{"id":345210,"date":"2025-04-04T16:00:25","date_gmt":"2025-04-04T10:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=345210"},"modified":"2025-04-07T17:32:26","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T12:02:26","slug":"delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> The present Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) was filed challenging a judgment delivered by the Single Judge dismissing the petition filed by the appellant. The Division Bench of Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ., and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, J., held that that the order dated 02-08-2024, is to be treated as an interim recommendation under Section 75<\/a> and 76<\/a> of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a> which needs to be considered by the respondent 1 and, in case, it is unable to accept said recommendation, it needs to convey the valid reasons therefore to the CCPD.<\/p>\n

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a dispute regarding the transfer of the appellant, an employee of the National Power Training Institute (NPTI), which was challenged before the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD). The appellant, a person with a disability, approached the CCPD, contending that the transfer order was contrary to the rights granted under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a>, and sought its suspension. By an order dated 02-08-2024, the CCPD directed the NPTI to keep the transfer in abeyance.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved by this order, NPTI filed a petition before the Single Judge, asserting that the CCPD lacked jurisdiction to intervene in matters of service and transfer, which fall within the domain of the employer’s discretion. It was further contended that the transfer was made in accordance with administrative exigencies and was not punitive in nature. Accepting these arguments, the Single Judge, by an order dated 02-09-2024, allowed the writ petition and set aside the CCPD’s directive.<\/p>\n

The present intra-court appeal has been preferred against this judgment, with the appellant arguing that the Single Judge erred in disregarding the special protections available to persons with disabilities under the law. The appellant contended that the CCPD has the authority to ensure compliance with disability rights and that the transfer order, if enforced, would cause undue hardship. Conversely, the respondents maintained that transfer is an incident of service and that the intervention by the CCPD was beyond its jurisdiction. The appeal, therefore, centers on the question of whether the CCPD had the authority to direct the suspension of the transfer order and whether the Single Judge correctly assessed the legal and factual matrix in setting aside the CCPD’s order.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the law under the old statutory regime in terms of 1995 Act is clear, according to which the Chief Commissioner or Commissioners under the said Act lacked necessary power, authority, and jurisdiction to issue any mandatory prohibitory injunction or other interim orders. The old regime, i.e., 1995 Act was enacted to implement the proclamation issued at the meeting held in the year 1992 of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and pacific to which India was a signatory. After the said proclamation and enactment of the Act 1995, the United Nations General Assembly adopted its Convention on rights of PwDs on 13-12-2006, laying down certain principles for empowerment of PwDs. India is a signatory to the said Convention and ratified the Convention on 01-10-2007 and accordingly, to implement the said Convention, the Parliament enacted 2016 Act. Thus, if the statutory provisions contained in 1995 Act and 2016 Act are compared, the provisions under 2016 regime provides better armory to the CCPD in its fold to ensure that recommendations made by him for taking corrective steps and measures are implemented.<\/p>\n

The Court examined the binding nature of recommendations made by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) under Sections 75<\/a> and 76<\/a> of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a>. The court observed that while the recommendations made by the Chief Commissioner are generally binding on the concerned authorities, there exists a narrow exception where the authority can decline to implement the recommendations by providing valid reasons. Such reasons must be communicated both to the Chief Commissioner and the affected person. The Court also clarified that the CCPD possesses the power to issue interim recommendations, which must be considered by the relevant authority. However, these interim measures are subject to the same condition that the authority may refuse to implement them for valid reasons, provided such reasons are conveyed.<\/p>\n

The Court further examined the scope of CCPD’s powers in employment-related matters concerning persons with disabilities (PwDs). It reiterated that service-related matters such as transfers, promotions, and disciplinary actions primarily fall within the purview of the employer. However, if an employer violates specific provisions under the 2016 Act, such as failing to provide the mandated reservation in recruitment or disregarding protections against discrimination, then the CCPD’s intervention would be justified. The Court also addressed the non-applicability of precedents cited by the appellant, emphasizing that the CCPD’s role is primarily recommendatory rather than adjudicatory.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court held that the order passed by the CCPD in the present case should be treated as an interim recommendation, not a mandatory direction, and must be considered by the authority considering the interpretation given under Section 76 of the Act.<\/p>\n

[Mukesh Kumar v. National Power Training Institute, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2056<\/a>, decided on 02-04-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Rahul Bajaj and Mr. Taha Bin Tasneem, Advocates<\/p>\n

