{"id":344082,"date":"2025-03-21T16:00:17","date_gmt":"2025-03-21T10:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=344082"},"modified":"2025-03-27T17:55:54","modified_gmt":"2025-03-27T12:25:54","slug":"mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"MP High Court stays DCP\u2019s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed against the respondents including State of Madhya Pradesh and Deputy Commissioner of Police, Indore (DCP), for issuing notice against the Advocate to appear before him and give his statements under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519397\" target=\"_blank\">161<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC) and also signature specimen, a single-judge bench of Subodh Abhyankar, J., stayed the impugned notice and restrained the DCP from proceeding further in the matter till the next date of hearing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The instant matter is related to a FIR registered at Police Station Banganga, Indore, concerning allegations under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561745\" target=\"_blank\">409<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\">420<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> against the accused. The High Court, vide order dated 19-11-2024, transferred the investigation to a senior officer (not below DCP rank) and directed disciplinary action against the previous Investigating Officer for issuing a Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519712\" target=\"_blank\">41-A CrPC<\/a> notice to the accused despite the rejection of anticipatory bail by both the High Court and the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 11-03-2025, the DCP issued a notice under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519846\" target=\"_blank\">91<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519396\" target=\"_blank\">160 CrPC<\/a> to the Advocate to appear before him and provide statements under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519397\" target=\"_blank\">161 CrPC<\/a> and submit specimen signatures. It was contended that the DCP, instead of conducting a fair investigation, allegedly misused his authority by harassing the complainant and his advocate. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging the impugned notice as illegal and an abuse of power aimed at intimidating an advocate for performing his professional duties and violating Advocate-Client Privilege<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stayed the impugned notice dated 11-03-2025 issued to the Advocate and directed the DCP to file an affidavit explaining the legality of the notice. As an interim measure, the Court restrained the DCP from proceeding further in the matter till the next date of hearing on 24-03-2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Praram Infra<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2wwPDn1Z\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine MP 2372<\/a>, Decided on 13-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Divyakant Lahoti with Shri Rahul Maheshwar, Counsel<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Anand Soni, Additional Advocate General with Dr. Amit Bhatia, appearing on behalf of Advocate General<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">As an interim measure, the Court restrained the DCP from proceeding further in the matter till the next date of hearing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2656,80050,80051,66889,7201,31638,80052,18381,31605],"class_list":["post-344082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advocate","tag-breach-of-advocate-client-privilege","tag-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate","tag-justice-subodh-abhyankar","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-section-161-crpc","tag-signature-specimen","tag-stay","tag-summon"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stays DCP&#039;s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stayed DCP&#039;s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP High Court stays DCP\u2019s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stayed DCP&#039;s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-21T10:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-27T12:25:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"MP High Court stays DCP\u2019s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stays DCP's notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-21T10:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-27T12:25:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stayed DCP's notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP High Court stays DCP\u2019s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stays DCP's notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege | SCC Times","description":"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stayed DCP's notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP High Court stays DCP\u2019s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege","og_description":"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stayed DCP's notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-21T10:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-27T12:25:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"MP High Court stays DCP\u2019s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/","name":"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stays DCP's notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-21T10:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-27T12:25:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Breach of Advocate-Client Privilege | MP High Court stayed DCP's notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/mp-high-court-stays-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-aiming-to-breach-advocate-client-privilege-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP High Court stays DCP\u2019s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen aiming to breach Advocate-Client Privilege"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":344900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/advocate-client-privilege-mp-high-court-quashes-dcps-notice-summoning-advocate-to-give-statement-and-signature-specimen-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":344082,"position":0},"title":"Advocate-client privilege | MP High Court quashes DCP\u2019s notice summoning Advocate to give statement and signature specimen","author":"Ritu","date":"April 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court rejected the intervener\u2019s application with costs of Rs. 10,000\/- to be deposited in the account of the High Court Employees Union within 15 days.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319583,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/06\/mp-hc-imposes-exemplary-cost-of-rs-150000-on-all-parties-for-treating-court-as-playground-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":344082,"position":1},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court imposes exemplary cost of Rs. 1,50,000\/- on parties for treating court as playground","author":"Ritu","date":"April 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court note that questions regarding the petitioner\u2019s status in the ancestral house and the subsequent eviction suit cannot be adjudicated in Section 482 CrPC petition.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":77601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/11\/appointment-of-addl-judges-madhya-pradesh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":344082,"position":2},"title":"Appointment of Addl. Judges, Madhya Pradesh HC","author":"Saba","date":"October 11, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The President in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 224 of the Constitution of India appointed Shri Vijay Kumar Shukla, Shri Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia and Shri Subodh Abhyankar, to be Additional Judges of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, in that order of seniority, for a period\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/17\/misuse-of-advocate-client-relationship-mp-high-court-denies-to-quash-fir-in-rape-allegations-against-advocate-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":344082,"position":3},"title":"Misuse of Advocate-Client Relationship | MP High Court refuses to quash FIR in Rape allegations against Advocate","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cStatement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of CrPC cannot be given preference over the FIR and the statement recorded under Section 161 of CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291676,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/09\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-section-529a-companies-act-1956-prevail-over-income-tax-act-1961\/","url_meta":{"origin":344082,"position":4},"title":"[Harmonious Construction] Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 would prevail over Income Tax Act, 1961: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026the Act of 1956 is a special Act which govern the law regarding companies only whereas IT Act is a general Act which percolates in just about every sphere of life and is applicable to all the citizen of India when it comes to payment of Income Tax.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276250,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/28\/he-was-kind-enough-to-leave-the-prosecutrix-alive-madhya-pradesh-high-court-observes-while-reducing-rape-convicts-sentence\/","url_meta":{"origin":344082,"position":5},"title":"\u201cHe was kind enough to leave the prosecutrix alive\u201d: Madhya Pradesh High Court observes while reducing rape convict&#8217;s sentence","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | The Division Bench comprising of Subodh Abhyankar* and Satyendra Kumar Singh, JJ., reduces life imprisonment awarded to a rape convict into 20 years rigorous imprisonment considering the fact that the convict was kind enough to leave the victim alive, the victim in this case was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344082\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}