{"id":344538,"date":"2025-03-28T15:00:07","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T09:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=344538"},"modified":"2025-04-03T18:13:16","modified_gmt":"2025-04-03T12:43:16","slug":"city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka HC terms the act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs probe in the matter"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka High Court:<\/span> While considering the instant revision petition challenging the rejection of appellants&#8217; (hereinafter defendants) application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523621\" target=\"_blank\">VII Rule 10<\/a> of the Code of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Civil Procedure code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) by the City Civil Judge, the Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">R. Devdas, J.*<\/span>, took strict note of the City Civil Judge relying on non-existent judgments rendered by the Supreme Court to pass the impugned order and said that this act of the Civil Judge would require further probe and appropriate action in accordance with law. Therefore, the Court directed that the instant order be placed before the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court for further action against the Civil Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The counsel for the defendants submitted before the Court that the plaintiffs availed various loans from the defendants, who are non-banking finance companies. On default, in repayment of the loans, defendant No1 issued a detailed acceleration notice dated 25-03-2022 to plaintiff No.1 and thereafter defendant No.1 invoked the pledge agreement by invocation notice dated 28-09-2024 and sought for transfer of the shares. The 1st plaintiff filed a commercial suit before the Commercial Court, Bengaluru, seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants from enforcing or acting upon the invocation notices dated 28-09-2024 and from undertaking any further proceedings related to the transfer or encumbrance of the pledged shares of plaintiffs 1 and 2 herein.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the plaintiffs therein filed a memo seeking to withdraw the suit as not pressed, while seeking liberty to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action. However, instead of filing a fresh suit before the commercial court, the plaintiffs filed a suit before the City Civil Court, Bengaluru with similar prayers as was sought before the Commercial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The defendants entered appearance in the suit before the City Civil Court and filed an interlocutory application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523621\" target=\"_blank\">VII Rule 10<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a> on the ground that the City Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the suit, since the subject matter of the suit was evidently a commercial dispute and therefore such a suit could be tried only by the Commercial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Rejecting the defendants&#8217; application the City Civil Judge placed reliance on 2 cases that were apparently decided by the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for the defendants stated that on careful search, it was found that no such decision is rendered by the Supreme Court and that the Civil Judge seems to have cited a non-existent decision to back the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the facts of the case, the Court opined that application filed by the defendants to return the plaint, should have been allowed because the plaintiffs who had earlier filed a Commercial Suit, did not seek leave of the Court while withdrawing the same, to present the suit before the civil court. Secondly, the plaintiffs are admittedly aggrieved of the demand notices issued by the defendants and such demand notices were issued only to some of the plaintiffs. Therefore, only those plaintiffs to whom demand notices were issued are aggrieved and they were entitled to seek relief at the hands of the competent court. Such of the plaintiffs could not have included some other entities to whom the defendants had not issued notices, to seek redressal of their grievance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further said that it is unacceptable that the entities who had earlier filed a Commercial Suit, would withdraw the suit, without liberty and thereafter filed a suit before the civil court impleading some other entities to whom admittedly notices were not issued by the defendants. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This is an ingenious method adopted by the plaintiffs seeking to maintain a suit before a court which had no jurisdiction<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Furthermore, the act of the City Civil Judge in citing non-existent Supreme Court cases to back his order was deemed to be disturbing enough by the Court to require further probe into the matter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the instant revision petition and the defendants&#8217; interlocutory application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523621\" target=\"_blank\">VII Rule 10<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a> were allowed. However, having regard to the express provisions contained in Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523622\" target=\"_blank\">VII Rule 10A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a>, the matter was remitted to the learned 9th Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, only to enable the plaintiffs to file an application in terms of Rule <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523622\" target=\"_blank\">10A (2) of Order VII<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sammaan Capital Limited v. Mantri Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/68yJBQI7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Kar 7<\/a>, decided on 24-3-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Order by Justice R. Devdas<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Appellants (defendants):<\/span> SRI. PRABHULING K NAVADGI., SR. COUNSEL A\/W SRI. CHINTAN CHINNAPPA M., ADVOCATE<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Respondents (plaintiffs):<\/span> SRI. SHYAM SUNDAR M.S., SR. COUNSEL A\/W SRI. B.K.S. SANJAY., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R9<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">While rejecting the defendants&#8217; application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, the Civil Judge cited 2 non-existent Supreme Court rulings to back his decision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":316069,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[80300,80298,47046,80299,28334,30292],"class_list":["post-344538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-citing-non-existent-cases","tag-city-civil-judge","tag-commercial-court","tag-justice-r-devdas","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-loan"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Karnataka HC finds act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs a probe<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While rejecting the defendants\u2019 application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, the Civil Judge cited 2 non-existent Supreme Court rulings to back his decision.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka HC terms the act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs probe in the matter\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While rejecting the defendants\u2019 application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, the Civil Judge cited 2 non-existent Supreme Court rulings to back his decision.