Mr. Prashant Shukla and Mr. Kartik Kumar, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Prernaa Singh, Advs. for R-2 and R-3.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a situation where rights available to persons with disabilities under the 2016 Act or the Rules 2017 or under any other measure involving the service-related issues are found to have been infringed or violated, the provisions of the 2016 Act will have to be given effect to.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[76612,80630,80642,80640,80308,72373,80629,80633,80638,74433,80637,80641,80635,80631,80639,80634,80636,80632],"class_list":["post-345210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-administrativelaw","tag-ccpd","tag-ccpdjurisdiction","tag-chiefcommissionerforpersonswithdisabilities","tag-constitutionallaw","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-disabilitiesact2016","tag-disabilityrightsindia","tag-disabledemployee","tag-employmentlaw","tag-interimreccommendation","tag-ministryofsocialjusticeandempowerment","tag-postpolioresidualparalysis","tag-pwdrights","tag-rightsofpersonswithdisabilitiesact","tag-rpwdact2016","tag-transferorder","tag-transferpolicy"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC clarifies CCPD\u2019s powers; Transfer of disabled employee an interim recommendation under RPwD Act, 2016| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) can issue interim recommendations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, in transfer-related matters, but such recommendations are not binding.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) can issue interim recommendations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, in transfer-related matters, but such recommendations are not binding.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-04T10:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-07T12:02:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"headline\":\"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-04T10:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-07T12:02:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":903,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"AdministrativeLaw\",\"CCPD\",\"CCPDJurisdiction\",\"ChiefCommissionerForPersonsWithDisabilities\",\"ConstitutionalLaw\",\"DelhiHighCourt\",\"DisabilitiesAct2016\",\"DisabilityRightsIndia\",\"disabledemployee\",\"EmploymentLaw\",\"interimreccommendation\",\"MinistryOfSocialJusticeAndEmpowerment\",\"PostPolioResidualParalysis\",\"PwDRights\",\"RightsOfPersonsWithDisabilitiesAct\",\"RPwDAct2016\",\"transferorder\",\"TransferPolicy\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC clarifies CCPD\u2019s powers; Transfer of disabled employee an interim recommendation under RPwD Act, 2016| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-04T10:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-07T12:02:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) can issue interim recommendations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, in transfer-related matters, but such recommendations are not binding.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/04\\\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-editor_9\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC clarifies CCPD\u2019s powers; Transfer of disabled employee an interim recommendation under RPwD Act, 2016| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) can issue interim recommendations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, in transfer-related matters, but such recommendations are not binding.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) can issue interim recommendations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, in transfer-related matters, but such recommendations are not binding.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-04T10:30:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-07T12:02:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/"},"author":{"name":"Arunima","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"headline":"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers","datePublished":"2025-04-04T10:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-07T12:02:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/"},"wordCount":903,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","keywords":["AdministrativeLaw","CCPD","CCPDJurisdiction","ChiefCommissionerForPersonsWithDisabilities","ConstitutionalLaw","DelhiHighCourt","DisabilitiesAct2016","DisabilityRightsIndia","disabledemployee","EmploymentLaw","interimreccommendation","MinistryOfSocialJusticeAndEmpowerment","PostPolioResidualParalysis","PwDRights","RightsOfPersonsWithDisabilitiesAct","RPwDAct2016","transferorder","TransferPolicy"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC clarifies CCPD\u2019s powers; Transfer of disabled employee an interim recommendation under RPwD Act, 2016| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-04T10:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-07T12:02:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD) can issue interim recommendations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, in transfer-related matters, but such recommendations are not binding.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-transfer-disabled-employee-interim-recommendation-ccpd-powers-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Transfer Order of disabled employee to be treated as interim recommendation under Disabilities Act, 2016; Delhi High Court clarifies scope of CCPD\u2019s powers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/delhi-high-court-amendment-application-being-rejected-as-belated-does-not-constitute-interim-award-susceptible-to-challenge-under-s-34-arbitration-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":345210,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court: Amendment application being rejected as ‘belated’ does not constitute interim award susceptible to challenge under S 34 Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (\u2018A&C Act') challenging an order passed wherein the arbitrator rejected an application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the statement of claim, Prateek Jalan, J. dismissed the petition as non-maintainable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297121,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/18\/delhi-court-grants-interim-bail-to-brij-bhushan-in-sexual-harassment-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":345210,"position":1},"title":"Delhi Court grants two-days interim bail to Brij Bhushan in a sexual harassment case","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBJP MP and former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh has been granted interim bail by Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court in the case of alleged sexual harassment of six female wrestlers. His secretary Vinod Tomar is also granted bail by the Delhi Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rouse avenue court, delhi","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/rouse-avenue-court-delhi.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/nclat-allows-inspection-of-aircraft-engines-leased-to-go-airlines-scc-blog-legal-researc-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":345210,"position":2},"title":"[Go Airlines] NCLAT allows inspection of leased Aircraft Engines","author":"Ritu","date":"August 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority is at a prima facie stage and should not be treated as a final expression of opinion.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277011,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/08\/interim-moratorium-under-s-96-ibc-in-respect-of-one-of-the-guarantors-would-not-ipso-facto-apply-against-a-co-guarantor-delhi-hc-stays-suit-in-view-of-bar-under-s-96-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":345210,"position":3},"title":"Interim moratorium under S. 96 IBC in respect of one of the guarantors would not ipso facto apply against a co-guarantor; Delhi HC stays suit in view of bar under S.96 IBC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In two separate suits filed seeking recovery of amount from the defendants, being ex- promoters and personal guarantors of debt of Bhushan Steel Limited, now renamed as Tata Steel Limited, Amit Bansal J., stayed the proceedings in the present suit against defendants in view of the clear\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273013,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/03\/delhi-high-court-denied-bail-rpf-constable-up-police-for-murder-lic-agent-interim-bail-different-from-regular-bail-indian-penal-code-legalnews-legalupdates-legalresearch-section302\/","url_meta":{"origin":345210,"position":4},"title":"Grant of interim bail does not obviate regular bail; Delhi High Court denies bail to UP Police official and RPF constable for committing murder of LIC agent","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In an application filed by the applicant who is a UP Police official, charged under Section 302, 120-B and 34 Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') seeking regular bail on the ground that the applicant was granted interim bail and never misused his liberty, Rajnish Bhatnagar J.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/delhi-high-court-restrains-flipkart-from-allowing-third-party-sellers-to-latch-on-to-mark-v-tradition-directs-to-ensure-latching-on-feature-is-di\/","url_meta":{"origin":345210,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Flipkart from allowing third-party sellers to \u2018latch on\u2019 to mark \u2018V Tradition\u2019; Directs to ensure \u2018Latching On\u2019 feature is disabled","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Flipkart (\u2018defendant\u2019) was sued by V Traditions (\u2018plaintiff\u2019) for infringing its mark by allowing third party sellers to latch on to the plaintiff product listings featured as best sellers, Prathiba M Singh J. restrains Flipkart from allowing any third-party sellers from \u2018latching on\u2019 to the mark \u2018V\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=345210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345210\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=345210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=345210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=345210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}