{"id":343268,"date":"2025-03-08T13:00:21","date_gmt":"2025-03-08T07:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343268"},"modified":"2025-03-10T18:06:22","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T12:36:22","slug":"complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a batch of transfer petitions under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) to transfer the criminal case under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> (&#8216;N.I. Act) pending before the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh (UT) to the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, essentially on the ground that there was no cause of action for the bank to lodge the complaint in Chandigarh, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">JB Pardiwala*<\/span> and R. Mahadevan, JJ. dismissed the petitions holding that the petitioners&#8217; assertation that no part of the cause of action arose within Chandigarh, was of no avail to them, as the law itself allows the institution of a complaint in Chandigarh. The enactment of sub-section (2)(a) of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544371\" target=\"_blank\">142<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a> and the Explanation thereto allows the complainant to file a complaint before the Courts within whose jurisdiction the collection branch of the bank falls.<\/p>\n<h3>Issues<\/h3>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether a complaint filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a> can be ordered to be transferred from one court to the other in exercise of powers under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction of the Court in which the complaint is filed?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Assuming that the Court in which the complaint filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a> lacks territorial jurisdiction to try the same, then is it permissible for this Court in exercise of powers under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> to transfer the said complaint to the court having territorial jurisdiction to try the offence?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the expression &#8220;that for the ends of justice, this Court can transfer any criminal case or appeal to any place.&#8221; in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> embraces in itself the lack of territorial jurisdiction of the court to try the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a>?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 1%;\">At the outset, referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yogesh Upadhaya<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Atlanta Limited<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k4lqC7Xh\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 170<\/a> the Court noted that while dealing with the plea for transfer filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> of six complaint cases filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544371\" target=\"_blank\">142<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a> respectively, the Court therein noted <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Bhaskaran<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VQDH78oW\" target=\"_blank\">(1999) 7 SCC 510<\/a>, wherein it was held that an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a> has five components:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(i) drawing of the cheque;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(ii) presentation of the cheque to the bank;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(iii) returning of the cheque unpaid by the drawee bank;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt;\">(iv) giving notice in writing to the drawer of the cheque demanding payment of the cheque amount; and;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">(v) failure of the drawer to make payment within 15 days of the receipt of the notice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also noted that it was further held that the jurisdiction to deal with the case vests in the Court having jurisdiction over the territorial limits wherein any of the five acts referred to above occurred. If the five acts were done in five different areas, then any one of the Courts exercising jurisdiction in those five areas would have jurisdiction and the complainant could choose any one of those Courts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Noting that reliance was placed by <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yogesh Upadhaya<\/span> (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">supra<\/span>) on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/531ogxHG\" target=\"_blank\">(2014) 9 SCC 129<\/a>, the Court referred to same and noted that it was held that the place, situs or venue of judicial inquiry and trial of the offence must logically be restricted to where the drawee bank is located, i.e., where the cheque is dishonoured upon presentation and not where the complainant&#8217;s bank is situated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also analysed the changes that came about after the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0003003824\" target=\"_blank\">Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2015<\/a>. Additionally, the Court noted that after the amendment, Section 142(2) made it clear that jurisdiction to try such an offence would vest only in the Court within whose jurisdiction the branch of the Bank where the cheque was delivered for collection, through the account of the payee or holder in due course, is situated. The newly inserted Section 142-A further clarified this position by validating the transfer of pending cases to the Courts conferred with such jurisdiction after the amendment came into force.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court underscored that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yogesh Upadhaya<\/span> (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">supra<\/span>), after considering Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544371\" target=\"_blank\">142(2)<\/a> along with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544372\" target=\"_blank\">142-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a>, it was held that two out of six complaints instituted at Nagpur were in accordance with the legal position. However, since the other four complaints also pertained to the same transaction, the Court felt that it would be advisable to have a common adjudication with a view to obviate the possibility of any contradictory findings being rendered in connection with the said complaints by different courts. In such circumstances, all the six complaints were ordered to be transferred to the South-west district Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> and upon referring to trajectory of authorities pronounced on the provision, the Court reiterated that transfer of cases under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a> may be allowed when there is a reasonable apprehension backed by evidence that justice may not be done and mere convenience or inconvenience of the parties may not by itself be sufficient to pray for transfer. The Court has to appropriately balance the grounds raised in the facts and circumstances of each case and exercise its discretion in a circumspect manner while ordering a transfer under Section 406.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 1%;\">Further, the Court stated that although no rigid and inflexible rule or test could be laid down to decide whether or not the power under Section 406 of the Cr.P.C should be exercised, yet it is manifest that an order of transfer of trial is not to be passed as a matter of routine and more particularly on the plea of lack of territorial jurisdiction of the Court to try the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;This power must be exercised cautiously and in exceptional situations, where it becomes necessary to do so to provide credibility to the trial.