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-28T09:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-03T12:43:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Karnataka HC terms the act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs probe in the matter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Karnataka HC finds act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs a probe\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-28T09:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-03T12:43:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"While rejecting the defendants\u2019 application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, the Civil Judge cited 2 non-existent Supreme Court rulings to back his decision.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Karnataka High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka HC terms the act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs probe in the matter\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka HC finds act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs a probe","description":"While rejecting the defendants\u2019 application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, the Civil Judge cited 2 non-existent Supreme Court rulings to back his decision.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka HC terms the act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs probe in the matter","og_description":"While rejecting the defendants\u2019 application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, the Civil Judge cited 2 non-existent Supreme Court rulings to back his decision.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-28T09:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-03T12:43:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Karnataka HC terms the act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs probe in the matter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Karnataka HC finds act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs a probe","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-28T09:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-03T12:43:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"While rejecting the defendants\u2019 application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, the Civil Judge cited 2 non-existent Supreme Court rulings to back his decision.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Karnataka High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/city-civil-judge-citing-non-existing-cases-disturbing-probe-ordred-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka HC terms the act of City Civil Judge citing non-existing cases to back decision as \u2018disturbing\u2019; Directs probe in the matter"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":357759,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/25\/karnataka-high-court-upholds-compulsory-retirement-of-senior-civil-judge\/","url_meta":{"origin":344538,"position":0},"title":"Karnataka High Court upholds compulsory retirement of Senior Civil Judge for threatening police officer with dire consequences","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Senior Civil Judge had allegedly threatened a police officer over a phone call in a complaint case filed against his sister.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Compulsory Retirement Senior Civil Judge","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Compulsory-Retirement-Senior-Civil-Judge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Compulsory-Retirement-Senior-Civil-Judge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Compulsory-Retirement-Senior-Civil-Judge.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Compulsory-Retirement-Senior-Civil-Judge.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7090,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/10\/special-court-having-jurisdiction-throughout-the-state-of-karnataka-constituted-by-the-central-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":344538,"position":1},"title":"Special Court having jurisdiction throughout the State of Karnataka constituted by the Central Government","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 10, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"On 29-01-2015, the Central Government in exercise of power conferred under Section 11(1); of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 notified the Court of XLIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City as the Special Court having Jurisdiction throughout the State of Karnataka for the trial of Scheduled Offences,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290417,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/24\/karnataka-high-court-suggestions-jurisdiction-district-court-first-appeals-legal-news-law-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":344538,"position":2},"title":"\u201cLife is too short to be spent on litigating\u201d; Karnataka High Court gives elaborate suggestions regarding jurisdiction of District Courts vis-\u00e0-vis hearing of First Appeals","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Raising concerns over the period of delays in hearing appeals, the Karnataka High Court made detailed suggestions for effective functioning of judiciary, and which can reduce work -load of the High Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-586.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244245,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/23\/appointment-of-judges-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":344538,"position":3},"title":"Elevation of 4 Additional Judges as Judges of Karnataka High Court [Read Notification]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Four Additional Judges elevated as Judges in Karnataka High Court President appoints S\/Shri Justices (1) Singapuram Raghavachar Krishna Kumar (2) Ashok Subhashchandra Kinagi (3) Suraj Govindaraj and (4) Sachin Shankar Magadum, Additional Judges of the Karnataka High Court, to be Judges of the Karnataka High Court. Read more about the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":313378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/07\/appointment-recommendation-justice-nv-anjaria-sc-collegium-chief-justice-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":344538,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of Justice NV Anjaria as 34th Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Current Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court, Justice PS Dinesh Kumar is due to retire on 24-02-2024.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka high court chief justice Justice NV Anjaria","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Karnataka-high-court-chief-justice-Justice-NV-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Karnataka-high-court-chief-justice-Justice-NV-Anjaria.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Karnataka-high-court-chief-justice-Justice-NV-Anjaria.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Karnataka-high-court-chief-justice-Justice-NV-Anjaria.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337623,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/20\/merely-passing-lengthy-orders-will-not-mean-order-on-application-of-mind-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":344538,"position":5},"title":"\u201cMerely passing lengthy orders, only to fill up the pages, will not mean an order on application of mind\u201d: Karnataka High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is the application of mind that is necessary in law and not application of ink; it is not the flow of ink on the paper that is necessary in law, but flow of content depicting such application of mind.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344538"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344538\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}