{"id":348100,"date":"2025-05-17T11:00:20","date_gmt":"2025-05-17T05:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=348100"},"modified":"2025-05-19T17:51:03","modified_gmt":"2025-05-19T12:21:03","slug":"claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> In a civil appeal against Delhi High Court’s decision, whereby, while appointing an Arbitral Tribunal in exercise of power under Section 11<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (the Act), the High Court excluded certain claims holding them to be non-arbitrable, the Division Bench of PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra*<\/span>, JJ. allowed the appeals and set aside the order of the High Court to the extent it excluded the part of claims of the impugned order. The parties were given the liberty to take the plea of non-arbitrability of certain claims before the arbitral tribunal, which shall decide the same without being prejudiced by any observations made in the order of the High Court.<\/p>\n

The appellant’s case was that while exercising power under Section 11<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, the Court has to only examine whether the arbitration agreement exists or not and if it exists, an Arbitrator is to be appointed who, thereafter, would decide whether the claims fall within the excepted category or not. The respondent’s submission was that the High Court is empowered to exclude non-arbitrable claims in light of Emaar India Limited<\/span> v. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP<\/span>, (2023) 13 SCC 661<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Issue<\/h3>\n

Whether while exercising power under Section 11<\/a> of the Act<\/a>, the Court has to confine its consideration as to the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties. If so, whether it would be permissible, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11, to hold that some of the claims raised are non-arbitrable.<\/p>\n

Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court pointed out that Sub-section (6A) of Section 11, which was inserted by Act 3 of 2016, with effect from 23-10-2015 made it clear that while considering an application under sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6), the Supreme Court or the High Court, shall, notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any Court, confine to the examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement.<\/p>\n

The Court also considered that the 2019 Amendment omitted sub-section (6A) but since the amending Act has not been notified thus far, sub-section (6A) of Section 11 of the 1996 Act remains intact.<\/p>\n

Further, the Court added that the significance of the use of the expression “not other issues” in the statement of objects and reasons of the 2015 amendment was discussed by a seven-Judge bench in Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under Arbitration, 1996 & Stamp Act, 1899<\/a>, In re<\/span>, (2024) 6 SCC 1<\/a> , and said that it indicates that the Supreme Court or High Court at the stage of the appointment of an Arbitrator shall ‘examine the existence of prima facie arbitration agreement and not other issues<\/span>’.<\/span> Further, therein, it was added that the other issues not only pertained to the validity of the arbitration agreement but also include any other issues which are a consequence of unnecessary judicial interference in the arbitration proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Court also relied on SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/span> v. Krish Spinning<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754<\/a> , wherein, it was reiterated that the scope of enquiry at the stage of appointment of Arbitrator is limited to the scrutiny of prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement, and nothing else. Hence, considering the abovementioned larger Bench decisions, the Court dismissed respondent’s submission.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court viewed that the High Court erred in bisecting the claim of the appellant into two parts, one arbitrable and the other non- arbitrable, when it found arbitration agreement to be there for settlement of disputes between the parties. The Court stated that the correct course for the High Court was to leave it open to the party to raise the issue of non-arbitrability of certain claims before the arbitral tribunal, which, if raised, could be considered and decided by it.<\/p>\n

[Office for Alternative Architecture v. Ircon Infrastructure and Services Ltd., 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1098<\/a>, decided on: 13-05-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment Authored by: Justice Manoj Misra<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The High Court erred in bisecting the claim of the appellant into two parts, one arbitrable and the other non- arbitrable, when it found arbitration agreement to be there for settlement of disputes between the parties.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":348103,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[10131,55018,57325,82150,44635,82149,5363],"class_list":["post-348100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-justice-manoj-misra","tag-justice-pamidighantam-sri-narasimha","tag-non-arbitrable","tag-sc","tag-section-11-of-ac-act","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nClaims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage: Supreme Court<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-17T05:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-19T12:21:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/\",\"name\":\"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage: Supreme Court\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-17T05:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-19T12:21:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Supreme court Non-Arbitrable claims\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage: Supreme Court","description":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court","og_description":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-17T05:30:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-19T12:21:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/","name":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage: Supreme Court","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-17T05:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-19T12:21:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at arbitrator appointment stage under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Supreme court Non-Arbitrable claims"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/17\/claims-cannot-be-bisected-into-arbitrable-and-non-arbitrable-at-arbitrator-appointment-stage-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Claims can\u2019t be bisected into arbitrable and non-arbitrable at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of A&C Act: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Supreme-court-Non-Arbitrable-claims.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":290615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/26\/supreme-court-explains-pre-referral-jurisdiction-of-high-court-under-s-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":348100,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on scope of Pre-referral jurisdiction of High Court under S. 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The limited scope of judicial scrutiny at the pre-referral stage is navigated through the test of a \u2018prima facie review\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"pre-reference jurisdiction of high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/pre-reference-jurisdiction-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/pre-reference-jurisdiction-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/pre-reference-jurisdiction-of-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/pre-reference-jurisdiction-of-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206752,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/amended-section-8-of-ac-act-does-not-inundate-entire-regime-of-special-legislation-in-non-arbitrable-casessc\/","url_meta":{"origin":348100,"position":1},"title":"Amended Section 8 of A&C Act does not inundate entire regime of special legislation in non-arbitrable cases: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 13, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Ashok Bhushan, JJ. dismissed a review petition filed against Supreme Court's judgment dated 13-02-2018 [Emaar MGF Ltd. v. Aftab Singh, 2018 SCC OnLine SC 2378 (order)] whereby the appeals filed by review petitioners were dismissed. The appeals were filed challenging the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240654,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/14\/landlord-tenant-disputes-under-transfer-of-property-act-are-arbitrable-sc-lays-down-test-for-determining-non-arbitrability-of-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":348100,"position":2},"title":"‘Landlord-tenant disputes under Transfer of Property Act are arbitrable’. SC lays down test for determining non-arbitrability of disputes","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of NV Ramana*, Sanjiv Khanna** and Krishna Murari, JJ has overruled the ratio in Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia, (2017) 10 SCC 706 wherein it was held that landlord-tenant disputes governed by the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, are not arbitrable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/preliminary-inquiry-under-section-11-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":348100,"position":3},"title":"Preliminary Inquiry under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ayushi Raghuwanshi*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337273,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/14\/disputes-relating-to-non-payment-of-wages-termination-order-non-arbitrable-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":348100,"position":4},"title":"Disputes relating to non-payment of wages & termination order within Industrial Tribunal\u2019s jurisdiction; SC quashes arbitrator\u2019s appointment","author":"Editor","date":"December 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cJurisdiction of the Industrial Court is also to the exclusion of the civil courts and is not arbitrable.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Disputes on wage payment and termination order","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/shared-image-22.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/shared-image-22.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/shared-image-22.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/shared-image-22.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/17\/a-dispute-cannot-be-referred-for-arbitration-on-account-of-fraud\/","url_meta":{"origin":348100,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC rejects argument that a dispute cannot be referred for arbitration on account of fraud: Read why","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: B.P. Colabawalla, J., addressed an arbitration application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Instant application was filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=348100"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348100\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/348103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=348100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=348100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=348100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}