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Court also enunciated broad factors, which are not exhaustive, to be kept in mind while considering an application for transfer of the trial:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>when it appears that the State machinery or prosecution is acting hand in glove with the accused, and there is likelihood of miscarriage of justice due to the lackadaisical attitude of the prosecution;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>when there is material to show that the accused may influence the prosecution witnesses or cause physical harm to the complainant;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>comparative inconvenience and hardships likely to be caused to the accused, the complainant\/the prosecution and the witnesses, besides the burden to be borne by the State exchequer in making payment of travelling and other expenses of the official and non-official witnesses;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>a communally surcharged atmosphere, indicating some proof of inability in holding a fair and impartial trial because of the accusations made and the nature of the crime committed by the accused; and<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">existence of some material from which it can be inferred that some persons are so hostile that they are interfering or are likely to interfere, either directly or indirectly, with the course of justice.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also discussed the phrase &#8216;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">expedient for the ends of justice&#8217;<\/span> which finds place in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>. The Court noted that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yakub Abdul Razak Memon<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7lf6uvJB\" target=\"_blank\">(2013) 13 SCC 1<\/a> it was observed that this phrase refers to the best interest of the public within the four corners of the statute. It means preservation of proper balance between the Constitutional\/statutory rights of an individual and rights of the people at large to have the law enforced. The &#8220;ends of justice&#8221; does not mean vague and indeterminate notions of justice, but justice according to the law of the land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 1%;\">The Court also stated that-<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: center;\">&#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">when a complainant institutes a case in a Court of his choosing and such a Court has the territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter then the transfer of such case has to be guided by principles that would achieve the ends of justice. The meaning of &#8220;ends of justice&#8221; essentially refers to justice for all the parties involved in the litigation.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On basis of the aforesaid, the Court said that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544371\" target=\"_blank\">142<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a>, provides the complainant with the right to lodge a complaint, before a Court, within whose jurisdiction, the branch of the bank where the cheque is delivered for collection, is situated. Therefore, the argument of the accused that another Court might also be empowered to take cognizance of the matter under Section 142, since the cause of action arose within that jurisdiction, cannot by itself be a ground for seeking transfer under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court conclusively held that when a cheque is delivered or issued to a person with liberty to present the cheque for collection at any branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course, as the case may be, maintains the account then, the cheque shall be deemed to have been delivered or issued to the branch of the bank, in which, the payee or holder in due course, as the case may be, maintains the account, and the Court of the place where such cheque was presented for collection, will have the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint alleging the commission of offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\">138<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was also mentioned that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">the word &#8216;delivered&#8217; used in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544371\" target=\"_blank\">142(2)(a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\">N.I. Act<\/a> has no significance.<\/span> What is of significance is the expression &#8216;for collection through an account&#8217;, the delivery of the cheque takes place where the cheque was issued and presentation of the cheque will be through the account of the payee or holder in due course, and the said place is decisive to determine the question of jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the matter at hand, the Court explained that for the purpose of transfer of any case or proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519697\" target=\"_blank\">406<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">CrPC<\/a>, the case must fall within the ambit of the expression &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">expedient for the ends of justice<\/span>&#8221;. Mere inconvenience or hardship that the accused may have to face in travelling from Coimbatore to Chandigarh would not fall within the expression &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">expedient for the ends of justice<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Shri Sendhur Agro &amp; Oil Industries v. Kotak Mahinda Bank Ltd., Transfer Petition (Crl.) No. 608 of 2024, decided on: 06-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice JB Pardiwala<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. C. Solomon, AOR; Mr. Kaushal Kishore, Adv.; Mr. Amit Pratap Shaunak, Adv.; Mr. T.s. Nanda Kumar, Adv.; Ms. S. Harini, Adv.; Mr. Nikhil Goel, Sr. Adv.; Ms. D Durga Devi, Adv.; Mr. Pranab Prakash, AOR<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv.; Ms. Sonia Dube, Adv.; Ms. Kanchan Yadav, Adv.; Mr. Tanishq Sharma, Adv.; Ms. Saumya Sharma, Adv.; Ms. Jasleen Virk, Adv.; Legal Options, AOR<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qR3ky78N\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 508<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Shri Sendhur Agro &amp; Oil Industries<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Kotak Mahinda Bank Ltd.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. C. Solomon, AOR; Mr. Kaushal Kishore, Adv.; Mr. Amit Pratap Shaunak, Adv.; Mr. T.s. Nanda Kumar, Adv.; Ms. S. Harini, Adv.; Mr. Nikhil Goel, Sr. Adv.; Ms. D Durga Devi, Adv.; Mr. Pranab Prakash, AOR.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv.; Ms. Sonia Dube, Adv.; Ms. Kanchan Yadav, Adv.; Mr. Tanishq Sharma, Adv.; Ms. Saumya Sharma, Adv.; Ms. Jasleen Virk, Adv.; Legal Options, AOR.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/know-thy-judge-justice-jb-pardiwala-supreme-court-gujarat-high-court\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/WhatsApp-Image-2022-05-09-at-6.14.52-PM-modified.png\" alt=\"JB Pardiwala, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border: 2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">JB Pardiwala, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/R.