green Tribunal<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NGT takes cognizance of plea on Guillain-Barr&eacute; Syndrome Outbreak in Pune due to contaminated drinking water<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an application filed by law students seeking urgent intervention from NGT regarding the outbreak of Guillain-Barr&eacute; Syndrome (GBS) in Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad, a Division bench of Dinesh Kumar Singh, J., (Judicial Member) and Dr. Vijay Kulkarni (Expert Member), acknowledged the gravity of the situation and took cognizance of the potential environmental and health hazards arising from contaminated drinking water. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/ngt-takes-cognizance-of-plea-on-guillain-barr-syndrome-outbreak-in-pune-due-to-contaminated-drinking-water-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8216;Necessary permissions were taken&#8217;; NGT dismisses plea against illegal tree cutting in Adani&#8217;s Chhattisgarh Coal mining project.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an original application against illegal cutting of more than 15,000 trees in Hasdev forest, Korba and Sarguja District of the State of Chhattisgarh for carrying out the proposed coal mining project of Parsa East, District Kele Bason, the Bench of Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member and Dr. Vijay Kulkarni, Expert Member, noted that the Joint Committee found that the necessary permissions were taken by the project proponents. The Tribunal directed the Project Proponent that the necessary plantation must be done to maintain the ecology in the area. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/14\/ngt-dismisses-plea-against-illegal-tree-cutting-in-adani-chhattisgar-coal-mining-project\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Matheran Horse Dung Pollution Case | NGT lists matter for next year as it awaits final report by Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an original application filed seeking directions for the protection of Matheran hill station which was facing environmental degradation due to the excessive use of horses for tourism and goods transportation, the Bench of Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, and Dr. Vijay Kulkarni, Expert Member, listed the matter for 30-01-2026, after being informed that the final report of environmental assessment by Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University (&#8216;BATU&#8217;) would be submitted after carrying out the testing scheduled for September to December 2025 and subsequent evaluation of test results. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/matheran-horse-dung-pollution-case-ngt-lists-matter-for-next-year-as-it-awaits-final-report-by-babasaheb-ambedkar-technological-university\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Felling of 700 trees in Bhoj Wetland, a Ramsar site; NGT forms panel, orders Statewide Tree Census<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an original application, raising substantial environmental issues relating to the felling of approximately 700 trees for road construction and the construction of a cricket stadium within the catchment area of Bhoj Wetland, a Ramsar site of international importance in Bhopal, the Division Bench of Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member and Dr. Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member allowed the application and formed the Joint Committee to enquire into the matter. The Tribunal gave a slew of directions to the Committee. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/28\/felling-of-700-trees-in-bhoj-wetland-ngt-orders-statewide-tree-census\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Neglect and encroachment of historical water body in Narela: NGT issues notice to authorities<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an application raising grievance regarding encroachment on a historical water body which was constructed by a king named Chand and historically used for water sports, a 3-member bench of Prakash Shrivastava (Chairperson), Arun Kumar Tyagi, JJ., and Dr. Afroz Ahmad (Expert Member), acknowledged that the matter involves &#8220;substantial issue relating to compliance of environmental norms&#8221; and issued notice to the respondents with direction to file their response\/reply. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/21\/neglect-and-encroachment-of-historical-water-body-in-narela-ngt-issues-notice-to-authorities-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; color: #171617; font-size: 14pt;\">Securities And Exchange Board of India<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">SEBI bans actor Arshad Warsi and 58 others for 5 years in a textbook case of &#8216;pump and dump&#8217; orchestrated through false narratives on digital media<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a case involving a fraudulent scheme to manipulate the share price of Sadhna Broadcast Limited, Ashwani Bhatia (Whole Time Member) after a detailed investigation, found that a group of connected entities had engaged in a coordinated &#8220;pump and dump&#8221; operation by artificially inflating the price and trading volume of the company&#8217;s scrip and luring retail investors through misleading YouTube videos being in violation of the SEBI Act, 1992 and the PFUTP Regulations, 2003. