{"id":347685,"date":"2025-05-13T17:30:38","date_gmt":"2025-05-13T12:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=347685"},"modified":"2025-05-14T17:57:24","modified_gmt":"2025-05-14T12:27:24","slug":"14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose acquittal was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant appeal challenging reversal of acquittal in a murder case, the Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">K. Vinod Chandran*<\/span>, JJ., noted that the Karnataka High Court in the instant matter, had reversed the accused&#8217;s acquittal on mere surmises and conjectures relying wholly on the testimony of the Investigating Officers, who merely repeated the statements recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519397\" target=\"_blank\">161<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> and the voluntary statements of the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that it <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">understood the consternation of the High Court Judges examining a cold-blooded murder where the elaborate investigation collapsed during the trial<\/span> and majority of the witnesses turned hostile. However, that was no reason to rely on Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> statements, or the story scripted by the investigating agency based on the so-called voluntary statements and the recoveries made, which the prosecution failed to prove to have a nexus with the crime.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court emphatically observed that, &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">We can only accede to and share the consternation of the Division Bench of the High Court, which borders on desperation, due to the futility of the entire exercise. That is an occupational hazard, every judge should learn to live with, which cannot be a motivation to tread the path of righteousness and convict those accused somehow, even when there is a total absence of legal evidence; to enter into a purely moral conviction, total anathema to criminal jurisprudence<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Prevaricating witnesses, turning hostile in Court and overzealous investigations, done in total ignorance of basic tenets of criminal law, often reduces prosecution to a mockery. Witnesses mount the box to disown prior statements, deny recoveries made, feign ignorance of aggravating circumstances spoken of during investigation and eyewitnesses turn blind&#8221;.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant case a brutal murder took place in 2011 whereby the deceased was hacked to death in front of his own son. The prosecution alleged that the reason behind the deceased&#8217;s murder differences arising from sharing of assets between the parties involved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As the case reached the Trial Court, 87 witnesses were led in trial to speak about the homicide, the motive, the meeting of minds leading to the conspiracy, the preparation, what transpired after the incident and the arrest, recovery, chemical analysis and so on and so forth; however, it was all in vain as 71 out of 87 witnesses, including the relevant witnesses and the deceased&#8217;s son, turned hostile. The prosecution was thus left to stand on the testimony of the police and official witnesses. Consequently, the Trial Court acquitted the accused persons finding no support for the prosecution case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Division Bench of the High Court reversed the acquittal and convicted accused persons A1 to A6 under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\">120-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a>; and affirmed the acquittal of A7 by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the appeal, the Court had to examine whether the High Court followed scrupulously the principles laid down in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6Ajm4lcd\" target=\"_blank\">(2007) 4 SCC 415<\/a>, in setting aside the order of acquittal. Whether, while exercising the full power conferred in an appeal to review, the High Court was able to reappreciate and consider the evidence led in the case; and whether, the Trial Court had been absolutely unreasonable in taking a view that there was insufficient evidence to bring home a conviction in the case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Examining the statements made by the witnesses presented by the prosecution to prove the motive, conspiracy and incidental circumstances, leading eventually to the murder of the deceased, the Court pointed out that most of the witnesses had turned hostile. The Court further noted that even though, Appellate Court had accepted that all these witnesses turned hostile, it looked at the story projected by the prosecution as spoken of in the Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> statements of the witnesses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the motive, conspiracy, preparation made before, and what transpired after the crime, as projected by the prosecution remained a mere scripted story as discernible from the Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> statements; and was not established in the trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was pointed out that the High Court having found that all the witnesses except the official witnesses turned hostile looked at the evidence of the official witnesses especially the Investigating Officers and the recoveries made in the course of investigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found that the High Court seriously erred in relying on the statements made by the witnesses under Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink>, as affirmed by the Investigating Officer, clearly in violation of Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"162\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">162<\/doclink>. The High Court had placed heavy reliance on the testimonies of PW&#8217;s <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"83\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">83<\/doclink>, <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"84\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">84<\/doclink> and <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"87\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">87<\/doclink>, the IOs, with the assertion that they were unshaken in cross-examination and reliance was placed on the affirmation of the statements made by the witnesses under Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink>, which the witnesses did not speak themselves in the box, at the trial. The Court observed that, even though <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">reliance was said to be placed on the testimony<\/span> of the IOs&#8217; this would in fact be a <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">reliance placed on Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> statements<\/span> as spoken of by the IOs, which was egregiously wrong.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Examining the statements of the witnesses as analysed by the High Court, the Court found that the prosecution had failed to establish motive behind the deceased&#8217;s murder. The statements made by the IOs regarding the motive, conspiracy and preparation, comes out as the prosecution story, as discernible from the Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> statements of various witnesses who were questioned by the police during investigation; which statements are wholly inadmissible under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519398\" target=\"_blank\">162<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Merely because the IOs spoke of such statements having been made by the witnesses during investigation, does not give them any credibility enabling acceptance, unless the witnesses themselves spoke of such motive or acts of commission<\/span> or omission or instances from which conspiracy could be inferred as the preparation, established beyond reasonable doubt. