{"id":343840,"date":"2025-03-18T16:00:06","date_gmt":"2025-03-18T10:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343840"},"modified":"2025-03-26T10:18:49","modified_gmt":"2025-03-26T04:48:49","slug":"s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed under Article 226<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a> challenging the confiscation proceedings and the order dated 15-01-2025, which denied the petitioner right to engage an advocate in the confiscation case, a single-judge bench of Vishal Dhagat, J., reaffirmed the right of advocates to appear in confiscation proceedings under Section 30<\/a> of the Advocates Act, 1961<\/a> (Advocates Act). However, the Court clarified that while legal representation is permitted, the right to cross-examine remain restricted.<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that he was not provided with the necessary documents related to the case, thereby preventing him from filing a proper application opposing the confiscation of his vehicle. Furthermore, it was argued that Section 52<\/a> of the Forest Act, 1927<\/a> (Forest Act), does not impose a bar on an advocate representing a client in confiscation proceedings. The petitioner relied on Kuldeep Sharma<\/span> v. State of M.P.<\/span>, 2012 SCC OnLine MP 1260<\/a>, wherein the Court observed that advocates might not appear in confiscation proceedings as no evidence is recorded.<\/p>\n

However, the State countered that Kuldeep Sharma<\/span> (Supra) restricts the appearance of advocates in confiscation proceedings. It was contended that the rejection of the petitioner’s request to engage an advocate was justified under Section 52<\/a> of the Forest Act, 1927<\/a>. It was argued that the petitioner had no valid cause of action to challenge the confiscation proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that Section 30 of the Advocates Act, grants advocate the right to appear before any tribunal or legally authorised person taking evidence. The Court stated that in confiscation proceedings, statements, affidavits, and documents are recorded as evidence, making the appearance of advocates permissible. The Court further stated that Section 52 of the Forest Act does not explicitly bar the appearance of advocates. The Court held that advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but without the right to cross-examine witnesses or challenge affidavits filed in such proceedings.<\/p>\n

“In view of Section 30<\/a> of Advocates Act, 1961<\/a> and Section 52<\/a> of Indian Forest Act, 1927<\/a>, Advocates can appear before authorized forest officer in confiscation proceedings.”<\/p>\n

The Court quashed the Divisional Forest Officer’s order dated 15-01-2025. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file an application to obtain the necessary documents from the Forest Ranger’s office in Niwari and submit his evidence.<\/p>\n

[Bhagban Singh Parmar<\/span> v. State of M.P.<\/span>, 2025 SCC OnLine MP 2359<\/a>, Decided on 10-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Shri Shashank Upadhyay, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/span><\/p>\n

Shri Yogesh Dhande, Government Advocate, Counsel for the Respondents\/State<\/span><\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“There is no bar under Section 52 of Forest Act, 1927 from appearance of Advocates in said proceedings.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[79910,63235,7201,46650,79912,79909,79911],"class_list":["post-343840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-confiscation-proceedings","tag-justice-vishal-dhagat","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-right-to-cross-examine","tag-right-to-legal-representation","tag-s-30-of-advocates-act","tag-section-52-of-forest-act"],"yoast_head":"\nS. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court","og_description":"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":275637,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/15\/delhi-high-court-quashes-confiscation-proceedings-against-satyender-jain-under-prohibition-of-benami-property-transactions-act-1988\/","url_meta":{"origin":343840,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes confiscation proceedings against Satyender Jain under Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a batch of petitions filed assailing proceedings initiated by the respondent- State under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 for attachment and confiscation of properties which were admittedly acquired prior to the enforcement of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016, Yashwant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214609,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/13\/sc-collegium-recommended-to-appoint-advocates-vishal-dhagat-and-vishal-mishra-as-judges-of-madhya-pradesh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":343840,"position":1},"title":"SC Collegium recommends the appointment of Advocates Vishal Dhagat and Vishal Mishra as Judges of Madhya Pradesh HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Proposal for the appointment of following five Advocates, as Judges of the Madhya Pradesh High Court: 1. Divesh Jain, 2. Sanjay Sarwate, 3. Archana Kher, 4. Vishal Dhagat, and 5. Vishal Mishra \"Collegium had an interaction with all the recommendees on 1st April, 2019. On the basis of interaction and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/21\/confiscation-of-truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":343840,"position":2},"title":"Confiscation of Truck loaded with cow progeny despite acquittal in criminal proceedings amounts to arbitrary deprivation of property\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the District Magistrate had directed confiscation of a Truck under the M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004 despite the criminal proceedings having culminated into acquittal, the bench of KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy*, JJ has held that in a case where the offender\/accused\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Confiscation-of-Truck-loaded-with-cow-progeny-despite-acquittal-in-criminal-proceedings-amounts-to-arbitrary-deprivation-of-property.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325919,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/rajasthan-high-court-asks-state-to-consider-providing-statutory-remedy-of-appeal-revision-against-section-6-a-rajasthan-bovine-animal-acts-orders-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":343840,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court asks State to consider providing statutory remedy of Appeal\/Revision against Section 6-A Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act\u2019s orders","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court held that the High Court\u2019s inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC do not extend to interfering with orders of the District Collector acting under Section 6-A of the RBA Act in a quasi-judicial capacity.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265036,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/05\/chh-hc-criminal-trial-and-confiscation-proceedings-may-run-simultaneously-once-the-information-of-confiscation-proceeding-under-s-52-e-indian-forest-act-is-given-to-dm-trial-magistrate-has-no-p\/","url_meta":{"origin":343840,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | Criminal trial and confiscation proceedings may run simultaneously; Once the information of confiscation proceeding under S. 52 (e) Indian Forest Act is given to DM, Trial Magistrate has no power over it","author":"Editor","date":"April 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Rajani Dubey, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are that a tractor and trolley was found carrying illegal timber woods in Tamor Pingla Sanctuary Area, Sarguja Forest Circle, Ambikapur. The said vehicle was driven by driver and the owner of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":320091,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/15\/allahabad-hc-quashes-order-of-appellate-authority-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":343840,"position":5},"title":"Confiscation of goods cannot be done on estimates when option of physical verification is available; Allahabad High Court quashes order of confiscating stock and imposing penalty","author":"Editor","date":"April 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe burden of proof for confiscation of goods is on the Department and the procedure cannot be done merely on estimates when a physical verification can be carried out.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343840"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343840\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}