{"id":343418,"date":"2025-03-10T17:00:05","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T11:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343418"},"modified":"2025-03-19T18:14:18","modified_gmt":"2025-03-19T12:44:18","slug":"delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark”"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> A suit was filed by ‘Ramada International Inc.’ (plaintiff) seeking permanent injunction restraining ‘ClubRamada Hotels and Resorts Private Limited’ (defendants) from infringing and using the impugned marks i.e., ‘CLUB RAMADA’, ‘CLUB RAMADA HOTELS AND RESORTS’, ‘CLUB RAMADA VACATION’ and ‘HOLIDAYS BY CLUB RAMADA VACATION’ and any other deceptively similar mark to that of plaintiff’s. Mini Pushkarna, J., granted permanent injunction to the plaintiff in its favour restraining the defendants from using the infringing ‘Ramada’ mark and awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages for trademark infringement.<\/p>\n

Ramada International Inc., the plaintiff, first adopted the trademark ‘RAMADA’ in 1954 for its hotel in Arizona, USA. Over the years, it expanded its operations, franchising and managing over 900 hotels across more than 60 countries, including India. The plaintiff first registered its ‘RAMADA’ trademark in India on23-12-1970, with a registration granted on 29-01-1972. The plaintiff’s earliest valid trademark registration for the ‘RAMADA’ word and device mark in India dates back to 08-10-1991, in Class 16, followed by subsequent registrations in Class 42 for hotel and related services.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff discovered in November 2020 that the defendants had unlawfully adopted the ‘RAMADA’ mark as part of their corporate name ‘ClubRamada Hotels and Resorts Private Limited’ and were using infringing marks such as ‘CLUB RAMADA,’ ‘CLUB RAMADA HOTELS AND RESORTS,’ and ‘CLUB RAMADA VACATION.’ The defendants had also registered domain names <clubramadavacation.com> and <clubramadahotelsandresorts.com> to promote their services. Despite cease-and-desist notices, the defendants refused to comply, prompting the plaintiff to initiate legal proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Court took note of the extensive trademark registrations owned by the plaintiff in India and worldwide, which demonstrated its longstanding and exclusive rights over the ‘RAMADA’ mark. The plaintiff also submitted evidence of the international reputation of the mark, including multiple domain names featuring ‘RAMADA’ and past legal actions successfully taken to prevent infringement.<\/p>\n

The Court found that despite multiple opportunities, the defendants failed to provide a valid defense or justification for adopting the infringing marks. Instead, the defendants’ reply to the plaintiff’s legal notice admitted knowledge of the ‘RAMADA’ mark but provided an implausible explanation that one director’s religious beliefs led to the adoption of the name. The Court held that this defense was an afterthought and lacked bona fide intent.<\/p>\n

The Court also took into account the defendants’ continued violations of previous injunction orders. Even after being directed to cease using the infringing marks, the defendants persisted, leading to contempt proceedings. The Court recorded that the defendants’ actions displayed a blatant disregard for its orders.<\/p>\n

The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a decree of permanent injunction against the defendants, restraining them from using the marks ‘CLUB RAMADA,’ ‘CLUB RAMADA HOTELS AND RESORTS,’ ‘CLUB RAMADA VACATION,’ or any deceptively similar variant.<\/p>\n

Further, considering the willful and continued violation of injunction orders, the Court awarded damages of \u20b910 lakhs to the plaintiff. Additionally, the Court directed the plaintiff to file a bill of costs within three months for reimbursement of litigation expenses.<\/p>\n

[Ramada International Inc. v. ClubRamada Hotels and Resorts Private Limited, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 1457<\/a>, decided on 09-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr. Ashwani Balayan, Ms. Richa Pushpam, Advocates for plaintiff<\/span><\/p>\n