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The witnesses had turned hostile, for reasons best known to themselves. The only inference possible, on the witnesses turning hostile is that either they have been persuaded for reasons unknown or coerced into resiling from the statements made under Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> or that they had not made such statements before police officers&#8221;.<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Merely because the story came out of the mouth of the IO, it cannot be believed and a legal sanctity given to it, higher than that provided to Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> statements under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519398\" target=\"_blank\">162<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, there was no clear connection established of the recovered items with the accused and the crime; especially in this case, where the clothes were not recovered on the confession statement of A5 &amp; A6, who are alleged to have committed the crime. The identification said to have been made by A5 &amp; A6 at the time of recovery, to the police officers, again is not a confession made under Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"27\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">27<\/doclink> and would be hit by Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516766\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516767\" target=\"_blank\">26<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>. Perusing the recoveries made in the case, the Court pointed out that they were akin to a seizure, not one made on the information supplied or confession recorded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The High Court had laboured on Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516772\" target=\"_blank\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act<\/a> to hold that the confession of a co-accused can be used against the other accused. It was held, Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"30\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">30<\/doclink> would bring within its ambit even a Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"27\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">27<\/doclink> confession in addition to an extra-judicial confession or one made under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\" target=\"_blank\">164<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>; the last two of which was totally absent in the present case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court hence observed that the High Court in reversing the order of acquittal of the Trial Court proceeded on mere surmises and conjectures relying wholly on the testimony of the Investigating Officers, who merely regurgitated the statements recorded under Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> and the voluntary statements of the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Supreme Court however stated that it understood the consternation of the High Court Judges, in the cold-blooded murder of a person, carried out in front of his own son where the investigation though elaborate, it collapsed miserably at the trial, where the prosecution witnesses; all of them, turned hostile.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court pointed out that consternation of the Judges was no reason to rely on Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> statements of the IOs. The Supreme Court thus found that the prosecution completely failed to prove the allegations raised and charged against each of the accused, more by reason of all the witnesses paraded before Court, at the trial, having turned hostile for reasons unknown. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Whatever be the reason behind such hostility, it cannot result in a conviction, based on the testimony of the Investigating Officers<\/span> which was founded only on Section <doclink docname=\"\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"161\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">161<\/doclink> statements and voluntary statements of accused; the former being violative of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519398\" target=\"_blank\">162<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> and the latter in breach of Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516766\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516767\" target=\"_blank\">26<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act<\/a>. The High Court had egregiously erred in convicting the accused on the evidence led and has jumped into presumptions and assumptions based on the story scripted by the prosecution without any legal evidence being available.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court thus decided to acquit the accused and set aside the reversal of acquittal, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">with a heavy heart for the unsolved crime, but with absolutely no misgivings on the issue of lack of evidence, against the accused arrayed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Renuka Prasad v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mMt1rIGm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 1074<\/a>, decided on 9-5-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice K. Vinod Chandran<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant(s)<\/span> Dr. G. Sivabalamurugan, AOR Mr. Selvaraj Mahendran, Adv. Mr. C. Adhikesavan, Adv. Mr. P.V. Harikrishnan, Adv. Mr. C. Kavin Ananth, Adv. Mrs. Vaijayanthi Girish, AOR Mr. Girish Ananthamurthy, Adv.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s)<\/span> Mr. Aman Panwar, A.A.G. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Shrey Kuldeep Brahmbhatt, Adv.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">In this 14-year-old cold-blooded case, the deceased was hacked to death in front of his own son. During the trial, 71 out of 87 witnesses turned hostile including the relevant ones, thereby leading to the collapse of the prosecution case before Trial Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":347689,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[4561,81992,3468,81993,63363,70060,54817,2574],"class_list":["post-347685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-acquittal","tag-conjecture-and-surmises","tag-conviction","tag-hostile-witnesses","tag-investigating-officers","tag-justice-k-vinod-chandran","tag-murder-case","tag-testimony"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose conviction was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In this 14-year-old cold-blooded case, the deceased was hacked to death in front of his own son. During the trial, 71 out of 87 witnesses turned hostile including the relevant ones.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose acquittal was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In this 14-year-old cold-blooded case, the deceased was hacked to death in front of his own son. During the trial, 71 out of 87 witnesses turned hostile including the relevant ones.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-13T12:00:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-14T12:27:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose acquittal was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"SC acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose conviction was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-13T12:00:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-14T12:27:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"In this 14-year-old cold-blooded case, the deceased was hacked to death in front of his own son. During the trial, 71 out of 87 witnesses turned hostile including the relevant ones.