-Mahadevan-modified.png\" alt=\"R. Mahadevan, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">R. Mahadevan, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">For the purpose of transfer of any case or proceedings under Section 406 of the CrPC, the case must fall within the ambit of the expression &#8220;expedient for the ends of justice&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":343281,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[29922,49365,70880,17041,30606,44635,23584,44017,79571,5363,23654],"class_list":["post-343268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-cheque-dishonour","tag-justice-j-b-pardiwala","tag-justice-r-mahadevan","tag-negotiable-instruments-act","tag-ni-act","tag-sc","tag-section-138-ni-act","tag-section-142-ni-act","tag-section-406-crpc","tag-supreme-court","tag-transfer-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act cannot be transferred for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act not transferred for lack of jurisdiction of Court, S. 142 allows filing of complaint at place of bank\u2019s branch: SC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act not transferred for lack of jurisdiction of Court, S. 142 allows filing of complaint at place of bank\u2019s branch: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-08T07:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-10T12:36:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act cannot be transferred for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-08T07:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-10T12:36:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act not transferred for lack of jurisdiction of Court, S. 142 allows filing of complaint at place of bank\u2019s branch: SC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act cannot be transferred for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court: SC | SCC Times","description":"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act not transferred for lack of jurisdiction of Court, S. 142 allows filing of complaint at place of bank\u2019s branch: SC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers","og_description":"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act not transferred for lack of jurisdiction of Court, S. 142 allows filing of complaint at place of bank\u2019s branch: SC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-08T07:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-10T12:36:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/","name":"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act cannot be transferred for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-08T07:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-10T12:36:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"Complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act not transferred for lack of jurisdiction of Court, S. 142 allows filing of complaint at place of bank\u2019s branch: SC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/complaint-under-s-138-of-ni-act-cannot-be-transferred-for-lack-of-territorial-jurisdiction-of-court-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can a complaint under S. 138 of N.I. Act be transferred from one Court to other for lack of territorial jurisdiction of Court? SC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/S.-138-NI-Act-case-transfer.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":285816,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/01\/notwithstanding-the-non-obstante-clause-in-s-1421-of-ni-act-the-power-of-sc-to-transfer-criminal-cases-under-s-406-crpc-remains-intact-in-relation-to-offences-under-s\/","url_meta":{"origin":343268,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Supreme Court&#8217;s power under Section 406 CrPC to transfer Section 138 NI Act cases and effect of non-obstante clause under Section 142(1) NI Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that as four of the six cases have been filed by the respondent company before the Dwarka Courts at New Delhi and only two such cases are pending before the Courts at Nagpur, it would be convenient and in the interest of all concerned, that the cases\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-585.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-585.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-585.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-585.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/26\/hc-roving-enquiry-debt-liability-quashing-section-138-ni-act-complaint-supreme-court-section-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":343268,"position":1},"title":"High Court Cannot Conduct Roving Enquiry into Debt or Liability While Quashing Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cUnder Section 139 of the NI Act, there is a presumption that the holder of a cheque received the cheque of the nature referred to in Section 138 NI Act for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability. This presumption can be rebutted by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Enquiry into Debt or Liability","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Enquiry-into-Debt-or-Liability.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Enquiry-into-Debt-or-Liability.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Enquiry-into-Debt-or-Liability.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Enquiry-into-Debt-or-Liability.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343943,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/19\/section-138-ni-act-proceedings-can-be-quashed-against-former-director-of-company-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":343268,"position":2},"title":"Can Section 138 NI Act proceedings be quashed against former director of company, suspended from his position on appointment of IRP? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"March 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The immunity granted by the moratorium order issued under Section 14 of the IBC can only be obtained by a corporate debtor and not by a natural person such as the present accused, who was the Director of the corporate debtor.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Quash Section 138 NI proceedings","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/CAN-21.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/16\/rajasthan-hc-section-138-ni-act-on-cheque-for-time-barred-debt-revives-enforceability-under-contract-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":343268,"position":3},"title":"Cheque for Time-Barred Debt Revives Enforceability Under S. 25(3) Contract Act; Dishonour attracts Section 138 NI Act: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA meaningful reading of Sections 20, 118 and 139 of the NI Act makes it clear that a person who signs a cheque and delivers it to the payee remains liable unless he successfully rebuts the statutory presumptions.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 138 NI Act on Cheque for Time-Barred Debt","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334202,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/31\/crpc-bars-review-power-under-sections-362-3973-raj-hc-dismisses-petition-as-de-facto-review-attempt-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":343268,"position":4},"title":"CrPC bars review power under Sections 362 &amp; 397(3); Rajasthan High Court dismisses petition as de facto review attempt","author":"Ritu","date":"October 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the petition was effectively a review in disguise, which is barred under Section 362 CrPC and cannot be entertained.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/supreme-court-sets-aside-madras-high-courts-sentence-in-section-138-ni-act-modifies-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":343268,"position":5},"title":"Section 138 NI Act| Supreme Court sets aside Madras High Court&#8217;s reversal of acquittal in a cheque bouncing case","author":"Editor","date":"January 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that the scope of interference in an appeal against acquittal is limited and that the Madras High Court \u2018could not have interfered with the finding of acquittal recorded by the learned Trial Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-164.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343268\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/343281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}