{"id":348347,"date":"2025-05-20T13:00:50","date_gmt":"2025-05-20T07:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=348347"},"modified":"2025-05-26T18:01:16","modified_gmt":"2025-05-26T12:31:16","slug":"offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law: Delhi HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed for quashing the FIR registered for the offence under Section 25<\/a>\/26<\/a>\/27<\/a> of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994<\/a>, (‘PC & PNDT Act’), Neena Bansal Krishna, J.*<\/span>, stated that the offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable and thus, registration of FIR and investigation by the police per se is not barred under law. The Court stated that the grounds for seeking quashing of the FIR were without merits and accordingly dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

Dr, Randhawa Ultrasonography Imaging and Research Institute (‘Petitioner 1’) was governed by the provisions of PC & PNDT Act regarding issues of pregnancy, Prohibition of Sex Selection, Ultrasonography. Petitioner 1 was recognized by Jefferson Institute Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, which maintained a very high standard in recognizing any Institute and providing continued recognition.<\/p>\n

It was submitted that originally, the Appropriate Authority under PC & PNDT Act for the Petitioner 1, was District Magistrate, West (‘DM, West’). However, from 26-9-2016, the Appropriate Authority was changed to District Magistrate (South-West District). An official communication to this effect was received by the petitioner through e-mail 30-11-2016 and the petitioners were complying with all the formalities with the Appropriate Authority. Petitioner 1 also sent intimation Letters to CDMO, District Appropriate Authority, South-West District, (‘DAA, South-West’) regarding change, use and installation of ultrasound\/sonography machines by Petitioner 1, which was duly received by it.<\/p>\n

It was contended that on 21-12-2017, officials of the Office of DM, West District inspected the premises of the petitioner. Though he protested as it was not the Appropriate Authority, but by use of brutal force, Respondent 2 conducted the inspection and checked all the records of Petitioner 1. They stayed in the premises for about five hours and illegally took away all the Records.<\/p>\n

On 23-12-2017, FIR under Section 25<\/a>\/26<\/a>\/27<\/a> of PC & PNDT Act<\/a> was registered on the Complaint of District Appropriate Authority, West (‘DAA, West’) based on the findings of Joint Inspection conducted on 21-12-2017.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n

1. Whether DAA, West District was the competent authority.<\/p>\n

The first ground for quashing of the complaint\/FIR was sought was that the Inspection was carried out by DAA, West District when, in fact, the Competent Authority was DAA, South-West District.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that it was evident that though inadvertently, the Files were transferred to District Appropriate Authority, South-West in 2016, but as per the Notification of NCT of Delhi, this sub-division Colony never got transferred to South-West District. As soon as this anomaly was noticed, the files were recalled by DAA, West. Consequently, the inspections were done with due Authority. Merely because there was inadvertent transfer of the files would not make DAA, South-West as the Competent Authority.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that there was no Notification transferring the sub-division to South-West. The sub-division where the Petitioner 1 was situated, was never notified for transfer to District South-West. Therefore, it was District West, which continued to be the Appropriate Authority.<\/p>\n

2. Registration of FIR under PC & PNDT Act<\/p>\n

The second ground taken by the petitioner for quashing of the FIR was that under Section 28<\/a> PC & PNDT Act<\/a> specifically provides that cognizance could be taken only on the Complaint of Appropriate Authority and therefore, no FIR could be registered under the Act.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that Section 28<\/a> of PC & PNDT Act<\/a>, makes it abundantly evident that a complaint before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, could be initiated either by Appropriate Authority or Central Government or State Government, which may authorise an Officer other than the Appropriate Authority to file a Complaint on which cognizance can be taken by the Court concerned.<\/p>\n

However, the question emerged that whether the FIR could be registered and whether charge-sheet could be filed before the Metropolitan Magistrate and if so done, what would be the status of such charge-sheet. The Court stated that under PC & PNDT Act, there was no mention of filing of a charge-sheet under the Act. Section 27<\/a> of the PC & PNDT Act<\/a> provides that the offence under the Act, shall be cognizable non-bailable and non-compoundable.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that from the harmonious reading of the provisions of PC & PNDT Act, which make the offences as cognizable and non-bailable along with the provisions of CrPC, it could not be said that no FIR could be registered or that the registration of FIR was barred under PC & PNDT Act. Further, Rule 18A(3)(iv) of PC & PNDT Act provides that as far as possible, Police being not involved for investigating cases under the Act, which again implied that the investigations by the Police, were not completely ousted. The Court stated that the PC & PNDT Act also envisaged investigations by the Police, if so required.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that though Section 28<\/a> of PC & PNDT Act<\/a> was specific in providing that the cognizance could be taken only on the complaint, but it nowhere barred the registration of FIR or the investigations to be conducted therein or a charge-sheet be filed.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to Section 4(2)<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> and stated that all offences under ‘any other law’ were also to be investigated, tried or otherwise to be dealt with as per provisions of CrPC, unless an exception was provided in ‘any other law’. Therefore, the Court stated that the offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable and thus, registration of FIR and investigation by the police per se is not barred under law.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that in the present case, cognizance was taken neither on the FIR nor on the Charge-Sheet, but on the Complaint filed separately by DAA. The Report under Section 173<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> is only a part of the investigation as the initial Search, Seizure, etc. was carried out by the DAA. Therefore, this ground for seeking quashing of the FIR was also without merits.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court dismissed the present petition.<\/p>\n

