{"id":346400,"date":"2025-04-24T17:30:55","date_gmt":"2025-04-24T12:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=346400"},"modified":"2025-04-30T16:49:50","modified_gmt":"2025-04-30T11:19:50","slug":"mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis dues recovery\/disconnection"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka High Court:<\/span> In the instant appeal, Mangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (MESCOM) challenged the interim order of the Single Judge Bench whereby the Court directed MESCOM not to take any coercive action against the respondent pursuant to the electricity dues recovery and disconnection notices impugned on the condition that the respondent deposits Rs.20,00,000\/- before the Court. While considering the challenge, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">N.V. Anjaria, CJ*<\/span>., and K.V. Aravind, J., pointed out that the impugned order challenged in the appeal in an interim order, as the very kind and nature of the order, it cannot be said that the order pronounced anything final or that it has crystallized the rights of any of the parties finally. Hence the appeal was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant had sent demand notices dated 28-12-2023 and 21-02-2024 to the respondent seeking to recover electricity dues of Rs. 1,47,47,245 for the period between 01-12-2008 and 01-03-2024. Furthermore, the appellant sent a disconnection notice dated 5-6-2024 to the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent challenged the afore-stated notices before the Single Judge Bench of Karnataka High Court. The Court via its impugned order dated 8-8-2024, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">passed interim order pending final consideration of the petition<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the appellant stated that the respondent&#8217;s petition before the Single Judge was not maintainable in view of the provisions of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553428\" target=\"_blank\">127<\/a> of The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002782344\" target=\"_blank\">Electricity Act, 2003<\/a>. Therefore, when the respondent could not maintain the petition, the question of granting the interim order would not arise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Per contra, the respondent defended the impugned order and submitted that the condition of depositing of Rs 20,00,000 was complied with, and the said amount was already deposited with the Court&#8217;s Registry<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the dispute, the Division Bench declined to express anything on the merits of the case and entertain the petition inasmuch as the order brought in appeal was an interim order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court therefore dismissed the appeal stating that the parties may work out their rights and remedies in the parent proceedings of the writ petition. The Court directed that the Single Judge while deciding the petition, shall permit both the sides to raise all the contentions which may be available to them in law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, Rs.20,00,000\/- which is deposited shall be invested by the Registry in a cumulative fixed deposit initially for a period of one year renewable in any nationalized bank which shall be subject to the final order which may passed by the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Mangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited v. Ultratech Cement Limited, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/tULf76nh\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Kar 12<\/a>, decided on 4-4-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice N.V Anjaria, Chief Justice<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Appellant:<\/span> Advocate General Mr. K. Shashi Kiran Shetty with Advocate Mr. Shahbaaz Husain<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Respondent:<\/span> Senior Advocate Mr. Dhyan Chinnappa with Advocate Mr. V.G. Prashanth<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Perusing the dispute, the Division Bench declined to express anything on the merits of the case and entertain the petition inasmuch as the order brought in appeal was an interim order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":316069,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37718,81352,81353,50808,65170,39777,81351,32455],"class_list":["post-346400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-coercive-action","tag-electricity-disconnection","tag-electricity-dues-recovery","tag-jsa","tag-justice-nv-anjaria","tag-karnataka-hc","tag-mescom","tag-ultratech-cement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis electricity dues recovery<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Perusing the dispute, the Division Bench declined to express anything on the merits of the case and entertain the petition inasmuch as the order brought in appeal was an interim order.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis dues recovery\/disconnection\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Perusing the dispute, the Division Bench declined to express anything on the merits of the case and entertain the petition inasmuch as the order brought in appeal was an interim order.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-24T12:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-30T11:19:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis dues recovery\/disconnection\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis electricity dues recovery\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-24T12:00:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-30T11:19:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Perusing the dispute, the Division Bench declined to express anything on the merits of the case and entertain the petition inasmuch as the order brought in appeal was an interim order.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Karnataka High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis dues recovery\/disconnection\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis electricity dues recovery","description":"Perusing the dispute, the Division Bench declined to express anything on the merits of the case and entertain the petition inasmuch as the order brought in appeal was an interim order.