{"id":344939,"date":"2025-04-02T18:00:17","date_gmt":"2025-04-02T12:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=344939"},"modified":"2025-04-05T09:39:54","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T04:09:54","slug":"dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563709\" target=\"_blank\">57<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;) seeking rectification\/removal of the trademark, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"28\" height=\"31\"\/>, registered in Respondent 1&#8217;s favour, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Mini Pushkarna, J.<\/span>, stated that Respondent 1&#8217;s marks i.e. PURPLLE TREE\/<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"26\" height=\"28\"\/> were liable to be removed from the Register of Trade Marks. Accordingly, the Court directed cancellation of registration of <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"27\" height=\"29\"\/>, registered in favour of Respondent 1.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was a company was incorporated in the year 2011 and operated an online beauty and wellness under the e-commerce platform named, PURPLLE. The petitioner operated through its website wherein, they offered makeup, skincare, hair, bath and body, herbal, baby care, beauty and wellness, fragrance, beauty appliances, and luxury products.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner was the owner and proprietor of several trade marks, i.e. <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-4.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"50\" height=\"25\"\/>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-5.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"50\" height=\"25\"\/>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-6.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"45\" height=\"25\"\/>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-7.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"45\" height=\"25\"\/>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-8.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"45\" height=\"25\"\/>, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">PURPLLE.COM<\/span>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-9.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"50\" height=\"25\"\/>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-10.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"80\" height=\"25\"\/>, <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-11.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"80\" height=\"20\"\/>, PURPLLE BEAUTY FM, under various classes, that were valid, subsisting and in continuous and extensive use since 2011.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">During a routine search of the Trade Marks Registry records, the petitioner came across a trade mark application for the mark PURPLLE TREE\/<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-12.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"30\" height=\"30\"\/> with respect to essential oils filed by Respondent 1. The said application was objected by the Trade Marks Registry under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563602\" target=\"_blank\">11<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\">Act<\/a>, citing marks of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon discovery of the said application of Respondent 1, the petitioner conducted a detailed search in the trade marks registry records and came across the impugned registrations for the mark, i.e., PURPLLE TREE\/<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-13.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"30\" height=\"30\"\/> , on a &#8216;proposed to be used&#8217; basis. Accordingly, the petitioner filed the present petitions seeking rectification of the impugned marks.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the depiction of the word, &#8216;PURPLLE&#8217; with addition of two &#8216;L&#8217;s resulted into an arbitrary formation of a mark. Hence, any adoption of the same in a manner, as adopted by the petitioner, would amount to a dishonest adoption. The Court stated that the impugned marks had an undeniable resemblance to the prior registered trade mark &#8216;PURPLLE&#8217; of the petitioner. Respondent 1 had adopted the mark of the petitioner in its entirety.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it was apparent from the examination of the marks that the petitioner&#8217;s mark was completely subsumed in the mark of Respondent 1. Respondent 1 had added the word, &#8216;TREE&#8217; as a suffix to the mark, &#8216;PURPLLE&#8217;, and added a pictorial representation of a tree. However, despite the endeavour of Respondent 1 to create distinctions, it was crystal clear that the impugned marks of Respondent 1 were confusingly\/deceptively similar to the earlier and registered trade mark of the petitioner. Such use of a similar mark would invariably mislead and confuse consumers and members of trade into believing that the goods under the impugned mark were sourced from the petitioner or were in some manner associated with the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that Respondent 1 blatantly lifted the prior used and registered trade mark &#8216;PURPLLE&#8217; and added the word &#8216;TREE&#8217;, which was hardly a distinguishing factor. The existence of entirely, phonetically, structurally and confusingly similar marks on the Register of the Trade Marks, was likely to cause confusion, and deception amongst the trade members, and the public. Thus, the impugned registration directly conflicted with the prior rights of the petitioner and amounts to trade mark infringement, as well as unfair competition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that given the long, continuous and extensive use and promotional activities undertaken by the petitioner, it was incomprehensible that Respondent 1 was unaware of the prior use, registrations, goodwill and reputation of the trademark &#8216;PURPLLE&#8217;. Thus, considering the facts on record, the adoption of a similar mark by Respondent 1 could be bona fide or honest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that extensive promotion of its products by the petitioner established substantial knowledge of the petitioner&#8217;s marks amongst the consumers and traders. There was ample proof on record that highlighted the widespread recognition of the products of the petitioner under the mark &#8216;PURPLLE&#8217;. Given the global accessibility of the internet, it was evident that knowledge and awareness of the business of the petitioner under its trade mark, were widespread and indisputable. Hence, it was apparent that Respondent 1 had adopted the marks in question knowingly and with dishonest and mala fide intention. Therefore, the fact that Respondent 1&#8217;s marks were registered in a different class, would be immaterial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court stated that Respondent 1&#8217;s marks i.e. PURPLLE TREE\/<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-14.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"30\" height=\"30\"\/> were liable to be removed from the Register of Trade Marks. Accordingly, the Court directed cancellation of registration of <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/18_Purplle-trade-mark-15.