{"id":342913,"date":"2025-03-04T16:00:59","date_gmt":"2025-03-04T10:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=342913"},"modified":"2025-03-05T15:13:45","modified_gmt":"2025-03-05T09:43:45","slug":"electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Electricity is an \u201cessential service\u201d under Section 14(2) IBC; can\u2019t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi:<\/span> In an appeal challenging the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order directing the appellant, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., to restore Corporate Debtor&#8217;s electricity without insisting on payment during CIRP, a 3-member bench of Ashok Bhushan, J., Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member), upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s order and held that Electricity is an essential service under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) and cannot be disconnected even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP.<\/p>\n<h3>Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the Corporate Debtor, Morarjee Textiles Ltd., was granted an electricity connection by the appellant for operating its textile mill. On 05-02-2024, electricity bill, for the month of January 2024, of Rs.4,78,27,140\/- was raised by the appellant towards unpaid electricity bills. On 09-02-2024, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the Corporate Debtor on an application filed by Axis Bank Limited. The appellant filed its claim for outstanding electricity dues for the pre-CIRP period in Form B. The appellant also issued notices under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001553536\" target=\"_blank\">56<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002782344\" target=\"_blank\">Electricity Act, 2003<\/a>, warning of disconnection due to non-payment. On 26-06-2024, the appellant disconnected the electricity connection on account of non-payment of outstanding dues for the month of April and May, 2024. Following assurances of payment, the supply was restored but was again disconnected on 28-08-2024 due to continued non-payment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Resolution Professional, relying on Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14(2)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a>, contended that the electricity supply should not be disconnected during CIRP. An application was filed by the Resolution Professional praying for various reliefs including directions to restore the electricity supply. Vide order dated 03-09-2024, the Adjudicating Authority passed an interim order directing the appellant to restore the electricity supply of the Corporate Debtor for 15 days. The electricity supply was reconnected, and the Resolution Professional made a partial payment of Rs. 50 lakhs on 05-09-2024. However, the appellant continued to demand clearance of dues.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Vide order dated 15-10-2024, the Adjudicating Authority observed that to ensure the continuance of supply during CIRP, the Corporate Debtor must clear its bills. Ultimately, the Adjudicating Authority, order dated 24-10-2024, ruled in favor of the Resolution Professional, directing the appellant to refrain from disconnecting the electricity supply.<\/p>\n<h3>Appellant&#8217;s Contentions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant challenged the order dated 24-10-2024 and contended that the electricity dues incurred by the Corporate Debtor during the CIRP period were required to be paid in accordance with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14(2A)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a>. The appellant argued that the Adjudicating Authority erred in directing the restoration of electricity supply without ensuring payment of current dues.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant relied on Shailesh Verma v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/dLUgyFj2\" target=\"_blank\">2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 4321<\/a>, where the NCLAT held that electricity charges during CIRP must be paid, failing which disconnection was justified and Noida Power Company Ltd. v. Gaurav Katiyar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/fF2NJ63w\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine NCLAT 1133<\/a>, where the NCLAT emphasised that non-payment of electricity dues during CIRP entitled the electricity provider to disconnect the supply.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Appellant further submitted that as per Regulation 31 of the CIRP Regulations, insolvency resolution process costs include amounts due for essential services under Regulation 32, but that does not exempt the Corporate Debtor from making timely payments. The Appellant argued that the electricity consumption of the Corporate Debtor was substantial and integral to its manufacturing operations, making it a &#8216;critical service&#8217; rather than an &#8216;essential service,&#8217; thereby falling under the purview of Section 14(2A). Consequently, as the Corporate Debtor failed to clear the electricity dues, the disconnection was justified.<\/p>\n<h3>Respondents&#8217; Contentions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondents contended that electricity supply falls within the ambit of &#8216;essential services&#8217; under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> and Regulation 32 of the CIRP Regulations. The respondents distinguished between &#8216;essential services&#8217; under Section 14(2) and &#8216;critical services&#8217; under Section 14(2A), asserting that the latter applied only where the Resolution Professional designated services as critical to preserving the Corporate Debtor&#8217;s value. The Respondent relied on Sandeep Khaitan v. JSVM Plywood Industries Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/J72DcFb6\" target=\"_blank\">(2021) 9 SCC 401<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that essential services should not be interrupted during the moratorium period.