{"id":346589,"date":"2025-04-28T13:00:35","date_gmt":"2025-04-28T07:30:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=346589"},"modified":"2025-04-30T16:59:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-30T11:29:00","slug":"mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: Delhi HC grants bail to a man accused u\/s 498A, 304-B IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In and application filed under Section 483<\/a> of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> seeking regular bail in the proceedings arising from FIR registered under Sections 498-A<\/a>1<\/sup><\/a>\/304-B<\/a>2<\/sup><\/a>\/34<\/a>3<\/sup><\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a>, Sanjeev Narula, J.<\/span>, stated that only allegations raised was related to an alleged demand for a car as dowry, and an alleged extra-marital relationship between the petitioner and his sister-in-law. The Court stated that mere suspicion of an extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible it might seem, did not per se amount to abetment of suicide.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court directed the petitioner to be released on bail after furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court on certain conditions.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

On 29-11-2023, an information was received that the petitioner’s wife (‘the deceased’) was brought to the hospital by her husband following an incident of alleged hanging that occurred at their house. The attending medical officer declared her “brought dead”. Thereafter, the officers concerned reached the location, when the petitioner’s sister-in-law was also present. The crime team inspected the scene of crime and took photographs.<\/p>\n

Further, the petitioner’s sister-in-law, produced a multicoloured chunni, stating it had been used by the deceased to hang herself from a ceiling fan in the bathroom. She disclosed that she broke open the bathroom door, untied the chunni from around the neck of the deceased and ceiling fan and placed it inside a cupboard in the room.<\/p>\n

Since the death of the deceased had occurred within seven years of marriage, an intimation was sent to hold inquest. Statements of the parents of the deceased were recorded by the Executive Magistrate. They alleged that the deceased had married the petitioner on 12-12-2022 and had since been subjected to physical and mental abuse by the petitioner and his family. Specific allegations included dowry demands, including a car, and claims that the marriage had not been consummated. The deceased was allegedly made to live in a bedroom without a door. An illicit relationship was also alleged between the petitioner and sister-in-law.<\/p>\n

The charge-sheet was filed on 24-2-2024 before the Trial Court, and charges were framed against the petitioner and the sister-in-law under Sections 498-A<\/a>\/304-B<\/a>\/34<\/a> IPC<\/a>, and alternatively Sections 306<\/a>\/34<\/a> IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court stated that on closer examination, prima facie, the material on record in the present case revealed significant ambiguities and lacked the specificity that Section 304-B<\/a> of IPC<\/a> demands. The Court observed that the allegation of dowry demand, primarily the alleged demand for a car, finds mention only in the post-incident statements made by the family of the deceased. Pertinently, there was no contemporaneous complaint by the deceased, her parents, or any other relative during her lifetime alleging harassment or demand for dowry. Further, the statements of the deceased’s family members were devoid of specific details, particularly with respect to the date, time, or frequency of the alleged demands.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that it was further alleged that the petitioner was involved in an illicit relationship with sister-in-law, and that the deceased purportedly discovered them in a compromising position on two occasions in August 2023. While such allegations might carry emotional and moral weight, their veracity and relevance were matters that would be determined at trial. The Court stated that even after assuming, that such relationship existed or demeaning language in reference to the deceased, was exchanged via WhatsApp between them, these facts, stand alone, do not, prima facie, at this stage, disclosed the specific ingredients of cruelty or harassment related to dowry demand.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that in the present case, prima facie, neither the complainant nor the prosecution had alleged that the petitioner was engaged in behaviour amounting to instigation, threat, or sustained cruelty of such a nature, as to trigger the deceased’s suicide. There was no indication of affirmative acts, whether by commission or omission, that drove the deceased to a state of desperation immediately preceding her death. Consequently, the statutory threshold for invoking Section 306<\/a> of IPC<\/a> prima facie remained unsatisfied. The only allegations raised was related to an alleged demand for a car as dowry, and an alleged extra-marital relationship between the petitioner and his sister-in-law. The Court stated that mere suspicion of an extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible it might seem, did not per se amount to abetment of suicide.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court stated that it was well-established that the object of granting bail was neither punitive nor preventative. The primary aim sought to be achieved by bail was to secure the attendance of the accused person at the trial. Accordingly, the Court directed the petitioner to be released on bail after furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court on certain conditions.<\/p>\n

[Karanjeet Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2567<\/a>, decided on 22-04-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> R.S. Juneja and J.S. Juneja, Advocates.<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State; Inspector Arjun Singh, P.S. Krishna N., Aman Akhtar, Mohd. Imran, Shoaib Ikram and Rashid Khan, Advocates for complainant<\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

1.<\/a> Section 85<\/a> of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (‘BNS’)<\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Section 80<\/a> of BNS<\/a><\/p>\n

