{"id":342525,"date":"2025-02-28T15:00:51","date_gmt":"2025-02-28T09:30:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=342525"},"modified":"2025-02-28T15:01:10","modified_gmt":"2025-02-28T09:31:10","slug":"2025-scc-vol-2-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544910\" target=\"_blank\">11(6)<\/a> &#8212; Limited scope of jurisdiction of Court under i.e. at referral stage:<\/span> Adjudication on merits by undertaking a detailed examination of factual matrix is not permissible, at referral stage, [<i>Goqii Technologies (P) Ltd.<\/i> v. <i>Sokrati Technologies (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FWt39HI8\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 2 SCC 192<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948150\" target=\"_blank\">Chartered Accountants Act, 1949<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554583\" target=\"_blank\">2(1)(b)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554611\" target=\"_blank\">3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554624\" target=\"_blank\">7<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554626\" target=\"_blank\">9<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554577\" target=\"_blank\">15<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554590\" target=\"_blank\">22<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554585\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554586\" target=\"_blank\">21-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554587\" target=\"_blank\">21-B<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001554588\" target=\"_blank\">21-C<\/a>, Sch. I Pts. I, II, III and IV and Sch. II Pts. I, II and III &#8212; Expression &#8220;any Guidelines issued by the Council&#8221; in Sch. II Pt. II(1) &#8212; Ambit and interpretation:<\/span> Cl. 6 of the impugned Guidelines dt. 8-8-2008 r\/w ceiling limit on the number of tax audits under S. 44-AB of the IT Act, 1961 fixed by Council provided a ceiling limit of 60 tax audits per chartered accountant per year since Financial Year 2014- 2015 as per the decision taken by Council in its 331st meeting, constitutionally valid, [<i>Shaji Poulose<\/i> v. <i>ICAI<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/BfO79URY\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 2 SCC 304<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Consumer Protection &#8212; Services &#8212; Housing and Real Estate &#8212; Possession &#8212; Delivery of possession &#8212; Delay &#8212; Compensation for delay:<\/span> Computation of compensation for delay in terms of agreement i.e. at contractual rate, determined, [<i>Santhosh Narasimha Murthy<\/i> v. <i>Mantri Castles (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/A3lZOIFT\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 2 SCC 243<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543752\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543751\" target=\"_blank\">24<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543735\" target=\"_blank\">13-B<\/a> r\/w Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574873\" target=\"_blank\">142<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> &#8212; Permanent alimony and maintenance &#8212; Quantum of:<\/span> Permanent alimony granted by court should not penalise husband but should ensure descent living of wife, [<i>Parvin Kumar Jain<\/i> v. <i>Anju Jain<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/64xKNjp6\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 2 SCC 227<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683660\" target=\"_blank\">Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958<\/a> (60 of 1958) &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000707686\" target=\"_blank\">47<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000707687\" target=\"_blank\">48<\/a> r\/w Rr. 21 and 22-A of the Maharashtra Stamp Rules, 1939 &#8212; Stamp duty paid on unexecuted conveyance deed &#8212; Refund of:<\/span> Period of expiry of limitation prescribed under any law may bar remedy but not right. Thus, appellant held entitled to claim refund of stamp duty amount on basis of fact that appellant had been pursuing her case as per remedies available to her in law, [<i>Bano Saiyed Parwaz<\/i> v. <i>State of Maharashtra<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0m271l7K\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 2 SCC 201<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726964\" target=\"_blank\">Motor Vehicles Act, 1988<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569568\" target=\"_blank\">166<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569570\" target=\"_blank\">168<\/a> r\/w S. 2(30) &#8212; Compensation &#8212; Person(s) liable to pay &#8212; &#8220;Owner&#8221; &#8212; Who is &#8212; Determination of:<\/span> &#8220;Owner&#8221; of a vehicle is not limited to the categories specified in S. 2(30) of the MV Act. Thus, if the context so requires, even a person at whose command or control the vehicle is, could be treated as its owner for the purposes of fixing tortious liability for payment of compensation, [<i>Vaibhav Jain<\/i> v. <i>Hindustan Motors (P) Ltd.<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/68PaW0OW\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 2 SCC 208<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\">Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534438\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)<\/a> &#8212; Power to arrest without warrant and without instituting criminal case:<\/span> Compliance with pre-conditions under S. 19(1) PMLA for exercise of power to arrest without warrant by designated authority, mandatory. Concept and import of &#8220;reasons to believe&#8221; arrestee guilty of offence under PMLA, explained, [<i>Arvind Kejriwal<\/i> v. <i>Enforcement Directorate<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NbCV2qNs\" target=\"_blank\">(2025) 2 SCC 248<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Limited scope of jurisdiction of Court<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":342532,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[77400,10131,79195,11241,4031,58441,44704,19791],"class_list":["post-342525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-2025-scc-vol","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-chartered-accountants-act","tag-consumer-protection","tag-hindu-marriage-act","tag-housing-and-real-estate","tag-maharashtra-stamp-act","tag-motor-vehicles-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Limited