{"id":346334,"date":"2025-04-23T17:00:47","date_gmt":"2025-04-23T11:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=346334"},"modified":"2025-04-24T17:39:44","modified_gmt":"2025-04-24T12:09:44","slug":"provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant appeal wherein the appellant claimed that Gujarat High Court had erroneously held that the date for determination of market value of yet to be acquired, He-0-11-41 sq. meters land shall be 01-1-2014 i.e., the date of commencement of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013<\/a> (2013 Act); the Division Bench of Dipankar Datta and Manmohan*<\/span>, JJ., opined that proviso to Section 26(1)<\/a> of the 2013 Act<\/a> lays down the methodology for computing the market value of the land on the date of the acquisition notification. The use of the word “shall”<\/span> in Section 26(1) proviso is reflective of the legislative mandate that Section 11 Notification is the date for determination of the compensation.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that the date of enactment of 2013 Act i.e. 01-1-2014 has no relevance to fresh acquisition initiated under the statute. The date of 01-1-2014 is relevant only if land acquisition proceedings had been initiated under the old Land Acquisition Act, 1894<\/a><\/span> and where no award had been made before the enforcement of the 2013 Act<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Appellant is the owner of Revenue Block No.119 (new Revenue Block No.126), situated at village Moje Sarkuva, Taluka Vyara, District Tapi, measuring He-0-36-87 sq. meters (total area). Out of this land, an area measuring He-0-17-84 sq. meters had been acquired earlier for the purpose of constructing the Ukai High Level Cantor Canal. However, the appellant’s counsel emphasised that additional portion of He-0-11-41 sq. meters had been utilized without carrying out any acquisition proceeding or payment of compensation.<\/p>\n

The appellant contended that the High Court failed to consider Section 26(1)<\/a> of the 2013 Act<\/a> especially its proviso.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondent admitted that the acquiring body namely, the Executive Engineer, Ukai Division-1 at Ukai Dam has till date not been able to submit the proposal for acquisition of He-0-11-41 sq. meters on the online portal known as “PM Gati Shaki Portal<\/span>” due to a technical error and assured that the process of acquisition would be commenced as soon as the technical error is resolved.<\/p>\n

Perusing the matter, the Court pointed out that the issue which arises for consideration in the instant Appeal is the interpretation of proviso to Section 26(1)<\/a> of the 2013 Act<\/a> in the context of the date that is relevant for determining the market value of the land being acquired.<\/p>\n

The Court explained that the legislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition. By fixing the date of 01-1-2014 as the date for determination of market value, High Court’s impugned order deprived the Appellant of compensation at the 2023 rates, which must be considerably higher.<\/p>\n

The Court further pointed out that the legislative scheme does not give discretion to the Courts to select a date for valuation. On the contrary, the 2013 Act expressly mandates that compensation\/valuation must be determined as of the date of Notification under Section 11<\/a> of the 2013 Act<\/a> — which in this instant case is yet to be issued.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n
\n

Citation:<\/span>
2025 SCC OnLine SC 832<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Appellants :<\/span>
Sumitraben Singhabhai Gamit<\/p>\n

Respondents :<\/span>
State of Gujarat<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s):<\/span>
Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv. Ms. Prina Sharma, Adv. Ms. Prerana Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, AOR<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span>
Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

