{"id":344468,"date":"2025-03-27T14:00:21","date_gmt":"2025-03-27T08:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=344468"},"modified":"2025-04-05T09:30:08","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T04:00:08","slug":"acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi:<\/span> In an appeal filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549797\" target=\"_blank\">61<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) challenging the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order dismissing Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> application, a Division Bench of Ashok Bhushan, J., and Barun Mitra (Technical Member), upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order that the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> application is time-barred. The NCLAT held that the acknowledgment in Balance sheet for the purpose of limitation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553179\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act, 1963<\/a> has to be counted from the date of signing of the Balance sheet and not from the date of its uploading with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) on the MCA portal.<\/p>\n<h3>Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The instant matter pertains to a loan agreement dated 27-02-2015, executed between IL&amp;FS Financial Services Ltd. (Appellant-Financial Creditor) and Adhunik Meghalaya Steels Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent-Corporate Debtor), wherein the Financial Creditor disbursed &#8377;24.44\/- crore out of a sanctioned amount of &#8377;30\/- crore. The loan was secured by pledging 8,10,804 shares of Corporate Debtor in favor of the Financial Creditor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon the Corporate Debtor&#8217;s failure to repay, the account was declared Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 01-03-2018. Subsequent notices of default and recall notices were issued on 10-07-2018 and 10-08-2018, respectively. However, no repayment was made, prompting the appellant to file a Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> application on 15-01-2024, seeking a claim of &#8377;55.45\/- crore.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Adjudicating Authority, vide order dated 16-05-2024, dismissed the application and held that it was barred by limitation. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the appellant filed an appeal before NCLAT challenging the same.<\/p>\n<h3>Moot Point<\/h3>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> application filed barred by limitation under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act, 1963<\/a>?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Whether the balance sheets of the Corporate Debtor, particularly for FY 2019-20, constituted an acknowledgment of liability under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553179\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act<\/a>, thereby extending the limitation period?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Whether the date of signing or the date of filing\/uploading the balance sheet with the MCA\/RoC should be considered for computing limitation?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uAX3jHoG\" target=\"_blank\">(2022) 3 SCC 117<\/a>, regarding COVID-19 limitation extension were correctly applied by the Adjudicating Authority?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Financial Creditor-appellant contended that the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt in its balance sheets up to FY 2019-20, listing an amount of &#8377;24.41 crore under &#8220;secured borrowings&#8221; and this acknowledgment as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553179\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act<\/a>, extended the limitation period. It was contended that the Adjudicating Authority misapplied the application of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re<\/span> (Supra) excluded the period from 15-03-2020 to 28-02-2022 for limitation purposes. It was stated that the balance sheet for FY 2019-20 was signed on 12-08-2020 but uploaded on the MCA portal only on 14-02-2021 and contended that limitation should be computed from the date of filing with the RoC (14-02-2021), rather than the signing date. It was lastly contended that considering the acknowledgment in the FY 2019-20 balance sheet and COVID-19 limitation extensions, Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> application was within time.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Corporate Debtor-respondent contended that the date of default was 01-03-2018, and the three-year limitation expired on 28-02-2021. It was contended that the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> application was filed on 15-01-2024 which clearly time barred. It was contended that balance sheets can only extend limitation if they unequivocally acknowledge the debt owed to a specific creditor and the Corporate Debtor&#8217;s FY 2019-20 balance sheet did not mention Financial Creditor by name, and therefore, no jural relationship is established.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Observations<\/h3>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\">Balance Sheet acknowledgment not sufficient<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT examined whether the balance sheets of the Corporate Debtor for the financial years 2016-17 to 2019-20 constituted an acknowledgment of debt, thereby extending the limitation period under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553179\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act<\/a>. The NCLAT stated that it is a well-settled principle that an acknowledgment of debt in a duly signed and authenticated balance sheet can extend the limitation period, however, such acknowledgment must be clear, unambiguous, and establish a jural relationship between the creditor and debtor. The NCLAT referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bishal Jaiswal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/WFW22sYA\" target=\"_blank\">(2021) 6 SCC 366<\/a>, where the Supreme Court reaffirmed that a balance sheet entry can be treated as an acknowledgment only if it unequivocally indicates the existence of a legally subsisting debt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT noted that in the present case, the balance sheet for FY 2019-20 recorded an outstanding liability of &#8377;24.41\/- crore under &#8220;secured borrowings&#8221;, however, the