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/31\/sebi-ban-arshad-warsi-sadhna-broadcast-stock-scam-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">From a &#8377;20.24 Cr Google settlement in an Android TV antitrust case to NCLT&#8217;s rejection of Vedanta&#8217;s demerger, the May 2025 roundup covers key regulatory and tribunal decisions. Highlights include NCLAT&#8217;s take on electricity dues during CIRP, SEBI&#8217;s 5-year ban on actor Arshad Warsi, environmental rulings by NGT, and Amazon penalized for a &#8377;100 Rakhi delivery failure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":349634,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45673,46957],"tags":[82995,82996,82992,82997,82999,82994,82998,82991,82993],"class_list":["post-349627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns-for-roundup","category-tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup","tag-amazon-rakhi-case","tag-explore-may-2025","tag-google-antitrust-fine","tag-nclt-blocks-vedanta","tag-punes-gbs-outbreak","tag-sebi-ban","tag-sebi-bans-arshad-warsi","tag-tribunal-commission-highlights-may-2025","tag-vedanta-demerger"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal &amp; Commission Highlights May 2025 | Google Antitrust Fine, Vedanta Demerger, SEBI Ban, Amazon Rakhi Case| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore May 2025\u2019s top legal and regulatory developments: Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr antitrust settlement, NCLT blocks Vedanta\u2019s demerger, SEBI bans Arshad Warsi, NGT acts on Pune\u2019s GBS outbreak, and Amazon fined over missing Rakhi.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup May 2025 | Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr Android TV Settlement, GBS Outbreak in Pune, Arshad Warsi SEBI Ban, Amazon Fined Over \u20b9100 Rakhi; and more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore May 2025\u2019s top legal and regulatory developments: Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr antitrust settlement, NCLT blocks Vedanta\u2019s demerger, SEBI bans Arshad Warsi, NGT acts on Pune\u2019s GBS outbreak, and Amazon fined over missing Rakhi.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-04T10:00:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-04T10:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup May 2025 | Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr Android TV Settlement, GBS Outbreak in Pune, Arshad Warsi SEBI Ban, Amazon Fined Over \u20b9100 Rakhi; and more\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal & Commission Highlights May 2025 | Google Antitrust Fine, Vedanta Demerger, SEBI Ban, Amazon Rakhi Case| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-04T10:00:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-04T10:00:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Explore May 2025\u2019s top legal and regulatory developments: Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr antitrust settlement, NCLT blocks Vedanta\u2019s demerger, SEBI bans Arshad Warsi, NGT acts on Pune\u2019s GBS outbreak, and Amazon fined over missing Rakhi.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Tribunal and Commission Roundup May 2025\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup May 2025 | Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr Android TV Settlement, GBS Outbreak in Pune, Arshad Warsi SEBI Ban, Amazon Fined Over \u20b9100 Rakhi; and more\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal & Commission Highlights May 2025 | Google Antitrust Fine, Vedanta Demerger, SEBI Ban, Amazon Rakhi Case| SCC Times","description":"Explore May 2025\u2019s top legal and regulatory developments: Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr antitrust settlement, NCLT blocks Vedanta\u2019s demerger, SEBI bans Arshad Warsi, NGT acts on Pune\u2019s GBS outbreak, and Amazon fined over missing Rakhi.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup May 2025 | Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr Android TV Settlement, GBS Outbreak in Pune, Arshad Warsi SEBI Ban, Amazon Fined Over \u20b9100 Rakhi; and more","og_description":"Explore May 2025\u2019s top legal and regulatory developments: Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr antitrust settlement, NCLT blocks Vedanta\u2019s demerger, SEBI bans Arshad Warsi, NGT acts on Pune\u2019s GBS outbreak, and Amazon fined over missing Rakhi.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-06-04T10:00:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-04T10:00:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup May 2025 | Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr Android TV Settlement, GBS Outbreak in Pune, Arshad Warsi SEBI Ban, Amazon Fined Over \u20b9100 Rakhi; and more","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/","name":"Tribunal & Commission Highlights May 2025 | Google Antitrust Fine, Vedanta Demerger, SEBI Ban, Amazon Rakhi Case| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-04T10:00:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-04T10:00:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Explore May 2025\u2019s top legal and regulatory developments: Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr antitrust settlement, NCLT blocks Vedanta\u2019s demerger, SEBI bans Arshad Warsi, NGT acts on Pune\u2019s GBS outbreak, and Amazon fined over missing Rakhi.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Tribunal and Commission Roundup May 2025"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/04\/legal-roundup-tribunal-commission-roundup-may-2025-google-antitrust-sebi-ban-vedanta-demerger-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunals and Commissions Roundup May 2025 | Google\u2019s \u20b920.24 Cr Android TV Settlement, GBS Outbreak in Pune, Arshad Warsi SEBI Ban, Amazon Fined Over \u20b9100 Rakhi; and more"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Tribunal-and-Commission-Roundup-May-2025.