{"id":345892,"date":"2025-04-16T14:00:40","date_gmt":"2025-04-16T08:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=345892"},"modified":"2025-04-16T12:46:14","modified_gmt":"2025-04-16T07:16:14","slug":"know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/","title":{"rendered":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Law is not static; it goes with the society. You should keep your eyes and ears open to see what is happening in the society.&#8221;<a id=\"fnref0\" href=\"#fn0\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right; font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8211; Justice Rajesh Bindal<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Elevated to the Supreme Court in 2023, Justice Rajesh Bindal has an expansive wealth of experience and wisdom that he gained during a long tenure as an advocate and equally lengthy tenure as Judge and later Chief Justice of the High Courts of Punjab and Haryana, Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh, Calcutta, Allahabad.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 9.9mm; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Early Life, Education and Advocacy<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Born on 16-04-1961, at Ambala City in Haryana, Justice Rajesh Bindal did his LL. B from Kurukshetra University in 1985 and joined the legal profession in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in September 1985<a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">During his tenure as an advocate, Justice Bindal represented the Income-tax Department, Haryana region before the High Court; Chandigarh Administration before Central Administrative Tribunal for more than a decade till 2004 and Punjab &amp; Haryana regions of Employees Provident Fund Organization before the High Court and Central Administrative Tribunal from 1992 till his elevation as Judge. Furthermore, he represented the&nbsp;State of Haryana, in settlement of the dispute concerning Satluj Yamuna Water with State of Punjab before Eradi Tribunal and the Supreme Court<a id=\"fnref2\" href=\"#fn2\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Judgeship of the High Courts<a id=\"fnref3\" href=\"#fn3\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 2%;\">Justice Bindal was elevated as a Judge of High Court of Punjab &amp; Haryana on 22-03-2006. Subsequently in 2018 he was transferred to the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and, in 2020 was appointed as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/08\/justice-rajesh-bindal-senior-most-judge-of-jammu-kashmir-high-court-appointed-as-the-acting-chief-justice\/\" target=\"_blank\">Acting Chief Justice<\/a> of the Common High Court for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Did You Know?<\/span> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">During his tenure as a Judge in Punjab and Haryana High Court, Justice Bindal disposed of around 80,000 cases!<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further on Justice Bindal was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal-judge-common-hc-for-ut-of-jk-and-ut-of-ladakh-appointed-as-judge-of-the-calcutta-high-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">transferred<\/a> to the High Court at Calcutta and was later sworn in as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/27\/justice-rajesh-bindal\/\" target=\"_blank\">Chief Justice<\/a> of the High Court at Calcutta with effect from 29-04-2021. On 11-10-2021, Justice Bindal took oath as the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Supreme Court of India<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Justice Rajesh Bindal&#8217;s elevation was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/01\/supreme-court-recommends-two-more-names-for-appointment-as-sc-judges-against-the-two-remaining-vacancies-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\">recommended<\/a> by the Supreme Court Collegium on 31-01-2023. The recommendation was approved by the President of India and with a notification dated 10-02-2023, the Ministry of Law and Justice, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/president-gives-nod-to-justice-rajesh-bindal-justice-aravind-kumar-elevation-legal-news-legal-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\">notified the appointment<\/a> of Justice Bindal to the Supreme Court. Justice Rajesh Bindal <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/14\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-new-appointment-justice-rajesh-bindal-justice-aravind-kumar-legal-news-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\">took oath<\/a> as a Supreme Court Judge on 13-02-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold;\">Chairmanship of various Committees<a id=\"fnref4\" href=\"#fn4\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>Justice Bindal was the Chairman of the Committee constituted pursuant to Resolution adopted in the Chief Justices&#8217; Conference, 2016, for framing Draft Rules for Electronic Evidence.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Justice Bindal was the Chairman of a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/19\/comments-invited-on-concept-note-on-issues-related-to-civil-aspects-of-international-child-removal\/\" target=\"_blank\">multi-member Committee<\/a> constituted by Ministry of Women and Child Development to study Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Bill, 2016, he submitted report accompanied by the recommendations and draft of the Protection of Children (Inter-Country Removal and Retention) Bill, 2018 to the Ministry in April 2018.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Justice Bindal also headed various Committees including Computer Committee, Arrears Committee; Finance Committee, Building and Infrastructure Committee, Information Technology Committee, State Court Management Systems Committee in the High Court and also Chairman of J&amp;K State Legal Service Authority.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>He was also the Chairman of the Committee constituted for conducting assessment for optimal use of technology by NALSA and the State Legal Services Authorities including use of Artificial Intelligence.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">He was also Member of the Committee constituted to go into the existing framework of Lok Adalats and Mediation and to suggest ways for enhancing operational efficiency and plugging gaps, if any, or better application of these ADR mechanisms for weaker sections of the society.