{"id":343389,"date":"2025-03-10T13:00:48","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T07:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343389"},"modified":"2025-03-12T10:07:45","modified_gmt":"2025-03-12T04:37:45","slug":"dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC grants relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto; directs cancellation of \u2018ZEPTO\u2019 trade mark registered by an individual in 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a rectification petition filed under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563698\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563709\" target=\"_blank\">57<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;) seeking cancellation\/ removal of the trade mark &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217; in the name of Respondent 1 (hereinafter &#8216;impugned mark&#8217;) from the Register of Trade Marks, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Amit Bansal, J.<\/span>, held that the impugned mark was liable to be removed from the Register of Trade Marks under the provisions of Section 47(1)(b) of the Act. Accordingly, the Court allowed the present petition and directed the Registry to remove the impugned mark &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217;, in the name of Respondent 1 from the Register of Trade Marks.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Kiranakart Technologies Private Limited (&#8216;petitioner&#8217;) was a highly reputed and well-established startup and provided quick commerce service under the marks &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217; and <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/13_zepto-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"51\" height=\"16\"\/> (&#8216;impugned marks&#8217;). The petitioner offered instant consumer goods delivery services for 7000+ products in 20+ categories through its state-of-the-art mobile application, namely, ZEPTO.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner had licensed the mark &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217; and its mobile application to third-party sellers who sell consumer products to the end consumers placing orders on the ZEPTO platform. The petitioner currently had a presence in over 10 cities across India and over 8 million customers have placed orders on its platform. In the year 2023-24, the petitioner&#8217;s turnover was approximately Rs. 4252 crores.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Since its commencement, the petitioner had widely advertised and promoted the &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217; marks by way of print, television, digital and outdoor campaigns. The &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217; marks were conspicuously displayed on the petitioner&#8217;s website, mobile application, packaging, delivery executive&#8217;s apparel, bags, etc. The petitioner also actively promoted the &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217; marks in the Indian markets by sponsoring events and collaborating with well-known entities and celebrities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Respondent 1 had registered the mark &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217; in classes 9 and 35. The impugned mark was registered in the name of Respondent 1, with effect from 14-07-2014 with a user claim since 1-4-2011. Aggrieved by the aforesaid, the present petition was filed.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Respondent 1 had not filed his reply to the present petition, which indicated that he had nothing substantial to put forth on merits by way of a response to the averments made in the petition. It was trite law that in the absence of any denial of the averments made in the petition, the same has to be taken as admitted. Thus, the Court stated that the averments made in the petition were deemed to be admitted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the petitioner had filed an affidavit to support its averments regarding non-use of the impugned mark by Respondent 1 in relation to the services in class 35 for nearly 8 years up to the date of filing of the present petition. Further, the Court stated that a perusal of Section 47(1)(b) of the Act would reveal that a registered trade mark was liable to be taken off the Register of Trade Marks if up to a date three months prior to the date of filing of the rectification petition, the same was not used in relation to those goods\/ services in respect of which it was registered for a continuous period of at least five years from the date on which the mark was entered in the Register of Trade Marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the petitioner had continuously and extensively been using the ZEPTO marks since July 2021 in India and, by virtue of their widespread advertisement and promotion, had acquired immense goodwill and reputation thereunder. On the other hand, Respondent 1 had not made any use of the impugned mark in relation to the aforesaid services in class 35. Despite the aforesaid, Respondent 1 opposed the petitioner&#8217;s application for the mark ZEPTO in class 35. Therefore, the Court stated that the petitioner was aggrieved by the continued subsistence of the impugned mark on the Register of Trade Marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that the impugned mark was liable to be removed from the Register of Trade Marks under the provisions of Section 47(1)(b) of the Act. Accordingly, the Court allowed the present petition and directed the Registry to remove the impugned mark &#8216;ZEPTO&#8217;, in the name of Respondent 1 from the Register of Trade Marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kiranakart Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Mohd. Arshad, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/kfAIJh00\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 1401<\/a>, decided on 3-3-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Shruti Baid, Aman Sagar and Anmol Kasana, Advocates;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC with Gurleen Kaur Waraich and Kritarth Upadhyay.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The petitioner has filed an affidavit of the authorized representative of an independent investigating agency to support its averments regarding non-use of the impugned mark by Respondent 1 in relation to the services in class 35 for nearly 8 years up to the date of filing of the present petition.