{"id":343418,"date":"2025-03-10T17:00:05","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T11:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343418"},"modified":"2025-03-19T18:14:18","modified_gmt":"2025-03-19T12:44:18","slug":"delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> A suit was filed by &#8216;Ramada International Inc.&#8217; (plaintiff) seeking permanent injunction restraining &#8216;ClubRamada Hotels and Resorts Private Limited&#8217; (defendants) from infringing and using the impugned marks i.e., &#8216;CLUB RAMADA&#8217;, &#8216;CLUB RAMADA HOTELS AND RESORTS&#8217;, &#8216;CLUB RAMADA VACATION&#8217; and &#8216;HOLIDAYS BY CLUB RAMADA VACATION&#8217; and any other deceptively similar mark to that of plaintiff&#8217;s. Mini Pushkarna, J., granted permanent injunction to the plaintiff in its favour restraining the defendants from using the infringing &#8216;Ramada&#8217; mark and awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages for trademark infringement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Ramada International Inc., the plaintiff, first adopted the trademark &#8216;RAMADA&#8217; in 1954 for its hotel in Arizona, USA. Over the years, it expanded its operations, franchising and managing over 900 hotels across more than 60 countries, including India. The plaintiff first registered its &#8216;RAMADA&#8217; trademark in India on23-12-1970, with a registration granted on 29-01-1972. The plaintiff&#8217;s earliest valid trademark registration for the &#8216;RAMADA&#8217; word and device mark in India dates back to 08-10-1991, in Class 16, followed by subsequent registrations in Class 42 for hotel and related services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff discovered in November 2020 that the defendants had unlawfully adopted the &#8216;RAMADA&#8217; mark as part of their corporate name &#8216;ClubRamada Hotels and Resorts Private Limited&#8217; and were using infringing marks such as &#8216;CLUB RAMADA,&#8217; &#8216;CLUB RAMADA HOTELS AND RESORTS,&#8217; and &#8216;CLUB RAMADA VACATION.&#8217; The defendants had also registered domain names &lt;clubramadavacation.com&gt; and &lt;clubramadahotelsandresorts.com&gt; to promote their services. Despite cease-and-desist notices, the defendants refused to comply, prompting the plaintiff to initiate legal proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of the extensive trademark registrations owned by the plaintiff in India and worldwide, which demonstrated its longstanding and exclusive rights over the &#8216;RAMADA&#8217; mark. The plaintiff also submitted evidence of the international reputation of the mark, including multiple domain names featuring &#8216;RAMADA&#8217; and past legal actions successfully taken to prevent infringement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found that despite multiple opportunities, the defendants failed to provide a valid defense or justification for adopting the infringing marks. Instead, the defendants&#8217; reply to the plaintiff&#8217;s legal notice admitted knowledge of the &#8216;RAMADA&#8217; mark but provided an implausible explanation that one director&#8217;s religious beliefs led to the adoption of the name. The Court held that this defense was an afterthought and lacked bona fide intent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also took into account the defendants&#8217; continued violations of previous injunction orders. Even after being directed to cease using the infringing marks, the defendants persisted, leading to contempt proceedings. The Court recorded that the defendants&#8217; actions displayed a blatant disregard for its orders.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a decree of permanent injunction against the defendants, restraining them from using the marks &#8216;CLUB RAMADA,&#8217; &#8216;CLUB RAMADA HOTELS AND RESORTS,&#8217; &#8216;CLUB RAMADA VACATION,&#8217; or any deceptively similar variant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, considering the willful and continued violation of injunction orders, the Court awarded damages of \u20b910 lakhs to the plaintiff. Additionally, the Court directed the plaintiff to file a bill of costs within three months for reimbursement of litigation expenses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Ramada International Inc. v. ClubRamada Hotels and Resorts Private Limited, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/07YT2nyu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 1457<\/a>, decided on 09-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Ashwani Balayan, Ms. Richa Pushpam, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Advocates for plaintiff<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">None for defendants<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">It is manifest that defendant 1 had direct knowledge of the plaintiffs&#8217; RAMADA brand at the time of adoption of the impugned mark. The defendant&#8217;s justification for adopting the mark &#8216;RAMADA&#8217; is an afterthought, and lacks bona fide intent, as it fails to provide any tenable rationale for its selection.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[79649,79650,2543,14201,79648,79647,18071],"class_list":["post-343418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-clubramada-hotels","tag-clubramada-resorts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-permanent-injunction","tag-ramada-international-inc","tag-ramada-trademark","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC grants \u20b910 lakh damages in Ramada Trademark case; ClubRamada restrained from using &#039;Ramada&#039; Mark| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the &#039;Ramada&#039; trademark.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the &#039;Ramada&#039; trademark.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark&quot;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"headline\":\"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark&#8221;\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":554,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"ClubRamada Hotels\",\"ClubRamada Resorts\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"permanent injunction\",\"Ramada International Inc\",\"Ramada Trademark\",\"trademark infringement\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants \u20b910 lakh damages in Ramada Trademark case; ClubRamada restrained from using 'Ramada' Mark| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2025\\\/03\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark&#8221;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-editor_9\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC grants \u20b910 lakh damages in Ramada Trademark case; ClubRamada restrained from using 'Ramada' Mark| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark\"","og_description":"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark\"","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/"},"author":{"name":"Arunima","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"headline":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark&#8221;","datePublished":"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/"},"wordCount":554,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","keywords":["ClubRamada Hotels","ClubRamada Resorts","Delhi High Court","permanent injunction","Ramada International Inc","Ramada Trademark","trademark infringement"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC grants \u20b910 lakh damages in Ramada Trademark case; ClubRamada restrained from using 'Ramada' Mark| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-10T11:30:05+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-19T12:44:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court rules in favor of Ramada International Inc., awarding \u20b910 lakh in damages and restraining ClubRamada from using the 'Ramada' trademark.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/delhi-high-court-ramada-trademark-infringement-case-clubramada-restrained-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants \u20b910 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using \u2018Ramada\u2019 Mark&#8221;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343418\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}