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 9.9mm; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14.0pt; color: #c00000;\">Notable Judgements by Justice Rajesh Bindal<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 2%; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 13.0pt; text-decoration: underline;\">Supreme Court of India<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000; font-weight: bold;\">Did You Know?<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Since his elevation to the Supreme Court in 2023, Justice Rajesh Bindal has authored more than 100 judgments<a id=\"fnref5\" href=\"#fn5\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Supreme Court advocates for direct bank transfer of compensation to streamline motor accident claims process<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Parminder Singh v. Honey Goyal<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 567, concerning the enhancement of motor accident compensation, the division bench of JK Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. concluded that the appellant is entitled to receive a total compensation of &#8377;36,84,000\/-. As a result, the impugned award of the Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court was modified to reflect this amount. Further, the Court expressed its concern regarding the mode of payment of compensation in motor accident cases. The Court highlighted that the existing process could be streamlined by directly transferring the compensation amount into the bank accounts of the claimants with intimation to the Tribunal. This approach, the Court noted, would help avoid unnecessary hassles for both the Insurance Companies and the claimants, and eliminate the need for cumbersome court processes. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/24\/supreme-court-bank-transfer-motor-accident-compensation\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">&#8216;Litigant cannot claim negative discrimination seeking direction to department to act in violation of statutory Rules&#8217;; SC rejects retired peon&#8217;s plea for promotion to Tracer post<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Jyostnamayee Mishra v. State of Odisha<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 117, which was a civil appeal against Orissa High Court&#8217;s decision, setting aside the decision of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneshwar (&#8216;Tribunal&#8217;) directing for promotion of the present appellant to the post of Tracer from Peon, the Division Bench of JK Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal*, JJ., dismissed the appeal stating that the post of Tracer, not being promotional post from the post of Peon, there was no merit in the claim. The Court also noted the lackadaisical approach of the State, which lead to several rounds of litigation. Hence, the Court observed that the case in hand was a glaring example of casualness on the part of the State Authorities while dealing with the litigation. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/sc-rejects-retired-peon-plea-for-promotion-to-tracer-post\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Not all private properties are &#8216;material resources of community&#8217; under Art. 39(b) for state to equally distribute; Supreme Court rules in landmark 7:2 verdict<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Nine-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJI Dr. DY Chandrachud, Hrishikesh Roy, B.V. Nagarathna, Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Rajesh Bindal, Satish Chandra Sharma and Augustine George Masih, JJ., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Property Owners Assn. v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3122 delivered its judgment on the issue of whether private resources form part of the &#8216;material resource of the community&#8217; under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575241\" target=\"_blank\">39(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The majority judgment delivered by CJI Dr. DY Chandrachud by the ratio of 7:2 held that all the &#8216;private properties&#8217; cannot form part of the &#8216;material resources of the community&#8217; under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575241\" target=\"_blank\">39(b)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>. The Court unanimously held that Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575139\" target=\"_blank\">31-C<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> to the extent that it was upheld in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala<\/span>, (1973) 4 SCC 225 remains in force. The majority view held that the view expressed by Justice Krishna Iyer in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka v. Ranganatha Reddy<\/span> (1977) 4 SCC 471 that- material resources of the community covered all resources, natural and man-made, publicly and privately owned and relied on by Justice Chinnappa Reddy in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sanjeev Coke Mfg. Co. v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd<\/span>. (1983) 1 SCC 147 cannot be accepted. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/05\/not-all-private-properties-are-material-resources-of-community-under-art-39b-for-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Presence only of advocates appearing or assisting during hearing, in person or online, to be marked: Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Baidya Nath Choudhary v. Surendra Kumar Singh<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2399 the division bench of JK Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. directed that in this Court, online presence of only those advocates be furnished and be marked who are appearing or assisting during hearing as indicated above and not of those who are not present in Court but may be associated in office of the advocates. During hearing, on being asked as to who is appearing for the respondent, it is informed by an Advocate, that an Advocate on Record (&#8216;AoR&#8217;), is representing them. He made a request to accommodate him because he is out of town and not available. Upon checking whether the AoR is connected to Court proceedings through video conferencing, it was revealed that the AoR is not connected online, however, his name was submitted through an online portal to mark his presence in the proceedings. The Court viewed that without AoR&#8217;s presence in Court in person or appearance through VC, submission of online appearance is completely unfair, especially when he is not in Court and not even in town. Further, the Court noted that there are more counsels representing the parties, who are neither present physically before this Court nor joined through video conferencing. