{"id":349006,"date":"2025-05-29T09:00:27","date_gmt":"2025-05-29T03:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=349006"},"modified":"2025-06-02T09:37:29","modified_gmt":"2025-06-02T04:07:29","slug":"petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court dismisses petition challenging 20 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant petition challenging Bombay High Court&#8217;s decision to upholding the conviction of the petitioner (convict) under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\">6<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">Protection of the Children from Sexual Offences Act<\/a> (POCSO Act) thereby sentencing him to 20 years&#8217; rigorous imprisonment; the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.,*<\/span> dismissed the petition finding no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n<h3>Background and Legal Trajectory:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Prosecution was launched by setting up a case that victim, a 6-year-old girl, was sexually assaulted by the convict by luring her with chocolate and edibles on 13-01-2020 i.e. while she was put up with her old great grandfather. The victim informed her mother, and she was thereafter taken for medical examination which revealed sexual assault.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Mother of victim lodged report with Ahmedpur Police Station on the strength of which crime was registered, and it was duly investigated by the Police, who on completion of investigation, chargesheeted the convict.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter was brought before the Special Judge for trial. Upon completion of trial, the accused was convicted for offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\">6<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a> and he was <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 20 years<\/span> and pay fine of Rs 25,000. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">The Trial Court did not award any separate sentence to the convict<\/span> under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376(3)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561707\" target=\"_blank\">377<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a> in view of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550522\" target=\"_blank\">42<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved with the afore-stated order by the Special Judge, the convict appealed before Bombay High Court. However, the single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abhay S. Waghwase, J.<\/span>, held that victim&#8217;s evidence found support from medical evidence; therefore, charges against the convict were cogently brought home by the prosecution. After going through the judgment of the Trial Court, the High Court was satisfied that findings were supported by sound reasons. Therefore, the convict&#8217;s appeal was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Once again being aggrieved with the dismissal of his appeal by the High Court, the convict approached the Supreme Court. However, the Bench of Nagarathna and SC Sharma, JJ., did not find any reason to interfere with the either the decision of the Trial Court or the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sachin v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Icm96wj5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1255<\/a>, decided on 26-5-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Partial Court Working Days Bench<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Priyanka R. Deshpande, AOR<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Trial Court hadn&#8217;t given any separate sentence to the convict under Sections 376(3), 377, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act in view of Section 42 of the POCSO Act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":349013,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[37825,14811,3468,82651,75044,23204,23524,3333,2519,6191,82650],"class_list":["post-349006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-bombay-hc","tag-child-abuse","tag-conviction","tag-latur-district-court","tag-partial-court-working-days","tag-pocso","tag-pocso-act","tag-Rigorous_Imprisonment","tag-Sentence","tag-sexual-assault","tag-sexual-assault-on-minor"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC dismisses petition challenging 20 years&#039; rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Trial Court hadn&#039;t given any separate sentence to the convict under 376(3), 377, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act in view of Section 42 of the POCSO Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court dismisses petition challenging 20 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Trial Court hadn&#039;t given any separate sentence to the convict under 376(3), 377, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act in view of Section 42 of the POCSO Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-29T03:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-02T04:07:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court dismisses petition challenging 20 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"SC dismisses petition challenging 20 years' rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-29T03:30:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-02T04:07:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Trial Court hadn't given any separate sentence to the convict under 376(3), 377, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act in view of Section 42 of the POCSO Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"20-year rigorous imprisonment under POCSO\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court dismisses petition challenging 20 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC dismisses petition challenging 20 years' rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act","description":"Trial Court hadn't given any separate sentence to the convict under 376(3), 377, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act in view of Section 42 of the POCSO Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court dismisses petition challenging 20 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act","og_description":"Trial Court hadn't given any separate sentence to the convict under 376(3), 377, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act in view of Section 42 of the POCSO Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-29T03:30:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-02T04:07:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court