name of Financial Creditor was not specifically mentioned. The NCLAT referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Tulip Star Hotels Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/McFCy9mW\" target=\"_blank\">(2020) 5 SCC 313<\/a>, where the Supreme Court held that a generic balance sheet entry cannot be treated as an acknowledgment unless the specific name of the creditor is reflected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT held that acknowledgment of liability, as contemplated under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553179\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act<\/a>, must establish a direct and express acknowledgment of debt towards a particular creditor. The NCLAT held that since the appellant&#8217;s name is absent in the balance sheet entry for FY 2019-20, the same weakens the claim of acknowledgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\">Application of Supreme Court&#8217;s suo motu order<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT noted that the core question is whether Para 5.I or Para 5.III of the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re<\/span> (Supra) applicable in the present case. The NCLAT noted that Para 5.III of the order states that if the limitation period expired between 15-03-2020 and 28-02-2022, an additional 90 days from 01-03-2022 is granted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT stated that the appellant&#8217;s reliance on Para 5.I is misplaced, as that clause applies only when a longer period of limitation remains. The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority rightly applied Para 5.III, granting a 90-day extension, which expired on 30-05-2022.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\">Signing Date v. Date of Uploading of Balance Sheet<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT rejected appellant&#8217;s contention that the limitation period should be calculated from the date of uploading the balance sheet on the MCA portal, 14-02-2021 rather than the date of signing, 12-08-2020. The NCLAT held that the relevant date for computation of limitation is the date of signing the balance sheet by the authorised signatory, not the date of its filing with the Registrar of Companies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">G.S. Buildtech (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ardee Infrastructure<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qIrpqDEy\" target=\"_blank\">2021 SCC OnLine NCLAT 4979<\/a>, where it was categorically held that the acknowledgment of liability under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553179\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act<\/a> is triggered on the date the balance sheet is signed, not when it is uploaded and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vijaya Kumar Machinery &amp; Electrical Stores<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Alaparthi Lakshmikanthamma<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/q6t8NwFe\" target=\"_blank\">1968 SCC OnLine AP 219<\/a>, where it was reiterated that the limitation period starts from the date the acknowledgment is signed and not from the date it is made public.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Applying these principles, the NCLAT held that since the balance sheet for FY 2019-20 was signed on 12-08-2020, the limitation period will expire on 11-08-2023 if it is to be extended by acknowledgment. Therefore, the NCLAT held that even assuming the acknowledgment was valid, the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> application filed on 15-01-2024 is time-barred.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT also examined the charge form dated 27-02-2015, which the appellant sought to rely upon to establish the continuing nature of the debt, but outrightly rejected the argument. The NCLAT noted that more than ten years have elapsed, and as per settled legal principles, an old charge form could not be relied upon to establish an ongoing acknowledgment of liability.<\/p>\n<h3>NCLAT&#8217;s Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order that the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549806\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> application is time-barred.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">IL&amp;FS Financial Services Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Adhunik Meghalaya Steels (P) Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/H7b5h23M\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine NCLAT 569<\/a>, Decided on 25-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Barun Mitra (Technical Member)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Krishnendu Dutta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Niharika Sharma and Ms. Kiran Sharma, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Swarnendu Chatterjee (AOR), Mr. Nilay Sengupta, Mr. D.N. Sharma, Mr. Sujit Banerjee, Ms. Deepakshi Garg and Ms. Harshita Rawat, Counsel for the Respondent<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;There is no mandatory requirement for factorising the date of uploading of the balance sheet on the MCA portal for computing the period of limitation.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":315817,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[80247,45905,32299,60466,80249,22064,46429,30182,22014,44649,80248,80250,32305],"class_list":["post-344468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet","tag-acknowledgment-of-debt","tag-balance-sheet","tag-barun-mitra-technical-member","tag-covid-19-extension","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code","tag-justice-ashok-bhushan","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-section-18-of-limitation-act","tag-section-7-ibc-application","tag-signing-date-v-uploading-date","tag-time-barred-claims"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act, be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT held that the acknowledgment of Balance Sheet for the purpose of limitation under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT held that the acknowledgment of Balance Sheet for the purpose of limitation under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-27T08:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-05T04:00:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act, be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-27T08:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-05T04:00:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT