{"id":348163,"date":"2025-05-17T16:30:26","date_gmt":"2025-05-17T11:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=348163"},"modified":"2025-05-17T16:29:40","modified_gmt":"2025-05-17T10:59:40","slug":"2025-scc-vol-4-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002763213\" target=\"_blank\">Central Sales Tax Act, 1956<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001573185\" target=\"_blank\">8(5)<\/a> (after 2002 Amendment) and S. 8(4) &#8212; Applicability of S. 8(5) after amendment to cases where exemption has already been granted:<\/span> Every statute prima facie is prospective therefore, 2002 Amendment to CST Act, held, will not affect accrued rights. Though after amendment of S. 8(5) of the CST Act, State Government&#8217;s right to grant exemption from tax has ceased to exist however, amendment being prospective, would not apply to cases where an absolute exemption has already been granted, [<i>State of Maharashtra<\/i> v. <i>Prism Cement Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656421\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 300<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523683\" target=\"_blank\">100<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523743\" target=\"_blank\">151<\/a>, Or. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523498\" target=\"_blank\">41 R. 5<\/a> and Or. 39 &#8212; Second appeal &#8212; Framing of substantial question of law:<\/span> Interim order or stay, in second appeal without first framing substantial question of law, not permissible, [<i>U. Sudheera<\/i> v. <i>C. Yashoda<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656414\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 215<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726954\" target=\"_blank\">Contract Act, 1872<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001527490\" target=\"_blank\">74<\/a>:<\/span> Forfeiture clause in an allotment agreement providing of forfeiture of earnest money in case of cancellation, when is not valid, principles reiterated, [<i>Godrej Projects Development Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Anil Karlekar<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656418\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 259<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Contract and Specific Relief &#8212; Contractual Obligations and Rights &#8212; Price\/Escalation Clauses &#8212; Claim for damages by contractor-claimant on account of delay on part of employer &#8212; Rejection of:<\/span> Plea against validity of contract clause prohibiting claim for damages\/compensation for failure or delay caused by the employer in fulfilling its obligations, as in the present case Clause 49.5 of the General Conditions of Contract (GCC), by contractor-claimant itself during the currency of contract, for seeking extension of time in view of Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001527397\" target=\"_blank\">23<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001527439\" target=\"_blank\">28<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726954\" target=\"_blank\">Contract Act<\/a> is not entertainable, when such plea not raised before Tribunal\/Courts below, [<i>C &amp; C Constructions Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>IRCON International Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656416\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 234<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519740\" target=\"_blank\">439<\/a> &#8212; Grant of bail:<\/span> A superficial application of bail parameters not only undermines the gravity of the offence itself but also risks weakening public faith in the judiciary&#8217;s resolve to combat the menace of dowry deaths. Duty of Court as well as relevant consideration, while granting bail in such serious matters, stated, [<i>Shabeen Ahmad<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656410\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 172<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516849\" target=\"_blank\">9<\/a> &#8212; Test identification parade &#8212; Evidentiary value and purpose:<\/span> A test identification parade, held, not substantive evidence but only corroborative evidence. Purpose of holding a TIP during the stage of investigation, held, firstly, to ensure that the investigating agency is proceeding in the right direction where the accused is unknown. Secondly, purpose, held, to serve as a corroborative piece of evidence when the witness identifies the accused during trial, [<i>Vinod<\/i> v. <i>State of Chhattisgarh<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656422\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 312<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561614\" target=\"_blank\">307<\/a> &#8212; Sentence &#8212; Quantum of, if life sentence is avoided and powers of appellate court:<\/span> As per S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561614\" target=\"_blank\">307<\/a>, of threshold term of imprisonment, of life sentence, is avoided, held, can only be 10 yrs and not more, [<i>Ganesan<\/i> v. <i>State of T.N.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656415\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 231<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\">366-A<\/a> &#8212; Acquittal:<\/span> Acquittal granted on the ground of consent of victim and she being not proved less than 18 yrs, [<i>Akula Raghuram<\/i> v. <i>State of A.P.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656413\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 209<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\">201<\/a> &#8212; Acquittal:<\/span> Reversal of acquittal by High Court by upholding admissibility of extra-judicial confession made before the Village Police Patil, not justified, [<i>Sadashiv Dhondiram Patil<\/i> v. <i>State of Maharashtra<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656419\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 275<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\">376<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561912\" target=\"_blank\">90<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561717\" target=\"_blank\">384<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561858\" target=\"_blank\">504<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\">506<\/a> r\/w S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561621\" target=\"_blank\">313<\/a> &#8212; Quashing of proceedings &#8212; Plea as to vitiation of consent under misconception of fact:<\/span> Continued sexual relationship for 16 yrs indicated absence of proof as to forcible intercourse and false promise of marriage, relationship between the complainant and appellant, held, consensual without the existence of any element of deceit or misconception, [<i>Rajnish Singh<\/i> v. <i>State of U.P.<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656412\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 197<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold; Bookman Old Style&quot;;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act, 1989<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543255\" target=\"_blank\">143<\/a> &#8212; Online fraud &#8212; Invocation of S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543255\" target=\"_blank\">143<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act, 1989<\/a> in case of illegal sale of e-tickets:<\/span><span style=\"Times New Roman&quot;;\"><\/span> <span style=\"Bookman Old Style&quot;;\">S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543255\" target=\"_blank\">143<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act, 1989<\/a> can be invoked against unauthorised procurement and supply of railway tickets, irrespective of mode of procurement and supply, [<i>Union of India<\/i> v. <i>Mathew K. Cherian<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656417\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 245<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002835343\" target=\"_blank\">Succession Act, 1925<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555650\" target=\"_blank\">63<\/a> &#8212; Will &#8212; Proof of its execution and its genuineness &#8212; Onus of proof on propounder:<\/span> If objection raised on genuineness of will by pointing out suspicious circumstances, propounder has to remove them. Propounder has to establish that testator had signed the will in a sound disposing state of mind and understanding nature and effect of