[Dr. Randhawa Ultrasonography Imaging and Research Institute v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3389<\/a>, decided on 13-5-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by- Justice Neena Bansal Krishna<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the Petitioners:<\/span> Percival Billimoria, Senior Advocate with Khowaja Siddiqui, Tushar Bathija, Jay Singh, Shilpa Ohri, Aswini Kumar, Rachita Sood and Arbaz Khan, Advocates.<\/p>\n

For the Respondents:<\/span> Yasir Rauf Ansari, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.); Alok Sharma and Amit Sahni, Advocates with SI Mukesh Yadav, PS Hari Nagar.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“From the harmonious reading of the provisions of PC & PNDT Act, which make the offences as cognizable and non-bailable along with the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, it cannot be said that no FIR can be registered or that the registration of FIR is barred under PC & PNDT Act.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[82298,82297,49853,2543,39794,69162,40609,44477,21114],"class_list":["post-348347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bailable-offences","tag-cognizable-offences","tag-criminal-procedure-code-1973","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-fir-registration","tag-justice-neena-bansal-krishna","tag-pc-pndt-act","tag-police-investigation","tag-quashing-of-fir"],"yoast_head":"\nOffences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation not barred: DHC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stated that offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stated that offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-20T07:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-26T12:31:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation not barred: DHC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-20T07:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-26T12:31:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court stated that offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law: Delhi HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation not barred: DHC | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court stated that offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law: Delhi HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court stated that offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-20T07:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-26T12:31:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law: Delhi HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/","name":"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation not barred: DHC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-20T07:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-26T12:31:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court stated that offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law: Delhi HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":290811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/28\/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-doctor-accused-of-carrying-out-illegal-sex-determination-issues-direction-for-proper-implementation-of-pcpndt-act-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":348347,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR against doctor accused of carrying out illegal sex determination; issues direction for proper implementation of PCPNDT (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court observed that it was aware of the conflict that plagued women who were torn between societal and familial pressure to bear sons and the emotional stress and moral uncertainty they experienced for not bearing a male child.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265883,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/25\/can-a-single-member-appropriate-authority-take-cognizance-of-a-complaint-filed-under-pcpndt-act-sex-determination\/","url_meta":{"origin":348347,"position":1},"title":"Can Court take cognizance of complaint filed by single-member Appropriate Authority for offences under PC&PNDT Act, 1994? Del HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., held that, the Metropolitan Magistrate\/ Judicial Magistrate of the first class is competent to take cognizance and try the offence punishable under the PC&PNDT Act on the complaint of an Appropriate Authority or any officer authorised on this behalf by the Central Government or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248770,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/26\/no-coercive-measures-to-be-taken-can-high-courts-pass-such-blanket-orders-while-refusing-to-quash-investigation-heres-the-law-laid-down-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":348347,"position":2},"title":"\u201cNo coercive measures to be taken\u201d| Can High Courts pass such blanket orders while refusing to quash investigation? Here’s the law laid down by the Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Granting of such blanket order would not only adversely affect the investigation but would have far reaching implications for maintaining the Rule of Law.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373390,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/21\/sc-jurisdiction-to-investigate-prevention-of-corruption-offences\/","url_meta":{"origin":348347,"position":3},"title":"State Police or its specialised agency can investigate Prevention of Corruption Act offences against Central Government Employees: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"January 21, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) is also a wing of State Police. The offences under the PC Act are also cognizable and can, therefore, be investigated by the State Police or VACB.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jurisdiction to investigate Prevention of Corruption offences","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-to-investigate-Prevention-of-Corruption-offences.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-to-investigate-Prevention-of-Corruption-offences.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-to-investigate-Prevention-of-Corruption-offences.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/jurisdiction-to-investigate-Prevention-of-Corruption-offences.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328177,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/06\/ph-hc-directs-state-of-punjab-ensure-fir-registered-whenever-complaint-reflecting-cognizable-offence-is-made\/","url_meta":{"origin":348347,"position":4},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC directs State of Punjab to ensure that FIR must be registered whenever a complaint reflecting commission of cognizable offence is made","author":"Arushi","date":"August 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Prima-facie case for wrongfully restraining the team of doctors and restraining them from doing their official duties was made out and both these offences were punishable under Sections 341 and 353 of the IPC. However, despite disclosing commission of cognizable offences, the police did not register an FIR.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331029,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/chairman-member-acting-alone-cannot-authorise-search-s-301-pndtact-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":348347,"position":5},"title":"Chairman or any other Member acting alone, cannot authorise Search under Section 30(1) of PNDT Act: Supreme Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Pointing out that if the law requires a particular thing to be done in a particular manner, the same shall be done in that manner only, the Court held that decision to authorise search must be a decision of the Appropriate Authority as a whole.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Search under Section 30(1) of PNDT Act 1994","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/chairman-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/chairman-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/chairman-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/chairman-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=348347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348347\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=348347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=348347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=348347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}