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/03\/presence-of-advocates-who-are-either-appearing-assisting-during-hearing-personally-online-will-be-marked-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Is 3-month period for completion of preliminary assessment under Juvenile Justice Act mandatory? Supreme Court answers<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">X (Juvenile) v. State of Karnataka<\/span>, (2024) 8 SCC 473, which was an appeal filed by the Child in Conflict with Law (&#8216;CCL&#8217;) against the order passed by Karnataka High Court, wherein the Court set aside the order passed by the Additional Juvenile Justice Board (&#8216;JJB&#8217;) and directed the Board to transmit the record to the Children&#8217;s Court for trial of the CCL as an adult, the division bench of CT Ravikumar and Rajesh Bindal, JJ., held that the provision of Section 14(3) of the Act, providing three months for completion of a preliminary assessment under Section 15 of the Act, is not mandatory, and is directory. The period can be extended, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, by the Chief Judicial Magistrate or the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/17\/3-month-period-completion-preliminary-assessment-juvenile-justice-act-not-mandatory-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Supreme Court&#8217;s verdict on Tenants right to pre-emption in the &#8216;urban immovable property&#8217; under Punjab Pre-Emption Act<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Jagmohan v. Badri Nath<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/42npGHQ7\" target=\"_blank\">(2024) 3 SCC 588<\/a>, the division bench of C.T. Ravikumar and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. while upholding tenants&#8217; pre-emption rights in the &#8216;urban immovable property&#8217; under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002880449\" target=\"_blank\">Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913<\/a> (&#8216;1913, Act&#8217;) said that &#8216;land&#8217; and &#8216;immovable property&#8217; are two different terms. The immovable property is more than the land on which certain construction has been made. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/explained-supreme-court-tenants-right-to-pre-emption-urban-immovable-property-punjab-pre-emption-act\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">&#8216;No rape on false promise to marry&#8217;; Supreme Court quashes rape case by married woman<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal titled <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">XXXX v. State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nSKj65Gy\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">(2024) 3 SCC 496<\/span><\/a>, challenging order passed by Madhya Pradesh High Court on 1-08-2022 dismissing the petition under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\">482<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) for quashment of First Information Report (&#8216;FIR&#8217;), the Division Bench of CT Ravikumar and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. quashed the FIR and further criminal proceedings while noting the fact of absence of any false promise to marry, and the consent of complainant, her daughter and even parents who were living in the same house. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/09\/no-rape-false-promise-to-marry-supreme-court-quashes-rape-case-married-woman\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">SC upholds Karnataka HC order quashing proceedings against man accused of rape on false promise to marry due to inconsistent Prosecutrix testimonies<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In a criminal appeal titled <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">X v. A<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/33klHD4E\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 316<\/span><\/a>, filed against the order passed by the Karnataka High Court, wherein the Court allowed the petition filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) preferred by the accused persons and quashed the entire proceedings pending against them before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, the three-judge bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">BR Gavai*<\/span>, Rajesh Bindal and Sandeep Mehta, JJ. while upholding the impugned order, said that there are no sufficient grounds for proceeding against the accused, and no error has been committed by the High Court by holding that permitting further proceedings to continue would be an abuse of process of law and result in miscarriage of justice. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/sc-upholds-kar-hc-order-quashing-proceedings-man-accused-rape-false-promise-to-marry-due-to-inconsistent-prosecutrix-testimonies\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">&#8216;Child is not a Chattel&#8217;: Supreme Court sets aside Orissa HC judgment granting father custody of child living with aunt for 14 years<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal filed against the judgment of the Orissa High Court, wherein the Court directed the Registrar of the Court to recover the child from the custody of the sister of the child, particularly from her aunt and uncle and to hand over to the father, the division bench of C.T. Ravikumar and Rajesh Bindal, JJ., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Shazia Aman Khan v. State of Orissa<\/span>, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ZvJt38XB\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 225<\/a><\/span> while setting aside the impugned Judgment, said that the child cannot be treated as a chattel at the age of 14 years to hand over her custody to the father, where she has not lived ever since her birth. Stability of the child is also of paramount consideration. