{"id":344498,"date":"2025-03-28T09:00:27","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T03:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=344498"},"modified":"2025-03-27T18:33:54","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T13:03:54","slug":"sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal against the Bombay High Court&#8217;s decision, whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the present accused and affirmed the Trial Court&#8217;s decision convicting the accused for offence under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561633\" target=\"_blank\">324<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">BR Gavai<\/span>* and Augustine George Masih, JJ. partly allowed the appeal and converted the conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> to Part I of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, considering that there was no premeditation of killing the deceased.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The deceased and the co-accused were brothers. Their agricultural fields were adjacent to each other, with a common boundary and a well. The complainant is the son of the deceased, and the present accused is the son of the co-accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">When the complainant had gone to his field, the accused hurled abuses at the complainant regarding the use of the common boundary to operate the electric pump on the well. The complainant narrated the incident to his parents. Thereafter, the complainant and his parents went to the field and asked the accused for an explanation as to why he was obstructing the complainant. Upon such confrontation, the accused and the co-accused became aggressive and assaulted the deceased and the complainant. The people present in nearby fields (prosecution witnesses) separated them and took the complainant and the deceased to the Government Hospital.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial Court convicted both the accused and the co-accused.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On perusing the post-mortem report and evidence of the medical officer, the Court noted that the death of the deceased was homicidal. Hence, the Court upheld the finding of the Trial Court that the accused, along with the co-accused, caused injuries to the deceased, resulting in his death.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the question that whether the offence committed by the accused would come under the ambit of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> or can it be altered into a lesser offence, the Court perused the witnesses&#8217; testimonies. The Court reiterated that merely because the witnesses are relatives of the deceased, and as such are interested witnesses, that alone cannot be a ground to discard their testimony. Perusing the evidence of the deceased&#8217;s nephew, the Court noted that the co-accused was assaulting the deceased with the blunt side of the axe, and the accused was armed with a stick and he assaulted the deceased with the said stick.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Noting that the place of the incident is near the house of the accused persons, the Court said that the possibility of a quarrel taking place on account of previous enmity between the accused and the deceased; and in a sudden fight in the heat of the moment, the possibility of the accused along with the co-accused assaulting the deceased could not be ruled out. Regarding the usage of a stick and the blunt side of the axe, the Court said that these tools are easily available in any agricultural field. Hence, any premeditation was ruled out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">If their intention was to kill the deceased, there was no reason why the co-accused would not have used the sharp side of the axe. The nature of injury and the evidence of the prosecution witnesses would also not show that the accused had taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel manner<\/span>, the Court stated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court held that the present case did not fall under the ambit of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and the accused was entitled to the benefit of Exception IV of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561605\" target=\"_blank\">300<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. The Court noted that the accused had already undergone the sentence of 6 years and 10 months, hence, the Court sentenced the accused to the period already undergone, while converting his conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> to Part I of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Sudam Prabhakar Achat v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/96T713IX\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 602<\/a>, decided on: 21-03-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice BR Gavai<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the appellants:<\/span> Ms. Deeplaxmi Subhash Matwankar, AOR, Mr. Ravindra Chingale, Adv., Ms. Manreet Kaur, Adv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents:<\/span> Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR, Ms. Soumya Priyadarshinee, Adv., Mr. Amlaan Kumar, Adv., Mr. Jatin Dhamija, Adv., Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/96T713IX\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 602<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Sudam Prabhakar Achat<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> State of Maharashtra<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Ms. Deeplaxmi Subhash Matwankar, AOR, Mr. Ravindra Chingale, Adv., Ms. Manreet Kaur, Adv.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR, Ms. Soumya Priyadarshinee, Adv., Mr. Amlaan Kumar, Adv., Mr. Jatin Dhamija, Adv., Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/24\/know-thy-judge-justice-br-gavai-judgements-career-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/17.-Gavai-modified.png\" alt=\"BR Gavai, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border: 2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">BR Gavai, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Justice-Augustine-Gerorge.jpg\" alt=\"Augustine George Masih, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Augustine George Masih, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Merely because the witnesses are relatives of the deceased, and as such are interested witnesses, that alone cannot be a ground to discard their testimony. The only requirement is that the testimony of such witnesses has to be scrutinized with greater caution and circumspection.