{"id":343412,"date":"2025-03-10T16:00:51","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T10:30:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343412"},"modified":"2025-03-10T15:58:10","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T10:28:10","slug":"sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/","title":{"rendered":"S. 304 Part II IPC | \u2018Purely accidental\u2019; SC allows discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court<\/span>: In a criminal appeal against the Bombay High Court&#8217;s decision, whereby the accused persons&#8217; revision application against the Trial Court&#8217;s order dismissing their discharge applications for death of the deceased-employees, ultimately for the offence under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304 Part II<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), the Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ujjal Bhuyan<\/span>*, JJ. allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned decision for absence of the basic ingredients of commission of offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304 Part II<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. The Court added that nothing was discernible from the record of the case that the accused persons had the knowledge that by asking the two employees to work on the sign board would likely cause their death or cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause their death.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The deceased persons were employees of accused 1, an interior decorator, who undertook the work of decorating a shop. The accused 2 was the store operation manager of the said shop. On the day of the incident, the two deceased-employees got electrocuted while working on the sign board, which was approximately at a height of 12 feet from the ground level. Due to the fall from the iron ladder, they suffered head injuries and were declared dead on arrival at the hospital.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Police Sub-Inspector lodged a First Information Report (FIR) against the accused persons, stating that the deceased were not provided with any safety equipment like belt, helmet, rubber shoes, etc. The chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561610\" target=\"_blank\">304A<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561462\" target=\"_blank\">182<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\">201<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The accused persons filed applications seeking discharge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519479\" target=\"_blank\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (CrPC). The Trial Court dismissed the discharge applications, viewing that both the accused persons were not oblivious of the fact that they had not provided safety gear to the employees, which was certainly dangerous to them as they got exposed to electrocution risk. There was sufficient material justifying framing of charge against them for the offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304 Part II<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The High Court also dismissed criminal revision application, viewing that there was strong suspicion against both the accused persons.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence, the related special leave petition. Vide order dated 09-01-2018, the Court issued notice and granted stay on further proceedings before the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304 Part II<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> is attracted if anyone commits culpable homicide not amounting to murder if the act is done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause death but without any intention to cause death or to cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The requirement of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304 Part II<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> is that the doer must have the knowledge that the act performed is likely to cause death or to cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death but without any intention to cause death.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the basic ingredient of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304 Part II<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> is presence of knowledge and absence of intention.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Applying the aforesaid to the matter at hand, the Court said that no prima facie case was made out against the accused persons for committing an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561609\" target=\"_blank\">304 Part II<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. The Court stated that there was no intention on the part of the two accused persons to cause the death or cause such bodily injury as was likely to cause the death of the two deceased employees. The Court also added that by asking the two deceased employees to work on the sign board as part of the work of decoration of the frontage of the shop, the accused persons did not have the knowledge that such an act was likely to cause the death of the two deceased employees. The Court termed the matter at hand as &#8216;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">purely accidental&#8217;<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court perused Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519479\" target=\"_blank\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> which deals with discharge. The Court noted that it provides that if upon consideration of the record of the case and the documents submitted therewith and after hearing the submissions of the accused and the prosecution in this behalf, the Judge considers that there are no sufficient grounds for proceeding against the accused, he shall discharge the accused and record his reasons for doing so. The Court clarified that at the stage of consideration of discharge, the Court is not required to undertake a threadbare analysis of the materials gathered by the prosecution. It is only to be seen at this stage that there are sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;By its very nature, a discharge is at a higher pedestal than an acquittal. Acquittal is at the end of the trial process, may be for a technicality or on benefit of doubt or the prosecution could not prove the charge against the accused; but when an accused is discharged, it means that there are no materials to justify launch of a criminal trial against the accused. Once he is discharged, he is no longer an accused&#8221;<\/span>, the Court stated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Conclusively, the Court held that the Trial Court and the High Court fell into error in rejecting the discharge applications of the accused persons. Both the impugned decisions were set aside and quashed. Consequently, the discharge applications were allowed.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Yuvraj Laxmilal Kanther v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/icA56eDj\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 520<\/a>, decided on: 07-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellants:<\/span> Mr. S.S. Ray, Sr. Adv., Ms. Rakhi Ray, AOR, Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Sr. Adv., Mr. S S Ray, Sr. Adv., Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR, Mr. Pawan Shukla, Adv., Ms. Tissy Annie Thomas, Adv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents:<\/span> Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/icA56eDj\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 520<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Yuvraj Laxmilal Kanther<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> State of Maharashtra<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. S.S. Ray, Sr. Adv., Ms. Rakhi Ray, AOR, Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Sr. Adv., Mr. S S Ray, Sr. Adv., Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR, Mr. Pawan Shukla, Adv., Ms. Tissy Annie Thomas, Adv.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/25.-Oka-modified.png\" alt=\"Abhay S. Oka, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Abhay S. Oka, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/02\/know-thy-judge-justice-ujjal-bhuyan-judge-of-supreme-court-of-india-career-notable-judgments-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Bhuyan-modified.jpg\" alt=\"Ujjal Bhuyan, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ujjal Bhuyan, J.<\/span><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The accused persons had no knowledge that by asking the two employees to work on the sign board as part of the work of decoration of the frontage of the shop, such an act was likely to cause the death of the two deceased employees.