held that the acknowledgment of Balance Sheet for the purpose of limitation under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act, be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT | SCC Times","description":"NCLAT held that the acknowledgment of Balance Sheet for the purpose of limitation under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT","og_description":"NCLAT held that the acknowledgment of Balance Sheet for the purpose of limitation under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-27T08:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-05T04:00:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/","name":"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act, be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-27T08:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-05T04:00:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT held that the acknowledgment of Balance Sheet for the purpose of limitation under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/acknowledgment-of-balance-sheet-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-be-counted-from-date-of-signing-of-balance-sheet-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Acknowledgment of Balance Sheet under Section 18 of Limitation Act to be counted from date of signing of Balance Sheet: NCLAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292953,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/nclat-benefit-section-10-a-ibc-claimed-default-occurs-during-prohibited-period-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":344468,"position":0},"title":"Whether an application filed under Section 7 IBC by Financial Creditor is barred by Section 10A IBC? NCLAT Answers","author":"Ritu","date":"May 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that benefit under S. 10-A of IBC can only be claimed when default occurs during prohibited period - \u201805-03-2020 to 25-03-2021\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/nclat-3-year-limitation-period-for-section-95-ibc-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":344468,"position":1},"title":"Limitation period of S.95 IBC applications against personal guarantor based on DRT recovery certificate is three years: NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The appellant relying on Tottempudi Salalith v. State Bank of India, (2024) 1 SCC 24, contended that the limitation for filing Section 95 IBC application in the present case must be treated as 12 years and hence the application filed was not barred by time.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Limitation period for Section 95 IBC application","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Limitation-period-for-Section-95-IBC-application.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Limitation-period-for-Section-95-IBC-application.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Limitation-period-for-Section-95-IBC-application.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Limitation-period-for-Section-95-IBC-application.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-and-commissions-monthly-roundup-january-2023-25-legal-stories-including-no-relief-in-cci-penalty-on-google-tds-deduction-and-interest-on-securities-high-level-commit\/","url_meta":{"origin":344468,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal, Regulatory Bodies and Commissions Monthly Roundup | January 2023 | 25+ Legal Stories including no relief in CCI penalty on Google, TDS deduction and interest on securities, high-level committee for Yamuna pollution, no clean chit to DLF, and more","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY (ATE) Bureau of Energy Efficiency takes suo motu verification test on a sample refrigerator of Whirlpool India and found quality non-compliance; Appellate Tribunal for Electricity sets aside the order A division bench of Ramesh Ranganathan (Chairperson) and Sandesh Kumar Sharma (Technical Member) set aside the order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-258.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":376163,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/19\/nclat-section7-ibc-application-not-barred-under-section10a\/","url_meta":{"origin":344468,"position":3},"title":"Section 7 IBC application must confine to the defaults committed after Section 10A period: NCLAT","author":"Bharti","date":"February 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\"When the Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) application is based on default committed subsequent to Section 10-A of the IBC period and the amount claimed subsequent to Section 10-A of the IBC period is well beyond threshold, application cannot be rejected on the ground.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 7 IBC application maintainable for post-Section 10A defaults","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Section-7-IBC-application-maintainable-for-post-Section-10A-defaults.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":210477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/21\/nclt-article-137-of-limitation-act-not-applicable-to-insolvency-application-under-s-7-ibc-where-corporate-debtor-acknowledges-debt-in-its-balance-sheet\/","url_meta":{"origin":344468,"position":4},"title":"NCLT | Article 137 of Limitation Act not applicable to insolvency application under S.7 IBC where corporate debtor acknowledges debt in its balance sheet","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai:\u00a0The Bench of Bhaskara Pantula Mohan, Member (Judicial) and V. Nallasenapathy, Member (Technical) allowed a petition filed by TJSB Sahakari Bank (\"the Bank)\u00a0for admission of an application\u00a0under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/17\/acknowledgment-of-debt\/","url_meta":{"origin":344468,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | &#8216;Balance and Security Confirmation Letter&#8217; is sufficient &#8216;acknowledgement of debt&#8217; so as to extend limitation period for initiating insolvency proceedings under S. 7 IBC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Division Bench of Justice Venugopal M. (Judicial Member) and V.P. Singh (Technical Member) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad (\"NCLT\"), whereby the NCLT had admitted an application filed by the Financial Creditor\u2212Punjab National Bank under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344468"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344468\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}