{"id":347973,"date":"2025-05-15T18:30:11","date_gmt":"2025-05-15T13:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=347973"},"modified":"2025-05-22T09:51:47","modified_gmt":"2025-05-22T04:21:47","slug":"cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work; Wife entitled to maintenance: Delhi HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a revision petition filed by the petitioner (&#8216;husband&#8217;), seeking to set aside the order dated 21-10-2023, passed by the Family Judge, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi (&#8216;Family Court&#8217;), <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.*<\/span>, stated that it is well settled that the responsibility of caregiving to a minor child fell disproportionately upon the parent with custody, often limiting their ability to pursue full-time employment, especially in cases where there was no family support to take care of the child. In such circumstances, the cessation of employment by the respondent (&#8216;wife&#8217;) could not be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work but consequently necessitated by the paramount duty of childcare.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found no perversity or legal infirmity in the said assessment by the Family Court and further stated that, while awarding interim maintenance, the Family Court had rightly considered the needs of the child, and the standard of living to which the parties were accustomed.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 12-1-2016 and a child was born from wedlock, who was currently in the custody of the wife. The parties have been living separately since July 2017. The wife alleged that she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by the husband, who was a practicing advocate. The wife was earlier employed as a guest teacher with the Delhi Government but became unemployed upon the termination of her contractual employment on 8-12-2022.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The wife filed a petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519355\" target=\"_blank\">125<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a>, seeking maintenance, and the Family Court, had vide impugned order, directed the husband to pay a monthly interim maintenance of Rs. 7,500 each to the six-year-old child and to the wife. However, since the wife was admittedly earning a notional income equivalent to the husband until December 2022 and was equally responsible for the child&#8217;s upkeep, no maintenance was awarded for the period prior to January 2023. Thus, the husband was made liable to pay arrears from January 2023 onwards until further orders.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The husband contended that since the wife was capable of earning, she was not entitled for maintenance. He further contended that he was already struggling financially and emotionally and was in no position to comply with the maintenance order. Hence, the impugned order deserved to be set aside.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the wife was employed as a TGT, earning approximately Rs. 30,000 per month until 2022. However, she was compelled to resign from her position due to the demands of single-handedly raising the minor child, coupled with the burden of long commuting hours. These circumstances, as reflected in the pleadings and submissions, reasonably explained her discontinuation from employment. It was undisputed that the wife was presently unemployed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that in the present case, it was not in dispute that the parties were residing separately, and the wife was taking care of the minor child as a single parent. Further, the Court observed that the wife was previously employed as a guest teacher. However, owing to the compelling responsibilities of single-handedly raising the child and the considerable distance of her workplace, she had to discontinue her employment. The Court found the explanation both reasonable and justified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it is well settled that the responsibility of caregiving to a minor child fell disproportionately upon the parent with custody, often limiting their ability to pursue full-time employment, especially in cases where there was no family support also to take care of the child while the mother was at work. In such circumstances, the cessation of employment by the wife could not be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it was not the potential earning capacity of the wife but her actual income at the relevant time that has to be considered while determining the amount of maintenance. Thus, the Family Court had rightly observed that there exists a material distinction between being &#8216;capable of earning&#8217; and &#8216;actually earning&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the Family Court had rightly held that for the period during which the wife was employed, she was not entitled to maintenance. However, for the period thereafter, when it was prima facie evident that she remained unemployed due to her role as the primary caregiver for the minor child, the notional income of the husband was appropriately assessed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that, while awarding interim maintenance, the Family Court had rightly considered the needs of the child, and the standard of living to which the parties were accustomed. The Court stated that it found no perversity or legal infirmity in the said assessment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, considering that the income affidavit filed by the husband was not taken into consideration, the Court remanded the matter back to the Family Court. The Court stated that the Family Court should reconsider the application for interim maintenance afresh, specifically considering the income affidavits and bank statements filed by both parties and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. The said exercise should be completed within one month of the date of receipt of this order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Meanwhile, as an interim arrangement, the husband should continue to pay Rs. 7,500 per month to the wife and Rs. 4,500 per month to a minor child, which should be without prejudice to the final determination by the Family Court, and any amount paid should remain adjustable in future maintenance. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the present petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. Y, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0G6184St\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 3258<\/a>, decided on 13-5-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Mayank Maini, Anmol Chadha, Biman Sethi, Aryan Sharma and Ankit Verma, Advocates<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The wife was previously employed as a guest teacher. However, owing to the compelling responsibilities of single-handedly raising the child coupled with the burden of long commuting hours, she had to discontinue her employment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[82099,49853,2543,82097,8591,68485,52816,82100,82098],"class_list":["post-347973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cessation-of-employment","tag-criminal-procedure-code-1973","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-duty-to-raise-child","tag-interim-maintenance","tag-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma","tag-section-125-of-crpc","tag-single-mother","tag-voluntary-abandonment-of-work"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Cessation of employment by wife to raise child not voluntary abandonment of work: DHC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stated that Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work and she is entitled to maintenance.