{"id":343019,"date":"2025-03-05T18:00:49","date_gmt":"2025-03-05T12:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=343019"},"modified":"2025-03-10T09:34:28","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T04:04:28","slug":"telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/","title":{"rendered":"Telangana HC rejects PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections; imposes Rs. 25,000 costs"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Telangana High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition challenging Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000568600\" target=\"_blank\">21(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000569169\" target=\"_blank\">Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;), which prohibited candidates with more than two children from contesting in the panchayat elections, the Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Renuka Yara, JJ., rejected the public interest litigation (&#8216;PIL&#8217;), holding that the petition could not be treated as a PIL. The Court also held that the question of whether the law needed to be revised was within the legislature&#8217;s power. Further, the Court imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the petitioner for filing the petition wrongly as a PIL.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner wanted to contest the panchayat elections but was barred by Section 21(3) of the Act, which prohibited candidates having more than two children from participating. The petitioner contended that it was the year 2025, and in view of the diminishing fertility rate, the provision imposing a ban on contesting elections for persons having more than two children needed to be revisited and declared unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court rejected the contention that the present writ petition could be treated as a PIL merely because the petitioner himself had more than two children and was interested in participating in the elections. The Court stated that if certain persons were held to be ineligible to contest the election having more than two children, such persons might be &#8216;persons aggrieved&#8217; and could have assailed that decision in an independent capacity and not as a PIL.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that even otherwise, the curtains on this aspect were already drawn by the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Javed<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/HfBH4f09\" target=\"_blank\">(2003) 8 SCC 369<\/a>, wherein a similar provision was unsuccessfully challenged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that whether the law needed to be revisited due to a change in fertility rate was within the purview of the lawmakers. In PIL, no such interference could be made. Thus, no case was made out for interference.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Since the petition was unnecessarily filed as a PIL, the Court imposed costs of Rs. 25,000 on the petitioner to be deposited before the High Court Legal Services Committee within 30 days.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Avula Nagaraju v. State of Telangana, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8YawrXR8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine TS 176<\/a>, decided on 03-03-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Anirudh Thimmaraju<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Government Pleader G. Veeraswamy and Assistant Government Pleader K. Anjamma<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;If certain persons were held to be ineligible to contest the election having more than two children, such persons may be &#8216;persons aggrieved&#8217; and could have assailed that decision in an independent capacity and not as a PIL.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":315575,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[79438,79435,71500,29807,11321,79437,33941,79436,13551],"class_list":["post-343019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-candidates-with-more-than-2-children","tag-justice-renuka-yara","tag-justice-sujoy-paul","tag-panchayat-elections","tag-pil","tag-rs-25000-cost","tag-telangana-high-court","tag-telangana-panchayat-raj-act","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Telangana HC rejects PIL against prohibition on candidates with more than 2 kids to contest in panchayat elections | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Telangana HC rejected PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections, imposed Rs 25,000 cost.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Telangana HC rejects PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections; imposes Rs. 25,000 costs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telangana HC rejected PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections, imposed Rs 25,000 cost.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-05T12:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-10T04:04:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Telangana HC rejects PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections; imposes Rs. 25,000 costs\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/\",\"name\":\"Telangana HC rejects PIL against prohibition on candidates with more than 2 kids to contest in panchayat elections | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-05T12:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-10T04:04:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Telangana HC rejected PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections, imposed Rs 25,000 cost.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Telangana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Telangana HC rejects PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections; imposes Rs. 25,000 costs\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Telangana HC rejects PIL against prohibition on candidates with more than 2 kids to contest in panchayat elections | SCC Times","description":"Telangana HC rejected PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections, imposed Rs 25,000 cost.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Telangana HC rejects PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections; imposes Rs. 25,000 costs","og_description":"Telangana HC rejected PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections, imposed Rs 25,000 cost.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-05T12:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-10T04:04:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Telangana HC rejects PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections; imposes Rs. 25,000 costs","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/","name":"Telangana HC rejects PIL against prohibition on candidates with more than 2 kids to contest in panchayat elections | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-05T12:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-10T04:04:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Telangana HC rejected PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections, imposed Rs 25,000 cost.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Telangana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/05\/telangana-hc-rejects-pil-against-prohibition-candidates-with-more-than-2-kids-panchayat-elections\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Telangana HC rejects PIL challenging prohibition on candidates with more than 2 children from contesting panchayat elections; imposes Rs. 25,000 costs"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299013,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-pil-alleging-misappropriation-of-funds-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":343019,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL alleging misappropriation of funds by Kharagpur Panchayat Samity&#8217;s Executive Officer","author":"Ritu","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court observed that at this stage, the Court we cannot examine the disputed questions and directed the District Magistrate to provide an appropriate reply to the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-pil-in-alleged-misuse-of-national-flag-in-election-campaign\/","url_meta":{"origin":343019,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL in alleged misuse of National Flag in election campaign","author":"Ritu","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the PIL as after noting that the FIR is already registered on the alleged offence and the investigation was in progress.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/19\/state-government-has-power-under-section-91-of-the-panchayat-raj-and-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-1993-to-interfere-with-an-order-passed-by-an-authority-under-the-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":343019,"position":2},"title":"State Government has power under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 to interfere with an order passed by an authority under the Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A review petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Sujoy Paul, J., to review an order passed by this court. Respondent had availed all the remedies available to him under M.P. Panchayat Service (D&A) Rules, 1999 where these rules were created under Section 70\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297988,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/know-thy-judge-chief-justice-telangana-high-court-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":343019,"position":3},"title":"Know Thy Judge| Justice Alok Aradhe: 6th Chief Justice of Telangana High Court","author":"Arunima","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Alok Aradhe was sworn in as Chief Justice of Telangana High Court on 23-07-2023 by the Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan. He succeeded Justice Ujjal Bhuyan who has been elevated as a Judge in the Supreme Court of India. Justice Aradhe has formerly served as Judge in Karnataka, Jammu and Kashmir\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice alok aradhe","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-alok-aradhe.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-alok-aradhe.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-alok-aradhe.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-alok-aradhe.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":195102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/09\/supreme-court-refuses-to-interfere-with-west-bengal-panchayat-polls\/","url_meta":{"origin":343019,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court refuses to interfere with West Bengal Panchayat Polls","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench of RK Agarwal and AM Sapre, JJ refused to extend the last date for the filing of nominations for panchayat polls in West Bengal, saying it cannot interfere with the election process. The Court, however, granted liberty to the candidates to approach the West Bengal State\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/03\/calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-on-grounds-having-private-motive-and-direct-interest-in-establishment-medical-college\/","url_meta":{"origin":343019,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL filed with private motive and direct interest in a Medical College&#8217;s establishment","author":"Ritu","date":"August 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Before entertaining a PIL, Court must diligently verify that the petition is genuinely rooted in public interest and not driven by personal vendettas or vested interests","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343019","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343019"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/343019\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=343019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=343019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}