disposition, [<i>Leela<\/i> v. <i>Muruganantham<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656420\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 289<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002881543\" target=\"_blank\">U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947<\/a> (26 of 1947) &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001676913\" target=\"_blank\">12-C(1)<\/a> &#8212; Re-counting of votes &#8212; Order for &#8212; Validity:<\/span> When three out of four candidates questioning veracity of elections and important documents about election are missing and such absence is unexplained, order of re-counting of votes, held, not illegal, [<i>Vijay Bahadur<\/i> v. <i>Sunil Kumar<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002656411\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 4 SCC 180<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 &#8212; S. 8(5) (after 2002 Amendment) and S. 8(4) &#8212; Applicability of S. 8(5) after amendment to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":348171,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[82181,9292,82184,82182,82183,54303],"class_list":["post-348163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-central-sales-tax-act-1956","tag-contract-act","tag-contract-relief","tag-cst-act","tag-escalation-clause","tag-specific-relief"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 \u2014 S. 8(5) (after 2002 Amendment) and S. 8(4) \u2014 Applicability of S. 8(5) after amendment to cases where exemption\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 \u2014 S. 8(5) (after 2002 Amendment) and S. 8(4) \u2014 Applicability of S. 8(5) after amendment to cases where exemption\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-17T11:00:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-17T11:00:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 \u2014 S. 8(5) (after 2002 Amendment) and S. 8(4) \u2014 Applicability of S. 8(5) after amendment to cases where exemption\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2 | SCC Times","description":"Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 \u2014 S. 8(5) (after 2002 Amendment) and S. 8(4) \u2014 Applicability of S. 8(5) after amendment to cases where exemption","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2","og_description":"Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 \u2014 S. 8(5) (after 2002 Amendment) and S. 8(4) \u2014 Applicability of S. 8(5) after amendment to cases where exemption","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-17T11:00:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/","name":"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-17T11:00:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 \u2014 S. 8(5) (after 2002 Amendment) and S. 8(4) \u2014 Applicability of S. 8(5) after amendment to cases where exemption","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/2025-scc-vol-4-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2025 SCC Vol. 4 Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/2025-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-2.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292483,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/small-scale-industries-not-entitled-to-exemption-from-sales-tax-for-tea-blending-after-amendment-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":348163,"position":0},"title":"Small-scale industries not exempted from sales tax for tea blending after amendment, holds SC; delivers split verdict doctrine of legitimate expectation aspect","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen a legitimate expectation of a specific outcome is created by a public authority, the said public authority is required to take into account such expectation created by it when making a decision that affects the interests of the individual or group\u201d -Justice Krishna Murari","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sales tax for tea blending","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/sales-tax-for-tea-blending.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/sales-tax-for-tea-blending.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/sales-tax-for-tea-blending.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/sales-tax-for-tea-blending.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":191784,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/22\/amendment-foreign-trade-exemption-application-rules-certain-cases-amendment-order-2017\/","url_meta":{"origin":348163,"position":1},"title":"Amendment in Foreign Trade (Exemption from application of Rules in certain cases) Amendment Order, 2017 notified","author":"Saba","date":"February 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"S.O. (E): In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3, read with Section 4, of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, as amended from time to time, the Central Government hereby deletes the following Rule provisions of the Foreign Trade (Exemption from application of Rules in certain\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Foreign Legislation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Legislation","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/foreign\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":132651,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/22\/catering-services-provided-by-railway-are-not-exempted-from-imposition-of-sales-tax-by-state-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":348163,"position":2},"title":"Catering Services provided by Railway are not exempted from imposition of Sales Tax by State Government","author":"Saba","date":"May 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Bench comprising of S.C. Dharmadhikari and Prakash D. Naik, JJ. dismissed a writ petition in favour of the respondent State Government and against the petitioner Union Government. The petitioner challenged an amendment by the State legislature which seeks to levy tax on the catering service provided\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258413,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/13\/cbdt-notifies-conditions-for-exemption-of-income-accrued-by-non-resident-as-a-result-of-transfer-of-non-deliverable-forward-contracts-vide-income-tax-33rd-amendment-rules-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":348163,"position":3},"title":"CBDT notifies conditions for exemption of income accrued by non-resident as a result of transfer of non-deliverable forward contracts vide Income-tax (33rd Amendment) Rules, 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Board of Direct taxes notified Income-tax (33rd Amendment) Rules, 2021 further to amend the Income-tax Rules,1962. \u00a0 Key features: In the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the following rule shall be inserted, namely:\u2014 \u201c21AK. Conditions for the purpose of clause (4E) of section 10: (1) The income accrued or arisen\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-159.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/","url_meta":{"origin":348163,"position":4},"title":"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"April 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar CJ and B.P. Routray, J. allowed the petition and held that the Tribunal was incorrect in holding that the freight shown in the sale bill separately is part of the sale price. It is held that the Petitioner is entitled to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":327895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/02\/experts-corner-taxability-of-ena-closing-the-chapter-or-opening-new-frontier\/","url_meta":{"origin":348163,"position":5},"title":"Taxability of ENA: Closing the Chapter or Opening a New Frontier?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shivam Mehta\u2020, Tanya Garg \u2020\u2020 and Srijita Chakraborty\u2020\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Taxability of ENA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Taxability-of-ENA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Taxability-of-ENA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Taxability-of-ENA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Taxability-of-ENA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=348163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348163\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/348171"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=348163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=348163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=348163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}