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"14-year-old murder case acquittal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose acquittal was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose conviction was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers","description":"In this 14-year-old cold-blooded case, the deceased was hacked to death in front of his own son. During the trial, 71 out of 87 witnesses turned hostile including the relevant ones.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose acquittal was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers","og_description":"In this 14-year-old cold-blooded case, the deceased was hacked to death in front of his own son. During the trial, 71 out of 87 witnesses turned hostile including the relevant ones.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-13T12:00:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-14T12:27:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose acquittal was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/","name":"SC acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose conviction was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-13T12:00:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-14T12:27:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"In this 14-year-old cold-blooded case, the deceased was hacked to death in front of his own son. During the trial, 71 out of 87 witnesses turned hostile including the relevant ones.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"14-year-old murder case acquittal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/14-year-old-murder-case-accused-acquitted-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court acquits accused in 14-year-old murder case whose acquittal was reversed by HC relying on testimony of the Investigating Officers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/14-year-old-murder-case-acquittal.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/05\/findings-high-court-based-conjectures-surmises-supreme-court-acquits-murder-convicts\/","url_meta":{"origin":347685,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court acquits murder convicts; reverses High Court findings based on conjectures and surmises","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the elaborate exercise of the trial Judge has been washed away by the High Court in a totally cursory manner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"murder convicts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/murder-convicts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/supreme-court-karnataka-high-court-section-302-of-the-penal-code-section-378-crpc-conviction-acquittal-unlawful-assembly-murder-common-object-first-information-reports-rioting-trespass-wi\/","url_meta":{"origin":347685,"position":1},"title":"Reversing acquittal of only 2 out of 22 acquitted murder accused, despite glaring contradictions between witness testimonies, illogical; SC sets aside Karnataka HC verdict","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against the Karnataka High Court's reversal of acquittal of 2 out of the 22 accused acquitted by the Sessions Court in a murder case, the bench of V. Ramasubramanian*and Indira Banerjee, JJ has reversed the High Court's verdict observing that there were glaring\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/sc-upholds-acquittal-of-accused-for-rioting-and-murder-to-multiple-investigative-laches-and-flaws\/","url_meta":{"origin":347685,"position":2},"title":"SC upholds acquittal of accused for rioting and murder due to \u201cmultiple investigative laches and flaws\u201d","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana and M.M. Shantanagoudar, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the State of U.P. against the judgment of Allahabad High Court whereby it had reversed the decision the decision of trial court and acquitted the accused of charges under Sections 302 and 307\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/09\/sc-sets-aside-husband-conviction-under-section-302-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":347685,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Not enough material to upset Trial Court\u2019s acquittal order, especially when there was no evidence regarding death being result of homicide\u2019; SC sets aside husband\u2019s conviction under S. 302 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"April 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court unfortunately reversed the acquittal without anything other than a finding on alibi having not been proved and the accused not having offered any explanation regarding the death of the deceased, which occurred while they were living together.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Husband\u2019s acquittal under S. 302","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Husbands-acquittal-under-S.-302.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Husbands-acquittal-under-S.-302.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Husbands-acquittal-under-S.-302.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Husbands-acquittal-under-S.-302.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370099,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/17\/mp-hc-allows-appeal-against-one-liner-acquittal-by-appellate-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":347685,"position":4},"title":"&#8216;Merely passing one-line order without reasoning is not proper&#8217;; Madhya Pradesh HC allows appeal against one-liner acquittal by Appellate Court","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"December 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not expected from a Judicial Officer of the Appellate Court to pass such a short, cryptic and non-speaking order without going into the merits of the case, discussing the evidence, and testing the reasoning given by the Trial Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"one-liner acquittal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/one-liner-acquittal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/one-liner-acquittal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/one-liner-acquittal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/one-liner-acquittal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216566,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/06\/pak-sc-acquittal-in-a-criminal-case-carries-a-presumption-of-innocence-with-it-and-should-be-reversed-only-when-finding-blatantly-perverse\/","url_meta":{"origin":347685,"position":5},"title":"Pak SC | Acquittal in a criminal case, carries a presumption of innocence with it and should be reversed only when finding blatantly perverse","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Pakistan Supreme Court: A Full Bench of Manzoor Ahmad Malik, Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ. allowed the appeal by the accused against the order given by Lahore High Court and set aside his conviction and sentence. Appellant herein was tried alongside two persons Abdul Razzaq\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=347685"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347685\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/347689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=347685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=347685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=347685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}