{"id":343943,"date":"2025-03-19T18:00:57","date_gmt":"2025-03-19T12:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343943"},"modified":"2025-03-20T16:50:48","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T11:20:48","slug":"section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal against Punjab and Haryana High Court&#8217;s decision, whereby the accused person&#8217;s application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\">482<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) for quashing of proceedings initiated under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> (&#8216;NI Act&#8217;) was dismissed, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sudhanshu Dhulia*<\/span> and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ. allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned decision opining that the High Court erred in denying the relief to the accused- former director of the corporate debtor by placing reliance upon <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">P. Mohan Raj<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/J00lSJRC\" target=\"_blank\">(2021) 6 SCC 258<\/a>. The Court explained that cause of action under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138 of the NI Act<\/a> arose after the commencement of the insolvency process.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench also quashed the summoning order and proceedings against the accused.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The accused was the director of the corporate debtor company. There was a contract between the corporate debtor and the respondent- Shakti Trading Company where the respondent was to function as a super stockist of the corporate debtor. As director of the corporate debtor, the accused had drawn eleven cheques in favour of the respondent of varying amounts, the total amount being Rs.11,17,326\/- (approximately). A legal notice under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138 of the NI Act<\/a> was issued to the accused by the respondent for dishonour of cheques. Meanwhile, insolvency proceedings against the corporate debtor, of which the accused was the director, commenced and a moratorium under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (&#8216;IBC&#8217;) was imposed. The interim resolution professional (&#8216;IRP&#8217;) was appointed regarding the corporate debtor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138 of the NI Act<\/a>, the accused was summoned. The accused challenged the said summoning order and sought quashing of the proceedings in view of the moratorium issued under Section 14 of the IBC. Vide the impugned order, the High Court dismissed the accused&#8217;s petition and declined to quash the complaint against him.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the High Court while dismissing the accused&#8217;s plea, relied upon <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">P. Mohan Raj<\/span> (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">supra<\/span>) where it was held that the immunity granted by the moratorium order issued under Section 14 of the IBC can only be obtained by a corporate debtor and not by a natural person such as the present accused, who was the Director of the corporate debtor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the High Court erred in relying upon <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">P. Mohan Raj (supra)<\/span> since the facts of that case were completely different from the present. The Court explained that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">P. Mohan Raj<\/span> the cause of action under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138 of the NI Act<\/a> arose before the imposition of the moratorium and on these facts, the Court had held that Section 14 of IBC bars or stays proceedings only against the corporate debtor and proceedings can be continued or initiated against the natural persons.<\/p>\n<p>The Court stated that-<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; text-align: center; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The return of the cheques dishonoured simpliciter does not create an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138 of the NI Act<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court added that clause (c) of the proviso to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138 of the NI Act<\/a> clarifies that cause of action arises only when demand notice is served and payment is not made pursuant to such demand notice within the stipulated fifteen-day period. Placing reliance upon <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jugesh Sehgal<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shamsher Singh Gogi<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/gGa6lKEE\" target=\"_blank\">(2009) 14 SCC 683<\/a>, the Court reiterated that the cause of action arises only when the amount remains unpaid even after the expiry of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the demand notice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the matter at hand, the Court noted that on 25-07-2018, the moratorium was imposed and management of the corporate debtor was taken over by the interim resolution professional as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549662\" target=\"_blank\">17 of the IBC<\/a>. Perusing Section 17 of the IBC, the Court said that the accused did not have the capacity to fulfil the demand raised by the respondent by way of the notice issued under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138 NI Act. When the notice was issued to the accused, he was not in charge of the corporate debtor as he was suspended from his position as the director of the corporate debtor as soon as IRP was appointed. Therefore, the powers vested with the board of directors were to be exercised by the IRP in accordance with the provisions of IBC. All the bank accounts of the corporate debtor were operating under the instructions of the IRP; hence, the accused could not repay the amount in light of Section 17 of the IBC. Additionally, the Court noted that after the imposition of the moratorium, the IRP had made a public announcement inviting the claims from the creditors of the corporate debtor and the respondent had filed a claim with the IRP.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Vishnoo Mittal v. Shakti Trading Company, Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.1104 of 2022, 17-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s)<\/span> Mr. Abhishek Anand, Adv. Mr. Karan Kohli, Adv. Mr. Krishna Sharma, Adv. Ms. Mithu Jain, AOR<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s)<\/span> Mr. Triloki Nath Razdan, AOR<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9A1ewFOP\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 558<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Vishnoo Mittal<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Shakti Trading Company<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Abhishek Anand, Adv. Mr. Karan Kohli, Adv. Mr. Krishna Sharma, Adv. Ms. Mithu Jain, AOR<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Triloki Nath Razdan, AOR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/10\/know-thy-judge-the-remarkable-odyssey-of-justice-sudhanshu-dhulia-from-bar-to-bench-scc-times\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Dhulia-.png\" alt=\"Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.