dismisses petition challenging 20 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/","name":"SC dismisses petition challenging 20 years' rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-29T03:30:27+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-02T04:07:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Trial Court hadn't given any separate sentence to the convict under 376(3), 377, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act in view of Section 42 of the POCSO Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"20-year rigorous imprisonment under POCSO"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/29\/petition-challenging-20years-rigorous-imprisonment-pocso-act-s6-dismissal-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court dismisses petition challenging 20 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment given to convict under S. 6 of POCSO Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20-year-rigorous-imprisonment-under-POCSO.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/09\/pocso-sexual-assault-minor-victim-sentence-reduced-twin-object-sentencing-policy-deterence-correction-mitigating-circumstances-bombay-high-court-legal-research-updates-criminal-trial-law-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":349006,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Sentencing policy&#8217;s twin objective is deterrence and correction\u2019; Bombay High Court reduces POCSO convict&#8217;s sentence in a 7-year-old&#8217;s sexual assault case","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that the convict was a young boy of 20 years, who has no father, and was shouldering the responsibility of his widowed sister and her son, hence, imprisonment for a term of 14 years would be adequate, to teach him a lesson.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":346352,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/supreme-court-article-142-restore-original-sentence-release-excess-term-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":349006,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to restore original sentence and order release after convict serves excess term in POCSO case","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The original judgment of the Special Court convicted and imposed a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for seven years on the convict. However, the convict had already undergone eleven years of actual sentence.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Excess term in POCSO case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Excess-term-in-POCSO-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Excess-term-in-POCSO-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Excess-term-in-POCSO-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Excess-term-in-POCSO-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/02\/convict-under-section-354-a-ipc-and-section-8-pocso-acquitted-from-offence-under-section-450-ipc-as-former-not-punishable-with-imprisonment-of-life-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":349006,"position":2},"title":"Convict under Section 354-A IPC and Section 8 POCSO acquitted from offence under Section 450 IPC as former not punishable with imprisonment of life: Bombay HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single judge Bench comprising of K.L. Wadane, J. partly allowed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Sections 450 and 354-A IPC along with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2000.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/orissa-hc-set-aside-conviction-for-raping-minor-girl-and-convicts-for-aggravated-sexual-assault\/","url_meta":{"origin":349006,"position":3},"title":"Rape versus \u2018Aggravated sexual assault\u2019 under POCSO: Why Orissa HC set aside Trial Court order convicting Man for Rape","author":"Editor","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court found that none of the acts of the convict would come within the definition of \u2018rape\u2019 under Section 375 of the IPC or \u2018penetrative sexual assault\u2019 under Section 3 of the POCSO Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/13\/conviction-pocso-ipc-higher-punishment-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":349006,"position":4},"title":"Law with &#8216;greater degree&#8217; of punishment applies when convicted under IPC and POCSO both: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe provisions of Section 42A of POCSO Act, cannot be interpreted so as to override the scope and ambit of enabling provision, i.e., Section 42 of POCSO Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Conviction under POCSO and IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Conviction-under-POCSO-and-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Conviction-under-POCSO-and-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Conviction-under-POCSO-and-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Conviction-under-POCSO-and-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373163,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/19\/del-hc-rubbing-penis-against-childs-private-part-not-penetrative-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":349006,"position":5},"title":"Rubbing penis against child&#8217;s private part not &#8216;Penetrative Sexual Assault&#8217; under POCSO Act; Delhi HC modifies sentence","author":"Ritu","date":"January 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe accused in this case was a doctor to whom the child was sent for medicine. The accused was in a position of authority and trust, and it was such a position that had been misused by him\u2026 In such circumstances, no leniency is called for.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Penetrative-Sexual-Assault-under-POCSO-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Penetrative-Sexual-Assault-under-POCSO-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Penetrative-Sexual-Assault-under-POCSO-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Penetrative-Sexual-Assault-under-POCSO-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=349006"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/349006\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/349013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=349006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=349006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=349006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}