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work; Wife entitled to maintenance: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stated that Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work and she is entitled to maintenance.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-15T13:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-22T04:21:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work; Wife entitled to maintenance: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/\",\"name\":\"Cessation of employment by wife to raise child not voluntary abandonment of work: DHC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-15T13:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-22T04:21:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court stated that Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work and she is entitled to maintenance.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work; Wife entitled to maintenance: Delhi HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cessation of employment by wife to raise child not voluntary abandonment of work: DHC | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court stated that Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work and she is entitled to maintenance.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work; Wife entitled to maintenance: Delhi HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court stated that Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work and she is entitled to maintenance.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-15T13:00:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-22T04:21:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work; Wife entitled to maintenance: Delhi HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/","name":"Cessation of employment by wife to raise child not voluntary abandonment of work: DHC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-15T13:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-22T04:21:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court stated that Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work and she is entitled to maintenance.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/15\/cessation-of-employment-by-wife-to-raise-child-not-voluntary-abandonment-of-work-entitled-to-maintenance-dhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cessation of employment by wife to raise her child cannot be viewed as voluntary abandonment of work; Wife entitled to maintenance: Delhi HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264242,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/24\/appointment-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":347973,"position":0},"title":"Two New Judges appointed to Delhi High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"President appoints (i) Smt. Poonam A. Bamba and (ii) Ms. Swarana Kanta Sharma, to be Judges of the Delhi High Court, in that order of seniority, with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices. Ministry of Law and Justice [Notification dt. 24-3-2022]","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/delhi-hc-custody-of-one-child-doesnt-dilute-maintenance-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":347973,"position":1},"title":"Custody of one child does not dilute husband&#8217;s duty to maintain wife and other child living with her: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"January 17, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAt the stage of consideration of interim maintenance, this Court is neither expected nor required to embark upon a detailed inquiry or conduct a mini trial to resolve such disputes conclusively.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Custody of One Child","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Custody-of-One-Child.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Custody-of-One-Child.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Custody-of-One-Child.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Custody-of-One-Child.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376763,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/25\/law-must-acknowledge-homemaker-unpaid-contribution-del-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":347973,"position":2},"title":"A homemaker doesn&#8217;t &#8216;sit idle&#8217;; Law must acknowledge economic value of her unpaid contribution: Delhi HC grants interim maintenance to wife","author":"Ritu","date":"February 25, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe capacity to earn and actual earning are distinct concepts, and as per settled law, mere capacity to earn cannot be a ground to deny maintenance. The real test is whether the wife is actually earning.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"homemaker unpaid contribution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/homemaker-unpaid-contribution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/homemaker-unpaid-contribution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/homemaker-unpaid-contribution.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/homemaker-unpaid-contribution.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/supreme-court-collegium-approves-proposal-for-elevation-of-6-judicial-officers-as-judges-in-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":347973,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium approves proposal for elevation of 6 Judicial Officers as Judges in Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for the elevation of the following Judicial Officers as Judges in the Delhi High Court: 1. Ms. Poonam A. Bamba, 2. Ms. Neena Bansal Krishna, 3. Shri Dinesh Kumar Sharma, 4. Shri Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, 5. Ms. Swarana Kanta Sharma, and 6. Shri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271377,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/delhi-high-court-takes-suo-motu-cognizance-on-a-bail-application-facilitating-admission-of-an-8-year-old-child-whose-parents-are-in-judicial-custody\/","url_meta":{"origin":347973,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court takes suo motu cognizance on a bail application facilitating admission of an 8-year-old child whose parents are in judicial custody","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"It is not only in cases dealing with family disputes that the rights and welfare of the child should be considered but also in the cases as the present one, the courts can become and act as the parent of the child and ensure that the child is not deprived\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/del-hc-father-duty-maintenance-minor-children-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":347973,"position":5},"title":"Working mothers can\u2019t be compelled exhaust themselves while fathers evade responsibility of their Children: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMaintenance of children is not confined to bare subsistence; it encompasses their overall upbringing, education, health, and standard of living, consistent with the means and status of the parents.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Father has Duty to provide Maintenance","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Father-has-Duty-to-provide-Maintenance.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Father-has-Duty-to-provide-Maintenance.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Father-has-Duty-to-provide-Maintenance.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Father-has-Duty-to-provide-Maintenance.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=347973"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347973\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=347973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=347973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=347973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}