{"id":345959,"date":"2025-04-17T13:00:16","date_gmt":"2025-04-17T07:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=345959"},"modified":"2025-04-19T15:42:42","modified_gmt":"2025-04-19T10:12:42","slug":"delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations despite acquittal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> A petition was filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 21-10-2022, issued by the Supreme Court Recruitment Cell, whereby his candidature for the post of Junior Court Attendant (JCA) in the establishment of the Supreme Court of India was cancelled as well as seeking a direction for his appointment to the said post. Prateek Jalan, J., held that there was no infirmity in the decision of the Supreme Court Recruitment Cell to cancel the petitioner&#8217;s candidature for the post of Junior Court Attendant (JCA).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The genesis of the case traces back to an advertisement dated 14-03-2018, inviting applications for 65 vacancies of Junior Court Attendant. The petitioner, being eligible, appeared in the written test, skill test, and medical examination, and successfully cleared all stages of the selection process. However, the controversy arose due to the registration of an FIR dated 16-08-2020, filed by the petitioner&#8217;s then wife, the marriage now stands dissolved, under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546433\" target=\"_blank\">3<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546434\" target=\"_blank\">4<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808049\" target=\"_blank\">Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961<\/a>, and Sections 307, 506, 323, and 498A of the IPC. The FIR was registered naming the petitioner as the main accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, the petitioner was asked to submit his biodata, in which he disclosed the FIR. Further details were provided on request. However, his candidature was later cancelled by the Competent Authority on the ground that &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">candidates with criminal history are not suitable for appointment in the Supreme Court.<\/span>&#8221; A petition was filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of the cancellation order and issuance of a direction to the respondent to appoint him as Junior Court Attendant. During the pendency of the petition, he was acquitted by the Trial Court vide judgment dated 10-02-2025, which he brought to the Court&#8217;s notice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was further stated that the petitioner was one among seven candidates with criminal antecedents, some of whom were acquitted, and the candidature of all seven was cancelled in that recruitment cycle. The respondent relied on precedents where similar decisions had been upheld and pointed out that two other candidates from this group had approached the Supreme Court which was dismissed by the Apex Court on 20-01-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Moreover, the Trial Court judgment in petitioner&#8217;s case recorded acquittal on benefit of doubt, holding that the evidence was only corroborative, and that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The respondent had a consistent policy of rejecting candidature even where acquittals were on technical grounds, compromises, or benefit of doubt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The issue under consideration was whether cancellation of candidature due to pendency of criminal proceedings at the time of recruitment can be judicially interfered with.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that this was not a case of suppression, but even in disclosed cases, the employer is empowered to assess suitability. The Court reiterated that the nature of the allegations, status of the proceedings, and post involved are critical factors and noted that the Supreme Court was justified in taking a strict view considering the sensitive nature of duties to be discharged by its staff. Further, the Court distinguished the case of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vikram Ruhal v. Delhi Police<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ba9L7V0c\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 3351<\/a> noting that the petitioner there was not the principal accused unlike the present petitioner who was the main accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the argument regarding post-acquittal reconsideration, the Court declined to accept that an acquittal (especially on benefit of doubt) mandates reconsideration, particularly when the recruitment process has already concluded. It held that this would lead to an endless reopening of selection processes. The Court remarked that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The Trial Court has concluded that the evidence against the accused falls in the category of corroborative evidence, but the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond all reasonable doubt. The petitioner has, thus, been acquitted on the reasoning that corroborative evidence alone cannot form the basis of a conviction. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, it has clearly been stated that the Competent Authority has exercised its discretion in such cases as well, i.e. cases in which acquittal was on account of reasonable doubt, and cancelled the candidature of those candidates.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court agreed with the respondent that the discretion of the employer, especially one like the Supreme Court, must be given deference unless mala fides are alleged, which was not the case here.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court concluded that there was no infirmity in the decision of the respondent to cancel the petitioner&#8217;s candidature, and the petition was accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Prayas Tyagi v Supreme Court of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eQc0t90N\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 2343<\/a>, decided on 09-04-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal, Mr. Abishek Kumar, Mr. Pratham Chawla, Advocates for petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Rajshekar Rao, Sr.Adv. with Ms. Mansi Sood, Ms. Zehra Khan, Mr. Areeb Amanullah, Advocates for R-1 to 3 with Mr. Rajarshi Sharma.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court observed that for the highest Court in the land to take a strict view regarding criminal antecedents of those who serve in its establishment can hardly be regarded as inappropriate or arbitrary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[81051,81052,81050,72373,72594,81054,81053,81049],"class_list":["post-345959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquittalcase","tag-courtjudgment","tag-criminalallegations","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-judicialreview","tag-juniorcourtattendant","tag-publicemploymentlaw","tag-supremecourtrecruitment"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate&#039;s application for the Junior Court Attendant post at the Supreme Court due to criminal allegations, despite his acquittal.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations despite acquittal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate&#039;s application for the Junior Court Attendant post at the Supreme Court due to criminal allegations, despite his acquittal.