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/stability-child-paramount-consideration-custody-battle-supreme-court-sets-aside-orissa-hc-judgment-granting-custody-father\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Supreme Court&#8217;s verdict on master and servant relationship following suspension<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">U.P. Singh v. Punjab National Bank<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UlgFD0RZ\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1681<\/a> filed by the workman\/ appellant against the order passed by the Division Bench of Delhi High Court, wherein the Court upheld the Single Judge order setting aside the Tribunal&#8217;s award directing Punjab National Bank (&#8216;PNB&#8217;) to reinstate the workman\/ appellant with full back wages along with interest and consequential benefits, the division bench of Hima Kohli and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. while upholding the impugned order, said that as per Clause XVI in the Bipartite Agreement the workman could have been treated to have been voluntarily retired immediately upon expiry of 90 days from 28-09-1983 as he had failed to join duty. Despite this, the Bank was magnanimous enough to have issued a final notice to the workman granting him 30 days&#8217; time to report for duty. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/16\/explained-supreme-court-verdict-on-master-and-servant-relationship-after-suspension\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Mere acquittal in criminal case will not automatically qualify candidate for appointment to a post in law enforcement agency<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">State of M.P. v. Bhupendra Yadav<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/A210BATE\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1181<\/a>, filed by the State against the judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court, wherein the Court set aside the order passed by the Superintendent of Police (&#8216;SP&#8217;) communicating to the respondent that he was found to be unfit to be recruited as a constable, after he disclosed his involvement in a criminal case; and relegated the matter back to the competent authority for passing a fresh order, the division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Hima Kohli*<\/span> and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. while upholding the judgment dated 17-11-2017, passed by the Single Judge, quashed the impugned judgment passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, and said that even though the respondent had truthfully declared that he was involved in a criminal case, as per the judgement, this was not a case of clean acquittal, as it was based on benefit of doubt. Therefore, it was held that the said decision taken by the State Government is not tainted by any malafides or arbitrariness for the High Court to have interfered therewith. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/02\/mere-acquittal-criminal-case-candidate-appointment-post-law-enforcement-agency-sc\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Investigating Agencies not obliged to submit translation of charge sheet in language of the Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">CBI v. Narottam Dhakad<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XdStsjS8\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1069<\/a> filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (&#8216;CBI&#8217;) against the High Court order allowing translation of two charge sheets in VYAPAM Scam case, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abhay S. Oka*<\/span> and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. held that there was no specific provision for translation of charge sheet in the language of the Court and allowed the instant appeals. The instant matter roams around State government&#8217;s power to determine the language of each Court within such State, other than the High Court, for the purposes of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a>, such Courts including Sessions Courts, Judicial Magistrates of First Class, Metropolitan Magistrates, Judicial Magistrates of Second Class and Executive Magistrates. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/28\/no-translation-of-charge-sheet-in-language-of-court-not-illegal-supreme-court\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Woman&#8217;s unnatural death in matrimonial home, within 7 years of marriage, not sufficient to convict husband\/in-laws for dowry death<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Charan Singh v. State of Uttarakhand<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d8JqT4B2\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 454<\/span><\/a>, dating back to 1995, wherein a woman died an unnatural death in her matrimonial home, the bench of Abhay S Oka and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajesh Bindal*<\/span>, JJ has held that mere death of the deceased being unnatural in the matrimonial home within seven years of marriage will not be sufficient to convict the accused under Section 304-B and 498-A IPC if the cruelty or harassment has not been proved to be soon before the death. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/26\/woman-unnatural-death-in-matrimonial-home-not-sufficient-to-convict-husband-in-laws-under-section-498a-ipc-dowry-death-cruetly-soon-before-death-supreme-court-uttaranchal-high-court-legal-research-new\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Constitutional Courts can exercise power of imposing a modified or fixed-term sentence even where capital punishment is not imposed or proposed<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In an appeal, the division bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abhay S. Oka*<\/span> and Rajesh Bindal, JJ., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Shiva Kumar v. State of Karnataka<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ZnzxdTNq\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 345<\/span><\/a>, allowed the appeal against order of life sentence to the accused by the Trial Court for offence punishable under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and modified the sentence to a fixed-term period of 30 years. The appeal before the Court was limited to the modification of the awarded sentence by the Trial Court for the offence punishable under S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a>. