{"id":343271,"date":"2025-03-08T13:30:46","date_gmt":"2025-03-08T08:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343271"},"modified":"2025-03-12T10:01:11","modified_gmt":"2025-03-12T04:31:11","slug":"delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Touching lips or lying next to victim not sufficient for POCSO charge without \u2018sexual intent\u2019: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: A criminal revision petition was filed by the petitioner, a minor (MRP) under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804170\" target=\"_blank\">438<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804175\" target=\"_blank\">442<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804327\" target=\"_blank\">Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a> (BNSS), challenging the order dated 30-07-2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in an FIR under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561668\" target=\"_blank\">354<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (POCSO Act) registered at Police Station Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi, based on allegations of inappropriate contact with a minor girl by her paternal uncle. Swarana Kanta Sharma, J., modified the impugned order by upholding the charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561668\" target=\"_blank\">354<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> while setting aside the charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>, holding that the allegations did not establish the essential ingredient of sexual intent required for aggravated sexual assault.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 01-03-2024, the in-charge of Udyan Ghar for Girls, accompanied by the victim and an order from the Child Welfare Committee (CWC), approached the police station to report alleged inappropriate conduct by the victim&#8217;s paternal uncle, the petitioner herein. The victim alleged that while staying at her home in Okhla during her winter vacation, the petitioner had touched and pressed her lips. Additionally, she stated that he would lie down next to her when no one else was present, causing her discomfort.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Following the victim&#8217;s statement, an FIR was registered for offences under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561668\" target=\"_blank\">354<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>. The victim was subsequently medically examined, and her statement was recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC. After completing the investigation, the police filed a charge sheet against the petitioner. The Trial Court, upon consideration of the evidence, framed charges under both provisions, leading to the present revision petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court first examined whether the allegations satisfied the legal criteria for an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561668\" target=\"_blank\">354<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. It referred to precedents, including <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rupan Deol Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/BmU8KdYX\" target=\"_blank\">(1995) 6 SCC 194<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Raju Pandurang Mahale v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/SzF1iJGj\" target=\"_blank\">(2004) 4 SCC 371<\/a> which define modesty, and the intent required under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561668\" target=\"_blank\">354<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. The Court noted that touching and pressing the lips of a minor girl, along with lying next to her in an inappropriate manner, could be construed as an act capable of outraging modesty. Given the victim&#8217;s vulnerability and discomfort, the Court held that a prima facie case under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561668\" target=\"_blank\">354<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> was made out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, regarding the charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>, the Court noted that an essential ingredient &#8216;sexual intent&#8217; in POCSO cases was absent from the victim&#8217;s statements. While the victim reported feeling uncomfortable, there was no explicit allegation of sexual intent or overtly sexual conduct by the petitioner. The Court emphasized that mere physical contact, without clear sexual intent, would not meet the threshold required under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>. Therefore, it concluded that no prima facie case for aggravated sexual assault was established.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court remarked that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;the absence of even the slightest indication of a sexually motivated advance in the statements of the victim negates the foundational requirement of &#8216;sexual intent&#8217;, which is an essential element of an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>. The act of touching and pressing lips or lying down next to the victim, though may result in violation of a woman&#8216;s dignity and lead to outraging of her modesty, but absent any overt or inferred sexual intent, the said acts would fall short of meeting the legal threshold required to sustain a charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also criticized the Trial Court&#8217;s impugned order for being non-speaking and unreasoned. It emphasized that orders framing charges, especially in cases involving serious offences, must provide at least minimal reasoning to demonstrate judicial application of mind. The Court expressed concern over a recurring trend of trial courts passing cryptic and mechanical orders on charge without engaging with the arguments presented by both parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court partially allowed the revision petition and upheld the charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561668\" target=\"_blank\">354<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, it set aside the charge under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550487\" target=\"_blank\">10<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\">POCSO Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">MRP v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/L1pu1q07\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 1404<\/a>, decided on 24-02-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Ms. Amrita Jaiswal, Advocate for petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with W\/SI Sunil Complainant in person alongwith Counsel (appearance not given)<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The presence of &#8216;sexual intent&#8217; is the determining factor in distinguishing an act of mere physical force from an act that constitutes sexual assault under the POCSO Act.