{"id":344321,"date":"2025-03-25T14:00:50","date_gmt":"2025-03-25T08:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=344321"},"modified":"2025-03-27T17:37:28","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T12:07:28","slug":"no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant arbitration petition, the 3-Judge Bench of Sanjiv Khanna, CJ., Sanjay Kumar and Joymalya Bagchi, JJ., pointed out that there was there was no agreement on the choice of the appointing authority after the petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, issued notice dated 28-01-2021.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Disposing of the petition, the Court said that Tata Communications Limited, or any other party, would be required to request the Secretary General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration to designate an appointing authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While considering the petition, the Court took note of Article 6 of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration (UNCITRAL) Rules, 2021 which deal with &#8220;Designating and appointing authorities&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Tata Communications Ltd. v. Aurora Engineering Company, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ysnSZYm9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 632<\/a>, decided on 17-3-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. Ratin Rai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ketan Gaur, Adv. Mr. Neil Chatterjee, Adv. Ms. Aastha Kulshrestha, Adv. Ms. Nidhisha Garg, Adv. Ms. Ritka, Adv. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, AOR<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya, Adv. Ms. Salonee Shukla, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Niti, AOR Mr. Shouryabrata Mandal, AOR Mr. Niraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raghav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Adv. Mr. Udit Sidhra, Adv. Ms. Dhanya Setlur Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Bindal, Adv. Ms. Akshita Salampuria, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Batra, Adv<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">While considering the petition, the Court took note of Article 6 of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration (UNCITRAL) Rules, 2021 which deal with &#8220;Designating and appointing authorities&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":344334,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[32372,3226,8781,80176,80175],"class_list":["post-344321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-appointing-authority","tag-arbitration","tag-permanent-court-of-arbitration","tag-tata-communications","tag-uncitral-rules"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Article 6 of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration (UNCITRAL) Rules, 2021 deals with \u201cDesignating and appointing authorities\u201d.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Article 6 of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration (UNCITRAL) Rules, 2021 deals with \u201cDesignating and appointing authorities\u201d.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-25T08:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-27T12:07:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"533\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-25T08:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-27T12:07:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Article 6 of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration (UNCITRAL) Rules, 2021 deals with \u201cDesignating and appointing authorities\u201d.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.webp\",\"width\":800,\"height\":533,\"caption\":\"arbitration appointing authority\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration","description":"Article 6 of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration (UNCITRAL) Rules, 2021 deals with \u201cDesignating and appointing authorities\u201d.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration","og_description":"Article 6 of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration (UNCITRAL) Rules, 2021 deals with \u201cDesignating and appointing authorities\u201d.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-25T08:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-27T12:07:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/","name":"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-25T08:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-27T12:07:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Article 6 of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration (UNCITRAL) Rules, 2021 deals with \u201cDesignating and appointing authorities\u201d.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.webp","width":800,"height":533,"caption":"arbitration appointing authority"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/no-agreement-direction-to-parties-to-approach-permanent-court-of-arbitration-for-appointing-authority-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018No agreement on choice of appointing authority\u2019; SC directs parties to approach Secretary General of Permanent Court of Arbitration"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/arbitration-appointing-authority.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":245454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/12\/arbitration-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":344321,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Whether disability of an appointing authority to appoint an arbitrator frustrate the arbitration agreement. HC unravels in light of Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., while addressing the matter in respect to the invocation of an arbitration clause expressed that: \u201c\u2026the legislative policy is to encourage arbitration, thus, any interpretation that would nullify an arbitration clause must be avoided.\u201d What led to the filing of the present petition? Petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291878,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/12\/appointment-of-arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements\/","url_meta":{"origin":344321,"position":1},"title":"Appointment of Arbitrator in Lender-Borrower Agreements","author":"Editor","date":"May 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Mohd. Suboor\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"arbitrator in lender-borrower agreements","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/arbitrator-in-lender-borrower-agreements.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/12\/impact-of-n-n-global-on-institutional-arbitrations-n-n-global-mercantile-p-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":344321,"position":2},"title":"One Step of Clarity and Two Steps into Oblivion: Impact of N.N. Global on Institutional Arbitrations | N.N. Global Mercantile (P) Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd.: A case comment","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Deepti Panda\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"n.n. global on institutional arbitrations","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/n.n.-global-on-institutional-arbitrations.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/n.n.-global-on-institutional-arbitrations.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/n.n.-global-on-institutional-arbitrations.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/n.n.-global-on-institutional-arbitrations.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266044,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/28\/mere-filing-of-a-proceeding-under-section-7-of-the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-would-amount-to-an-embargo-on-the-court-considering-an-application-under-section-11-of-the-arbitration-and-conci\/","url_meta":{"origin":344321,"position":3},"title":"Can mere filing of proceedings under S. 7 IBC be treated as an embargo on Court exercising jurisdiction under S. 11 of Arbitration &#038; Conciliation Act? Bom HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A very interesting question was considered by G.S. Kulkarni, J., the question being, whether mere filing of a proceeding under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 would amount to an embargo on the Court considering an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/BomIBC-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240196,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/section-11-after-2019-amendment-act-an-opportunity-to-strengthen-institutional-arbitration-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":344321,"position":4},"title":"Section 11 after 2019 Amendment Act \u2013 An Opportunity to Strengthen Institutional Arbitration in India  \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Aniket Pandey*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitration.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitration.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitration.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitration.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/arbitration.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286933,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/unilateral-appointment-of-arbitrator-whether-absolute-prohibition-contrary-to-the-scheme-of-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":344321,"position":5},"title":"Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator \u2014 Whether Absolute Prohibition Contrary to the Scheme of the Act?","author":"Editor","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Prashant Tripathi\u2020 and Sanjeev Singh\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-775.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344321"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344321\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/344334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}