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/04\/sc-and-hc-can-modify-fixed-term-sentence-wherein-capital-punishment-not-imposed-sc-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Labour Disputes| Workmen must mention their permanent address, even if they are represented by Labour Unions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Creative Garments Ltd. v. Kashiram Verma<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6qCyn0h7\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 277<\/span><\/a>, after noticing that workmen do not mention their permanent address in cases where labour disputes are filed through Unions, the Bench of Abhay S. Oka and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajesh Bindal*<\/span>, JJ., directed the authorities to take some corrective steps. It was directed that<\/span> parties shall be required to furnish their permanent address(es), even if the representative of the workman is appearing, he shall furnish permanent address of the workman as well. Merely mentioning through Labour Union or authorised representatives, who are sometimes union leaders or legal practitioners, will not be sufficient. Service of notice of workman will have to be effected on the permanent address of the workman. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/labour-law-dispute-workman-permanent-addressed-must-be-mentioned-even-if-represendted-by-union-labour-codes-supreme-court-legal-updates-research-knowledge-news\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Allegation of demand of gratification and acceptance made by a public servant must be established beyond a reasonable doubt<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Neeraj Dutta v. State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2e008d21\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 280<\/a>, where an appeal was filed against order of the Delhi High Court upholding the order of conviction for illegal gratification under the provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825997\" target=\"_blank\">Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988<\/a>, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abhay S. Oka*<\/span> and Rajesh Bindal reiterated that in the absence of direct evidence, reliance can be placed on circumstantial evidence to prove demand of illegal gratification. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/30\/circumstantial-evidence-can-be-relied-on-to-prove-demand-of-gratification-under-corruption-act-sc-reiterates-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\">High Courts<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Allahabad High Court | Manual Scavenging | No protective gears provided to the sanitation workers; summons issued to DM and Nagar Ayukt<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of Rajesh Bindal, CJ. and J.J. Munir, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">In Re Ensuring the Security of Life &amp; Safety of Health of the Workmen &amp; Employees Engaged v. State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/U1bV040S\" target=\"_blank\">2022 SCC OnLine All 475<\/a>, had taken note of a news item published in a newspaper on 24-05-2022 regarding cleaning of drains in the city where the workers were carrying out their job without any protective gears, this petition was registered in public interest. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/19\/allahabad-high-court-no-protective-gears-provided-to-the-sanitation-workers-dm-and-nagar-ayukt-summoned-manual-scavenging\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Does advertisement issued in a newspaper with barely any circulation affect fair opportunity to candidates? Allahabad High Court answers<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of Rajesh Bindal, CJ. and J.J. Munir, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Ravi Pratap Mishra v. State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7zqv2lU9\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2022 SCC OnLine All 397<\/span><\/a> dismissed an appeal which was filed against the order of the Single Judge who had dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant with the observation that prior to his appointment, the vacancy was not properly advertised. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/14\/does-advertisement-issued-in-a-newspaper-with-barely-any-circulation-affect-fair-opportunity-to-candidates-all-hc-answers\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Even after &#8216;Levana Suites fire&#8217; case, unauthorised hotels still functioning in the city as Lucknow Development Authority has failed to take any action: Allahabad High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of Rajesh Bindal, C.J. and Brij Raj Singh, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dr. Surendra Kumar v. State of UP<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/56ZwQht5\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine All 18<\/a><\/span>, ordered for a comprehensive affidavit to be filed by the State furnishing explanation regarding the inaction against the unauthorised hotels functioning in Lucknow. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/14\/allahabad-high-court-even-after-levana-suites-fire-case-unauthorised-hotels-still-functioning-in-the-city-as-lucknow-development-authority-has-failed-to-t\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Did Sourav Ganguly play with the &#8216;System&#8217;? Calcutta High Court pens down its decision in illegal allotment of plot to cricketer against State&#8217;s land allotment policy<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 1%;\">Opining that &#8220;process of applying the pick and choose a policy and making allotments at the whims and fancies of the persons in power continued in the State&#8221; Division Bench of Rajesh Bindal, CJ and Arijit Banerjee, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Humanity, Salt Lake v. State of W.B.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/aHRpe93Q\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2021 SCC OnLine Cal 2610<\/span><\/a> remarked that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;It is a fact that Sourav Ganguly has brought laurels for the country in Cricket. But when it comes to law, our Constitutional Scheme is that all are equal and no one can claim to be exclusive, above the law and seek benefits from the State, especially when question arises for allotment of plots for commercial venues.