{"id":345147,"date":"2025-04-04T10:00:23","date_gmt":"2025-04-04T04:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=345147"},"modified":"2025-04-18T17:19:27","modified_gmt":"2025-04-18T11:49:27","slug":"delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Oréal against trademark infringement and counterfeiting"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a suit filed by Loreal SA (plaintiff) seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant 1 from infringement of registered trademark and copyright of the plaintiff and other conjuncted reliefs of passing off, delivery up, damages, rendition of accounts, etc., Mini Pushkarna, J., granted injunction in favour of the plaintiff and held that the plaintiff is entitled to a nominal cost of ₹1,00,000, which shall be paid to the plaintiff by the defendant no. 1, within a period of eight weeks.<\/p>\n

L’Oréal SA, a global cosmetics giant, filed the present suit against defendants, alleging trademark infringement, passing off, and counterfeiting of its registered trademarks. The plaintiff contended that its brand names, including ‘L’Oréal,’ ‘Maybelline,’ and ‘Garnier,’ are globally renowned and enjoy immense goodwill and reputation. The company maintained that it had secured valid trademark registrations for these brands in multiple jurisdictions, including India. It was alleged that the defendants were engaged in the unauthorized manufacture, distribution, and sale of counterfeit products bearing L’Oréal’s trademarks, thereby misleading consumers and tarnishing the brand’s reputation.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff claimed that these counterfeit products were of substandard quality and posed a serious risk to consumer safety. It was contended that such infringing activities not only deceived the public but also resulted in substantial economic loss to L’Oréal. The suit was initiated upon receiving reports of counterfeit goods circulating in the market, prompting an investigation that led to the identification of the defendants as primary offenders.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff argued that it was a well-established brand with significant market share and consumer trust. It was contended that the defendants’ actions violated the Trademarks Act, 1999<\/a>, and constituted both civil and criminal wrongs. The plaintiff submitted evidence, including market surveys and forensic reports, to establish the presence of counterfeit goods in the market. It further argued that allowing such infringement to persist would not only harm its brand reputation but also endanger consumers.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, the defendants denied the allegations and contended that they were not involved in any counterfeiting activities. Some defendants claimed that they were merely distributors and had no role in the manufacturing of the allegedly infringing goods. Others argued that their business dealings were legitimate and that the plaintiff’s claims were exaggerated. Certain defendants also challenged the validity of the plaintiff’s trademarks and asserted that they had independent rights to trade in similar goods.<\/p>\n

The Court examined the evidence presented by both parties and took note of the extensive documentation provided by the plaintiff, including trademark registration certificates, market surveys, and forensic reports confirming the presence of counterfeit products. The Court emphasized that trademark protection is essential to prevent consumer deception and to uphold brand integrity. It noted that under Sections 29<\/a> and 30<\/a> of the Trademarks Act, 1999<\/a>, the unauthorized use of a registered trademark amounts to infringement, and the burden lay on the defendants to disprove the allegations.<\/p>\n

The Court also considered the impact of counterfeiting on public health and consumer safety and observed that the cosmetics industry involves products that come into direct contact with consumers’ skin and hair, making it imperative to ensure authenticity and quality control. The presence of counterfeit goods in the market not only misleads consumers but also exposes them to potential health hazards. Regarding the defendants’ arguments, the Court found that mere denial of liability was insufficient considering the plaintiff’s evidence. It held that the defense of being a mere distributor did not absolve the defendants from liability if they were found to be dealing in counterfeit goods. The Court further rejected the challenge to the validity of L’Oréal’s trademarks, affirming that they were duly registered and entitled to protection under the law.<\/p>\n

After considering the submissions and evidence, the Court ruled in favor of L’Oréal SA and granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing counterfeit products bearing the plaintiff’s trademarks. The Court also directed the appointment of local commissioners to conduct search-and-seizure operations at the defendants’ premises to seize the infringing goods.<\/p>\n

Additionally, the Court awarded damages in favor of the plaintiff, recognizing the economic loss and reputational harm suffered due to counterfeiting.<\/p>\n

[Loreal SA v. Ashok Kumar, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2005<\/a>, decided on 04-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate for plaintiff<\/p>\n