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":344501,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[80274,9661,44635,80275,39919,5363,80276],"class_list":["post-344498","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-convert-conviction","tag-property-dispute","tag-sc","tag-section-302-to-section-304-ipc","tag-section-304-part-i-ipc","tag-supreme-court","tag-uncles-murder"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-28T03:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-28T03:30:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":746,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Convert conviction\",\"Property dispute\",\"SC\",\"Section 302 to Section 304 IPC\",\"Section 304 Part-I IPC\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Uncle&#8217;s murder\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/\",\"name\":\"SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-28T03:30:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"Convert conviction from S. 302\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/28\\\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-online-editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle | SCC Times","description":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing","og_description":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-28T03:30:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"headline":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing","datePublished":"2025-03-28T03:30:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/"},"wordCount":746,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp","keywords":["Convert conviction","Property dispute","SC","Section 302 to Section 304 IPC","Section 304 Part-I IPC","Supreme Court","Uncle&#8217;s murder"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/","name":"SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-28T03:30:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC accused of killing uncle","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"Convert conviction from S. 302"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205896,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/conviction-under-section-302-ipc-upheld-on-finding-incident-to-be-not-at-spur-of-moment\/","url_meta":{"origin":344498,"position":0},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld on finding incident to be not at spur of moment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and M.R. Shah, JJ. dismissed an appeal arising out of Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment, while altering the conviction and sentence awarded under Sections 304 Part II IPC to that of under Section 302 IPC. The factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313440,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/know-why-supreme-court-modified-murder-conviction-section-304-part-2-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":344498,"position":1},"title":"Know why Supreme Court modified murder conviction to Section 304 part 2 of IPC for one out of four accused","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"While convicting the said accused under Section 304 Part 2 of IPC, the Court sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for 10 years.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 304 part 2 IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Section-304-part-2-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Section-304-part-2-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Section-304-part-2-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Section-304-part-2-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/14\/sc-alters-conviction-under-section-302-to-s-304-part-ii-ipc-for-firing-in-marriage-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":344498,"position":2},"title":"Celebratory firing during marriage ceremonies has disastrous consequences; SC alters conviction u\/s 302 to S. 304 Part II IPC","author":"Editor","date":"March 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The convict opened fire in a marriage ceremony without taking reasonable measures for safety, which led to the unfortunate demise of the deceased.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"celebratory firing in marriage ceremony","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/celebratory-firing-in-marriage-ceremony.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/celebratory-firing-in-marriage-ceremony.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/celebratory-firing-in-marriage-ceremony.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/celebratory-firing-in-marriage-ceremony.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/07\/ori-hc-conviction-for-murder-under-s-302-ipc-altered-to-s-304-part-i-on-grounds-of-lack-of-premeditation-and-motive\/","url_meta":{"origin":344498,"position":3},"title":"Ori HC |\u00a0Conviction for murder under S. 302 IPC altered to S. 304 Part-I on grounds of lack of premeditation and motive","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of Pramath Patnaik and Dr A. K. Mishra JJ. modified the conviction given by the trial court and convicted the accused under Section 304 Part-I Penal Code, 1860.\u00a0 The brief facts of the case are that the accused was charged under Section 302 IPC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":339569,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/22\/sc-upheld-conviction-killing-co-villager-turned-conviction-from-302-to-304-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":344498,"position":4},"title":"Read why Supreme Court turned conviction of two brothers from S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in 23-year-old co-villager\u2019s murder case","author":"Editor","date":"January 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe requirement of law in criminal trials is not to prove the case beyond all doubt but beyond reasonable doubt and such doubt cannot be imaginary, fanciful, trivial or merely a possible doubt but a fair doubt based on reason and common sense.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Convert conviction from S. 302 to S. 304","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302-to-S.-304.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302-to-S.-304.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302-to-S.-304.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302-to-S.-304.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6739,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/09\/16\/conviction-under-section-302-ipc-of-a-person-who-survived-a-suicide-pact-improper\/","url_meta":{"origin":344498,"position":5},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 IPC of a person who survived a suicide pact, improper","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 16, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a one of a kind case where the deceased and the accused had a suicide pact, in which the accused survived, the bench of T.S. Thakur and R. Banumathi, JJ held that the death of deceased was not premeditated and the act of the accused causing death\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344498"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344498\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/344501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}