{"id":343840,"date":"2025-03-18T16:00:06","date_gmt":"2025-03-18T10:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343840"},"modified":"2025-03-26T10:18:49","modified_gmt":"2025-03-26T04:48:49","slug":"s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a> challenging the confiscation proceedings and the order dated 15-01-2025, which denied the petitioner right to engage an advocate in the confiscation case, a single-judge bench of Vishal Dhagat, J., reaffirmed the right of advocates to appear in confiscation proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\" target=\"_blank\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\" target=\"_blank\">Advocates Act, 1961<\/a> (Advocates Act). However, the Court clarified that while legal representation is permitted, the right to cross-examine remain restricted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that he was not provided with the necessary documents related to the case, thereby preventing him from filing a proper application opposing the confiscation of his vehicle. Furthermore, it was argued that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534986\" target=\"_blank\">52<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760183\" target=\"_blank\">Forest Act, 1927<\/a> (Forest Act), does not impose a bar on an advocate representing a client in confiscation proceedings. The petitioner relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kuldeep Sharma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mJJV6U7X\" target=\"_blank\">2012 SCC OnLine MP 1260<\/a>, wherein the Court observed that advocates might not appear in confiscation proceedings as no evidence is recorded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the State countered that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kuldeep Sharma<\/span> (Supra) restricts the appearance of advocates in confiscation proceedings. It was contended that the rejection of the petitioner&#8217;s request to engage an advocate was justified under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534986\" target=\"_blank\">52<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760183\" target=\"_blank\">Forest Act, 1927<\/a>. It was argued that the petitioner had no valid cause of action to challenge the confiscation proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Section 30 of the Advocates Act, grants advocate the right to appear before any tribunal or legally authorised person taking evidence. The Court stated that in confiscation proceedings, statements, affidavits, and documents are recorded as evidence, making the appearance of advocates permissible. The Court further stated that Section 52 of the Forest Act does not explicitly bar the appearance of advocates. The Court held that advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but without the right to cross-examine witnesses or challenge affidavits filed in such proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;In view of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543825\" target=\"_blank\">30<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\" target=\"_blank\">Advocates Act, 1961<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534986\" target=\"_blank\">52<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002760183\" target=\"_blank\">Indian Forest Act, 1927<\/a>, Advocates can appear before authorized forest officer in confiscation proceedings.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court quashed the Divisional Forest Officer&#8217;s order dated 15-01-2025. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file an application to obtain the necessary documents from the Forest Ranger&#8217;s office in Niwari and submit his evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhagban Singh Parmar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/s33aq9Y6\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine MP 2359<\/a>, Decided on 10-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Shashank Upadhyay, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Petitioner<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Yogesh Dhande, Government Advocate, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Respondents\/State<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;There is no bar under Section 52 of Forest Act, 1927 from appearance of Advocates in said proceedings.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[79910,63235,7201,46650,79912,79909,79911],"class_list":["post-343840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-confiscation-proceedings","tag-justice-vishal-dhagat","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-right-to-cross-examine","tag-right-to-legal-representation","tag-s-30-of-advocates-act","tag-section-52-of-forest-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":435,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"confiscation proceedings\",\"Justice Vishal Dhagat\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\",\"Right to cross-examine\",\"Right to Legal Representation\",\"S. 30 of Advocates Act\",\"Section 52 of Forest Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/\",\"name\":\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/18\\\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court","og_description":"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court","datePublished":"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"},"wordCount":435,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","keywords":["confiscation proceedings","Justice Vishal Dhagat","Madhya Pradesh High Court","Right to cross-examine","Right to Legal Representation","S. 30 of Advocates Act","Section 52 of Forest Act"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-18T10:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-26T04:48:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court held that under S. 30 of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/18\/s-30-of-advocates-act-advocates-can-appear-in-confiscation-proceedings-but-have-no-right-to-cross-examine-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343840"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343840\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}