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was argued that the electricity dues during CIRP constituted CIRP costs, which are payable in priority but are not immediately due. The Respondent asserted that the Adjudicating Authority correctly directed the restoration of electricity supply, as discontinuation would jeopardize the Corporate Debtor&#8217;s ability to function as a going concern.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, it was submitted that payments were made towards electricity dues, including a partial payment of Rs. 50 lakhs, and the Committee of Creditors (CoC) has resolved to arrange for additional payments through interim financing. The respondents also assured that textile subsidies awaited from the Government would be allocated towards outstanding electricity dues.<\/p>\n<h3>NCLAT&#8217;s Observation<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT noted that electricity supply to the Corporate Debtor constituted an &#8216;essential service&#8217; under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> read with Regulation 32 of the CIRP Regulations. The NCLAT asserted that since the Corporate Debtor uses electricity for running machinery but not as a direct input to textile production, it qualifies as an essential supply.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While distinguishing between Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14(2) and 14(2A)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a>, the NCLAT noted that Section 14(2) protects essential services from disconnection during CIRP, irrespective of payment status and Section 14(2A) applies to &#8216;critical supplies,&#8217; allowing termination if dues during CIRP are unpaid. The NCLAT stated that as the Resolution Professional relied on Section 14(2) and not 14(2A), electricity supply could not be disconnected. The NCLAT asserted that electricity, unless proven to be a direct input to production, falls within the statutory protection against termination during the moratorium period.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT noted a proposed IBBI amendment to clarify that electricity supply to manufacturing units may be treated as a critical service under Section 14(2A), requiring payment during CIRP. However, the NCLAT stated that as of now, the existing law, Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549629\" target=\"_blank\">14(2)<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\">IBC<\/a> applies, and electricity must continue without immediate payment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;&#8230;the resolution professional, as assured to the appellant, need to take steps to clear the electricity dues, however, non-payment of electricity dues cannot be a ground to discontinue the electricity which is a clear mandate by Section 14(2).&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>NCLAT&#8217;s Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#8217;s decision and directed the appellant not to disconnect the electricity connection necessary for running the manufacturing facilities. The NCLAT further directed the resolution professional to pay the electricity dues as assured through various letters to the appellant by taking steps including raising interim finance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ravi Sethia Resolution Professional of Morarjee Textiles Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/58W0v07d\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine NCLAT 382<\/a>, Decided on 24-02-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Ashok Bhushan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Pulkit Doera, Mr. Anup Jain and Ms. Sneha Singh, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Appellant<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. J. Rajesh, Mr. Dhrupad Vaghani, Mr. Yashwardhan Agarwal and Mr. Arsalan Ahmed, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Respondents<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;If the Corporate Debtor operates as a manufacturing facility, then electricity may be treated as critical service by the insolvency professional and the dues for such services must be paid.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":342919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[79346,22814,30594,79347,46429,79349,51642,30182,22014,79350,79348],"class_list":["post-342913","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-barun-mitra-technical-member-and-arun-baroka-technical-member","tag-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process","tag-electricity","tag-essential-service","tag-justice-ashok-bhushan","tag-maharashtra-state-electricity-distribution-company-ltd","tag-msedcl","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-payment-of-electricity-dues","tag-section-142-of-ibc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Electricity is an &quot;essential service&quot; under Section 14(2) of IBC; can&#039;t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT held that Electricity supply is an &quot;essential service&quot; under Section 14(2) of IBC and it cannot be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Electricity is an \u201cessential service\u201d under Section 14(2) IBC; can\u2019t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT held that Electricity supply is an &quot;essential service&quot; under Section 14(2) of IBC and it cannot be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-03-04T10:30:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-05T09:43:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Electricity is an \u201cessential service\u201d under Section 14(2) IBC; can\u2019t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Electricity is an \\\"essential service\\\" under Section 14(2) of IBC; can't be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-04T10:30:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-05T09:43:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT held that Electricity supply is an \\\"essential service\\\" under Section 14(2) of IBC and it cannot be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Section 14(2) of IBC\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Electricity is an \u201cessential service\u201d under Section 14(2) IBC; can\u2019t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Electricity