{"id":344653,"date":"2025-03-29T13:00:50","date_gmt":"2025-03-29T07:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=344653"},"modified":"2025-04-03T18:19:53","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T12:49:53","slug":"mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom\u2019; MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition challenging the orders by Collector and District Magistrate and Divisional Commissioner, Shahdol, which externed the petitioner from District Umariya and neighboring districts for one year, a single-judge bench of Vivek Agarwal, J., deemed both the orders as cryptic and arbitrary and appearing to be an attempt on behalf the mighty State to curtail the personal freedom of an individual and quashed them.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioner challenged the externment order and contended that she had only six pending cases against her, but none resulted in conviction. It was stated that two of these cases were under Section 110<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>, two under Sections 294<\/a>, 323<\/a>, 506<\/a>, 34<\/a> of IPC<\/a>, and two under the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that the externment order was arbitrary and violated Section 5 of the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam). It was contended that the primary witness, SHO, admitted that no contraband was recovered from the petitioner and that there was no public apprehension regarding her activities.<\/p>\n

However, the respondent justified the issuance of the externment order based on the petitioner’s alleged criminal activities. It was contended that the impugned order was passed in compliance with Sections 5(a) and 5(b) of the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that Section 5(a) of the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam requires that a person’s movements or acts must cause alarm, danger, or harm to persons or property and Section 5(b) necessitates that there be reasonable grounds to believe that the person is involved in offenses related to force, violence, or other serious crimes, and that witnesses fear testifying against them.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the petitioner was implicated solely based on the statement of an accused, without any recovery of contraband. It was noted that no statements were recorded from individuals claiming public fear due to the petitioner’s actions, no cases were registered against her for rioting, public disorder, or other major crimes. The Court further noted that the police had not issued any prior notice to the petitioner before seeking her externment.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the Collector’s order was passed without fulfilling the statutory requirements of Section 5(b) the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam and the Divisional Commissioner merely upheld the Collector’s order without independent application of mind. The Court held that the authorities acted arbitrarily, seemingly under extraneous pressures rather than legal considerations.<\/p>\n

The Court deemed the externment order dated 21-10-2024 and the appellate order dated 20-01-2025, cryptic, arbitrary, and an undue restriction on personal liberty and quashed them. The Court directed the State to bear the litigation costs of ₹ 25,000\/- payable to the petitioner within seven days.<\/p>\n

[Munni v. State of M.P., 2025 SCC OnLine MP 2684<\/a>, Decided on 28-02-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n

Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Counsel for the Respondents\/State<\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“It is unfortunate that even the Divisional Commissioner, Shahdol has chosen to merely countersign an order of rejection of appeal, without application of mind.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[53034,50564,73891,80339,37399,7201,33487,80340,27064,75685],"class_list":["post-344653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitrary-action","tag-due-process","tag-externment-order","tag-individuals-personal-freedom","tag-justice-vivek-agarwal","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-madhya-pradesh-rajya-suraksha-adhiniyam","tag-pay-litigation-costs","tag-personal-liberty","tag-quashment-of-order"],"yoast_head":"\nMP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court quashed Externment order for being an attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom and directed the State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom\u2019; MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court quashed Externment order for being an attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom and directed the State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-29T07:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-03T12:49:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom\u2019; MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-29T07:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-03T12:49:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court quashed Externment order for being an attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom and directed the State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom\u2019; MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court quashed Externment order for being an attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom and directed the State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom\u2019; MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs","og_description":"MP High Court quashed Externment order for being an attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom and directed the State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-29T07:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-03T12:49:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom\u2019; MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/","name":"MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-29T07:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-03T12:49:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court quashed Externment order for being an attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom and directed the State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/29\/mp-high-court-quashes-externment-order-directs-state-to-pay-25000-in-litigation-costs-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Attempt to curtail individual\u2019s personal freedom\u2019; MP High Court quashes Externment order; directs State to pay \u20b9 25,000\/- in litigation costs"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":340422,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/04\/mp-hc-imposes-cost-of-50000-on-state-for-harassment-directs-chief-secretary-to-caution-dms-against-decisions-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":344653,"position":0},"title":"MP High Court imposes cost of \u20b950,000\/- on State for harassment; directs Chief Secretary to caution DMs against politically influenced decisions","author":"Ritu","date":"February 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that lodging an FIR does not equate to conviction as per the requirements of the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258407,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/13\/natural-justice-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":344653,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | Not providing sufficient time to produce acquittal orders, violation of natural justice; Court allows petition quashing Externment order","author":"Editor","date":"December 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Subodh Abhyankar, J., allowed a writ petition which was filed against the order of externment wherein the respondent had externed the petitioner from the limits of District Indore as also the adjoining Districts. The petitioner had averred that although the remedy of appeal was available to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219118,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/04\/collegium-reiterates-its-recommendation-for-transfer-of-justice-vivek-agarwal-to-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":344653,"position":2},"title":"Collegium reiterates its recommendation for transfer of Justice Vivek Agarwal to Allahabad HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Reconsideration of the proposal of transfer of Justice Vivek Agarwal, Judge, Madhya Pradesh High Court. Collegium had recommended transfer of Justice Vivek Agarwal, Judge, Madhya Pradesh High Court, in the interest of better administration of justice, to Allahabad High Court. Upon being requested to send his response in terms of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220466,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/transfer-orders-of-justice-vivek-agarwal-as-judge-of-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":344653,"position":3},"title":"Transfer Orders of Justice Vivek Agarwal as Judge of Allahabad HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"President is pleased to transfer Justice Vivek Agarwal, Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, as a Judge of the Allahabad High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Allahabad High Court on or before 17th October, 2019. Ministry of Law and Justice [Notification\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":339525,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/22\/pil-filed-to-settle-personal-score-no-illegality-in-construction-of-shopping-complex-mp-high-court-imposes-25000-cost-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":344653,"position":4},"title":"\u201cPIL filed to settle personal score, no illegality in construction of shopping complex\u201d; MP High Court imposes \u20b925,000\/- cost","author":"Ritu","date":"January 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner has unnecessarily given the negative publicity of this matter against the Panchayat has resulted into delay of sale of the shops.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/15\/state-bar-councils-refusal-to-grant-separate-recognition-to-high-court-advocates-bar-association-not-arbitrary-illegal-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":344653,"position":5},"title":"State Bar Council\u2019s refusal to grant separate recognition to High Court Advocates Bar Association not arbitrary: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that there was no justification for granting separate recognition to the petitioner association when the welfare schemes for advocates were already being administered through recognized bar associations.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344653\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}