scope of jurisdiction of Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Limited scope of jurisdiction of Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-28T09:30:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-28T09:31:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-28T09:30:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-28T09:31:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Limited scope of jurisdiction of Court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2 | SCC Times","description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Limited scope of jurisdiction of Court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2","og_description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Limited scope of jurisdiction of Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-28T09:30:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-28T09:31:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/","name":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-28T09:30:51+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-28T09:31:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Limited scope of jurisdiction of Court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-SCC-Vol.-2-Part-2.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":290615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/26\/supreme-court-explains-pre-referral-jurisdiction-of-high-court-under-s-11-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":342525,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Supreme Court verdict on scope of Pre-referral jurisdiction of High Court under S. 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The limited scope of judicial scrutiny at the pre-referral stage is navigated through the test of a \u2018prima facie review\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"pre-reference jurisdiction of high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/pre-reference-jurisdiction-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/pre-reference-jurisdiction-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/pre-reference-jurisdiction-of-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/pre-reference-jurisdiction-of-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295510,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/28\/arbitration-sc-on-scope-of-referral-court-jurisdiction-at-the-pre-referral-stage-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":342525,"position":1},"title":"Explained| Existence &amp; Validity of Arbitration Agreement: Scope of Referral Court&#8217;s jurisdiction at the Pre-referral stage","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the Delhi High Court had referred the disputes for arbitration without conclusively deciding the issue of the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement and had left it to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"referral courts jurisdiction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/referral-courts-jurisdiction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/referral-courts-jurisdiction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/referral-courts-jurisdiction.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/referral-courts-jurisdiction.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279307,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/08\/supreme-court-post-vidya-drolia-reconsidering-referral-jurisprudence-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":342525,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Post Vidya Drolia: Reconsidering Referral Jurisprudence in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Senu Nizar\u2020 and Velpula Audityaa\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Reconsidering Referral Jurisprudence in India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image78.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":273795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/16\/2022-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":342525,"position":3},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8, 11, 7, 2(1)(h), 16 and 45 \u2014 Non-signatory or non-party to arbitration agreement: Arbitration against, or by non-signatory or non-party to arbitration agreement, when may be invoked, discussed. The scope, ambit and validity of Group of Companies doctrine, explained. Doubting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SCC Part","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217158,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/extent-of-judicial-review-in-foreign-awards-whether-arbitration-and-conciliation-amendment-act-2015-expanded-the-scope-of-public-policy-in-section-48-of-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":342525,"position":4},"title":"Extent of Judicial Review in Foreign Awards: Whether Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 expanded the scope of \u201cPublic Policy\u201d in Section 48 of the Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Soumyajit Saha\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/AdobeStock_122928222.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/29\/supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates-arbitration-conciliation-act-1996-section-116-scope-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":342525,"position":5},"title":"Explained| Three types of issues that can be considered in an application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Editor","date":"November 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by Telangana High Court, wherein the High Court dismissed the application filed by the appellant under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (\u2018Act of 1996\u2019), the division bench of B.R Gavai and B.V. Nagarathna*, JJ. held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image11.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=342525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342525\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/342532"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=342525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=342525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}