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[64065,2543,70893,63304,79635,79636,2616,42104,79634],"class_list":["post-343389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-64065","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-justice-amit-bansal","tag-non-use-of-mark","tag-quick-commerce-platform","tag-register-of-trade-mark","tag-Trade_Mark","tag-trade-marks-act","tag-zepto"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC directs cancellation of &#039;ZEPTO&#039; trade mark registered by an individual in 2014 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi HC granted relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto, directs cancellation of &#039;ZEPTO&#039; trade mark registered by an individual in 2014\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC grants relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto; directs cancellation of \u2018ZEPTO\u2019 trade mark registered by an individual in 2014\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi HC granted relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto, directs cancellation of &#039;ZEPTO&#039; trade mark registered by an individual in 2014\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-10T07:30:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-12T04:37:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC grants relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto; directs cancellation of \u2018ZEPTO\u2019 trade mark registered by an individual in 2014\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC directs cancellation of 'ZEPTO' trade mark registered by an individual in 2014 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-10T07:30:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-12T04:37:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi HC granted relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto, directs cancellation of 'ZEPTO' trade mark registered by an individual in 2014\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto; directs cancellation of \u2018ZEPTO\u2019 trade mark registered by an individual in 2014\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC directs cancellation of 'ZEPTO' trade mark registered by an individual in 2014 | SCC Times","description":"Delhi HC granted relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto, directs cancellation of 'ZEPTO' trade mark registered by an individual in 2014","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC grants relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto; directs cancellation of \u2018ZEPTO\u2019 trade mark registered by an individual in 2014","og_description":"Delhi HC granted relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto, directs cancellation of 'ZEPTO' trade mark registered by an individual in 2014","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-10T07:30:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-12T04:37:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC grants relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto; directs cancellation of \u2018ZEPTO\u2019 trade mark registered by an individual in 2014","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/","name":"Delhi HC directs cancellation of 'ZEPTO' trade mark registered by an individual in 2014 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-10T07:30:48+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-12T04:37:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi HC granted relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto, directs cancellation of 'ZEPTO' trade mark registered by an individual in 2014","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/10\/dhc-directs-cancellation-of-zepto-trade-mark-registered-by-an-individual-in-2014\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC grants relief to Kiranakart Technologies for its quick commerce platform Zepto; directs cancellation of \u2018ZEPTO\u2019 trade mark registered by an individual in 2014"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":336972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/10\/dhc-upholds-trade-mark-rights-of-ganesh-grains-over-its-ganesh-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":343389,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds trade mark rights of Ganesh Grains over its \u2018GANESH\u2019 marks; directs cancellation of \u2018GANESH HARA MATAR\u2019 mark","author":"Arushi","date":"December 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPetitioner has established that that it was the prior registered proprietor and prior user of the mark \u2018GANESH\u2019 and its other formative marks since 1936. The adoption and use of the mark \u2018GANESH HARA MATAR\u2019 by Respondent 1, is likely to create confusion in the market.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":339561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/22\/dhc-grants-relief-in-favour-of-rapido-in-trade-mark-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":343389,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Identical marks, identical goods\/services and identical target consumers\u2019: Delhi HC grants relief in favour of Rapido in trade mark dispute","author":"Arushi","date":"January 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is clear that the impugned mark has been adopted by Respondent 1 dishonestly to trade upon the goodwill and reputation of the petitioner under the RAPIDO marks and to associate itself with the petitioner.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/29\/del-hc-grants-relief-to-crocs-in-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":343389,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of \u2018CROOSE\u2019 mark","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner company Crocs is a popular footwear brand with a widespread range of more than 300 styled for men, women and children which are popular both in India and abroad.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"relief to Crocs case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/relief-to-Crocs-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358886,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/03\/del-hc-grants-zepto-interim-relief-trade-mark-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":343389,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court orders takedown of fake sites offering jobs at Zepto; Grants interim injunction in trade mark dispute","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The defendants were operating several websites and applications to trick the general public into believing that they were representatives\/associates of Zepto and so as to scam them into paying for fake job opportunities with Zepto","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Zepto trade mark infringement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Zepto-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Zepto-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Zepto-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Zepto-trade-mark-infringement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344939,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/02\/dhc-directs-removal-of-mark-purplle-tree-from-register-of-trade-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":343389,"position":4},"title":"Delhi HC grants relief to e-commerce platform \u2018Purplle\u2019; directs removal of mark \u2018Purplle Tree\u2019 from Register of Trade Marks","author":"Arushi","date":"April 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Despite Respondent 1\u2019s endeavour to create distinctions, it is crystal clear that the marks are confusingly\/deceptively similar to the petitioner\u2019s registered trade mark. Such use of a similar mark would invariably mislead consumers and members into believing that the goods under the impugned mark were sourced from the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311660,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/18\/marks-removal-for-non-use-requires-clear-unequivocal-evidence-of-abandonment-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":343389,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Mark\u2019s removal for non-use requires clear, unequivocal evidence of abandonment\u2019; Delhi High Court dismisses application for removal of mark \u2018BAOJI\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"January 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 47 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 serves to protect the integrity of the trade mark register by ensuring that registered marks that are not actively used in commerce are removed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343389\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}