{"id":346976,"date":"2025-05-02T12:00:52","date_gmt":"2025-05-02T06:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=346976"},"modified":"2025-05-06T14:52:08","modified_gmt":"2025-05-06T09:22:08","slug":"calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband by publishing false second marriage claim in newspaper"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> An appeal was filed by the wife (appellant) being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Port Blair on 24-02-2020 in an appeal filed by husband (respondent) wherein the First Appellate Court reversed the judgment of the Trial Court that had dismissed the husband&#8217;s suit for defamation. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supratim Bhattacharya, J.<\/span>, held that the notices amounted to defamation and upheld appellant&#8217;s right to damages, however, it modified the quantum of damages from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000, considering proportionality and the appellant&#8217;s financial status.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The dispute stemmed from a long-standing matrimonial discord between the appellant and the respondent. The couple was married on 02-03-1994 and had a son. While the wife was employed as a Draughtswoman in the APWD, Port Blair, the husband worked as an Assistant Engineer (Electrical) with the Port Blair Municipal Council. The relationship deteriorated over time, culminating in a matrimonial suit filed by the husband on grounds of cruelty and desertion. Though the Trial Court initially decreed the suit in husband&#8217;s favour, the judgment was reversed by a Division Bench of the High Court which held that the marriage still subsisted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">During the pendency of these proceedings and after the Appellate Court had upheld the subsistence of the marriage, the wife published two public notices in &#8220;The Daily Telegram&#8221; through her advocate. These notices warned the public, claiming that the husband, despite the subsisting marriage, was attempting to marry another woman. The content of the notice stated that any such second marriage would be illegal and void. Aggrieved by this, the husband filed a civil suit for damages and compensation for defamation against the wife Ananta and the editor of the newspaper.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the central issue for determination was whether the publication of notices dated 03-12-2008 and 05-12-2008 in the daily newspaper The Daily Telegram by the wife amounted to defamation of her husband. Referring to the essential elements of defamation under the law of torts namely that the statement must be defamatory, refer to the plaintiff, and be published, the Court reiterated that defamation injures a person&#8217;s reputation, which is considered property under the law. A defamatory statement, it stated, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">is one that lowers a person in the estimation of right-thinking members of society or exposes them to contempt, ridicule, or social isolation, regardless of the speaker&#8217;s intent<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that, in this case, the wife admitted that the notices were published at her instruction, based on unverified information allegedly received from unnamed friends, claiming her husband was attempting to contract a second marriage while their marital bond legally subsisted. The Court found that the wife was unable to name either the alleged second bride or the source of the information and failed to provide any evidence supporting the accusation. The Court stated that the act of making such an allegation in a widely circulated newspaper, without substantiation, amounted to an unprovoked attack on the husband&#8217;s dignity and reputation, thereby fulfilling all the requirements of actionable defamation. It further observed that several witnesses had testified to the reputational harm suffered by the husband.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that although quantifying damage to reputation is difficult, under Indian tort law, general damages are presumed in cases where the defamatory words are actionable <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">per se<\/span>, as they were here. The Court recognized the right to live with dignity under Article 21 and stated that publication of such baseless and uncorroborated claims not only caused emotional distress but also harmed societal values. Accordingly, the Court reduced the damages awarded by the First Appellate Court from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000, considering the appellant&#8217;s employment status.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further exonerated the newspaper editor, holding that he bore no responsibility for the content of paid notices. The Second Appeal was thus allowed in part, modifying the earlier decree, and directing the wife to pay Rs. 1,00,000 to the husband within three months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">A v. R, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/164m3vdZ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Cal 3841<\/a>, decided on 11-04-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Judgment by: Justice Supratim Bhattacharya<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Mr. KMB Jayapal<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Mrs. Anjili Nag, Sr. Adv, Mr. Ajay Majhi<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\"> The wife published two notices in a local newspaper without her husband&#8217;s knowledge, claiming ignorance of the informant&#8217;s identity and failing to ascertain the name of the girl allegedly involved with him despite diligent efforts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314821,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[72033,74798,81619,81614,81616,81615,81618,81613,81617,81612],"class_list":["post-346976","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-calcuttahighcourt","tag-defamationcase","tag-defamationdamages","tag-falseallegation","tag-lawoftorts","tag-newspaperdefamation","tag-penalcode1860","tag-righttoreputation","tag-section499ipc","tag-tortlaw"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta HC directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband in newspaper| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directed a wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 in damages for falsely alleging in a newspaper that her husband was attempting a second marriage during the subsistence of their marriage.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband by publishing false second marriage claim in newspaper\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directed a wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 in damages for falsely alleging in a newspaper that her husband was attempting a second marriage during the subsistence of their marriage.