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[79575,74322,72373,79578,79579,79572,79576,79573,79574,79577],"class_list":["post-343271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-childprotection","tag-criminallaw","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-nonspeakingorder","tag-outragingmodestyofwomen","tag-pocsoact","tag-pocsocharges","tag-s354ipc","tag-sexualintent","tag-unreasonedorder"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC upholds IPC charge, sets aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court modifies order by upholding IPC charge while setting aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Touching lips or lying next to victim not sufficient for POCSO charge without \u2018sexual intent\u2019: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court modifies order by upholding IPC charge while setting aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-08T08:00:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-12T04:31:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Touching lips or lying next to victim not sufficient for POCSO charge without \u2018sexual intent\u2019: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC upholds IPC charge, sets aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-08T08:00:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-12T04:31:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court modifies order by upholding IPC charge while setting aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Touching lips or lying next to victim not sufficient for POCSO charge without \u2018sexual intent\u2019: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC upholds IPC charge, sets aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court modifies order by upholding IPC charge while setting aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Touching lips or lying next to victim not sufficient for POCSO charge without \u2018sexual intent\u2019: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court modifies order by upholding IPC charge while setting aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-08T08:00:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-12T04:31:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Touching lips or lying next to victim not sufficient for POCSO charge without \u2018sexual intent\u2019: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC upholds IPC charge, sets aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-08T08:00:46+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-12T04:31:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court modifies order by upholding IPC charge while setting aside POCSO charge for lack of \u2018sexual intent\u2019.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/delhi-hc-ipc-charge-upheld-pocso-dismissed-sexual-intent-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Touching lips or lying next to victim not sufficient for POCSO charge without \u2018sexual intent\u2019: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216857,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/del-hc-doing-of-act-with-sexual-intent-is-precondition-to-attract-punishment-for-sexual-harassment-under-s-12-of-pocso-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":343271,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Doing of act with &#8216;sexual intent&#8217; is precondition to attract punishment for sexual harassment under S.12 of POCSO Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed by the State against the order of the trial court whereby the accused was discharged of the offence punishable under Section 12\u00a0(punishable for sexual harassment)\u00a0of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). The subject FIR was registered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221992,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/12\/del-hc-discharge-from-offence-under-s-12-pocso-upheld-where-victim-did-not-mention-any-act-of-sexual-assault-or-intent\/","url_meta":{"origin":343271,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Discharge from offence under S. 12 POCSO upheld where victim did not mention any act of sexual assault or intent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Suresh Kumar Kait, J., dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by the State against the order of the trial court whereby the accused-respondent discharged from the offence punishable under Section 12\u00a0(prevention from sexual harassment)\u00a0of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. An FIR was registered against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":231840,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/06\/pocso-del-hc-pulling-down-leggings-of-child-victim-and-touching-of-thighs-is-evident-of-sexual-intent-and-constitutes-an-offence-of-sexual-assault-under-s-7-pocso-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":343271,"position":2},"title":"[POCSO] Del HC | Pulling down leggings of child victim and touching of thighs is evident of sexual intent and constitutes an offence of sexual assault under S. 7 POCSO Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J., while addressing a matter wherein a child aged 9 years old was sexually assaulted, held that, Pulling down the leggings of the child victim and touching of the thighs is evident of sexual intent and accordingly constitutes an offence of sexual assault. Appellant impugns\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":372180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/09\/del-hc-making-minor-touch-private-parts-aggravated-sexual-assault-pocso\/","url_meta":{"origin":343271,"position":3},"title":"Making minor touch private parts with sexual intent constitutes Aggravated Sexual Assault under POCSO Act: Delhi High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Minor inconsistencies arising from age, vocabulary or manner of narration do not erode the credibility of the prosecution, particularly where the allegation relates to commission of sexual assault with sexual intent.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Making minor touch private parts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Making-minor-touch-private-parts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328541,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/delhi-hc-puts-woman-to-trial-for-committing-aggravated-penetrative-sexual-assault-under-pocso-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":343271,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Ss. 3 and 5 of the POCSO Act are offences regardless of gender of offender\u2019; Delhi HC puts woman to trial for committing \u2018aggravated penetrative sexual assault\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"August 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The word \u2018he\u2019 in Section 3 of the POCSO Act could not be given a restrictive meaning to say that it referred only to a \u2018male\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352198,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/bom-hc-saying-i-love-you-doesnt-show-sexual-intent\/","url_meta":{"origin":343271,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Merely saying \u2018I Love You\u2019 does not show sexual intent\u2019; Bombay HC acquits man in POCSO case","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf somebody said that he was in love with another person or expressed his feelings itself would not amount to an \u201cintent\u201d showing some sort of his \u201csexual intention\u201d. What constituted such \u201csexuality\u201d or \u201csexual intent\u201d and what was not, was a question of fact.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"i love you sexual intent","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/i-love-you-sexual-intent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/i-love-you-sexual-intent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/i-love-you-sexual-intent.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/i-love-you-sexual-intent.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343271\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}