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"30\" height=\"30\"\/>, registered in favour of Respondent 1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Manash Lifestyle (P) Ltd. v. Viraj Harjai, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/clszSJmi\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 2000<\/a>, decided on 10-3-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Nageshwar Kumar and Ayush Dey, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> R. Venkat Prabhat, SPC with Kamna Behrani, Ansh Kalra, and Divyanshu Sinha, Advocates; Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Debasish Mishra and Arnav Mittal, Advocates; Vinay Yadav, SPC with Kamna Behrani, Ansh Kalra and Divyanshu Sinha, Advocates.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Trade Marks Act, 1999 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"trade marks act, 1999\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-296380\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-886x590.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Despite Respondent 1&#8217;s endeavour to create distinctions, it is crystal clear that the marks are confusingly\/deceptively similar to the petitioner&#8217;s registered trade mark. Such use of a similar mark would invariably mislead consumers and members into believing that the goods under the impugned mark were sourced from the petitioner.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[52955,2543,69176,80514,80511,80512,80513,53144,42599,52951],"class_list":["post-344939","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deceptively-similar","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-mini-pushkarna","tag-mislead-consumers","tag-purplle","tag-purplle-tree","tag-register-of-trade-marks","tag-similar-mark","tag-trade-marks","tag-trade-marks-act-1999"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DHC directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019 and directed removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019 and directed removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-02T12:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-05T04:09:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/\",\"name\":\"DHC directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-02T12:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-05T04:09:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court granted relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019 and directed removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DHC directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court granted relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019 and directed removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks","og_description":"Delhi High Court granted relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019 and directed removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-04-02T12:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-05T04:09:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/","name":"DHC directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-04-02T12:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-05T04:09:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court granted relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019 and directed removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":328460,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/10\/delhi-hc-directs-restaurant-take-steps-changing-trade-name-within-4-weeks-in-plea-trade-mark-infringement-nizams\/","url_meta":{"origin":344939,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court directs \u2018Andaaz-E-Nizaam\u2019 restaurant to change name in Trade Mark infringement plea by \u2018Nizam\u2019s","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides for taking a registered trade mark off the Register on account of non-use of the trade mark.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/10\/dhc-upholds-trade-mark-rights-of-ganesh-grains-over-its-ganesh-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":344939,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds trade mark rights of Ganesh Grains over its \u2018GANESH\u2019 marks; directs cancellation of \u2018GANESH HARA MATAR\u2019 mark","author":"Arushi","date":"December 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPetitioner has established that that it was the prior registered proprietor and prior user of the mark \u2018GANESH\u2019 and its other formative marks since 1936. The adoption and use of the mark \u2018GANESH HARA MATAR\u2019 by Respondent 1, is likely to create confusion in the market.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":344939,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner company Crocs is a popular footwear brand with a widespread range of more than 300 styled for men, women and children which are popular both in India and abroad.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"relief to Crocs case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331189,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/delhi-hc-cancels-trade-mark-lil-monster-protect-intellectual-property-rights-monster-energy-company-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":344939,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court cancels trade mark \u2018LI\u2019L MONSTER\u2019 to protect the Intellectual Property Rights of Monster Energy Co.","author":"Editor","date":"September 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The trade mark \u2018MONSTER\u2019 had been adopted by Monster Energy Co. in 2002 in the United States of America.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/delhi-hc-upholds-registration-of-harpic-drainxpert-trade-mark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":344939,"position":4},"title":"Treating \u2018HARPIC DRAIN XPERT\u2019 similar to \u2018XPERT\u2019 would be stretching the principle of similarity to an unreasonable extent: Delhi High Court upholds registration","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo hold that a customer would be confused, because the word \u2018XPERT\u2019 forms the second part of the second word of the impugned mark, would be consigning reality to oblivion.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/22\/dhc-grants-relief-in-favour-of-rapido-in-trade-mark-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":344939,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Identical marks, identical goods\/services and identical target consumers\u2019: Delhi HC grants relief in favour of Rapido in trade mark dispute","author":"Arushi","date":"January 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is clear that the impugned mark has been adopted by Respondent 1 dishonestly to trade upon the goodwill and reputation of the petitioner under the RAPIDO marks and to associate itself with the petitioner.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344939","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344939"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344939\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344939"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344939"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344939"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}