is an \"essential service\" under Section 14(2) of IBC; can't be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT | SCC Times","description":"NCLAT held that Electricity supply is an \"essential service\" under Section 14(2) of IBC and it cannot be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Electricity is an \u201cessential service\u201d under Section 14(2) IBC; can\u2019t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT","og_description":"NCLAT held that Electricity supply is an \"essential service\" under Section 14(2) of IBC and it cannot be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-03-04T10:30:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-05T09:43:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Electricity is an \u201cessential service\u201d under Section 14(2) IBC; can\u2019t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/","name":"Electricity is an \"essential service\" under Section 14(2) of IBC; can't be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.webp","datePublished":"2025-03-04T10:30:59+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-05T09:43:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT held that Electricity supply is an \"essential service\" under Section 14(2) of IBC and it cannot be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Section 14(2) of IBC"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/04\/electricity-is-an-essential-service-under-section-142-of-ibc-cant-be-discontinued-even-if-dues-remain-unpaid-during-cirp-nclat-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Electricity is an \u201cessential service\u201d under Section 14(2) IBC; can\u2019t be discontinued even if dues remain unpaid during CIRP: NCLAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Section-142-of-IBC.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":341144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/12\/financial-creditors-involvement-in-project-monitoring-does-not-absolve-corporate-debtors-from-repayment-obligations-nclat-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":342913,"position":0},"title":"Financial Creditors\u2019 involvement in project monitoring does not absolve Corporate Debtors from repayment obligations: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"February 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny dispute even pending in the arbitration does not in any manner prohibit the financial creditor to take remedy under Section 7 IBC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/11\/nclat-demand-notice-issued-under-s-8-ibc-against-corporate-debtor-for-dues-of-sister-concern-group-company-is-not-valid\/","url_meta":{"origin":342913,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT | Demand notice issued under S. 8 IBC against Corporate Debtor for dues of sister concern\/group company is not valid","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0The Bench of Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial), Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) and V.P. Singh, Member (Technical), allowed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, whereby it had admitted the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332849,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/10\/an-one-time-settlement-agreement-cannot-extend-the-date-of-default-nclat-dismisses-samrat-restaurants-cirp-plea-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":342913,"position":2},"title":"\u2018A One Time Settlement agreement cannot extend the date of default\u2019; NCLAT dismisses Samrat Restaurant\u2019s CIRP plea","author":"Ritu","date":"October 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held the appellant\u2019s claim was inflated, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly recalculated the actual unpaid amount, which fell below the Rs 1 crore threshold.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306156,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/irrevocable-and-unconditional-bank-guarantees-can-be-invoked-during-moratorium-period-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":342913,"position":3},"title":"Irrevocable and unconditional bank guarantees can be invoked during moratorium period: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe \u2018Bank Guarantee\u2019 is a \u2018contract of Guarantee\u2019 provided\/furnished by the Bank, the \u201csurety\u201d, to perform the \u2018promise\u2019, or \u2018discharge\u2019 the liability, of the third person, being the Corporate Debtor herein, in case of his \u2018default\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/14\/nclat-issues-notice-in-an-appeal-against-nclts-rejection-of-challenge-to-lay-off-notice-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":342913,"position":4},"title":"NCLAT issues notice in appeal against NCLT\u2019s rejection of challenge to Lay-Off notice under Industrial Disputes Act","author":"Ritu","date":"November 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The main contention of the appellants is that the lay-off notice was not issued in accordance with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/27\/nclat-financial-debt-under-section-58-ibc-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":342913,"position":5},"title":"Transition between the parties should be direct to construe the debt as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019 under Section 5(8) of the IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"June 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Amount taken by the Directors of the Corporate Debtor in their personal capacity cannot be construed as \u2018Financial Debt\u2019 under S. 5(8) of the IBC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342913","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=342913"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342913\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/342919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342913"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=342913"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=342913"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}