{"id":347697,"date":"2025-05-13T19:00:54","date_gmt":"2025-05-13T13:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=347697"},"modified":"2025-05-13T18:58:26","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T13:28:26","slug":"hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> In a civil appeal against Bombay High Court’s decision dismissing the suit while considering an application for an injunction, the Division Bench of PS Narasimha and Joymala Bagchi, JJ. allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned decision and restored the appellants’ suit filed before the Bombay City Civil Court holding that while considering an appeal against the order of the Trial Court refusing to grant an injunction pending the disposal of the suit, the High Court cannot dismiss the substantive portion of the suit itself and direct that the remaining part of the suit be agitated in a suit filed by the defendant.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The three brothers were the co-tenants of the suit property. The present appellants and respondents are descendants of the brothers. The appellants’ case was that by a notarised affidavit respondent no. 1’s predecessor transferred his rights in the tenanted premises to appellants’ predecessor, their predecessor-in-interest. Subsequently, after the death of the respondent’s predecessor, his widow signed a declaration relinquishing her rights in the suit property in favour of the appellant.<\/p>\n

Relying on the same, the plaintiff-appellants filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction, in which their prayer for interim relief of temporary injunction was dismissed by the Trial Court. In appeal against this order, the High Court by the order impugned herein virtually dismissed the suit. The respondent had also instituted his own suit before the High Court against the appellants for recovery of possession, permanent injunction, and mesne profits with respect to the same property.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court noted that the High Court after recording of the admission or a concession by respondent 1, came to an extraordinary conclusion that certain prayers in the suit have therefore become infructuous. Further, the Court took note of the High Court’s conclusion that the agreements, relied on by the appellants for a declaratory relief, could not be taken on record as they were unregistered and an order or decree could not be granted in appellants’ favour in view of Section 49<\/a> of the Registration Act, 1908<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Criticising the said stand taken by the Court, the Court said that there was no occasion for the High Court to consider the two agreements while deciding an application for interim relief. The legality, validity, and admissibility of those documents were matters to be considered in the suit during trial. Regarding the part that the High Court reversed the finding of the Trial Court and granted injunction, the Court upheld the same in view of the statement or concession of respondent no.1\/defendant no. 1. However, the High Court dismissed prayers in the appellants’ suit and then proceeded to direct that the other prayers in the suit filed by the appellants, namely prayers should be considered in the suit filed by respondent no. 1\/defendant no. 1 for recovery of possession.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that, in an appeal to the High Court against the order of the Trial Court refusing to grant injunction pending disposal of the suit, the High Court could not have dismissed the substantive portion of the suit itself and direct that the remaining part of the suit be agitated in a suit filed by the defendant. The Court found the High Court’s approach to be completely illegal and unsustainable in law.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n
\n

Citation:<\/span>
2025 SCC OnLine SC 1068<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Appellants :<\/span>
Mahendra Magruram Gupta<\/p>\n

Respondents :<\/span>
Rajdai Shaw<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s):<\/span>
Mr. Amol Chitale, Adv., Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Adv., Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span>
Mr. Satyajit A Desai, Adv., Mr. Amit K. Pathak, Adv., Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv., Mr. Sachin Singh, Adv., Mr. Ananya Thapliyal, Adv., Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR, Mr. Siddhant Singh, Adv., Mr. Pratik Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

CORAM :<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"PS
PS Narasimha, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"Joymala
Joymala Bagchi, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court was considering an appeal appeal against an order of the High Court dismissing the suit while considering an application for an injunction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":347708,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[24894,14321,60880,57325,5363],"class_list":["post-347697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-dismissal-of-suit","tag-interim-injunction","tag-justice-joymalya-bagchi","tag-justice-pamidighantam-sri-narasimha","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nHC cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-13T13:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/\",\"name\":\"HC cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-13T13:30:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Dismissal of suit\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HC cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC","description":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court","og_description":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-13T13:30:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/","name":"HC cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-13T13:30:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: SC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Dismissal of suit"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":274438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/26\/plaintiff-cannot-get-relief-by-clever-drafting-substantive-relief-permanent-injunction-unregistered-document-supreme-court-legal-researchupdates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":347697,"position":0},"title":"Clever drafting cannot result into Plaintiff getting relief indirectly which otherwise cannot be given: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where a plaintiff had sought for permanent injunction without applying for the substantive relief of specific performance of the unregistered agreement to sell, the bench of MR Shah* and Krishna Murari, JJ has held that the plaintiff cannot get the relief by clever drafting. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/05\/permanent-injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-sc-reverses-three-concurrent-findings\/","url_meta":{"origin":347697,"position":1},"title":"Permanent Injunction can’t be granted against true owner once the title dispute is settled; SC reverses three concurrent findings\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Reversing the concurrent findings of all the Court below in a case where the plaintiff was granted the relief of permanent injunction despite having lost the title, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the plaintiff is not entitled to a relief of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Permanent-Injunction-cant-be-granted-against-true-owner-once-the-title-dispute-is-settled-Supreme-Court-reverses-three-concurrent-findings.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291137,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/03\/subramanian-swamy-defamation-case-madras-hc-gives-heads-up-to-singapore-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":347697,"position":2},"title":"Foreign company, even though fully owned by Indian Company is not amenable to jurisdiction of Indian Court: Madras High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court allowed Advantage Strategic Consulting Singapore Private Limited, a foreign company to proceed with the defamation case against renowned politician and economist Dr. Subramanian Swamy","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268855,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/22\/bombay-high-court-directs-removal-of-infringing-links-of-film-janhit-mein-jaari-ad-interim-injunction-granted-in-favour-of-bhanushali-studios-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":347697,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court directs removal of infringing links of film ‘Janhit mein Jaari’ from online platforms; Ad-interim injunction granted in favour of Bhanushali Studios Ltd","author":"Editor","date":"June 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: RI Chagla J. granted an ad-interim injunction in favour of the producers of the film \u201cJanhit Mein Jaari\u201d and directed the defendants to remove infringing links with immediate effect. The Applicants\/Plaintiffs are producers of the cinematography film titled \u201cJanhit Mein Jaari which was released worldwide and in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/delhi-hc-power-transfer-proceedings-between-high-courts-is-exclusively-vested-in-the-sc-u-s25-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":347697,"position":4},"title":"Power to transfer proceedings between High Courts u\/s 25 of CPC is exclusively vested in Supreme Court: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Delhi High Court cannot exercise power to transfer proceedings between two separate High Courts as the said power of transfer between two High Courts, can be exercised in terms of Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, by only the Supreme Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/22\/unstamped-and-unregistered-but-still-permitted-as-proof-for-oral-agreement-of-sale-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":347697,"position":5},"title":"Unregistered document affecting immovable property can be an admissible evidence of contract in a suit for specific performance: Supreme Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In S. Kaladevi v. V.R. Somasundaram, (2010) 5 SCC 401, the Supreme Court had held that an unregistered document may be received as evidence of a contract in a suit seeking specific performance.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unregistered document","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/unregistered-document.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/unregistered-document.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/unregistered-document.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/unregistered-document.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=347697"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347697\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/347708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=347697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=347697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=347697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}