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":343415,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[79645,70219,79646,47247,37644,59782,33311,31160,31488,5363],"class_list":["post-343412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-death-by-electrocution","tag-electrocution-case","tag-employers-responsibility","tag-justice-abhay-s-oka","tag-justice-ujjal-bhuyan","tag-safety-measures","tag-section-227-crpc","tag-section-304-ipc","tag-section-304-part-ii-ipc","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC allows discharge in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"&#039;Purely accidental&#039;; SC allowed discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S. 304 Part II IPC | \u2018Purely accidental\u2019; SC allows discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&#039;Purely accidental&#039;; SC allowed discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-10T10:30:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"S. 304 Part II IPC | \u2018Purely accidental\u2019; SC allows discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/\",\"name\":\"SC allows discharge in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-10T10:30:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"'Purely accidental'; SC allowed discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"\u201cThe accused persons had no knowledge that by asking the two employees to work on the sign board as part of the work of decoration of the frontage of the shop, such an act was likely to cause the death of the two deceased employees.\u201d\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S. 304 Part II IPC | \u2018Purely accidental\u2019; SC allows discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC allows discharge in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board | SCC Times","description":"'Purely accidental'; SC allowed discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S. 304 Part II IPC | \u2018Purely accidental\u2019; SC allows discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board","og_description":"'Purely accidental'; SC allowed discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-10T10:30:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"S. 304 Part II IPC | \u2018Purely accidental\u2019; SC allows discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/","name":"SC allows discharge in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-10T10:30:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"'Purely accidental'; SC allowed discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"\u201cThe accused persons had no knowledge that by asking the two employees to work on the sign board as part of the work of decoration of the frontage of the shop, such an act was likely to cause the death of the two deceased employees.\u201d"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/sc-allows-discharge-death-by-electrocution-case-of-workers-working-sign-board\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S. 304 Part II IPC | \u2018Purely accidental\u2019; SC allows discharge of two in death by electrocution case of workers while working on sign board"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Discharge-in-electrocution-case.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":363235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/rajasthan-high-court-converts-fathers-murder-conviction-to-culpable-homicide-son-murder-302-to-304-ii\/","url_meta":{"origin":343412,"position":0},"title":"Rajasthan High Court converts conviction from murder to culpable homicide of father who inflicted fatal blow on son neck","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWe are of the view that in ordinary circumstances, no parent would cause fatal injury to their children, howsoever frustrated or dejected he or she may be.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"father's murder conviction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/fathers-murder-conviction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/fathers-murder-conviction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/fathers-murder-conviction.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/fathers-murder-conviction.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/14\/sc-alters-conviction-under-section-302-to-s-304-part-ii-ipc-for-firing-in-marriage-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":343412,"position":1},"title":"Celebratory firing during marriage ceremonies has disastrous consequences; SC alters conviction u\/s 302 to S. 304 Part II IPC","author":"Editor","date":"March 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The convict opened fire in a marriage ceremony without taking reasonable measures for safety, which led to the unfortunate demise of the deceased.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"celebratory firing in marriage ceremony","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/celebratory-firing-in-marriage-ceremony.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/celebratory-firing-in-marriage-ceremony.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/celebratory-firing-in-marriage-ceremony.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/celebratory-firing-in-marriage-ceremony.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/26\/woman-unnatural-death-in-matrimonial-home-not-sufficient-to-convict-husband-in-laws-under-section-498a-ipc-dowry-death-cruetly-soon-before-death-supreme-court-uttaranchal-high-court-legal-research-new\/","url_meta":{"origin":343412,"position":2},"title":"Woman&#8217;s unnatural death in matrimonial home, within 7 years of marriage, not sufficient to convict husband\/in-laws for dowry death: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme court observed that for woman's death to be considered dowry death under Section 304-B and 498-A IPC, the cruelty or harassment has to be soon before the death.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"supreme court on dowry death","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/supreme-court-on-dowry-death.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/supreme-court-on-dowry-death.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/supreme-court-on-dowry-death.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/supreme-court-on-dowry-death.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/sc-principles-alteration-conviction-section-304-ipc-part-i-to-part-ii-guilty-intention\/","url_meta":{"origin":343412,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court Decodes Section 304 IPC Maze: When can conviction under Part I be Converted to Part II?","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While summarising the principles for altering conviction under Section 304 Part I of the IPC to Section 304 Part II of the IPC, the Supreme Court highlighted the difference between \u2018guilty intention\u2019 and \u2018guilty knowledge\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"section 304 ipc","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/section-304-ipc.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/section-304-ipc.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/section-304-ipc.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/section-304-ipc.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/27\/trial-court-framing-of-charges-discharge-of-accused-murder-postmortem-report-wrong-supreme-court-legal-updates-criminal-law-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":343412,"position":4},"title":"Trial Court not a &#8216;mere post office&#8217;; must apply its mind while framing charges: SC unimpressed with discharge of murder accused based on postmortem report only\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Ultimately, upon appreciation of the entire evidence on record at the end of the trial, the trial court may take one view or the other i.e. whether it is a case of murder or case of culpable homicide. But at the stage of framing of the charge, the trial court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Trial-Court-not-a-mere-post-office-it-must-apply-its-mind-while-framing-charges.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248924,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/29\/after-one-year-of-marriage-woman-burnt-to-death-over-dowry-supreme-court-finds-accused-guilty-explains-the-true-import-of-soon-before-under-section-304-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":343412,"position":5},"title":"After one year of marriage, woman burnt to death over dowry. Supreme Court finds accused guilty; explains the true import of &#8220;soon before&#8221; under Section 304-B IPC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the legislature used the words, \u201csoon before\u201d they did not mean \u201cimmediately before\u201d. Rather, they left its determination in the hands of the courts.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343412"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343412\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/343415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}