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-02T06:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-06T09:22:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband by publishing false second marriage claim in newspaper\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta HC directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband in newspaper| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-02T06:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-06T09:22:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court directed a wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 in damages for falsely alleging in a newspaper that her husband was attempting a second marriage during the subsistence of their marriage.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband by publishing false second marriage claim in newspaper\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta HC directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband in newspaper| SCC Times","description":"Calcutta High Court directed a wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 in damages for falsely alleging in a newspaper that her husband was attempting a second marriage during the subsistence of their marriage.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband by publishing false second marriage claim in newspaper","og_description":"Calcutta High Court directed a wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 in damages for falsely alleging in a newspaper that her husband was attempting a second marriage during the subsistence of their marriage.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-05-02T06:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-06T09:22:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband by publishing false second marriage claim in newspaper","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/","name":"Calcutta HC directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband in newspaper| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-05-02T06:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-06T09:22:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Calcutta High Court directed a wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 in damages for falsely alleging in a newspaper that her husband was attempting a second marriage during the subsistence of their marriage.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Calcutta High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/02\/calcutta-high-court-wife-defamation-newspaper-damages-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court directs wife to pay \u20b91,00,000 damages for defaming husband by publishing false second marriage claim in newspaper"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":207563,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/defamation-by-mere-levelling-of-allegation-without-any-substance-presumption-cannot-be-drawn-that-it-was-in-discharge-of-public-duty-chhattisgarh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":346976,"position":0},"title":"Defamation| By mere levelling of allegation without any substance, presumption cannot be drawn that it was in discharge of public duty: Chhattisgarh HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: The Bench comprising of Goutam Bhaduri, J. allowed an appeal concerning the defamatory publication made against two doctors in a newspaper. In the present case, it has been stated that the appeal was filed against the judgment and decree passed by Additional District Judge, Manendragarh, wherein suit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/kar-hc-%e2%94%82-whether-pleadings-in-trial-amount-to-publication-in-a-suit-for-defamation-court-discusses-nuances-to-s-500-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":346976,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Whether pleadings in trial amount to \u2018publication\u2019 in a suit for defamation; Court discusses nuances to S. 500 IPC \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"October 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: H.B. Prabhakara Sastry, J., while allowing the criminal revision in part, remarked that, if the accused seeks to take defense of truth under Section 499 Penal Code, 1860, it is upon him to prove that the statements made are facts. \u00a0Brief Facts The present criminal revision is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":298949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/09\/calcutta-high-court-acquits-accused-in-alleged-domestic-cruelty-case-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":346976,"position":2},"title":"Mental Cruelty is subjective and varies from person to person; Calcutta High Court acquits accused in alleged domestic cruelty case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held the trial court's findings were not aligned with the legal requirements for cruelty under Section 498A IPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/30\/enhancement-of-compensation-in-motor-accident-claims-case-due-to-wrong-multiplier-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":346976,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court enhances compensation in motor accident claims case","author":"Ritu","date":"September 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court deleted the name of one of the claimants who had passed away, and condoned the delay in filing the appeal.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246560,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/08\/illicit-relationship\/","url_meta":{"origin":346976,"position":4},"title":"[Cruelty by Wife] Cal HC | Reckless allegations against husband corroborated by daughter. Affidavit of daughter how far can corroborate husband&#8217;s allegations? Court determines while confirming divorce decree against wife","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench of Arindam Sinha and Suvra Ghosh, JJ. confirmed a decree of divorce passed in favour of the husband by the trial court on grounds of cruelty by the wife. The instant appeal, dismissed by the High Court, was preferred by the wife against the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305238,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/19\/court-has-wide-discretion-to-interpret-what-is-cruelty-literally-and-contextually-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":346976,"position":5},"title":"Court has wide discretion to interpret \u2018What is cruelty\u2019, literally and contextually: Calcutta High Court upholds divorce on ground of \u2018Cruelty\u2019","author":"Ritu","date":"October 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"With regards to custody of the child, the Calcutta High Court after considering the paramount welfare of the child, held the husband is not fit person for custody.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346976","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=346976"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346976\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=346976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=346976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=346976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}