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":286237,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/04\/sebi-restrained-promoters-sadhna-enterprises-including-arshad-warsi-wife-entities-from-buying-selling-dealing-in-securities-market-violating-provisions-of-sebi-act-sebi-pfutp-regulations-for-luring-i\/","url_meta":{"origin":349627,"position":0},"title":"SEBI imposes penalty on Arshad Warsi and his wife &amp; 29 other entities; Bars from Securities Market for practicing fraudulent &amp; unfair trade practices","author":"Kriti","date":"March 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"On 2-3-2023, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (\u2018SEBI\u2019) restrained the promoters of Sadhna Enterprises including Arshad Warsi along with other 29 entities from buying, selling or dealing in the securities market for violating the provisions of the SEBI Act, 1992 and SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/04\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-march-2023-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":349627,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | Top 13 Legal Stories covering Google-CCI case, FTS under India Netherlands DTAA, RCap Resolution, RBI Penalty on Amazon, SEBI Penalty on Arshad Warsi, and more from March 2023","author":"Ridhi","date":"April 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Find interesting rulings by NCLT, NCLAT, RBI, ITAT, SEBI, NCDRC covering legal stories on FTS under India Netherlands DTAA, reconsideration of approved resolution plan in insolvency proceedings, definition of financial debt, compensation against doctor\u2019s legal obligations, and much more.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Monthly Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-973.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-973.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-973.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-973.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288426,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/03\/sat-reverses-sebis-order-in-arshad-warsis-pump-and-dump-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":349627,"position":2},"title":"SAT reverses SEBI&#8217;s order in Arshad Warsi&#8217;s pump and dump case","author":"Editor","date":"April 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal: In the instant appeal filed against the ex parte ad-interim order passed by the Whole Time Members (WTM) of Securities Exchange Board of India (\u2018SEBI\u2019) in Arshad Warsi's case, the two-member bench of Tarun Agarwal, J. (Presiding Officer) and Meera Swarup (Technical Member), of Securities Appellate Tribunal,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-969.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-969.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-969.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-969.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291165,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/tribunals-commissions-regulatory-bodies-roundup-april-2023-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":349627,"position":3},"title":"[Monthly Roundup ] Top Stories like Arshad Warsi pump and dump case; Compensation on failure to deliver \u2018Onam Sadya\u2019; Sambhal cold storage collapse incident, and more [April 2023]","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore decisions of Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions in India with stories on supply of goods to overseas customers, question of condonation of delay by NCLAT, maintainability of application u\/s 7 of IBC Code, NGT on violation of environmental norms by State, and so on.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunals april 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/tribunals-april-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/tribunals-april-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/tribunals-april-2023.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/tribunals-april-2023.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/31\/sebi-ban-arshad-warsi-sadhna-broadcast-stock-scam-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":349627,"position":4},"title":"SEBI bans actor Arshad Warsi and others in a textbook case of \u2018pump and dump\u2019 scam orchestrated through false narratives on digital media","author":"Arunima","date":"May 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"SEBI emphasized that the integrity of the securities market is sacrosanct and any attempt to mislead investors, however novel or tech-enabled, would be dealt with strictly under the law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Securities and Exchange Board of India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357260,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/21\/sat-order-on-sadhna-broadcast-stock-manipulation-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":349627,"position":5},"title":"Read why Securities Appellate Tribunal granted relief to Naman Broadcasting in Sadhna Broadcast stock manipulation case","author":"Ekta","date":"August 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Naman Broadcasting amongst others was alleged to contravene the provisions of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 by using digital platforms to mislead the investors. It was alleged that the price and volume of the scrip was manipulated through a coordinated scheme involving dissemination of misleading information and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sadhna Broadcast stock manipulation case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sadhna-Broadcast-stock-manipulation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sadhna-Broadcast-stock-manipulation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sadhna-Broadcast-stock-manipulation-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sadhna-Broadcast-stock-manipulation-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=349627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349627\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/349634"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=349627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=349627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=349627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}