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; text-align: right;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/29\/sourav-ganguly-illegal-allotment-plot\/\" target=\"_blank\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Mismanagement and Wastage of Medicines in Government Hospitals | Taxpayers money cannot be wasted; Calcutta High Court directs State to produce records of medicines, maintain system through IT<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of Rajesh Bindal, ACJ. and Arijit Banerjee, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Court on its own motion v. State of West Bengal<a id=\"fnref6\" href=\"#fn6\"><sup>7<\/sup><\/a><\/span> suo moto took up a matter in larger public interest which was brought into notice by Shivakant Prasad, J., wherein he had noticed disturbing news published in the daily Hindi newspaper &#8216;Sanmarg&#8217; regarding apprehension of waste of medicines worth a crore of rupees in Beliaghata ID hospital. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/24\/wastage-of-medicines-in-government-hospitals\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">CM Mamta Banerjee&#8217;s Dharna at CBI office: Public trust and confidence in the judicial system is more important; Mob cannot have an upper hand: Calcutta High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Division Bench of Rajesh Bindal, CJ(A). and Arijit Banerjee, J., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">CBI ACB Kolkata v. Firhad Hakim<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8Wo1aADU\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2021 SCC OnLine Cal 1629<\/span><\/a>, were called upon to deal with an extra-ordinary situation where Chief Minister of the State can sit on a dharna outside the office of the Central Bureau of Investigation (&#8216;CBI&#8217;) along with her supporters, which had investigated the case and was to present a charge-sheet in court against the accused who are senior party leaders of the party in power in the State, some of them being Ministers. Law Minister of the State was also present in Court where the accused were to be presented along with mob of 2000 to 3000 supporters. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/cal-hc-cm-mamta-banerjees-dharna-at-cbi-office-public-trust-and-confidence-in-the-judicial-system-is-more-important-mob-cannot-have-an-upper-hand-tmc-leaders-bail-stayed\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read more<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Non-applicant cannot be convicted on the statement of co-accused recorded under S. 67 of the NDPS Act, 1985: Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A Division Bench of Sanjay Dhar and Rajesh Bindal, JJ., in <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Union of India v. Rafi Ahmed<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/oespXWEt\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2020 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 643<\/span><\/a> while dismissing the present application seeking leave to appeal, said, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;&#8230;the non-applicant cannot be convicted on the statement of co-accused recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, as the same cannot be used as a confessional statement being barred under the provision of Section 25 of the Evidence Act.&#8221;<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/j-application-dismissed\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #c00000;\">Importer will not be held responsible for bearing the cost of inordinate delay which was condoned by Authorities: <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Punjab and Haryana High Court<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While deciding the case of detainment of imported goods of petitioner for the inordinate period by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) or the customs authorities, the Bench of Rajesh Bindal and Harinder Singh Sidhu, JJ., in<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shri Lakshmi Steels v. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2016_SCC_OnLine_P%26H_12111\" target=\"_blank\">2016 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 12111<\/a><\/span>, said that the importing company cannot be burdened to incur unnecessary detention and demurrage charges if the delay is condoned by the Port Authority. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/31\/importer-will-not-be-held-responsible-for-bearing-the-cost-of-inordinate-delay-which-was-condoned-by-authorities\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn0\" href=\"#fnref0\">1.<\/a> Address to Trainee Judicial Officers at Chandigarh Judicial Academy &lt;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tribuneindia.com\/news\/chandigarh\/embrace-independence-fairness-justice-bindal-urges-judicial-officers-609830\" target=\"_blank\">Embrace independence, fairness, Justice Rajesh Bindal urges judicial officers : The Tribune India<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">2.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/jkhighcourt.nic.in\/formerJudges.php\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Rajesh Bindal<\/a>, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">3.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.calcuttahighcourt.gov.in\/Judges\/181\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Rajesh Bindal<\/a>, Calcutta High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">4.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.allahabadhighcourt.in\/service\/judgeDetail.jsp?id=340\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Rajesh Bindal<\/a>, Allahabad High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">5.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.allahabadhighcourt.in\/service\/judgeDetail.jsp?id=340\" target=\"_blank\">Justice Rajesh Bindal<\/a>, Allahabad High Court<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn5\" href=\"#fnref5\">6.<\/a> www.scconline.com | &#8216;Judge Only&#8217; feature<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn6\" href=\"#fnref6\">7.<\/a> WPA (P) 180 of 2021, order dated: 22-06-2021<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prior to being elevated to the Supreme Court in 2023, Justice Rajesh Bindal was serving as the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":345895,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38347],"tags":[38700,2822,41139,2689,13191,77115,6691,37965,8011,38349,54971,35320,41625,23204,10521,2670,34169],"class_list":["post-345892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-judges-information","tag-advocate-on-record","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-aor","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-child-custody","tag-community-resources","tag-dowry-death","tag-jammu-and-kashmir-high-court","tag-juvenile-justice","tag-know-thy-judge","tag-levana-suites-fire","tag-mamta-banerjee","tag-manual-scavenging","tag-pocso","tag-prevention-of-corruption","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore the life, career and important judgments delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal, Judge of Supreme Court of India.