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-17T07:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-19T10:12:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations despite acquittal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-17T07:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-19T10:12:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's application for the Junior Court Attendant post at the Supreme Court due to criminal allegations, despite his acquittal.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations despite acquittal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's application for the Junior Court Attendant post at the Supreme Court due to criminal allegations, despite his acquittal.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations despite acquittal","og_description":"Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's application for the Junior Court Attendant post at the Supreme Court due to criminal allegations, despite his acquittal.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-17T07:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-19T10:12:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations despite acquittal","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-17T07:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-19T10:12:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's application for the Junior Court Attendant post at the Supreme Court due to criminal allegations, despite his acquittal.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/17\/delhi-high-court-cancels-junior-court-attendant-candidature-criminal-allegations-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court upholds cancellation of Junior Court attendant candidature over criminal allegations despite acquittal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":338253,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/01\/orissa-hc-upholds-cancellation-candidature-for-junior-overman-post-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":345959,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Suppression of criminal antecedents &amp; failure to disclose pending FIRs has significant consequences\u2019: Orissa HC upholds cancellation of candidature for Junior Overman post","author":"Editor","date":"January 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe role of a writ court to interfere with the discretionary power of the appointing authority is necessarily limited. This discretion, however, must be exercised judiciously, with due regard to the principles of fairness, proportionality, and the objectives of public service. The authority retains the prerogative to evaluate a candidate\u2019s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":210060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/16\/del-hc-en-masse-cancellation-of-candidature-not-desirable-petitioner-directed-to-be-appointed-as-chowkidar\/","url_meta":{"origin":345959,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | En masse cancellation of candidature not desirable; petitioner directed to be appointed as &#8216;Chowkidar&#8217;","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of S. Muralidhar and Sanjeev Narula, JJ. addressed a petition concerning the aggrieved not being offered appointment in spite of clearing the required stages of the selection process. In the present case, a recruitment notification was issued for various posts including that of \u2018Chowkidar\u2019\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281995,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/supreme-court-collegium-lauds-saurabh-kirpal-for-his-openness-about-sexual-orientation-reiterates-recommendation-as-delhi-high-court-judge-legal-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":345959,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium lauds Saurabh Kirpal for his openness about his sexual orientation; reiterates his recommendation as a Delhi High Court judge&nbsp;","author":"Editor","date":"January 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court Collegium stated that every individual is entitled to maintain their own dignity and individuality, based on sexual orientation. Senior Advocate Kirpal's openness about his orientation goes to his credit and rejecting his candidature on this ground would be contrary to the constitutional principles laid down by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kirpal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-138.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":202247,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/employer-to-exercise-discretion-in-matters-of-canceling-candidature-in-accordance-with-law-laid-down-by-the-apex-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":345959,"position":3},"title":"Employer to exercise discretion in matters of cancelling candidature in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. disposed of a petition where petitioner was selected for appointment to the post of Constable in U.P. Police in the recruitment exercise initiated in the year 2015. He had to be trained but his candidature was not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":285054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/24\/delhi-high-court-directs-constitution-board-conduct-physical-fitness-test-quashed-cancellation-of-candidature-for-uploading-10th-certificate-instead-of-aadhar-card-not-being-incorrect-information-lega\/","url_meta":{"origin":345959,"position":4},"title":"Whether uploading of 10th certificate instead of Aadhaar card amount to \u2018incorrect information\u2019 rendering cancellation of the candidature? Delhi High Court rules","author":"Arunima","date":"February 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The purpose of the application form and admission process is to ensure that no candidate by an unfair means becomes eligible when he is ineligible.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/07\/labour-and-service-law-developments-2025-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":345959,"position":5},"title":"Labour and Service Law in 2025: Landmark Reforms and Defining Judgments","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"An in-depth analysis of the 2025 service and labour law framework, examining pivotal Supreme Court and High Court judgments, significant legislative reforms, and key policy clarifications that have shaped the domain.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Labour and Service Law Developments in 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Labour-and-Service-Law-Developments-in-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Labour-and-Service-Law-Developments-in-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Labour-and-Service-Law-Developments-in-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Labour-and-Service-Law-Developments-in-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=345959"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345959\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=345959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=345959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=345959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}