3.<\/a> Section 3(5)<\/a> of BNS<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Even after assuming, that such relationship existed between petitioner and his sister-in-law, or demeaning language in reference to the deceased, was exchanged via WhatsApp between them, these facts, stand alone, do not, prima facie, disclose the specific ingredients of cruelty or harassment related to dowry demand.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[22444,2664,70594,2570,2543,37730,68785,81439,36335,39700],"class_list":["post-346589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abetment-of-suicide","tag-Bail","tag-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-2023","tag-Cruelty","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-extra-marital-affair","tag-justice-sanjeev-narula","tag-morally-reprehensible","tag-penal-code-1860","tag-section-498a-ipc"],"yoast_head":"\nMere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: DHC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stated that mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: Delhi HC grants bail to a man accused u\/s 498A, 304-B IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stated that mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-28T07:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-30T11:29:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: Delhi HC grants bail to a man accused u\/s 498A, 304-B IPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/\",\"name\":\"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: DHC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-28T07:30:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-30T11:29:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court stated that mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: Delhi HC grants bail to a man accused u\/s 498A, 304-B IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: DHC","description":"Delhi High Court stated that mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: Delhi HC grants bail to a man accused u\/s 498A, 304-B IPC","og_description":"Delhi High Court stated that mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-28T07:30:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-30T11:29:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: Delhi HC grants bail to a man accused u\/s 498A, 304-B IPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/","name":"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: DHC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-28T07:30:35+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-30T11:29:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court stated that mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/28\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-however-morally-reprehensible-does-not-per-se-amount-to-abetment-of-suicide-dhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere suspicion of extra-marital affair, however morally reprehensible, does not per se amount to abetment of suicide: Delhi HC grants bail to a man accused u\/s 498A, 304-B IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6501,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/25\/husband-s-extra-marital-relationship-does-not-amount-to-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":346589,"position":0},"title":"Husband\u2019s extra- marital relationship does not amount to cruelty","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the instant case, where the question arose that whether a husband\u2019s extra-marital affair amounts to cruelty under Section 498A of IPC, the Bench of Dipak Misra and S.J Mukhopadhayay, JJ., observed that\u00a0husband has developed some intimacy with another, during the subsistence of marriage and failed to discharge\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/30\/husbands-girlfriend-not-relative-prosecution-under-s-498a-ipc-gujarat-hc-quashes-cruelty-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":346589,"position":1},"title":"Husband\u2019s girlfriend not a \u2018relative\u2019 for prosecution under S. 498A IPC\u2019; Gujarat HC quashes cruelty case","author":"Editor","date":"April 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the petitioner was the alleged girlfriend of the complainant\u2019s husband, and no other status or relation had been assigned to her for prosecution under Section 498A of the IPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":87821,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/25\/mere-suspicion-of-extra-marital-relationship-per-se-would-not-come-within-the-ambit-of-cruelty-under-section-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":346589,"position":2},"title":"Mere suspicion of extra-marital relationship, per se, would not come within the ambit of \u2018cruelty\u2019 under Section 498-A IPC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 25, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Stating that extra-marital relationship, per se, or as such would not come within the ambit of Section 498-A IPC, the Court held that it would be an illegal or immoral act, but other ingredients are to be brought home so that it would constitute a criminal offence. It\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345550,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/09\/merely-because-suicide-is-committed-in-parental-home-and-not-matrimonial-home-does-not-mean-it-is-not-a-case-of-dowry-death-delhi-hc-dismisses-bail-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":346589,"position":3},"title":"Merely because suicide is committed in parental home and not matrimonial home, does not mean it is not a case of dowry death: Delhi HC dismisses bail application","author":"Arushi","date":"April 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The expression \u201csoon before her death\u201d in Section 304-B of Penal Code, 1860 must be read as an expression of continuity of time and not an expression of mere length of time. The legislature in its wisdom had used the phrase as \u201csoon before\u201d and not \u201cimmediately before\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/25\/bom-hc-easy-to-accuse-somebody-of-ill-treatment-after-someone-dies-but-it-will-not-be-wise-to-convict-somebody-based-on-general-statements-every-cruelty-is-not-an-offence-under-s\/","url_meta":{"origin":346589,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | \u201cEasy to accuse somebody of ill-treatment after someone dies, but not wise to convict somebody based on general statements\u201d; Every Cruelty is not an offence under S. 498A IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: K.R. Shriram, J., while deciding the appeal filed impugning the order and judgment passed with regard to acquittal for offence punishable under Sections 498A (Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty) and Section 306 (Abetment of suicide) of Penal Code, 1860, observed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321315,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/03\/bombay-high-court-acquits-accused-498a-306-ipc-charges-insufficent-evidence-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":346589,"position":5},"title":"[Death by Suicide] Allegations were general and omnibus in nature; Bombay High Court acquits husband due to insufficient evidence","author":"Editor","date":"May 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"To attract the charge of Section 306 of the Penal Code, the prosecution must establish incitement, instigation, aiding, or abetment to commit suicide.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=346589"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346589\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=346589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=346589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=346589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}