<\/span><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/imageedit_24_9207258843-1.jpg\" alt=\"Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The immunity granted by the moratorium order issued under Section 14 of the IBC can only be obtained by a corporate debtor and not by a natural person such as the present accused, who was the Director of the corporate debtor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":343954,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[30361,44110,55017,44753,23584,5363],"class_list":["post-343943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-ibc","tag-irp","tag-justice-ahsanuddin-amanullah","tag-justice-sudhanshu-dhulia","tag-section-138-ni-act","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Section 138 NI Act proceedings can be quashed against former director of company: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP: SC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-19T12:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-20T11:20:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Section 138 NI Act proceedings can be quashed against former director of company: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-19T12:30:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-20T11:20:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP: SC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Quash Section 138 NI proceedings\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 138 NI Act proceedings can be quashed against former director of company: SC | SCC Times","description":"Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP: SC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers","og_description":"Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP: SC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-19T12:30:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-20T11:20:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/","name":"Section 138 NI Act proceedings can be quashed against former director of company: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-19T12:30:57+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-20T11:20:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP: SC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Quash Section 138 NI proceedings"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":377286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/03\/del-hc-summoning-order-under-section-138-ni-act-application-of-mind\/","url_meta":{"origin":343943,"position":0},"title":"Summoning order under Section 138 NI Act need not be elaborate, but must reflect application of mind: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 3, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIssuance of summons in a criminal case is a very serious matter, since even mere issuance of summons by criminal court may stigmatise a person, who may not be required to be summonsed at all.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Summoning Order under Section 138 NI Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Summoning-Order-under-Section-138-NI-Act-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362849,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/07\/ibc-does-not-bar-s-138-ni-act-action-against-directors-bom-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":343943,"position":1},"title":"S. 138 NI Act action against Directors continues despite prior initiation of IBC proceedings; Bombay High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt made no difference whether the NI Act proceedings were initiated prior to initiation of IBC proceeding or thereafter as it was a settled principle that natural persons could not escape from their personal liability under Section 138 of the NI Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"S. 138 NI Act action against directors","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/S.-138-NI-Act-action-against-directors.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/S.-138-NI-Act-action-against-directors.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/S.-138-NI-Act-action-against-directors.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/S.-138-NI-Act-action-against-directors.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/16\/rajasthan-hc-section-138-ni-act-on-cheque-for-time-barred-debt-revives-enforceability-under-contract-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":343943,"position":2},"title":"Cheque for Time-Barred Debt Revives Enforceability Under S. 25(3) Contract Act; Dishonour attracts Section 138 NI Act: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA meaningful reading of Sections 20, 118 and 139 of the NI Act makes it clear that a person who signs a cheque and delivers it to the payee remains liable unless he successfully rebuts the statutory presumptions.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 138 NI Act on Cheque for Time-Barred Debt","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334202,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/31\/crpc-bars-review-power-under-sections-362-3973-raj-hc-dismisses-petition-as-de-facto-review-attempt-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":343943,"position":3},"title":"CrPC bars review power under Sections 362 &amp; 397(3); Rajasthan High Court dismisses petition as de facto review attempt","author":"Ritu","date":"October 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the petition was effectively a review in disguise, which is barred under Section 362 CrPC and cannot be entertained.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/initiation-ibc-proceedings-does-not-absolve-company-director-signatories-of-criminal-liability-under-section-138-negotiable-instruments-act-supreme-court-legal-research-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":343943,"position":4},"title":"Initiation of IBC proceedings does not absolve Company Directors\/Signatories of criminal liability under Section 138 NI Act: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that the scope of nature of proceedings under the two Acts are quite different and would not intercede each other.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 138","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-760kjg.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-760kjg.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-760kjg.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-760kjg.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/10\/interplay-between-negotiable-instruments-act-and-the-insolvency-code\/","url_meta":{"origin":343943,"position":5},"title":"Interplay between Negotiable Instruments Act and the Insolvency Code","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akaant Kumar Mittal\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Akaant Mittal&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Akaant Mittal","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/individual\/akaant-mittal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/mittal-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/mittal-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/mittal-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/mittal-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/mittal-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343943"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343943\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/343954"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}