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore the life, career and important judgments delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal, Judge of Supreme Court of India.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-16T08:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-74.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/\",\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-16T08:30:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Explore the life, career and important judgments delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal, Judge of Supreme Court of India.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"Justice Rajesh Bindal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal | SCC Times","description":"Explore the life, career and important judgments delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal, Judge of Supreme Court of India.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal","og_description":"Explore the life, career and important judgments delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal, Judge of Supreme Court of India.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-16T08:30:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-74.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/","name":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-16T08:30:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Explore the life, career and important judgments delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal, Judge of Supreme Court of India.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"Justice Rajesh Bindal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-important-judgments-sc-legal-news-updates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Media-_74_.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":289841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-of-india-justice-rajesh-bindal-birthday-career-judgments-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":345892,"position":0},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Newly elevated Judge of the Supreme Court of India, Justice Rajesh Bindal, celebrates his 62nd birthday today. Prior to being elevated to the Supreme Court, Justice Bindal was serving as the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice rajesh bindal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283597,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/10\/president-gives-nod-to-justice-rajesh-bindal-justice-aravind-kumar-elevation-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":345892,"position":1},"title":"President gives nod to Justice Rajesh Bindal &amp; Justice Aravind Kumar&#8217;s elevation; Supreme Court achieves sanctioned strength of 34 Judges","author":"Editor","date":"February 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Chief Justices of the High Courts of Allahabad and Gujarat have been elevated thereby paving the way for the Supreme Court to achieve its sanctioned strength of 34 Judges","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-349.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":283875,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/14\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-new-appointment-justice-rajesh-bindal-justice-aravind-kumar-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":345892,"position":2},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judges- Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Aravind Kumar","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"With former High Court Chief Justices Rajesh Bindal and Aravind Kumar swearing in as Supreme Court Judges, read to know about the new appointees and what it means for Supreme Court\u2019s Judges\u2019 strength.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-104.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":320125,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/16\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-of-india-justice-rajesh-bindal-career-judgments-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":345892,"position":3},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Rajesh Bindal","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Prior to being elevated to the Supreme Court in 2023, Justice Rajesh Bindal was serving as the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice rajesh bindal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241670,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/04\/justice-rajesh-bindal-judge-common-hc-for-ut-of-jk-and-ut-of-ladakh-appointed-as-judge-of-the-calcutta-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":345892,"position":4},"title":"Justice Rajesh Bindal, Judge Common HC for UT of J&#038;K and UT of Ladakh, appointed as Judge of the Calcutta High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"President transfers Justice Rajesh Bindal, Judge, Common High Court for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh, as a Judge of the Calcutta High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Calcutta High Court. ORDER Ministry of Law and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240340,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/08\/justice-rajesh-bindal-senior-most-judge-of-jammu-kashmir-high-court-appointed-as-the-acting-chief-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":345892,"position":5},"title":"Justice Rajesh Bindal, senior-most Judge of Jammu &#038; Kashmir High Court appointed as the Acting Chief Justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"APPOINTMENT President appoints Justice Rajesh Bindal, senior-most Judge of Common High Court for the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir and Union Territory of Ladakh, to perform the duties of the office of Chief Justice of that High Court with effect from 09-12-2020 consequent upon the retirement of Kumari Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=345892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345892\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/345895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=345892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=345892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=345892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}