Mr. Rishabh Dev Mishra, Adv. for D3 (Through VC) Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Mohd. Bilal, Ms. Priya Singh, Mr. Nishant Sharma and Ms. Archana Roy, Advs. for D-4.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Defendant 1 is unknown person\/persons, who have fraudulently engaged with different business entities to commit fraud, impersonation and are misleading the general public into believing that they are acting on behalf of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[74503,73949,80604,72373,72374,74865,72375],"class_list":["post-345147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-brandprotection","tag-copyrightlaw","tag-counterfeitingproducts","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-intellectualproperty","tag-justiceminipushkarna","tag-trademarkinfringement"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al against trademark infringement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants an injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al in a trademark infringement and counterfeiting case, reinforcing brand protection against unauthorized use.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al against trademark infringement and counterfeiting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants an injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al in a trademark infringement and counterfeiting case, reinforcing brand protection against unauthorized use.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-04T04:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-18T11:49:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Oréal against trademark infringement and counterfeiting\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al against trademark infringement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-04T04:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-18T11:49:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court grants an injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al in a trademark infringement and counterfeiting case, reinforcing brand protection against unauthorized use.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Oréal against trademark infringement and counterfeiting\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al against trademark infringement | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court grants an injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al in a trademark infringement and counterfeiting case, reinforcing brand protection against unauthorized use.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al against trademark infringement and counterfeiting","og_description":"Delhi High Court grants an injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al in a trademark infringement and counterfeiting case, reinforcing brand protection against unauthorized use.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-04T04:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-18T11:49:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Oréal against trademark infringement and counterfeiting","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al against trademark infringement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-04T04:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-18T11:49:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court grants an injunction in favour of L\u2019Or\u00e9al in a trademark infringement and counterfeiting case, reinforcing brand protection against unauthorized use.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-injunction-loreal-trademark-infringement-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favour of L\u2019Oréal against trademark infringement and counterfeiting"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":253042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/interim-injunction-in-favour-of-dps-society-against-infringement-of-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":345147,"position":0},"title":"Del HC grants interim injunction in favour of DPS Society against Infringement of trademark and crest logo by Delhi Public International School","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. while addressing the matter of trademark infringement, opined that, \u201cBesides, considering that parties are in the field of education, deliberate adoption by the Defendants of impugned trade marks and logo that are deceptively similar and\/or identical to the Plaintiff\u2019s registered trade marks\/names and logos\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Screenshot-2021-08-20-at-6.04.50-PM.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":273586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-jamshedpur-based-restaurant-social-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-social\/","url_meta":{"origin":345147,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte ad interim injunction against Jamshedpur based restaurant SOCIAL 75 for using the registered trademark SOCIAL","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a trademark infringement suit filed by a company namely, Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt Ltd. (\u2018plaintiff') running a well-known restaurant, SOCIAL against the offending trademark SOCIAL 75 (\u2018defendant'), Jyoti Singh J. granted ex parte ad-interim injunction, as the impugned trademark is deceptively similar to the registered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/20\/permanent-injunction-granted-for-infringement-of-trademark-on-satisfaction-of-triple-identity-test\/","url_meta":{"origin":345147,"position":2},"title":"Permanent injunction granted for infringement of trademark on satisfaction of \u2018triple identity test\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manmohan, J. decreed a suit for grant of a permanent injunction against the defendant for infringement of plaintiff \u2019s trademarks. It was an admitted fact that the plaintiff was a registered owner of the trademarks SUMEET and SUMEET TRADITIONAL for their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":278074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","url_meta":{"origin":345147,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. passed an interim order restraining Vistara Media Private Limited from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":266738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/trademark-infringement-of-starbucks-trademark-frappuccino\/","url_meta":{"origin":345147,"position":4},"title":"Infringement of Starbucks trademark FRAPPUCCINO | Del HC awards Rs 2 lakh in damages and 9 lakh costs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a matter wherein Starbucks trademark \u2018frappuccino\u2019 was being infringed, Jyoti Singh, J., while observing that, FRAPPUCCINO trademarks have acquired formidable reputation and goodwill in India, awarded Starbuck Rupees 2 lakhs damages and 9 lakh costs. Instant suit had been filed to seek a decree of permanent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/the-term-fly-high-used-by-vistara-is-common-to-aviation-delhi-high-court-vacates-interim-injunction-granted-in-favour-of-frankfinn\/","url_meta":{"origin":345147,"position":5},"title":"The term \u2018FLY HIGH\u2019 used by Vistara is common to aviation; Delhi High Court vacates interim injunction granted in favour of Frankfinn","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Frankfinn Aviation Services Private Limited (\u2018plaintiff\u2019) seeking permanent and mandatory injunction restraining the Defendant inter alia from infringement of trademark \u2018FLY HIGH\u2019, passing off, unfair competition, dilution and for rendition of accounts, Jyoti Singh, J., vacates an interim injunction order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=345147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345147\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=345147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=345147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=345147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}