CORAM :<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"Dipankar
Dipankar Datta, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"Manmohan,
Manmohan, J.<\/span><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Legislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition”.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":346340,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[81308,68715,2723,12231,49366,81306,81307],"class_list":["post-346334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-acquisition-notification","tag-justice-manmohan","tag-Land_Acquisition","tag-legislative-intent","tag-market-value","tag-pm-gati-shakti-portal","tag-ukai-dam"],"yoast_head":"\nProviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land's market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"'Legislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition'.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"'Legislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition'.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-23T11:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-24T12:09:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land's market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-23T11:30:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-24T12:09:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"'Legislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition'.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"market value land acquisition\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land's market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC","description":"'Legislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition'.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC","og_description":"'Legislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition'.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-23T11:30:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-24T12:09:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/","name":"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land's market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-23T11:30:47+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-24T12:09:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"'Legislative intent behind proviso to Section 26(1) is to ensure that the landowners receive fair compensation reflective of the market value prevailing at the time of acquisition'.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"market value land acquisition"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/23\/provsio-s261-land-acquisition-act-2013-method-to-compute-market-value-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Proviso to S. 26(1) of 2013 Land Acquisition Act lays down method for computing land\u2019s market value on the date of acquisition notification: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/market-value-land-acquisition.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":226629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/06\/no-lapse-of-acquisition-proceedings-if-government-has-paid-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":346334,"position":0},"title":"No lapse of acquisition proceedings if government has ‘paid’ compensation","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a landmark ruling the 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah, and Ravindra Bhat, JJ has unanimously held that the land owners who had refused to accept compensation or who sought reference for higher compensation, cannot claim that the acquisition proceedings had lapsed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305878,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/28\/land-acquisition-compensation-rate-supreme-court-reduces-15-percent-annual-increase-to-8-percent\/","url_meta":{"origin":346334,"position":1},"title":"Land Acquisition Compensation Rate | \u201811 years gap pretty large\u2019: Supreme Court reduces 15% annual increase to 8%","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court considered what would be fair and just compensation to do justice between the parties so that landowners get a fair and reasonable compensation for losing their land.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Land Acquisition Compensation Rate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Land-Acquisition-Compensation-Rate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Land-Acquisition-Compensation-Rate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Land-Acquisition-Compensation-Rate.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Land-Acquisition-Compensation-Rate.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/11\/land-acquisition-applying-2-year-limitation-period-as-per-section-11a-of-1894-act-for-passing-award-in-pending-cases-under-section-241a-of-the-2013-act-impractical-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":346334,"position":2},"title":"Land Acquisition| Applying 2-year limitation period as per Section 11A of 1894 Act for passing award in pending cases under Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act impractical: SC\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an important ruling on Land Acquisition and Requisition law, the bench of AM Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna*, JJ has held that Section 25 of the 2013 Act applies to awards made under Section 24(1)(a) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267539,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/28\/land-acquisition-compensation-interim-order-pendency-of-proceedings-supreme-court-judgments-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":346334,"position":3},"title":"Land Acquisition| Compensation under 2013 Act cannot be claimed if award under 1894 Act couldn’t be passed due to pendency of proceedings or interim stay: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that in a case where on the date of commencement of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, no award has been declared under Section 11 of the Act, 1894,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-191.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":173874,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/08\/notification-issued-1-1-2014-land-acquisition-act-1894-order-continue-proceedings-new-act-2013\/","url_meta":{"origin":346334,"position":4},"title":"Notification to be issued before 1-1-2014 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in order to continue proceedings under \u2018New Act of 2013\u2019","author":"Saba","date":"December 8, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Punjab and Haryana: The order being disposed of by Rajesh Bindal, J., with respect to the writ petition filed challenging the notifications, under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued for acquisition of land in the area of Villages Kankrola, Badshahpur, Mohammadpur Jharsa,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218530,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/23\/mad-hc-article-2542-of-the-constitution-not-applicable-to-repugnant-state-laws-such-already-repugnant-laws-being-void-cannot-be-saved-by-presidential-assent\/","url_meta":{"origin":346334,"position":5},"title":"Mad HC | Article 254 (2) of the Constitution not applicable to repugnant State laws \u2013 such already repugnant laws, being void, cannot be saved by Presidential assent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: A Division Bench of S. Manikumar, and Subramonium Prasad, JJ. allowed a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and held that three land acquisition laws enacted by the Tamil Nadu legislature were repugnant to the Right to Fair Compensation and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=346334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/346334\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/346340"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=346334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=346334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=346334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}