{"id":34731,"date":"2016-02-04T16:22:29","date_gmt":"2016-02-04T10:52:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=34731"},"modified":"2016-02-10T14:58:48","modified_gmt":"2016-02-10T09:28:48","slug":"division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/","title":{"rendered":"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0 Deciding the moot question as to whether a Division Bench of a High Court can exercise its power of superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution\u00a0 against an order made in a suit by a Single Bench, the Court held that a Single Judge or a Single Bench of a High Court is not a court subordinate to the Division Bench and, therefore, the power of superintendence vested in a High Court by Article 227, is not exercisable against an order or decision of its own Single Bench. The order under challenge in the present petition was the Single Judge’s order dated 29-10-2015 wherein the Court, in exercise of its original jurisdiction had dismissed an application in a testamentary suit\u00a0 as not maintainable.<\/p>\n

The Division Bench comprising of\u00a0 I.A. Ansari, Actg. C.J. And\u00a0 Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.in the course of tracing the history of Article 227 observed that while Section 107 of the Government of India Act, 1915 vested in the High Courts, the power of superintendence over all the \u201ccourts\u201d \u00a0<\/em>subject to its appellate jurisdiction, Article 227\u00a0 has vested in the High Courts, the power of superintendence not only over the courts subject to its territorial jurisdiction, but also over all the tribunals in relation to which the High Court exercises territorial jurisdiction. A Single Bench of the High Court does not fall within the expressions \u201ccourts\u201d and \u201ctribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises\u00a0 jurisdiction\u201d. Clause (2) of Article 227 empowers a High Court to:<\/p>\n

(a) call for returns from such courts;<\/p>\n

(b) make and issue general rules and prescribe forms for regulating the practice and proceedings of such courts; and<\/p>\n

(c) prescribe forms in which books, entries and accounts shall be kept by the officers of any such courts.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Dismissing the petition as misconceived and not maintainable, the\u00a0 Court observed that all the powers, which are given to the High Court under sub-clauses (a<\/em>), (b<\/em>) and (c<\/em>)\u00a0 of Article 227(2) are in respect of courts and tribunals which are subordinate to the territorial jurisdiction of a High Court and a Single Bench is not a court subordinate to the Division Bench meaning thereby that as against the order passed in a suit, such as the present one, by a Single Judge of this Court, no application\/petition under Article 227\u00a0 is maintainable. [Anil Kumar Shrivastava<\/em>\u00a0 v. Shaurya Sunil<\/em>,\u00a02016 SCC OnLine Pat 21<\/a>\u00a0decided on January 20, 2016]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:\u00a0 Deciding the moot question as to whether a Division Bench of a High Court can exercise its power of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nDivision Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court:\u00a0 Deciding the moot question as to whether a Division Bench of a High Court can exercise its power of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-02-04T10:52:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-10T09:28:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/\",\"name\":\"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-04T10:52:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-10T09:28:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench","og_description":"Patna High Court:\u00a0 Deciding the moot question as to whether a Division Bench of a High Court can exercise its power of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2016-02-04T10:52:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-10T09:28:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/","name":"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-02-04T10:52:29+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-10T09:28:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/04\/division-bench-of-hc-has-no-power-of-superintendence-under-article-227-over-its-own-single-bench\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Division Bench of High Court has no power of superintendence under Article 227 over its own Single Bench"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":239567,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/24\/j-petition-dismissed-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":34731,"position":0},"title":"J&K HC | Supervisory jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly only in appropriate cases for purposes of keeping Subordinate courts and Tribunals within bounds of their authorities; Petition dismissed \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"November 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Javed Iqbal Wani J., while dismissing the present petition, discusses the ambit and scope of Article 227 of the Constitution and the statutory restriction of filing written statement within a stipulated period as mentioned under Order VIII Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure. Background In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":212082,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/15\/jha-hc-court-abstains-from-interfering-on-finding-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-under-the-garb-of-article-227\/","url_meta":{"origin":34731,"position":1},"title":"Jha HC | Court abstains from interfering on finding no error apparent on the face of record under the garb of Article 227","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. disposed of a petition seeking to make amendment in the plaint as stipulated under schedule to the petition. To state the facts briefly the petitioner had filed for declaration of right and title over the suit property in which the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":228449,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/18\/the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-should-the-high-courts-exercise-the-powers-of-superintendence-over-arbitral-tribunals\/","url_meta":{"origin":34731,"position":2},"title":"The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Should the High Courts exercise the powers of superintendence over arbitral tribunals?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhinav Shrivastava* and Nirmal Prasad**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Arbitration.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216796,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/","url_meta":{"origin":34731,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | High Court’s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A miscellaneous petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was allowed by Sanjay Dwivedi, J., where the petitioner challenged the order passed by Additional Commissioner under revenue proceedings. In the instant petition, the respondent raised an objection that the petition was not maintainable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/07\/letters-patent-appeal-will-not-lie-against-judgment-passed-by-single-judge-in-appellate-jurisdiction-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":34731,"position":4},"title":"Letters Patent Appeal will not lie against judgment passed by Single Judge in appellate jurisdiction or against order by Court subject to superintendence of this Court: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"March 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The jurisdiction available to this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution is primarily in the nature of superintendence and accordingly the Letters Patent Appeal will not lie in the instant matter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262283,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/23\/power-under-article-227-of-constitution-of-india-cannot-be-exercised-to-upset-conclusions\/","url_meta":{"origin":34731,"position":5},"title":"Power under Article 227 of Constitution of India cannot be exercised to upset conclusions, howsoever erroneous they may be, unless there was something grossly wrong or unjust: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., while expressing the scope of power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India dismissed the present petition. A petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners\/defendants against the order of the Commercial Court. Petitioners\/Defendants Counsel submitted that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34731"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34731\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}