{"id":347650,"date":"2025-05-13T14:00:46","date_gmt":"2025-05-13T08:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=347650"},"modified":"2025-05-16T09:36:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-16T04:06:00","slug":"dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a joint application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523254\" target=\"_blank\">23 Rule 3<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> filed on behalf of the plaintiff and Defendant 2 seeking a consent decree based on the terms of the Joint Settlement Agreement dated 8-4-2025, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Saurabh Banerjee, J.*<\/span>, perused the terms of the Agreement and found them to be lawful. Accordingly, the Court stated that the present suit was decreed in terms of the Joint Settlement Agreement arrived between the plaintiff and Defendant 2.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, Defendant 3 was the owner of the Instagram handle &#8220;@hustlewithhritik&#8221;, and was responsible for uploading the impugned reel titled &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Never Use Dettol in your Skin<\/span>&#8221; featuring the offending portion of the impugned podcast. As such it was observed by the Court vide order dated 8-4-2025 that, Defendant 3 vide e-mail dated 6-4-2025, had categorically stated that &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Delete kar di wo video okay (sic)<\/span>&#8221; or &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">That video has been deleted, okay<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, vide order dated 8-4-2025, restrained Defendant 3 from re-uploading the impugned reel or any other reel\/ video containing the offending portion of the impugned podcast on his Instagram handle and\/ or any social media\/ other platform available on the internet till the next date of hearing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, as per joint draft terms of settlement, vide order dated 8-4-2025, the Court directed all Meta Platforms, Inc. and YouTube LLC, to remove any and all reels\/ shorts\/ videos featuring the offending portion of the impugned podcast forthwith.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the plaintiff and Defendant 2 confirmed the terms of Joint Settlement Agreement dated 8-4-2025. The Court perused the terms of the Agreement and found them to be lawful. Accordingly, the Court stated that the present suit was decreed in terms of the Joint Settlement Agreement dated 8-4-2025 arrived between the plaintiff and Defendant 2. The plaintiff and the Defendant 2 should remain bound by the terms of Joint Settlement Agreement dated 8-4-2025. The Court further stated that the Joint Settlement Agreement should form a part of the decree sheet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter would next be listed on 10-7-2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Reckitt Benckiser India (P) Ltd. v. Manjot Marwah, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/i3p3t106\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 3019<\/a>, decided on 6-5-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Order by Justice Saurabh Banerjee<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Plaintiff:<\/span> Nancy Roy and Nida, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Defendants:<\/span> Satvik Varma, Senior Advocate with Nakul Gandhi, Mujeeb, Tanish Gupta and Shantanu, Advocates; Varun Pathak, Amee Rana, Dhruv Bhatnagar and Ananya Gogoi, Advocates; Vihan Dang, Ujjawal Bhargava, Aditya Mathur and Anuparna Chatterjee, Advocates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">In the present case, a social media influencer-Defendant 3, was the owner of Instagram handle &#8220;@hustlewithhritik&#8221;, and uploaded the reel titled &#8220;Never Use Dettol in your Skin&#8221; featuring the offending portion of the impugned podcast.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,81966,37489,81968,68814,81969,81967,42129],"class_list":["post-347650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-dettol-controversy","tag-instagram","tag-joint-settlement-agreement","tag-justice-saurabh-banerjee","tag-podcast","tag-social-media-influencer","tag-social-media-platform"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DHC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer in Dettol controversy case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court decreed suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court decreed suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-13T08:30:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-16T04:06:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/\",\"name\":\"DHC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer in Dettol controversy case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-13T08:30:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-16T04:06:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court decreed suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DHC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer in Dettol controversy case | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court decreed suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case","og_description":"Delhi High Court decreed suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-13T08:30:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-16T04:06:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/","name":"DHC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer in Dettol controversy case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-13T08:30:46+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-16T04:06:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court decreed suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/dhc-decrees-suit-between-reckitt0benckiser-and-social-media-influencer-in-dettol-controversy-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC decrees suit between Reckitt Benckiser and social media influencer based on Joint Settlement Agreement in Dettol controversy case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273772,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/15\/delhi-high-court-coke-studio-and-cook-studio-arrived-settlement-cook-studio-adopted-new-mark-cook-pro-6\/","url_meta":{"origin":347650,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court| COKE STUDIO and COOK STUDIO arrived settlement; COOK STUDIO adopted new mark COOK Pro 6","author":"Editor","date":"September 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Nikhil Chawla (\u2018plaintiff') for its brand COOK STUDIO in the nature of threat application seeking declaration of non-infringement of the registered trademark COKE STUDIO by Coca Cola Company (\u2018defendant'), Prathiba M Singh, J. recorded the settlement terms arrived at between the parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310352,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/declaration-of-status-or-right-title-to-property-is-a-relief-in-personam-and-is-arbitrable-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":347650,"position":1},"title":"Declaration of status or right\/title to property is a relief in personam and is arbitrable: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Only when the subject matter of the dispute relates to actions in rem, that do not relate to subordinate rights in personam arising from rights in rem, the subject matter will be non-arbitrable.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/23\/dhc-no-bar-s-44-sell-undivided-share-joint-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":347650,"position":2},"title":"No embargo under S.44 of TPA to sell unpartitioned\/undivided share in joint property: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"June 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 provides that a person cannot transfer a right greater than he himself has, but the same does not preclude the co-owner from transferring his share in the joint property only because the same is unpartitioned\/undivided.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311906,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/20\/dhc-restrains-bohemia-from-engaging-with-third-parties-for-making-sound-recordings-without-prior-written-approval-from-saga-music-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":347650,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Bohemia from engaging with third parties for making sound recordings without prior written approval from Saga Music","author":"Simranjeet","date":"January 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBohemia and his agents are restrained from posting, uploading, sharing, e-sharing and\/or publishing or causing any defamatory, disparaging, misleading posts against Saga Music (P) Ltd. on any social media or digital platform.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":347650,"position":4},"title":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tis Hazari Court: Man Mohan Sharma, District Judge, partly disposed of a trademark infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd., noting that the plaintiffs and the defendants reached a settlement agreement. Factual Background Plaintiff was aggrieved by the actions of the Defendants who committed the trademark infringement and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281254,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/07\/delhi-high-court-holds-termination-agreement-contract-of-service-valid-guise-of-indringement-suit-bhojpuri-khesari-lal-yadav-youtube-specific-relief-legalnews-legalawareness-legalresearch\/","url_meta":{"origin":347650,"position":5},"title":"An artist cannot be compelled to deal with another party against his own wish in perpetuity; Delhi High Court holds termination of agreement by Khesari Lal Yadav, valid","author":"Editor","date":"January 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Grant of injunction in favour of the plaintiff company would cause irreparable injury to the Artist which cannot be compensated in monetary terms as he would be forced to continue with the contract of personal service even though mutual trust has been lost between parties.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=347650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347650\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=347650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=347650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=347650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}