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis dues recovery\/disconnection","og_description":"Perusing the dispute, the Division Bench declined to express anything on the merits of the case and entertain the petition inasmuch as the order brought in appeal was an interim order.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-24T12:00:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-30T11:19:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis dues recovery\/disconnection","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis electricity dues recovery","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-24T12:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-30T11:19:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Perusing the dispute, the Division Bench declined to express anything on the merits of the case and entertain the petition inasmuch as the order brought in appeal was an interim order.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Karnataka High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/24\/mescom-appeal-coercive-action-against-ultratech-cement-electricity-dues-recovery-dismissed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka HC dismisses MESCOM appeal against order directing not to take coercive action against Ultratech Cement vis-a-vis dues recovery\/disconnection"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":350635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/15\/know-thy-new-judge-justice-nv-anjaria-supreme-court-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":346400,"position":0},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge: Justice N.V. Anjaria","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Nilay Vipinchandra Anjaria was serving as the 34th Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court prior to being appointed as Judge of Supreme Court in May 2025.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Anjaria","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/23\/know-thy-judge-justice-nv-anjaria-supreme-court-of-india-profile\/","url_meta":{"origin":346400,"position":1},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice N.V. Anjaria\u2019s versatile career and notable judgments","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 23, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Nilay Vipinchandra Anjaria was serving as the 34th Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court prior to being appointed as Judge of Supreme Court in May 2025.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Anjaria","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Justice-Anjaria.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222191,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/16\/all-hc-company-has-a-separate-legal-identity-from-its-owners-no-coercive-steps-to-be-taken-for-recovery-of-dues-of-ghaziabad-development-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":346400,"position":2},"title":"All HC | Company has a separate legal identity from its owners; no coercive steps to be taken for recovery of dues of Ghaziabad Development Authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Pankaj Mithal and Vivek Agarwal, JJ. concurred that any amount already recovered by the respondents from\u00a0 the petitioner shall be invested by the respondents in a fixed deposit with a Nationalised Bank in a short term deposit Petitioner 1 had approached this Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":334185,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/disconnection-of-essential-utilities-by-landlords-experts-corner\/","url_meta":{"origin":346400,"position":3},"title":"Disconnection of Essential Utilities by Landlords: Permissible or Not?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tamarra Sequeira*, Amruthavarshini**, Aditya Sethi*** and Nandita Mathihalli****","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Essential utilities by landlords","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Essential-utilities-by-landlords.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Essential-utilities-by-landlords.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Essential-utilities-by-landlords.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Essential-utilities-by-landlords.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205223,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/binani-industries-cannot-not-pay-dues-and-settle-ultratech-cements-revised-resolution-plan-for-binani-cement-accepted-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":346400,"position":4},"title":"Binani Industries cannot now repay dues and settle; UltraTech Cement\u2019s revised resolution plan for Binani Cement accepted: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Two-Member bench comprising of S.J. Mukhopadhya (Chairperson) and Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) disposed of a set of company appeals by directing National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata to set up a monitoring committee for implementation of the approved revised resolution plan for Binani\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207118,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/21\/order-imposing-penalty-for-illegal-mining-passed-without-hearing-the-mining-leaseholder-not-sustainable-under-law-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":346400,"position":5},"title":"Order imposing penalty for illegal mining, passed without hearing the mining leaseholder, not sustainable under law: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of CJ Dinesh Maheshwari and S. Sujatha, J. allowed a civil writ petition challenging the imposition of penalty on the petitioner for carrying out illegal mining. Petitioner, a mining leaseholder for a particular tract of land, preferred the instant petition being aggrieved of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=346400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346400\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=346400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=346400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=346400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}