None for defendants<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It is manifest that defendant 1 had direct knowledge of the plaintiffs’ RAMADA brand at the time of adoption of the impugned mark. The defendant’s justification for adopting the mark ‘RAMADA’ is an afterthought, and lacks bona fide intent, as it fails to provide any tenable rationale for its selection.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[79649,79650,2543,14201,79648,79647,18071],"class_list":["post-343418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-clubramada-hotels","tag-clubramada-resorts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-permanent-injunction","tag-ramada-international-inc","tag-ramada-trademark","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC grants \u20b910 lakh damages in Ramada Trademark case; ClubRamada restrained from using 'Ramada' Mark| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark"\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants \u20b910 lakh damages in Ramada Trademark case; ClubRamada restrained from using 'Ramada' Mark| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark”\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC grants \u20b910 lakh damages in Ramada Trademark case; ClubRamada restrained from using 'Ramada' Mark| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark\"","og_description":"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark\"","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC grants \u20b910 lakh damages in Ramada Trademark case; ClubRamada restrained from using 'Ramada' Mark| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark”"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":370583,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/2024-key-high-court-judgments-intellectual-property-high-court-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":343418,"position":0},"title":"Cases Reported in HCC | Latest High Court Cases on Intellectual Property","author":"Nikita","date":"December 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore latest Cases reported in SCC\u2019s High Court Cases (HCC) shaping Intellectual property Laws which covers trademark infringement, patentability, passing off and Brand name disputes. A holistic view of evolving jurisprudence on intellectual property laws in India.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property High Court Cases","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-High-Court-Cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-High-Court-Cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-High-Court-Cases.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-High-Court-Cases.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/03\/delhi-high-court-permanently-injuncts-grand-vivanta-from-using-vivanta-mark-adopts-new-name-grand-vihan\/","url_meta":{"origin":343418,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court permanently injuncts GRAND VIVANTA from using VIVANTA mark; Adopts new name GRAND VIHAN","author":"Editor","date":"October 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The permanent injunction passed shall come into effect from 1-11-2022.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-permanently-injuncts-GRAND-VIVANTA-from-using-VIVANTA-mark-Adopts-new-name-GRAND-VIHAN-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-permanently-injuncts-GRAND-VIVANTA-from-using-VIVANTA-mark-Adopts-new-name-GRAND-VIHAN-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-permanently-injuncts-GRAND-VIVANTA-from-using-VIVANTA-mark-Adopts-new-name-GRAND-VIHAN-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-permanently-injuncts-GRAND-VIVANTA-from-using-VIVANTA-mark-Adopts-new-name-GRAND-VIHAN-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-permanently-injuncts-GRAND-VIVANTA-from-using-VIVANTA-mark-Adopts-new-name-GRAND-VIHAN-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/24\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-in-favour-of-boeing-company-legal-updates-research-news-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":343418,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Advance Technologies from using logo similar to The Boeing Company; Directs costs upto 5 lakhs","author":"Arunima","date":"April 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that customers are being misled by the defendants and the entire effort is deliberate and dishonest amounting to dilution of the reputation and goodwill of the trademark\/logo of the plaintiffs.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/trademark-infringement-of-starbucks-trademark-frappuccino\/","url_meta":{"origin":343418,"position":3},"title":"Infringement of Starbucks trademark FRAPPUCCINO | Del HC awards Rs 2 lakh in damages and 9 lakh costs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a matter wherein Starbucks trademark \u2018frappuccino\u2019 was being infringed, Jyoti Singh, J., while observing that, FRAPPUCCINO trademarks have acquired formidable reputation and goodwill in India, awarded Starbuck Rupees 2 lakhs damages and 9 lakh costs. Instant suit had been filed to seek a decree of permanent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272963,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/03\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-in-favour-of-vistara-against-using-similar-keychains-tags-similar-marks-damages-compensation-20lakhs-intellectual-property-rights-airlines-trademark-infringementlega\/","url_meta":{"origin":343418,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains company selling keychains and baggage tags having VISTARA marks online; Raises security concerns and directs damages of Rs 20 lakh","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Tata Sia Airlines (\u2018plaintiff') seeking decree of permanent injunction against company selling keychains and baggage tags bearing the \u2018VISTARA Marks' in the aubergine and gold colour-combination, on a Chinese e-commerce platform, namely AliExpress, by the seller (\u2018defendant'), Navin Chawla J.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"VISTARA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-38-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":80141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/yahoo-proves-trademark-infringement-by-apricot-foods-passing-off-goods-by-using-goodwill\/","url_meta":{"origin":343418,"position":5},"title":"YAHOO! proves trademark infringement by Apricot foods – passing off goods by using goodwill","author":"Saba","date":"October 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0\u00a0In this case the plaintiffs are seeking permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from passing off of goods by infringing upon the trademark of the plaintiffs. The facts of the case are that the plaintiffs are owners of the trademark \u2018YAHOO\u2019 that has been registered in India in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343418\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}