{"id":344598,"date":"2025-03-28T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T13:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=344598"},"modified":"2025-04-03T18:03:38","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T12:33:38","slug":"issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In an appeal against the rejection of application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1<\/a> and 2<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) to restrain the respondents from using the mark pending the final disposal of the suit, a single-judge bench of Anoop Kumar Dhand, J., quashed the impugned the order and restrained the respondents from using the trademark “Swastik” and its label on their products until the final disposal of the suit.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the appellant, Rajani Products filed a suit under the Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a>, against the respondents, Bhagwan Das Harwani and Karishma Trading Corporation. The dispute arose over the use of the word “Swastik” and its associated label on the respondents’ products. The appellant claimed that they had been using the registered trademark “Swastik” since 1983 for their edible oil business. The appellant sought an interim injunction to restrain the respondents from using the mark pending the final disposal of the suit, however, the same was rejected by Additional District Judge vide order dated 06-02-2020. The appellant then filed the present appeal challenging the impugned rejection.<\/p>\n

The appellant alleged that the respondents were using an identical and deceptively similar mark under the name “Shree Parwati Swastik,” is visually, phonetically, and structurally identical, creating consumer confusion, constituting infringement and caused significant business losses. It was contended that the trial court’s rejection of the interim injunction was erroneous as it failed to recognize the issuance of prior injunction in an identical matter where it had granted an injunction restraining the use of “Swastik.”<\/p>\n

The Court emphasised that in cases of blatant intellectual property rights violations, prompt injunctions are necessary to protect not only the aggrieved party but also the public interest.<\/p>\n

“In the matters of blatant violation of Intellectual Property Rights, a prompt order of injunction must be granted to protect not only the interest of the person aggrieved but also that of the public at large.”<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the respondents’ trademark “Shree Parwati Swastik” bore a close resemblance to the appellant’s registered mark, including the use of the same symbol and label. The Court found that prima facie, the respondents’ use of the mark constituted an infringement of the appellant’s trademark rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a>. The Court observed that the same trial court had previously granted an injunction in an identical case involving Shanker Oil Mill, and there was no reason to take a different stance in the present matter.<\/p>\n

The Court allowed the appeal and quashed the impugned order dated 06-02-2020. The Court restrained the respondents from using the trademark “Swastik” and its label on their products until the final disposal of the suit. The Court clarified that its observations were limited to the interim relief and would not influence the trial court’s decision on the merits of the case. The Court directed the trial court to decide the main suit expeditiously, based on the evidence led by both parties.<\/p>\n

[Rajani Products<\/span> v. Bhagwan Das Harwani<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine Raj 660<\/a>, Decided on 19-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Shruvan Kumar Bansal for Mr. Kapil Gupta and Mr. R.S. Sinsinwar, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n

Buy Trade Marks Act, 1999   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"trade<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court found that the respondents’ label is a near replica of the appellant’s trademark and design, including the “Swastik” symbol, which has been consistently used by Rajani Products since 1983.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[36595,8341,80330,66973,3391,2575,36088,42104,18071],"class_list":["post-344598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deceptive-similarity","tag-intellectual-property-rights","tag-ipr-violation","tag-justice-anoop-kumar-dhand","tag-public_interest","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-temporary-injunction","tag-trade-marks-act","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nIssuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-28T13:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-03T12:33:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-28T13:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-03T12:33:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-28T13:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-03T12:33:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-28T13:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-03T12:33:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/issuance-of-injunction-essential-in-cases-of-blatant-ipr-violations-to-safeguard-both-private-public-interests-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Issuance of injunction essential in cases of blatant IPR violations to safeguard both private & public interests: Rajasthan High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":344598,"position":0},"title":"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Anoop Kumar Dhand J. allowed the appeal and quashed the impugned order dated 17-08-2021 passed by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 9, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur. The facts of the case are such that the disputed property was purchased by the plaintiff from one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/3-advocates-and-2-judicial-officers-appointed-as-judges-of-rajasthan-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":344598,"position":1},"title":"3 Advocates and 2 Judicial Officers appointed as Judges of Rajasthan High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"President appoints the following Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges of the Rajasthan High Court and directs them to assume charge of their respective offices: - Sl. No. Name (S\/Shri) Name of the High Court in which appointed 1. Farjand Ali, Advocate Rajasthan 2. Sudesh Bansal, Advocate Rajasthan 3. Anoop\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/06\/supreme-court-collegium-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":344598,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium recommends elevation of 3 Advocates & 3 Judicial Officers as Judges of Raj HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court | Elevation of Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges Supreme Court Collegium approved the proposal for elevation of the following Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges in the Rajasthan High Court: Advocates Ganesh Ram Meena, Sudesh Bansal, and Anoop Dhand. Judicial Officers Shri Uma Shankar Vyas, Shri\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":318826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/30\/rajasthan-high-court-directs-to-establish-separate-cells-to-ensure-court-order-compliance-in-contempt-of-court-case-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":344598,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court directs State to establish \u2018separate cells\u2019 to ensure timely compliance of court order","author":"Ritu","date":"March 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDisobedience of the Court orders strikes at the very root of the Rule of Law and the judicial orders are bound to be obeyed at all costs.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293404,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/30\/karnataka-high-court-blinkit-vs-blinkhit-trademark-dispute-rules-in-favour-set-aside-injunction-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":344598,"position":4},"title":"[Blinkit v. Blinkhit Trademark Infringement] | Karnataka HC sets aside temporary restraining injunction against Blinkit","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the Trial Court made an error in allowing Blinkhit's application for temporary injunction, without properly appreciating the available materials on record vis-\u00e0-vis the trademark's usage and nature of the business carried out by the parties.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/rajasthan-hc-directed-the-grant-of-notional-increment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":344598,"position":5},"title":"Notional increment cannot be denied on the ground that the person retired one day before the increment was due: Rajasthan High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the position of law is almost identical everywhere in the other States and when the benefit of Annual Increment is given to such employees, then denial of such benefits to the petitioners would amount to violation of their right of equality enshrined under Article 14 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344598\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}